RSS Feed by Calculated Risk on 2/19/2018 04:43:00 PM
Monday, February 19, 2018
Las Vegas: Record Convention Attendance in 2017, Visitor Traffic off Slightly
During the recession, I wrote about the troubles in Las Vegas and included a chart of visitor and convention attendance: Lost Vegas.
Since then Las Vegas visitor traffic recovered to new record highs.
However, in 2017, visitor traffic declined 1.7% compared to 2016, but was still 8% above the pre-recession peak.
Convention attendance is now at record levels. Here is the data from the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority.
Click on graph for larger image.
The blue bars are annual visitor traffic (left scale), and the red line is convention attendance (right scale).
Convention attendance was up 5.3% in 2017 compared to 2016, and was at a new record high.
There were many housing related conventions during the housing bubble, so it took some time for convention attendance to recover. But attendance has really picked up over the last three years.
The Housing Bubble, Mortgage Debt as Percent of GDP
by Calculated Risk on 2/19/2018 12:09:00 PM
Last year on Presidents' Day, I excerpted from a post I wrote in February 2005 (yes, 13 years ago).
In that 2005 post, I included a graph of household mortgage debt as a percent of GDP. Several readers asked if I could update the graph.
First, from 2005:
The following chart shows household mortgage debt as a % of GDP. Although mortgage debt has been increasing for years, the last four years have seen a tremendous increase in debt. Last year alone mortgage debt increased close to $800 Billion - almost 7% of GDP.
Source: Federal Reserve
The second graph shows household mortgage debt as a percent of GDP through Q4 2017. Yes, the graphs have improved!Mortgage debt has declined by $0.7 trillion from the peak. Studies suggest most of the decline in debt has been because of foreclosures (or short sales), but some of the decline is from homeowners paying down debt (sometimes so they can refinance at better rates).
The "bubble" is pretty obvious on this graph, and the sharp increase in mortgage debt was one of the warning signs.
Existing Home Sales: Lawler vs. the Consensus
by Calculated Risk on 2/19/2018 09:57:00 AM
This will be a light week for economic data and the key economic report this week is January existing home sales. The NAR is scheduled to report January Existing Home Sales on Wednesday, February 21st at 10:00 AM ET.
The consensus, according to Bloomberg, is that the NAR will report sales of 5.65 million. However, housing economist Tom Lawler estimates the NAR will report sales of 5.48 million on a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) basis.
Housing economist Tom Lawler has been sending me his predictions of what the NAR will report for almost 8 years. The table below shows the consensus for each month, Lawler's predictions, and the NAR's initial reported level of sales.
Lawler hasn't always been closer than the consensus, but usually when there has been a fairly large spread between Lawler's estimate and the "consensus", Lawler has been closer.
NOTE: There have been times when Lawler "missed", but then he pointed out an apparent error in the NAR data - and the subsequent revision corrected that error. As an example, see: The “Curious Case” of Existing Home Sales in the South in April
Over the last seven plus years, the consensus average miss was 144 thousand, and Lawler's average miss was 68 thousand.
The consensus is above Lawler's estimate this month, so I'd take the under.
| Existing Home Sales, Forecasts and NAR Report millions, seasonally adjusted annual rate basis (SAAR) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Month | Consensus | Lawler | NAR reported1 |
| May-10 | 6.20 | 5.83 | 5.66 |
| Jun-10 | 5.30 | 5.30 | 5.37 |
| Jul-10 | 4.66 | 3.95 | 3.83 |
| Aug-10 | 4.10 | 4.10 | 4.13 |
| Sep-10 | 4.30 | 4.50 | 4.53 |
| Oct-10 | 4.50 | 4.46 | 4.43 |
| Nov-10 | 4.85 | 4.61 | 4.68 |
| Dec-10 | 4.90 | 5.13 | 5.28 |
| Jan-11 | 5.20 | 5.17 | 5.36 |
| Feb-11 | 5.15 | 5.00 | 4.88 |
| Mar-11 | 5.00 | 5.08 | 5.10 |
| Apr-11 | 5.20 | 5.15 | 5.05 |
| May-11 | 4.75 | 4.80 | 4.81 |
| Jun-11 | 4.90 | 4.71 | 4.77 |
| Jul-11 | 4.92 | 4.69 | 4.67 |
| Aug-11 | 4.75 | 4.92 | 5.03 |
| Sep-11 | 4.93 | 4.83 | 4.91 |
