by Calculated Risk on 4/15/2009 01:00:00 PM

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the builder confidence index from the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB).

The housing market index (HMI) increased to 14 in April from 9 in March. The record low was 8 set in January.

The increase in April follows five consecutive months at either 8 or 9.

Note: any number under 50 indicates that more builders view sales conditions as poor than good.

Press release from the NAHB (added): April Data Suggests Market At or Near Bottom

Builder confidence in the market for newly built, single-family homes rose five points in April to the highest level since October 2008, according to the latest National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI), released today. This gain was the largest one-month increase recorded since May of 2003, and brings the HMI out of single-digit territory for the first time in six months – to 14. Every component of the HMI reflected the boost, with the biggest gain recorded for sales expectations in the next six months.
...
“This is a very encouraging sign that we are at or near the bottom of the current housing depression,” said NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. “With the prime home buying season now underway, builders report that more buyers are responding to the pull of much-improved affordability measures, including low home prices, extremely favorable mortgage rates and the introduction of the $8,000 first-time home buyer tax credit.”
...
Derived from a monthly survey that NAHB has been conducting for more than 20 years, the NAHB/Wells Fargo HMI gauges builder perceptions of current single-family home sales and sales expectations in the next six months as “good,” “fair” or “poor.” The survey also asks builders to rate traffic of prospective buyers as “high to very high,” “average” or “low to very low.” Scores for each component are then used to calculate a seasonally adjusted index where any number over 50 indicates that more builders view conditions as good than poor.

Each of the HMI’s component indexes recorded substantial gains in April. The largest of these gains was a 10-point surge in the component gauging builder sales expectations for the next six months, which brought that index to 25. The component gauging current sales conditions and the component gauging traffic of prospective buyers each rose five points, to 13 and 14, respectively.

The HMI also rose in every region in April, with an eight-point gain to 16 in the Northeast, a six-point gain to 14 in the Midwest, a five-point gain to 17 in the South and a 4-point gain to 9 in the West.

by Calculated Risk on 4/15/2009 09:16:00 AM

How about this headline from Rex Nutting at MarketWatch: Biggest drop in industrial output since VE Day

Industrial production is down 13.3% since the recession began in December 2007, the largest percentage decline since the end of World War II. ... Factory output has fallen 15.7% during the recession, also the largest decline since 1945-1946.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Here is some serious cliff diving. Also - since capacity utilization is at a record low (the series starts in 1967), there is little reason for investment in new production facitilies.

The Federal Reserve reported:

Industrial production fell 1.5 percent in March after a similar decrease in February. For the first quarter as a whole, output dropped at an annual rate of 20.0 percent, the largest quarterly decrease of the current contraction. At 97.4 percent of its 2002 average, output in March fell to its lowest level since December 1998 and was nearly 13 percent below its year-earlier level. Production in manufacturing moved down 1.7 percent in March and has registered five consecutive quarterly decreases. Broad-based declines in production continued; one exception was the output of motor vehicles and parts, which advanced slightly in March but remained well below its year-earlier level. Outside of manufacturing, the output of mines fell 3.2 percent in March, as oil and gas well drilling continued to drop. After a relatively mild February, a return to more seasonal temperatures pushed up the output of utilities. The capacity utilization rate for total industry fell further to 69.3 percent, a historical low for this series, which begins in 1967.
emphasis added

by Calculated Risk on 4/15/2009 08:42:00 AM

From the BLS:

The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.2 percent in March, before seasonal adjustment, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The index has decreased 0.4 percent over the last year, the first 12 month decline since August 1955.

On a seasonally adjusted basis, the CPI-U decreased 0.1 percent in March after rising 0.4 percent in February. The decrease was due to a downturn in the energy index ... The index for all items less food and energy increased 0.2 percent for the third month in a row.

But for some reason, owners' equivalent rent increased again in March:

The shelter index was virtually unchanged in March. The indexes for rent and owners' equivalent rent [OER] both rose 0.2 percent, but these increases were offset by a 2.4 percent decrease in the index for lodging away from home. This was the sixth straight monthly decline in that index, which has fallen 7.8 percent over the past year.

So CPI is picking up the decline in hotel room rates, but the survey is apparently missing the widespread decline in residential rents.

