by Calculated Risk on 1/30/2009 02:55:00 PM

Note: This is a new "record low", but the index has only been compiled since 2002, so this is the first recession for the index.

From the National Restaurant Association (NRA): Restaurant Industry Outlook Softens as the Restaurant Performance Index Fell to a Record Low in December

The outlook for the restaurant industry continued to weaken in December, as the National Restaurant Association's comprehensive index of restaurant activity fell to another record low. The Association's Restaurant Performance Index (RPI) - a monthly composite index that tracks the health of and outlook for the U.S. restaurant industry - stood at 96.4 in December, down 0.2 percent from November and its 14th consecutive month below 100.

The December decline in the Restaurant Performance Index was the result of a drop in the current situation component. Same-store sales results were the softest in the history of the Restaurant Performance Index, with nearly two-thirds of restaurant operators reporting lower sales in December.
...
Capital spending activity in the restaurant industry deteriorated along with sales and traffic in recent months. Thirty-four percent of operators said they made a capital expenditure for equipment, expansion or remodeling during the last three months, the lowest level on record.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Unfortunately the data for this index only goes back to 2002.

The index values above 100 indicate a period of expansion; index values below 100 indicate a period of contraction.

Based on this indicator, the restaurant industry has been contracting since November 2007.

by Calculated Risk on 1/30/2009 02:04:00 PM

From Bloomberg: Simon Falls on Plan to Pay Part of Dividend in Stock (hat tip Sam)

David Simon [Chief Executive Officer, Simon Property Group Inc., the biggest U.S. shopping mall owner] ... said the company doesn’t plan to begin construction on new projects or major redevelopments in 2009 and there will be little new U.S. retail construction for years to come.

“The new development business is dead for a decade,” Simon said on today’s call. “Maybe it’s eight years. Maybe it’s not completely dead. Maybe I’m over-dramatizing it for effect.”

In Q3, investment in U.S. malls was at a $33 billion annual pace, but that includes renovations (there are always renovations). Still I'd expect mall investment to decline in half or more by the end of 2009. I'll have more on mall investment in a few days (when the supplemental GDP data is released).

by Calculated Risk on 1/30/2009 01:22:00 PM

The rebalancing of the U.S. economy is ongoing. The savings rate is rising, consumption is falling, and the trade deficit is declining ...

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

The first graph shows Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) as a percent of GDP. Note: the graph doesn't start at zero to better show the change.

PCE as a percent of GDP declined to 69.6% in Q4, the lowest level since Q2 2001.

Some analysts think the U.S. will return to the days of Ozzie and Harriet with PCE as a percent of GDP in the low 60s, but I think a decline to around 68% is more likely.

Net exports as a percent of GDP has declined sharply to 3.7% of GDP. This is the smallest deficit since the end of the '01 recession.

Since GDP = C + I + G + (X − M), the decline in C is being offset by the improvement in net trade (X - M).

As we all know, I (investment) is declining and some components of investment (like non-residential investment in structures) will decline sharply in 2009. G (government) will increase with the Obama stimulus package, and the goal is to increase G until Investment bottoms out. We will see, but the rebalancing of the U.S. economy that we discussed several years ago is now happening.

Note:
C = Personal Consumption expenditures.
I = Gross private domestic investment.
G = Government consumption expenditures and gross investment.
X = exports
M = imports.

by Calculated Risk on 1/30/2009 12:11:00 PM

From Fannie Mae: Fannie Mae Extends Eviction Suspension Another Month (hat tip Bradley)

Fannie Mae (FNM/NYSE) today announced that it will extend its suspension of evictions from Fannie Mae-owned single-family properties through February 28, 2009. The suspension applies to all single-family properties including owner-occupied properties that have been foreclosed upon as well as foreclosed properties occupied by renters.

The company this month began implementing its National Real Estate Owned (REO) Rental Policy that allows qualified renters in Fannie Mae-owned foreclosed properties to stay in their homes. The new policy applies to renters occupying any type of single-family foreclosed properties at the time Fannie Mae acquires the property. Eligible renters will be offered a new month-to-month lease with Fannie Mae or financial assistance for their transition to new housing should they choose to vacate the property. The properties must meet state laws and local code requirements for a rental property. On behalf of the company, property managers are contacting renters in Fannie Mae-owned foreclosed properties to notify them of their options.

