by Calculated Risk on 7/02/2009 09:25:00 AM

Note: earlier Employment post: Employment Report: 467K Jobs Lost, 9.5% Unemployment Rate. The earlier post includes a comparison to previous recessions.

Stress Test Scenarios

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the unemployment rate compared to the stress test economic scenarios on a quarterly basis as provided by the regulators to the banks (no link).

This is a quarterly forecast: the Unemployment Rate in Q2 was higher than the "more adverse" scenario.

Note also that the unemployment rate has already exceeded the peak of the "baseline scenario".

Diffusion Index

Here is a look at how "widespread" the job losses are using the employment diffusion index from the BLS.

Job losses were widespread across the major industry sectors, with large declines occurring in manufacturing, professional and business services, and construction.
BLS, June Employment Report

The BLS diffusion index is a measure of how widespread changes in employment are. Some people think it measures the percent of industries increasing employment, but that isn't quite correct.

From the BLS handbook:

The diffusion indexes for private nonfarm payroll employment are based on estimates for 278 industries, while the manufacturing indexes are based on estimates for 84 industries. Each component series is assigned a value of 0, 50, or 100 percent, depending on whether its employment showed a decrease, no change, or an increase over a given period. The average (mean) value is then calculated, and this percent is the diffusion index number.

Think of this as a measure of how widespread the job losses are across industries. The further from 50 (above or below), the more widespread the job losses or gains reported by the BLS.

Before September, the all industries employment diffusion index was close to 40, suggesting that job losses were limited to a few industries. However starting in September the diffusion index plummeted. In December, the index hit 20.5, suggesting job losses were very widespread. The index has recovered since then, but declined slightly in June to 28.6, suggesting job losses are still widespread.

The manufacturing diffusion index fell even further, from 40 in May 2008 to just 6 in January 2009. The manufacturing index is still very low in June (13.9) indicating widespread job losses.

Initial Weekly Unemployment Claims

The DOL reports on weekly unemployment insurance claims:

In the week ending June 27, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 614,000, a decrease of 16,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 630,000. The 4-week moving average was 615,250, a decrease of 2,750 from the previous week's revised average of 618,000.
...
The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment during the week ending June 20 was 6,702,000, a decrease of 53,000 from the preceding week's revised level of 6,755,000.

This graph shows weekly claims and continued claims since 1971.

Continued claims decreased to 6.70 million. This is 5.0% of covered employment.

The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims decreased this week, and is now 43,500 below the peak of 12 weeks ago. There is a reasonable chance that claims have peaked for this cycle.

However the level of initial claims (over 614 thousand) is still very high, indicating significant weakness in the job market.

by Calculated Risk on 7/02/2009 08:30:00 AM

From the BLS:

Nonfarm payroll employment continued to decline in June (-467,000), and the unemployment rate was little changed at 9.5 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Job losses were widespread across the major industry sectors, with large declines occurring in manufacturing, professional and business services, and construction.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the unemployment rate and the year over year change in employment vs. recessions.

Nonfarm payrolls decreased by 467,000 in June. The economy has lost almost 5.7 million jobs over the last year, and 6.46 million jobs during the 18 consecutive months of job losses.

The unemployment rate rose to 9.5 percent; the highest level since 1983.

Year over year employment is strongly negative.

The second graph shows the job losses from the start of the employment recession, in percentage terms (as opposed to the number of jobs lost).

For the current recession, employment peaked in December 2007, and this recession was a slow starter (in terms of job losses and declines in GDP).

However job losses have really picked up over the last 9 months (4.4 million jobs lost, red line cliff diving on the graph), and the current recession is now the 2nd worst recession since WWII in percentage terms - and also in terms of the unemployment rate (only early '80s recession was worse).

This is another weak employment report ... more soon.

by Calculated Risk on 7/01/2009 09:48:00 PM

A quick summary ...

California starts issuing IOUs tomorrow. From the SacBee: Furlough Fridays back - now three days a month

With California on the verge of issuing IOUs, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger moved to conserve cash Wednesday by ordering state workers to take a third day of unpaid furlough each month ... [about 14 percent] pay cut for state workers ...

Auto sales were still below 10 million units (SAAR):

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the historical light vehicle sales (seasonally adjusted annual rate) from the BEA (blue) and an estimate for June (red, light vehicle sales of 9.69 million SAAR from AutoData Corp).

Construction spending declined in May

This graph shows private residential and nonresidential construction spending since 1993 through May. Note: nominal dollars, not inflation adjusted.

"Spending on private construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $649.2 billion, 1.0 percent below the revised April estimate of $655.6 billion."

Residential construction spending fell further in May, and nonresidential spending was up a little (because of private spending on power), but will probably decline sharply over the next two years.

The ISM June 2009 Manufacturing Report On Business® showed continued contraction.

Employment reports from ADP, Challenger and Monster were released. The BLS report will be released tomorrow (Thursday) because of the holiday on Friday.

The NAR Pending Home Sales Index increased.

The MBA reported refinance applications were off 30%.

by Calculated Risk on 7/01/2009 06:30:00 PM

Here is a review of a few previous state bailouts during recessions by Richard H. Mattoon, senior economist at the Chicago Fed: Should the federal government bail out the states? Lessons from past recessions. A few excerpts:

The rationale for [a bailout] is that states (which are generally prohibited from running deficits) need the money to maintain key programs, such as Medicaid, unemployment insurance, and work force training, for which demand rises during a recession. Also, this aid might help states avoid enacting spending cuts or tax increases that could deepen or prolong the economic downturn.
...
Three factors are particularly important in evaluating the effectiveness of such federal aid to states—timing, triggers, and targeting.

The biggest problem was found to be timing - here is a review of a previous bailout (the 1973-1975 Antirecession Fiscal Assistance (ARFA)):

Extensive evaluations were conducted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), and the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) to assess the federal government’s aid package in response to the 1973–75 recession. In general, the reports were critical of the effectiveness of the aid programs. Specifically, the Treasury’s report found that the aid to the states arrived after the recession had already bottomed out and did little to forestall states from taking budgetary actions that likely exacerbated the recession. In addition, a significant portion of the aid was received during the subsequent economic recovery and may have contributed to post-recession inflationary pressures. Finally, it appears that some states failed to spend the money and instead put the aid toward rebuilding state budget balances during the recovery.
emphasis added

First, many states are now cutting spending and / or raising taxes - what Krugman calls the Fifty Herbert Hoovers.

Second, aid to the states is already late and the public layoffs are already happening (and tax increases for 25 states). But the "good news" is the recovery will probably be very sluggish - so it is unlikely that the aid will not be used (or lead to inflationary pressures).

Of course states like California need more than a little aid ...

by Calculated Risk on 7/01/2009 04:43:00 PM

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the historical light vehicle sales (seasonally adjusted annual rate) from the BEA (blue) and an estimate for June (red, light vehicle sales of 9.69 million SAAR from AutoData Corp).

June was about average for the year so far on seasonally adjusted basis, and sales are still on pace to be the worst since 1967.

The second graph shows light vehicle sales since the BEA started keeping data in 1967.

The small increase in June hardly shows up on the graph.

In 1967 there were 103 million drivers and 9.54 million light vehicles sold; now there are about twice that many (205.7 million licensed drivers in 2007). Compared to the number of drivers, the current sales rate is the lowest since the BEA started tracking auto sales.