This is important because OER accounts for almost one-fourth of CPI. CPI ex-OER is off -0.2% in March.

by Calculated Risk on 4/14/2009 10:30:00 PM

A couple of article on revealing the stress tests results ...

From the WSJ: Banks Await Stress-Test Results

The Obama administration is considering making public some results of the stress tests being conducted on the country's 19 largest banks, said people familiar with the matter, a move that could help more clearly separate healthy banks from the weaklings.
...
It isn't clear precisely what information the government might disclose. ... But some within the administration believe a certain amount of information needs to be released in order to provide assurance about the validity and rigor of the assessments. In addition, these people also are concerned that the tests won't be able to fulfill their basic function of shoring up confidence unless investors are able to see data for themselves.

And from the NY Times: U.S. Planning to Reveal Data on Health of Top Banks

The Obama administration is drawing up plans to disclose the conditions of the 19 biggest banks in the country, according to senior administration officials ... The administration has decided to reveal some sensitive details of the stress tests now being completed after concluding that keeping many of the findings secret could send investors fleeing from financial institutions rumored to be weakest.
...
“The purpose of this program is to prevent panics, not cause them,” said one senior official ... “And it’s becoming clearer that we and the banks are going to have to explain clearly where each bank falls in the spectrum.”

Two senior government officials said on Tuesday that they were now likely to encourage the banks to reveal a range of information, perhaps including the size of losses the banks could suffer under each of the stress assumptions.

Yes, the results have to be bank specific ... otherwise the doubts will remain.

by Calculated Risk on 4/14/2009 08:46:00 PM

From the WSJ: Banks Ramp Up Foreclosures

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Co., Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac all say they have increased foreclosure activity in recent weeks. Those companies say they have lifted internal moratoriums which temporarily halted foreclosures.
...
Citigroup Inc. says it stopped all foreclosures until March 12, at the Obama administration's request, on loans serviced for Fannie and Freddie. Since then, says a spokesman, it has "reverted to our previous business-as-usual moratorium."
...
Wells Fargo has also increased foreclosure actions since the expiration of its foreclosure moratorium ...

Both Fannie and Freddie have stepped up sales of foreclosed properties since their moratoriums ended on March 31.
...
More than 2.1 million homes will be lost this year because borrowers can't meet their loan payments, up from about 1.7 million in 2008, according to Moody's Economy.com.

Just something to be aware as foreclosure activity picks up again - the lull was because of the moratorium, not market fundamentals.

by Calculated Risk on 4/14/2009 06:28:00 PM

More conference call comments (ht Brian). A little long, but provides some insight into how Intel views inventory levels. Note the comment about the "industry's at a new baseline".

Analyst: What do you expect your internal inventory to do and any comment on the channel.

Intel: Those two things are obviously related. I'll start with the channel inventory question first. As we look and do our checks of channel inventory levels, we saw a significant burn-off of the overhang of inventory that we had seen in Q4 and in the beginning of Q1. If anything, that burned off a little more quickly than we thought. That's what allowed us to start loading our factories. And you can see in our inventory levels we dropped significantly from Q4 to Q1. And actually I'd say for our inventory levels, we're probably a little lower than we would like. In general, when we look at channel inventories, they look generally lean across the supply chain. If anything, as we thing about a seasonal second half on the back of a pretty weak first quarter, we'll probably grow inventories a little bit as we get into Q2. I don't think it will be significant but I think it will be up a little bit.

Analyst: How much of what you are seeing at the moment [is inventory adjustments] and when do you think that process will end? I know you mentioned Q2, but just to scale it, when do you think -- how much of that is, there is weak underlying demand and when do you think that process will be done?

Intel: I think there was some replenishment of Intel chips at our OEM's customers in the first quarter but certainly not a number that I think would reflect full inventory levels. I think everyone is still running very lean. We actually have seen some expedites in the March time frame of can you get us product real fast, we're running out of end user built products, et cetera. So I think you're still seeing that. My sense is it will stay that way until the second half of this year when you start seeing normal seasonal growth return into the business.

Analyst: Beginning in the second quarter, would you expect sequential sales [growth] in your overall server, two way server processors in the second quarter?