It is usually easier to sell a vacant home, but with the glut of homes on the market, and because the foreclosure is not the fault of the renter, this policy seems to make sense.

by Calculated Risk on 1/30/2009 09:09:00 AM

Here are a couple of graphs on the investment slump. Residential real residential fixed investment decreased at an a 23.6% annualized rate in Q4.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows residential investment (RI) as a percent of GDP since 1947. Residential investment has fallen to 3.07% of GDP. This is the lowest residential investment, as a percent of GDP, since WW II.

I'll post more on the components of RI in a few days when the supplemental data is released.

The second graph shows non-residential investment as a percent of GDP.

Investment in software and equipment declined at a 27.8% annualized rate in Q4. Cliff diving! This investment is at the lowest rate since the '70s.

However investment in non-residential structures only declined at a 1.8% annualized rate. As a percent of GDP, non-residential structure investment actually increased slightly in Q4. This story will change in 2009, and non-residential structure investment will be a significant drag on GDP.

I'll have much more on non-residential structures in a few days ...

This investment slump is a huge part of the recession story. Residential led the economy into recession (as is typical) and now non-residential investment is falling off a cliff - or, as in the case of non-residential structures, will fall off a cliff in 2009.

by Calculated Risk on 1/30/2009 08:31:00 AM

I'll have more a little later ...

From the BEA: GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER 2008 (ADVANCE)

From MarketWatch:

U.S. Q4 GDP down 3.8%, inventories limit downturn The U.S. economy contracted at a 3.8% annualized rate in the fourth quarter but the decline would have been worse except that the government counts an unwanted buildup of goods on store shelves as growth.

A clearer picture of the scope of the weakness in the fourth quarter, which excludes the inventory buildup, contracted at a 5.1% pace, the weakest in 28 years.
...
Consumer spending fell 3.5%, including a 7.1% drop in spending on services, a 3.5% drop in spending on durable goods and a 22.4% decline in spending on nondurable goods, the weakest in 21 years.

Business investment fell 20.1% in the fourth quarter, subtracting 2.3 percentage points from growth. ...

Investments in equipment and software dropped 27.8%, the weakest in 50 years.

Investments in structures fell 19.1%, the largest decline since the first quarter of 1975.

Exports fell 19.7% in the fourth quarter, while imports, which are a subtraction from the calculation of GDP, fell 15.7%. As a result, the narrowing trade deficit added 0.09 percentage points to growth.

Government spending increased 1.9% after rising 5.8% in the third quarter. ...

Businesses added $6.2 billion to their inventories after cutting them by $29.6 billion in the third quarter. The change in inventories added 1.32 percentage points to growth.

Residential investment fell 23.6% in the fourth quarter ...

by Calculated Risk on 1/29/2009 11:44:00 PM

As a late night thread, here are some forecasts for Q4 GDP.

From the LA Times: Economy is going from bad to worse, reports show

Many economists think the economic output declined in the fourth quarter at an annual rate of 5% or more -- which would make it the worst quarter for the U.S. economy since 1982.

"It will be bad," said Nigel Gault, chief U.S. economist at IHS Global Insight, a forecasting firm in Lexington, Mass. He estimated that the economy shrank at a 5.3% annual rate in the three months that ended Dec. 31.
...
"It's going to confirm what we already know, and that is that we're in a severe recession," said Ben Herzon, senior economist with forecasting firm Macroeconomic Advisers in St. Louis, who expects the report to show a decline of 5.5%.

From CNNMoney:

The gross domestic product is expected to have declined by an annual rate of 5.4% in the fourth quarter, according to a consensus of economist expectations from Briefing.com.

Goldman Sachs most recent estimate is for real GDP to decline by 5.9%.

Northern Trust is forecasting a decline of 4.7%.

Looks like tomorrow will be interesting.

by Calculated Risk on 1/29/2009 09:17:00 PM

From Ruth Simon at the WSJ: Option ARMs See Rising Defaults (hat tip ShortCourage)

Nearly $750 billion of option adjustable-rate mortgages, or option ARMs, were issued from 2004 to 2007, according to Inside Mortgage Finance ... Rising delinquencies are creating fresh challenges for companies such as Bank of America Corp., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co. that acquired troubled option-ARM lenders.
...
As of December, 28% of option ARMs were delinquent or in foreclosure, according to LPS Applied Analytics ... An additional 7% involve properties that have already been taken back by the lenders. ... Just over half of subprime loans were delinquent, in foreclosure, or related to bank-owned properties as of December. The nearly $750 billion of option ARMs issued from 2004 to 2007 compares with roughly $1.9 trillion each of subprime and jumbo mortgages in that period.

