by Calculated Risk on 1/31/2011 12:05:00 PM

From earlier this morning ...

• From the Chicago Business Barometer™ Gained: The overall index increased to 68.8 from 66.8 in December. This was above consensus expectations of 65.0. Note: any number above 50 shows expansion.

"EMPLOYMENT strengthened to a height not seen since May 1984". The employment index increased sharply to 64.1 from 58.4.

"NEW ORDERS increased to the highest point since December 1983". The new orders index increased to 75.7 from 71.3.

This was a strong report.

• From the Dallas Fed: Texas Manufacturing Activity Flat but Six-Month Outlook Improves

Texas factory activity held steady in January, according to business executives responding to the Texas Manufacturing Outlook Survey. The production index, a key measure of state manufacturing conditions, came in at zero, suggesting output was unchanged from December.
...
Labor market indicators continued to reflect expansion, although increases in employment and hours worked abated. The employment index came in at a reading of 9 [down from 16.1 in December], with 21 percent of firms reporting hiring compared with 12 percent reporting layoffs. The hours worked index fell from 14 to 4, while the wages and benefits index rose.

This is the last of the regional Fed surveys for January. The regional surveys provide a hint about the ISM manufacturing index, as the following graph shows.

Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.

The New York and Philly Fed surveys are averaged together (dashed green, through January), and averaged five Fed surveys (blue, through January) including New York, Philly, Richmond, Dallas and Kansas City. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) PMI (red) is through December (right axis).

The regional surveys suggest the ISM manufacturing index will in the mid-to-high 50s (fairly strong expansion). The ISM index for January will released tomorrow, Feb 1st. The consensus is for an increase to 57.9 from 57.0 in December.

by Calculated Risk on 1/31/2011 10:00:00 AM

The Census Bureau reported the homeownership and vacancy rates for Q4 2010 this morning.

Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.

The homeownership rate was at 66.5%, down from 66.9% in Q3. This is at about the level as 1998.

Note: graph starts at 60% to better show the change.

The homeownership rate increased in the '90s and early '00s because of changes in demographics and "innovations" in mortgage lending. Some of the increase due to demographics (older population) will probably stick, so I've been expecting the rate to decline to around 66%, and probably not all the way back to 64%.

The homeowner vacancy rate increased to 2.7% in Q4 2010 from 2.5% in Q3 2010. This has been bouncing around in the 2.5% to 2.7% range for two years, and is slightly below the peak of 2.9% in 2008.

A normal rate for recent years appears to be about 1.7%.

This leaves the homeowner vacancy rate about 1.0% above normal. This data is not perfect, but based on the approximately 75 million homeowner occupied homes, we can estimate that there are close to 750 thousand excess vacant homes.

The rental vacancy rate declined sharply to 9.4% in Q4 2010, from 10.3% in Q3 2010.

This decline fits with the Reis apartment vacancy data and the NMHC apartment survey. This report is nationwide and includes homes for rent.

It's hard to define a "normal" rental vacancy rate based on the historical series, but we can probably expect the rate to trend back towards 8%. According to the Census Bureau there are close to 42 million rental units in the U.S. If the rental vacancy rate declined from 9.4% to 8%, then 1.4% X 42 million units or about 600 thousand excess units would have to be absorbed.

This suggests there are still about 1.35 million excess housing units. This number has been steadily declining over the last few quarters, but there is still a long way to go.

Note: Some analysts also add in the increase in "held off market, other" units to track the excess housing units - and that has increased from 2.6 million units at the end of 2005 to 3.6 million units at the end of 2010.

by Calculated Risk on 1/31/2011 08:30:00 AM

The BEA released the Personal Income and Outlays report for December this morning.

Personal income increased $54.5 billion, or 0.4 percent ... Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) increased $69.5 billion, or 0.7 percent.
...
Real PCE -- PCE adjusted to remove price changes -- increased 0.4 percent in December, compared with an increase of 0.2 percent in November.

The following graph shows real Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) through December (2005 dollars). Note that the y-axis doesn't start at zero to better show the change.

Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.

The quarterly change in PCE is based on the change from the average in one quarter, compared to the average of the preceding quarter. Consumption picked up sharply in Q4.

Also personal income less transfer payments increased again in December. This increased to $9,327 billion (SAAR, 2005 dollars) from $9,310 billion in November.

This graph shows real personal income less transfer payments as a percent of the previous peak. This has been slow to recover - and is still 4.3% below the previous peak - but personal income less transfer payments is growing again.

Some of the increase in spending came from a decline in the personal saving rate that fell to 5.3% in December.

Personal saving as a percentage of disposable personal income was 5.3 percent in December, compared with 5.5 percent in November.

This graph shows the saving rate starting in 1959 (using a three month trailing average for smoothing) through the December Personal Income report.