Intel: The question mark we would have is the overall strength of the enterprise market going forward and what we're seeing is that enterprise budgets are locked down pretty tight and CIOs are going to let their fleets age a bit until they get a little more clarity on what the economy looks like.

Analyst: I was wondering if you might have been able to give some color on how you perceive sort of broader visibility and how you might have compared that to the conversation from January. You talked about a bottom in the PC market and possibly some month over month improvement as you went through the quarter. On the other side of that, your guidance was sort of flat or somewhat similar although it's not formal but just general color on how you see the marketplace and to what extent there is any visibility.

Intel: I think that first of all, when we said that we were planning our business flat in this environment, you have to remember that traditionally the second quarter is seasonally below the first quarter so that alone is at least internally is a sign of how we view the world. In terms of visibility, three months ago we were sitting in a fragile global economic environment and we had just come off of a horrendous Q4 and we weren't sure where sales were of PCs. Three months later, we're still sitting in a fragile global economic environment but we've got three or four months of fairly good trending in terms of where the business is, what the inventory levels are, what geographies are still buying product, what segments are still buying product and so the -- the global environment hasn't changed but our ability to look and plot some points, historical points, has given us the confidence to essentially say that we've seen the bottom, the industry's seen the bottom and I feel pretty comfortable in that, having done this for more than a few years.

Analyst: Do you feel, then that the seasonality is likely to be somewhat similar to broader seasonal patterns in the second half, do you have any color there?

Intel: Well, that goes back to the pipeline. Desktops are a business which is very, very quick. Most of them are assembled to order. 40% of our desktop chips go through our industrial distribution channel. They're sold in white boxes for the most part. There is essentially no inventory on those. When we saw that stabilizing in the early part of the quarter, that was the first stake in the ground in terms of trying to figure out where the business was. The notebook business, we talked about this last time, not only has a longer supply chain and most of it is branded, much of it was put on boats in the third and fourth quarter to save fuel costs and there was a lot of inventory built ahead of the holiday season in Q4 that had to burn off. We now believe that the vast majority of that has burned off. All the patterns we've seen on chip sets for mobile and on microprocessors for mobile are consistent with that in terms of our customers and the Taiwanese mother board manufacturers now beginning to buy again for product that is reflecting end user consumption.

Analyst: So you're confident that you're seeing normal seasonal patterns return but not sure sort of to what degree, perhaps. Is that the main issue that you think that in the second half we do get that uptick but we just don't know how big it is yet and that's why you're being conservative about guidance?

Intel: I think you have it exactly right. Everything I've seen suggested that the industry's at a new baseline. We're starting to see the normal seasonality adjusted a little bit for the inventory. Replenishment we talked about earlier for Q2. And then every sign we see in terms of markets recovering and here's the time phased deal, suggests that we're likely to see typical seasonality in the second half. I talked about Europe being weak. My sense is everything we've seen is that Europe was like the United States except two or three months later. And so Europe is sitting today where we all were two or three months ago, which was still a bit more frozen than we are today. And our recent channel checks in Europe suggest that consumers are now starting to open their wallets for notebooks again.
emphasis added

by Calculated Risk on 4/14/2009 05:44:00 PM

From Intel CEO Paul Otellini (ht Brian):

As we indicated in our last earnings call, we made significant reductions in our wafer starts to bring inventory in line with the new demand environment. These actions resulted in an inventory reduction of 19%, below the fourth quarter levels. Our spending is being controlled and the number of employees declined by 1400 from Q4 levels. Almost all of the headcount reductions in Q1 and in 2009 will be focused on aligning our factory network to the new demand levels while accelerating our conversion to newer silicon technologies. Our product development machine is in high gear, delivering a new generation of products in all segments. We believe that these products extend our lead in our core businesses and position us for significant growth in the new markets we are targeting. In terms of demand, we saw a few important trends play out this quarter. First, we are seeing signs that a bottom in the PC market segment has been reached. I believe the worst is now behind us from an inventory correction and demand level adjustment perspective. We saw order patterns strengthen throughout the quarter. Desktop sales appear to have hit bottom first and have followed a more normal patterns since early February. In notebooks, the length of the supply chain and higher levels of inventory took longer to work through but now have returned to normal levels. In terms of end user consumption, the consumer segment has held up much better than the enterprise. This is particularly true in consumer notebooks, which continue to be the volume-driver in this segment. Netbook sales continue to grow as anticipated, and are clearly incremental volume for us in a difficult market. In the enterprise segment, the server portion is in reasonable shape. Partially reflecting demand for our newly released dual processor products. The client portion remains weak reflecting constrained budgets and redeployment of older equipment. The installed base of enterprise notebooks is now over three years average age and will need to be upgraded as capital budgets free up. Lastly, in terms of end markets, we saw the US and China demonstrate relative strength while Europe, Japan and the emerging markets showed continuing weakness.

