by Calculated Risk on 5/26/2010 12:40:00 PM

As part of the new home sales report, the Census Bureau reported that the median price for new homes fell to the lowest level since 2003.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the median and average new home price. It appears the builders sold at a lower price point in April, and that helped boost sales.

This makes sense since many of the buyers were trying to take advantage of the housing tax credit (and probably using FHA insurance). Since the modification programs and the delays in foreclosure limited the number of distressed sales - many buyers at the low end found buying a new home easier than buying an existing home.

The second graph shows the percent of new home sales by price.

Half of all home sales were under $200K in April - tying Jan 2009 as the highest level since 2003 (there was panic selling in Jan 2009).

And excluding Jan 2009, this is the highest percentage under $300K since May 2003 - and the highest under 400K since April 2003.

To summarize: the homebuilders sold 16,000 more units in April 2010 than in April 2009 - probably because of the tax credit, and at lower prices - and now sales will decline sharply in May probably close to the 34,000 units sold in May 2009.

by Calculated Risk on 5/26/2010 10:00:00 AM

The Census Bureau reports New Home Sales in April were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 504 thousand. This is an increase from the revised rate of 439 thousand in March (revised from 411 thousand).

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

The first graph shows monthly new home sales (NSA - Not Seasonally Adjusted).

Note the Red columns for 2010. In April 2010, 48 thousand new homes were sold (NSA).

The record low for the month of April was 32 thousand in 1982 and 2009; the record high was 116 thousand in 2005.

The second graph shows New Home Sales vs. recessions for the last 45 years.

Sales of new one-family houses in April 2010 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 504,000 ... This is 14.8 percent (±19.5%)* above the revised March rate of 439,000 and is 47.8 percent (±26.0%) above the April 2009 estimate of 341,000.

And another long term graph - this one for New Home Months of Supply.

Months of supply declined to 5.0 in April from 6.2 in March. This is significantly below the all time record of 12.4 months of supply set in January 2009. This would be about normal, except the months of supply will increase next month when sales decline.

The seasonally adjusted estimate of new houses for sale at the end of April was 211,000. This represents a supply of 5.0 months at the current sales rate.

The final graph shows new home inventory.

New home sales are counted when the contract is signed, so this pickup in activity is related to the tax credit.

For new home sales, the tax credit selling ended in April and sales will probably decline sharply in May.

by Calculated Risk on 5/26/2010 08:07:00 AM

The MBA reports: Mortgage Refinance Applications Continue to Increase, Purchase Applications Decline Further

The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, increased 11.3 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier ...

The Refinance Index increased 17.0 percent from the previous week. This third consecutive increase marks the highest Refinance Index recorded in the survey since October 2009. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 3.3 percent from one week earlier and is the lowest Purchase Index observed in the survey since April 1997.
...
“Refinance application volume jumped last week as continuing financial market turmoil related to the budget crises in Europe extended the opportunity for homeowners to lock in at historically low mortgage rates,” said Michael Fratantoni, MBA’s Vice President of Research and Economics. “In contrast, purchase applications fell further this week, following last week’s sharp decline, keeping the purchase index at 13-year lows.”
...
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 4.80 percent from 4.83 percent, with points remaining constant at 1.08 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value (LTV) ratio loans. This is the lowest 30-year fixed-rate recorded in the survey since the week ending November 27, 2009.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the MBA Purchase Index and four week moving average since 1990.

There was a spike in purchase applications in April, followed by a decline to a 13 year low last week. As Fratantoni noted last week: "The data continue to suggest that the tax credit pulled sales into April at the expense of the remainder of the spring buying season."

by Calculated Risk on 5/25/2010 11:59:00 PM

From the San Francisco Chronicle: Parkmerced in default (ht David)

The commercial real estate meltdown has caught up with one of the largest apartment complexes in the country -- San Francisco's Parkmerced.

The complex's owner is due to announce that the loan on the property is in default.