When the recession began, I expected the saving rate to rise to 8% or more. With a rising saving rate, consumption growth would be below income growth. But that 8% rate was just a guess. It is possible the saving rate has peaked, or it might rise a little further, but either way most of the adjustment has already happened.

There is still a long way to go. I'd like to see personal income less transfer payments above the pre-recession peak, and I'd like to see personal consumption not growing faster than personal income.

Weekend on U.S. economy:
• Summary for Week ending January 29th
• Schedule for Week of January 30th
• BLS Employment Revisions on Feb 4th

by Calculated Risk on 1/30/2011 11:31:00 PM

On inflation in China ...
• From Keith Bradsher at the NY Times: Inflation in China May Limit U.S. Trade Deficit

Inflation is starting to slow China’s mighty export machine, as buyers from Western multinational companies balk at higher prices and have cut back their planned spring shipments across the Pacific.

• And from Paul Krugman: A Cross of Rubber

While recovery in advanced nations has been sluggish, developing countries — China in particular — have come roaring back from the 2008 slump. This has created inflation pressures within many of these countries; it has also led to sharply rising global demand for raw materials.

... inflation in China is China’s problem, not ours. It’s true that right now China’s currency is pegged to the dollar. But that’s China’s choice; if China doesn’t like U.S. monetary policy, it’s free to let its currency rise. Neither China nor anyone else has the right to demand that America strangle its nascent economic recovery just because Chinese exporters want to keep the renminbi undervalued.

Egypt and U.S. Futures: Here is the Al Jazeera live Egypt blog for January 31st. The Asian markets are mostly off about 1% to 1.5% tonight.

CNBC's Pre-Market Data shows the S&P 500 and Dow futures flat. Not much of a reaction.

Earlier on U.S. economy:
• Summary for Week ending January 29th
• Schedule for Week of January 30th
• BLS Employment Revisions on Feb 4th

by Calculated Risk on 1/30/2011 06:12:00 PM

Here is the Monday live Egypt blog from Al Jazeera. Other resources: The Lede at the NY Times and the Guardian

From the WSJ: Egypt Opposition Picks a Leader

The Egyptian government, with newly appointed military generals in top positions, struggled to impose order and present a show of unified strength on Sunday, but it showed no signs of bending to demands that President Hosni Mubarak resign.

From the NY Times: Opposition Rallies to ElBaradei as Military Reinforces in Cairo

The Egyptian uprising, which emerged as a disparate and spontaneous grass-roots movement, began to coalesce Sunday, as the largest opposition group, the Muslim Brotherhood, threw its support behind a leading secular opposition figure, Mohamed ElBaradei, to negotiate on behalf of the forces seeking the fall of President Hosni Mubarak.

by Calculated Risk on 1/30/2011 02:05:00 PM

Earlier:
• Summary for Week ending January 29th
• Schedule for Week of January 30th

On Feb 4th, with the release of the January employment report, the BLS will make the following three changes / revisions:

1) Annual Benchmark revision to the Establishment Survey Data

With the release of January 2011 data on February 4, 2011, the Current Employment Statistics survey will introduce revisions to nonfarm payroll employment, hours, and earnings data to reflect the annual benchmark adjustments for March 2010 and updated seasonal adjustment factors. Not seasonally adjusted data beginning with April 2009 and seasonally adjusted data beginning with January 2006 are subject to revision.

Last October the BLS released the preliminary annual benchmark revision of minus 366,000 payroll jobs. Usually the preliminary estimate is pretty close to the final benchmark estimate.

Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.

This graph shows the impact of the preliminary benchmark revision on job losses in percentage terms from the start of the employment recession.

The red line on the graph is the current payroll estimate, and the dotted line shows the impact using the preliminary benchmark estimate. This means that payroll employment in March 2010 was 366,000 lower than originally estimated (using the preliminary estimate). The number is then "wedged back" to the previous revision (March 2009). This is slightly larger than a normal adjustment (see table in the post from last October).

2) Birth/death adjustment factors will be estimated on a quarterly basis

Effective with the release of January 2011 data on February 4, 2011, the establishment survey will begin estimating net business birth/death adjustment factors on a quarterly basis, replacing the current practice of estimating the factors annually. This will allow the establishment survey to incorporate information from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages into the birth/death adjustment factors as soon as it becomes available and thereby improve the factors. Additional information on this change is available at www.bls.gov/ces/ces_quarterly_birthdeath.pdf.

This should improve the accuracy of the model at turning points.

3) Changes in Population Controls for Household Survey

Effective with the release of data for January 2011 on February 4, 2011, revisions will be introduced into the population controls for the household survey. These changes reflect the routine annual updating of intercensal population estimates by the U.S. Census Bureau.