... In closing, while it is clear that our end markets are still impacted by the global financial conditions, we are comfortable with our investment levels and capacity profile. We expect business conditions in Q2 to mirror those of Q1, with some gradual recovering of demand and replenishment of inventories occurring as the industry sees increasing signs of stabilization and a return to more normal seasonal trends.
emphasis added

It sounds like the Q1 inventory correction was very significant, and this could subtract a point or two from Q1 GDP.

Brian comments: [Intel] has historically ... had a poor forecasting track record, so take it with a grain of salt

by Calculated Risk on 4/14/2009 03:46:00 PM

Up or down more than 1% is just a normal day these days ...

DOW down 1.8%

S&P 500 down 2.0%

NASDAQ down 1.7%

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

The first graph is from Doug Short of dshort.com (financial planner): "Four Bad Bears".

This is the 2nd worst S&P 500 / DOW bear market in the U.S. in 100 years.

Note that the Great Depression crash is based on the DOW; the three others are for the S&P 500.

The second graph compares four significant bear markets: the Dow during the Great Depression, the NASDAQ, the Nikkei, and the current S&P 500.

See Doug's: "The Mega-Bear Quartet and L-Shaped Recoveries".

And since I haven't posted this for awhile, here are a few credit crisis indicators ...

From The Times: Libor falls at fastest rate since January

This morning, three month dollar Libor continued a fortnight-long fall, going down one basis point to 1.122 per cent ... has fallen from 1.33 per cent a month ago.

The LIBOR peaked at 4.81875% on Oct. 10th, and hit a cycle low of 1.0825% on Jan. 14th.

There has been more improvement in the A2P2 spread. This has declined to 0.62. This is far below the record (for this cycle) of 5.86 after Thanksgiving, but still somewhat above the normal spread.

This is the spread between high and low quality 30 day nonfinancial commercial paper.

Meanwhile the TED spread is holding just below 100 at 96.97. This is the difference between the interbank rate for three month loans and the three month Treasury. The peak was 463 on Oct 10th and a normal spread is around 50 bps. The TED spread has been relatively flat for months (and is being impacted by the Fed and other Central Banks).

by Calculated Risk on 4/14/2009 02:54:00 PM

Update note: this is just one month of data, and not seasonally adjusted.

Port traffic gives us an early hint of changes in the trade deficit. Usually I wait until both Los Angeles and Long Beach ports report monthly traffic, but this rebound might be significant. (I'll add Long Beach when the data is released)

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the loaded inbound and outbound traffic at the port of Los Angeles in TEUs (TEUs: 20-foot equivalent units or 20-foot-long cargo container). Although containers tell us nothing about value, container traffic does give us an idea of the volume of goods being exported and imported.

Inbound traffic was 6% below last March and 35% above last month.

Outbound traffic was 9.8% below March 2008, and 25% above February.

We have to be careful because of the impact of the Chinese New Year on trade in February, but there does appear to be a significant rebound after trade collapsed in February.

by Calculated Risk on 4/14/2009 12:19:00 PM

That was fast ...

From Bloomberg: Goldman Sachs Raises $5 Billion to Repay TARP Funds

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. ... raised $5 billion in the largest stock sale this year to help repay $10 billion in government rescue funds.

The bank sold 40.65 million shares at $123 each ... The price was the same as when Goldman Sachs last sold shares in September.
...
While many analysts and investors applauded Goldman Sachs’s plan to repay the TARP money, others said it may pressure other banks to follow suit or risk appearing dependent on the government.

The government favors letting banks return money if they fare well on stress tests completed by the end of this month and can get private capital, according to people familiar with the matter.