"Parkmerced and its lenders engaged a special servicer (a company that specializes in handling loans in default) to support the payments of the loan on the property," said Seth Mallen, an executive vice president of Stellar Management, a co-owner of Parkmerced, in a statement to be released Wednesday.
...
The 116-acre complex, purchased by Stellar Management and another real estate investment firm, Rockpoint Group, has 1,683 rental units contained in 11 residential towers. Blocks of two-story garden townhouses account for an additional 1,538 apartments.

The beat goes on ... just yesterday Bloomberg reported: Defaults on Apartment-Building Loans Set Record for U.S. Banks

Defaults on apartment-building mortgages held by U.S. banks climbed to a record 4.6 percent in the first quarter, almost twice the year-earlier level, as more borrowers failed to repay debt approved near the market peak, said Real Capital Analytics Inc. in a report.

Defaults on so-called multifamily mortgages rose from 4.4 percent in the fourth quarter and from 2.4 percent during the same period in 2009 ...

by Calculated Risk on 5/25/2010 10:12:00 PM

Just a summary of the housing news ...

Tomorrow the New Home sales report will be released, and since new homes are reported when the contract is signed, April was most likely the peak month for tax credit related buying.

For existing home sales, the sales are reported when the transaction is closed, and buyers have until June 30th to close - so reported sales will probably increase further. On existing home sales, please see Inventory increases Year-over-Year and Existing Home Sales increase in April

On house prices, see: Case-Shiller House Prices "Weakening" and First American CoreLogic: House Prices Decline 0.3% in March

And the MBA released the Q1 National Delinquency Survey last week showing record delinquencies:
1) Press Release from the MBA: Delinquencies, Foreclosure Starts Fall in Latest MBA National Delinquency Survey
2) Comments from MBA conference call.
3) Two key graphs: Mortgage Delinquencies by Period and by State

Best to all

by Calculated Risk on 5/25/2010 06:30:00 PM

From the Congressional Budget Office: Estimated Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on Employment and Economic Output from January 2010 Through March 2010

CBO estimates that in the first quarter of calendar year
2010, ARRA’s policies:

Raised the level of real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic product (GDP) by between 1.7 percent and 4.2 percent,

Lowered the unemployment rate by between 0.7 percentage points and 1.5 percentage points,

Increased the number of people employed by between 1.2 million and 2.8 million, and

Increased the number of full-time-equivalent jobs by 1.8 million to 4.1 million compared with what those amounts would have been otherwise.

The effects of ARRA on output and employment are expected to increase further during calendar year 2010 but then diminish in 2011 and fade away by the end of 2012.

Here is the CBO's estimate of the impact on GDP by quarter:

Change Attributable to ARRA, GDP change (percent)
		Low Estimate	High Estimate
2009	Q1	0.1	0.1
2009	Q2	0.9	1.5
2009	Q3	1.3	2.7
2009	Q4	1.5	3.5
2010	Q1	1.7	4.2
2010	Q2	1.7	4.6
2010	Q3	1.4	4.2
2010	Q4	1.1	3.6

Note: the impact on GDP growth (the headline number reported each quarter by the BEA), is the change in spending from one quarter to the next. The ARRA impact on GDP peaks in Q2 2010 and is lower in Q3 2010 by both estimates. This change will show up as a drag on GDP growth in Q3.

This is part of the reason I expect a slowdown in growth in the 2nd half of 2010. Other factors include: the inventory correction appears over, I expect households to save more (a drag on consumption growth), and I expect further weakness in housing.

by Calculated Risk on 5/25/2010 04:00:00 PM

The euro recovered to 1.23 dollars and I had to put away my Dow 10K hat ...

The S&P 500 actually finished up slightly.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph is from Doug Short of dshort.com (financial planner): "Four Bad Bears".

Note that the Great Depression crash is based on the DOW; the three others are for the S&P 500.

by Calculated Risk on 5/25/2010 11:40:00 AM

S&P/Case-Shiller also released the Q1 2010 National Index this morning.