Nearly 61% of option ARMs originated in 2007 will eventually default, according to a recent analysis by Goldman Sachs ...

If 61% of the $750 billion in Option ARMs default, and with a 50% loss severity, the losses to lenders will be about $225 billion - far less than for subprime, but still a huge problem.

The key problem with Option ARMs is that they were used as affordability products, mostly in California and Florida, because buyers couldn't qualify for fixed rate mortgages or even regular ARMs. It should have been no surprise that most borrowers chose the negatively amortizing option; it was the only one they could afford!

by Calculated Risk on 1/29/2009 08:19:00 PM

It's been awhile, and by popular demand ...

Treasuries have rebounded somewhat since the beginning of the year, and there was tepid demand today for Five Year Treasuries, from Bloomberg: Treasuries Drop as Record Sale Draws Higher-Than-Forecast Yield

Treasuries plunged as the government sold a record $30 billion of five-year notes at a higher yield than forecast, indicating weak demand.

The auction, which caps a week when the Treasury raised $78 billion in notes and bonds, may signal investors will have trouble absorbing the as-much-as $2.5 trillion in debt the U.S. is likely to issue this year ...

“We’re seeing a bit of indigestion,” said Larry Dyer, a U.S. interest-rate strategist with HSBC Securities (USA)

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

The 10-year yield is at 2.82% today, well above the record low of 2.07% set on Dec 18th.

This graph shows the 10 year yield since 1962. The smaller graph shows the ten year yield since the start of 2008. In the bigger scheme, this has been a fairly small rebound in yield.

The yield on 3 month treasuries has risen to 0.22%. I guess that means less fear than a yield of zero!

The three month LIBOR has decreased to 1.17%. The three-month LIBOR rate peaked (for this cycle) at 4.81875% on Oct. 10. (improved) Imagine all those adjusted rate mortgage loans tied to treasuries or even the 3 month LIBOR? Those rates are looking pretty good.

The TED spread is at 0.94, still moving lower. (improved) The TED spread was stuck above 2.0 for some time. The peak was 4.63 on Oct 10th. The TED spread has finally moved below 1.0, although a normal spread is around 0.5.

The A2P2 spread as at 2.10. The spread has moved up slightly in recent days, but this spread has seen a huge decline in 2009. This is far lower than the record (for this cycle) of 5.86 after Thanksgiving, but still way too high. (improved).

This is the spread between high and low quality 30 day nonfinancial commercial paper. Right now quality 30 day nonfinancial paper is yielding close to zero. If the credit crisis eases, I'd expect a significant further decline in this spread - although this is good progress.

Federal Reserve Assets

The Federal Reserve assets decreased to $1.93 trillion this week from a high of over $2.3 trillion in December.

Note: the graph shows Total Factors Supplying Federal Reserve Funds and is an available series that is close to assets.

This is interesting too, from Bloomberg: U.S. Commercial Paper Falls Most on Record as Fed Buying Drops

Corporate borrowing in the commercial paper market shrank the most on record as companies sold less 90- day debt to the Federal Reserve.

U.S. commercial paper outstanding fell $98.8 billion, or 5.9 percent, to a seasonally adjusted $1.59 trillion during the week ended Jan. 28, the Fed said today in Washington. Financial issuance accounted for almost all of the drop, falling $93.5 billion, or 12.7 percent, to $641.8 billion.

The decline in the commercial paper market signals improved conditions as financial companies find other funding sources such as government-backed corporate bonds, Tony Crescenzi, chief bond- market strategist at Miller Tabak & Co. in New York, said in a note to clients today.

By these indicators, the Fed is making progress.

by Calculated Risk on 1/29/2009 05:36:00 PM

From CNBC: Bank Bailout Could Cost Up to $4 Trillion: Economists

Goldman Sachs estimated that it would take on the order of $4 trillion to buy troubled mortgage and consumer debt. That number could shrink if the program were limited to only certain loans or banks, but it could also grow if other asset classes such as commercial real estate loans were included.
...
The Wall Street Journal said government officials had discussed spending $1 trillion to $2 trillion to help restore banks to health, citing people familiar with the matter.
...
The government would not necessarily have to spend the full $4 trillion to buy the assets. If it follows the model used in a Federal Reserve program to support consumer and small business loans, the government could potentially put up just 10 percent of the total.

We need more details ...