Looks like TARP will have more money for AIG and Citi ...

by Calculated Risk on 4/14/2009 10:35:00 AM

President Obama will speak at 11:30 AM ET.

Here is the CNBC feed.

Here are some excerpts from the WSJ:

... All of these actions – the Recovery Act, the bank capitalization program, the housing plan, the strengthening of the non-bank credit market, the auto plan, and our work at the G20 – have been necessary pieces of the recovery puzzle. They have been designed to increase aggregate demand, get credit flowing again to families and businesses, and help them ride out the storm. And taken together, these actions are starting to generate signs of economic progress. Because of our recovery plan, schools and police departments have cancelled planned layoffs. Clean energy companies and construction companies are re-hiring workers to build everything from energy efficient windows to new roads and highways. Our housing plan has helped lead to a spike in the number of homeowners who are taking advantage of historically-low mortgage rates by refinancing, which is like putting a $2,000 tax cut in your in pocket. Our program to support the market for auto loans and student loans has started to unfreeze this market and securitize more of this lending in the last few weeks. And small businesses are seeing a jump in loan activity for the first time in months.

This is all welcome and encouraging news, but it does not mean that hard times are over. 2009 will continue to be a difficult year for America’s economy. The severity of this recession will cause more job loss, more foreclosures, and more pain before it ends. ...

There is no doubt that times are still tough. By no means are we out of the woods just yet. But from where we stand, for the very first time, we are beginning to see glimmers of hope. And beyond that, way off in the distance, we can see a vision of an America’s future that is far different than our troubled economic past.

by Calculated Risk on 4/14/2009 08:30:00 AM

On a monthly basis, retail sales decreased 1.1% from February to March (seasonally adjusted), but sales are off 10.7% from March 2008 (retail and food services decreased 9.4%). Automobile and parts sales declined 2.3% in March (compared to February), but excluding autos, all other sales declined -0.9%.

The following graph shows the year-over-year change in nominal and real retail sales since 1993.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

To calculate the real change, the monthly PCE price index from the BEA was used (March PCE prices were estimated as the same increase from January to February).

Although the Census Bureau reported that nominal retail sales decreased 10.7% year-over-year (retail and food services decreased 9.4%), real retail sales declined by 11.6% (on a YoY basis).

The second graph shows real retail sales (adjusted with PCE) since 1992. This is monthly retail sales, seasonally adjusted.

NOTE: The graph doesn't start at zero to better show the change.

This shows that retail sales fell off a cliff in late 2008, but have been somewhat stable the last four months.

Here is the Census Bureau report:

The U.S. Census Bureau announced today that advance estimates of U.S. retail and food services sales for March, adjusted for seasonal variation and holiday and trading-day differences, but not for price changes, were $344.4 billion, a decrease of 1.1 percent (±0.5%) from the previous month and 9.4 percent (±0.7%) below March 2008. Total sales for the January through March 2009 period were down 8.8 percent (±0.5%) from the same period a year ago. The January 2009 to February 2009 percent change was revised from -0.1 percent (±0.5%)* to +0.3 percent (±0.3%).

Gasoline stations sales were down 34.0 percent (±1.5%) from March 2008 and motor vehicle and parts dealers sales were down 23.5 percent (±2.3%) from last year.

Seasonally adjusted Q1 retail sales are still about 1.5% below sales in Q4, but have been at about the same level since December.

Although Q1 GDP will be very weak - because investment fell off a cliff and there was apparently a significant inventory correction - Q1 PCE will probably be close to neutral.

by Calculated Risk on 4/13/2009 10:51:00 PM

From the WSJ: General Growth Bondholders Ask Trustee to Sue (ht bearly)

A group of bondholders have ratcheted up the pressure on General Growth Properties Inc. by asking their trustee to sue the debt-laden mall owner for payment of their past-due bonds.
...
The bondholders' action pushes General Growth closer to a bankruptcy filing but doesn't mean that one is imminent.

Here is the story from Reuters: General Growth bondholders seek to sue company--WSJ

by Calculated Risk on 4/13/2009 08:54:00 PM

A number of forecasters have mentioned Unemployment Claims as an important indicator of the end of a recession. Professor Hamilton mentioned this last week: Initial unemployment claims and the end of recessions. Historically this is a useful indicator.