By request, here is a graph that shows the national index in both nominal and real terms (adjusted with CPI less shelter).

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

In nominal terms (blue), the National Index declined 1.3% in Q1, and is 2.1% off the recent bottom in Q1 2009.

Note: Case-Shiller reported the national index declined 3.2% in Q1 (Not Seasonally Adjusted, NSA) - however I'm using the SA data.

In real terms (red), the National Index declined 1.9% in Q1, and is now at the lowest level since Q4 2000.

by Calculated Risk on 5/25/2010 09:00:00 AM

IMPORTANT: These graphs are Seasonally Adjusted (SA). S&P has cautioned that the seasonal adjustment is probably being distorted by irregular factors. These distortions could include distressed sales and the various government programs.

S&P/Case-Shiller released the monthly Home Price Indices for March (actually a 3 month average), and the Q1 2010 National Index.

The monthly data includes prices for 20 individual cities, and two composite indices (10 cities and 20 cities).

From S&P: The First Quarter of 2010 Indicates Some Weakening in Home Prices

Data through March 2009, released today by Standard & Poor’s for its S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices ... show that the U.S. National Home Price Index fell 3.2% in the first quarter of 2010, but remains above its year-earlier level. In March, 13 of the 20 MSAs covered by S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices and both monthly composites were down although the two composites and 10 MSAs showed year-over-year gains.

Housing prices rebounded from crisis lows, but recently have seen renewed weakness as tax incentives are ending and foreclosures are climbing.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

The first graph shows the nominal not seasonally adjusted Composite 10 and Composite 20 indices (the Composite 20 was started in January 2000).

The Composite 10 index is off 29.8% from the peak, and up slightly in March (SA).

The Composite 20 index is off 29.3% from the peak, and down slightly in March (SA).

The second graph shows the Year over year change in both indices.

The Composite 10 is up 3.2% compared to March 2009.

The Composite 20 is up 2.4% compared to March 2009.

This is the second month with YoY price increases in a row.

The third graph shows the price declines from the peak for each city included in S&P/Case-Shiller indices.

Prices decreased (SA) in 11 of the 20 Case-Shiller cities in March (SA).

Prices in Las Vegas are off 56% from the peak, and prices in Dallas only off 5.8% from the peak.

Case Shiller is reporting on the NSA data (13 cities down), and I'm using the SA data. I'm not sure why Case-Shiller is saying prices are weakening because the tax incentive is ending. This is Q1 and March 2010 data - and the tax incentive pulled forward demand and probably supported prices. Just wait until later this year ...

by Calculated Risk on 5/25/2010 08:12:00 AM

From the NY Times: Concerns Over North Korea Shake Markets and Euro

From the WSJ: Europe's Banks Hit by Rising Loan Costs

On Monday, the London interbank offered rate, or Libor—the rate at which banks lend money to each other, and thus a vital sign of their mutual trust—rose to its highest level for the three-month dollar rate since last July. While the current Libor, at just above 0.5%, is far below the sky-high levels of 4.81875% reached at the height of the financial crisis in 2008, it is still a significant jump from 0.25% as recently as March.

But Libor's jump is more pronounced at European banks. On Monday, German state-controlled lender WestLB AG said it cost 0.565% to borrow dollars for three months, up from 0.38% a month earlier. U.S.

The three month Libor has moved even higher, and is now at 0.54.

The TED spread is up to 38.61 (from 34.47). This is the difference between the interbank rate for three month loans and the three month Treasury. The peak was 463 on Oct 10th -the spread is still low, but has been steadily rising.

The European markets are off sharply. The German DAX off 2.76%, the FTSE 100 off 2.5%.

From CNBC: Pre-Market Data shows the S&P 500 off about 25 or over 2.0%. Dow futures are off almost 200 points.

The Euro is down to 1.22 dollars.