Back on March 28th, the WSJ quoted Robert J. Gordon, an economist at Northwestern University and a member of the National Bureau of Economic Research committee:

[Gordon] points to one indicator in particular with a remarkable track record: the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits. In past recessions, it has hit its peak about four weeks before the economy hit a trough and began to grow again. As of right now, the four-week average of new claims hit its peak of 650,000 in the week ended March 14. Based on the model, "if there's no further rise, we're looking at a trough coming in April or May," he said, which is far earlier than most forecasts currently anticipate.

Since then, the four-week average has risen further (now at 657,250). So much for a trough in April ...

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the four-week average of initial unemployment claims and recessions.

Typically the four-week average peaks near the end of a recession.

Also important - in the last two recessions, initial unemployment claims peaked just before the end of the recession, but then stayed elevated for a long period following the recession - a "jobless recovery". There is a good chance this recovery will be very sluggish too, and we will see claims elevated for some time (although below the peak).

We need to see a significant decline in the four-week average before we start talking about the peak. In a note today, Goldman Sachs economist Seamus Smyth estimated a significant decline as:

Roughly speaking, a 20,000 decline in the 4-week moving average corresponds to a 50% probability that the peak has already been reached, and a 40,000 improvement to a 90% probability.

So we need to see the four-week average decline by 20,000 to 40,000 or more. Don't hold your breathe ...

by Calculated Risk on 4/13/2009 06:29:00 PM

Here is the 2nd part of the VoiceofSanDiego article: A Staggering Swindle: How It Could Happen in 2008

In 2008, when the loans were made to McConville's buyers, some of the only companies still willing to buy these bundles of mortgages were Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, even though the mortgage mess had affected them, too.

At the tail end of McConville's deals, last September, the federal government took over Fannie and Freddie, assuming more direct control of the companies' day-to-day operation and pumped in funding to absorb their losses. Now the taxpayers own 79.9 percent of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

"You and I are getting stuck with these inflated loans, via Fannie and Freddie," [Real estate appraiser Todd Lackner] said.

There is a way out, as long as the smaller lenders who made the loans to McConville's buyers still exist. On any loans Fannie and Freddie bought, if they discover fraud or faults in underwriting in the loans, they'll send them down the chain, requiring the investor that sold the loans to the giants to buy them back. Ultimately, the original lenders might face those buybacks, said Michael Lea, a former chief economist for Freddie Mac.

But the small lenders who made these mortgages might not be in business anymore -- like Nazari's All American Finance.

Ask Wall Street what happens when they push back loans to the small lenders - they just close up shop.

Here was Part I: Rented Identities, Extravagant Prices and Foreclosure: A Post-Boom Real Estate Scam

And a related article: Mafia-Esque Charges Brought Against Alleged Mortgage Fraud Ring

by Calculated Risk on 4/13/2009 04:29:00 PM

From MarketWatch: Goldman Sachs swings to profit, plans $5 billion offering

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said Monday it swung to a profit in the first-quarter, and announced it has commenced a public offering of $5 billion of its common stock. Goldman Sachs said net earnings for the period ended in March were $1.8 billion ... compared to a loss of $2.1 billion ... in the same period a year earlier.

The $5 billion will be used to repay the TARP money Goldman received last year.

by Calculated Risk on 4/13/2009 04:09:00 PM

From Oregon.gov (ht Justin):

This graph is from Oregon’s Employment Situation: March 2009 and shows the Oregon unemployment rate since Jan 2000.

The unemployment rate is at the peak level of the 1982 recession - the highest since record keeping started in 1947. The unemployment rate is increasing rapidly, and the rate of increase appears to be accelerating.

Oregon’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate rose to 12.1 percent in March from 10.7 percent (as revised) in February. The state’s unemployment rate has risen rapidly and substantially over the past nine months, from a rate of 5.9 percent in June 2008.
...
Manufacturing shed 2,100 jobs in March, during a time of year when a flat employment pattern is typical. Employment stood at 171,600 in March, which was by far the lowest employment level since comparable records began in 1990.
...
Construction losses steepened, dropping 1,700 jobs at a time of year when a gain of 700 was the expected normal seasonal movement. The rate of seasonally adjusted losses in construction has quickened, as the industry is down 12,600 jobs or 13.6 percent over the past six months.

Seasonally adjusted construction employment, at 80,000, is now below its level of approximately 83,000 jobs seen during much of 1997 through 2000. Despite a drop of more than 25,000 jobs since reaching its peak in 2007, construction is still slightly above its low point over the past dozen years—75,500, which was reached in June 2003.
...
Oregon’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate rose to 12.1 percent from 10.7 percent in February. This tied Oregon’s unemployment rate in November 1982, the highpoint of the early 1980s recession. While historical records prior to 1976 are not exactly comparable, it appears clear that the 12.1 percent level is Oregon’s highest since 1947, when the Employment Department first started publishing unemployment rates.

by Calculated Risk on 4/13/2009 03:00:00 PM

From Bloomberg: Manhattan Apartment Rents Fall as Unemployment Rises

Manhattan apartment rents fell as much as 5.9 percent in March from a year earlier as rising unemployment damped demand, Citi-Habitats Inc. said.
...
Rents for studios dropped 2.1 percent to an average of $1,812, while those for one-bedroom apartment fell 5.9 percent to $2,595. The cost of renting two-bedroom homes declined 2.2 percent to $3,631 and three-bedrooms fell 1.6 percent to an average of $4,670.

The average declines for March don’t reflect concessions offered by landlords, such as a free month’s rent, that lower the overall cost, [Gary Malin, president of Citi-Habitats] said.

“There is a greater degree of price decline than those numbers show,” he said.

Some asking prices are falling even faster. From Amanda Fung at Crain's on New York: Big landlord takes hit on falling apt. rents

Since February alone, Equity Residential has lowered its Manhattan asking rents by an average of 13%, said Michael Levy, an analyst at Macquarie. That reduction came on top of a 15% cut over the previous year.

by Calculated Risk on 4/13/2009 01:49:00 PM

Here is another story from VoiceofSanDiego: Mafia-Esque Charges Brought Against Alleged Mortgage Fraud Ring

Federal prosecutors on Tuesday announced unprecedented charges against individuals involved in an alleged mortgage fraud ring involving 220 properties in San Diego County, with total purchase prices topping $100 million.

The 24 defendants were all charged with participating in a "corrupt enterprise" under a federal law created by the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act...

... defendants include several real estate professionals ... a public notary ... a licensed real estate agent ... a licensed real estate appraiser ... a CPA; and ... registered tax preparers.
...
Prosecutors also name several straw buyers as participants in the corrupt enterprise ...

This is a different case than the previous story, but notice that the straw buyers are facing charges too. "Lend" out your good credit, sign false documents - and face prosecution and jail time.

by Calculated Risk on 4/13/2009 11:24:00 AM

Kelly Bennett and Will Carless at the VoiceofSanDiego investigate: Rented Identities, Extravagant Prices and Foreclosure: A Post-Boom Real Estate Scam

Over the course of several months last year, [James D. McConville] picked up at least 81 condo conversions from distressed developers and orchestrated their sale to more than 20 buyers who'd rented him their identities ...

By arranging purchase prices well above market value, McConville was able to pay off the developers and capture what the developers' records state as more than $12.5 million. Now, 74 of the 81 homes involved in the deals in Sommerset Villas and Sommerset Woods in Escondido and Westlake Ranch in San Marcos are in the first stage of foreclosure.

McConville bought distressed condos from developers in bulk, and then sold them to straw buyers (individuals with solid credit records who agreed to sign for the loans for a fee). McConville pocketed the difference between the straw buyer price and the bulk price - approximately $12.5 million.

McConville promised to rent the properties, and pay the mortgages from the rental income.

The individuals had pristine credit, and one mortgage lender said:

"Everything was just absolutely perfect -- some of the cleanest loans we'd seen."

Of course the relationship with McConville was apparently never disclosed.

This was happening in 2008. Lenders were supposed to be back to the three C's: creditworthiness, capacity, and collateral. These straw buyers - who apparently were willing to falsely sign that they were the actual buyers - satisfied the creditworthiness and capacity criteria. But this raises serious questions about the appraisals.

Also McConville timed the multiple applications perfectly so the lender wouldn't see the other loans apps when they performed a credit check - that is pretty amazing.

Part II will be out today tonight ...