| Oct-11 | 4.80 | 4.86 | 4.97 |
| Nov-11 | 5.08 | 4.40 | 4.42 |
| Dec-11 | 4.60 | 4.64 | 4.61 |
| Jan-12 | 4.69 | 4.66 | 4.57 |
| Feb-12 | 4.61 | 4.63 | 4.59 |
| Mar-12 | 4.62 | 4.59 | 4.48 |
| Apr-12 | 4.66 | 4.53 | 4.62 |
| May-12 | 4.57 | 4.66 | 4.55 |
| Jun-12 | 4.65 | 4.56 | 4.37 |
| Jul-12 | 4.50 | 4.47 | 4.47 |
| Aug-12 | 4.55 | 4.87 | 4.82 |
| Sep-12 | 4.75 | 4.70 | 4.75 |
| Oct-12 | 4.74 | 4.84 | 4.79 |
| Nov-12 | 4.90 | 5.10 | 5.04 |
| Dec-12 | 5.10 | 4.97 | 4.94 |
| Jan-13 | 4.90 | 4.94 | 4.92 |
| Feb-13 | 5.01 | 4.87 | 4.98 |
| Mar-13 | 5.03 | 4.89 | 4.92 |
| Apr-13 | 4.92 | 5.03 | 4.97 |
| May-13 | 5.00 | 5.20 | 5.18 |
| Jun-13 | 5.27 | 4.99 | 5.08 |
| Jul-13 | 5.13 | 5.33 | 5.39 |
| Aug-13 | 5.25 | 5.35 | 5.48 |
| Sep-13 | 5.30 | 5.26 | 5.29 |
| Oct-13 | 5.13 | 5.08 | 5.12 |
| Nov-13 | 5.02 | 4.98 | 4.90 |
| Dec-13 | 4.90 | 4.96 | 4.87 |
| Jan-14 | 4.70 | 4.67 | 4.62 |
| Feb-14 | 4.64 | 4.60 | 4.60 |
| Mar-14 | 4.56 | 4.64 | 4.59 |
| Apr-14 | 4.67 | 4.70 | 4.65 |
| May-14 | 4.75 | 4.81 | 4.89 |
| Jun-14 | 4.99 | 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Jul-14 | 5.00 | 5.09 | 5.15 |
| Aug-14 | 5.18 | 5.12 | 5.05 |
| Sep-14 | 5.09 | 5.14 | 5.17 |
| Oct-14 | 5.15 | 5.28 | 5.26 |
| Nov-14 | 5.20 | 4.90 | 4.93 |
| Dec-14 | 5.05 | 5.15 | 5.04 |
| Jan-15 | 5.00 | 4.90 | 4.82 |
| Feb-15 | 4.94 | 4.87 | 4.88 |
| Mar-15 | 5.04 | 5.18 | 5.19 |
| Apr-15 | 5.22 | 5.20 | 5.04 |
| May-15 | 5.25 | 5.29 | 5.35 |
| Jun-15 | 5.40 | 5.45 | 5.49 |
| Jul-15 | 5.41 | 5.64 | 5.59 |
| Aug-15 | 5.50 | 5.54 | 5.31 |
| Sep-15 | 5.35 | 5.56 | 5.55 |
| Oct-15 | 5.41 | 5.33 | 5.36 |
| Nov-15 | 5.32 | 4.97 | 4.76 |
| Dec-15 | 5.19 | 5.36 | 5.46 |
| Jan-16 | 5.32 | 5.36 | 5.47 |
| Feb-16 | 5.30 | 5.20 | 5.08 |
| Mar-16 | 5.27 | 5.27 | 5.33 |
| Apr-16 | 5.40 | 5.44 | 5.45 |
| May-16 | 5.64 | 5.55 | 5.53 |
| Jun-16 | 5.48 | 5.62 | 5.57 |
| Jul-16 | 5.52 | 5.41 | 5.39 |
| Aug-16 | 5.44 | 5.49 | 5.33 |
| Sep-16 | 5.35 | 5.55 | 5.47 |
| Oct-16 | 5.44 | 5.47 | 5.60 |
| Nov-16 | 5.54 | 5.60 | 5.61 |
| Dec-16 | 5.54 | 5.55 | 5.49 |
| Jan-17 | 5.55 | 5.60 | 5.69 |
| Feb-17 | 5.55 | 5.41 | 5.48 |
| Mar-17 | 5.61 | 5.74 | 5.71 |
| Apr-17 | 5.67 | 5.56 | 5.57 |
| May-17 | 5.55 | 5.65 | 5.62 |
| Jun-17 | 5.58 | 5.59 | 5.52 |
| Jul-17 | 5.57 | 5.38 | 5.44 |
| Aug-17 | 5.48 | 5.39 | 5.35 |
| Sep-17 | 5.30 | 5.38 | 5.39 |
| Oct-17 | 5.30 | 5.60 | 5.48 |
| Nov-17 | 5.52 | 5.77 | 5.81 |
| Dec-17 | 5.75 | 5.66 | 5.57 |
| Jan-18 | 5.65 | 5.48 | --- |
| 1NAR initially reported before revisions. | |||
Sunday, February 18, 2018
Goldman: "Federal fiscal policy is entering uncharted territory"
by Calculated Risk on 2/18/2018 08:02:00 PM
A few excerpts from a note by Goldman Sachs economists: What’s Wrong with Fiscal Policy?
Federal fiscal policy is entering uncharted territory. ... While most of the recent fiscal expansion has not come as a surprise to us, this nevertheless raises new questions about the plan for US fiscal policy.CR Note: The Federal government is the only entity that can run counter cyclical fiscal policy during a recession (increase spending to offset the downturn). State and local governments cut spending during a recession, as do households. Standard policy would be to reduce the Federal deficit in the later stages of an expansion, and then increase the deficit during the next downturn. The opposite of the current fiscal policy.
The Treasury continues to borrow at low rates and it should be able to do so for a while even if market rates move higher in our view, thanks to a nearly 6-year average maturity of outstanding debt. ... In the past, as the economy strengthens and the debt burden increases, Congress has responded by raising taxes and cutting spending. This time around, the opposite has occurred. ...
While the continued growth of public debt raises eventual sustainability questions if left unchecked, we note that the level of debt at the moment is within the range of several other DM economies, albeit at the high end of the range. Where the US is more of an outlier is in its cyclically adjusted deficit.
The fiscal expansion should boost growth by around 0.7pp in 2018 and 0.6pp in 2019, but will likely come to an end after that ... the growth effect comes from the change in the deficit ... some of the recent deficit expansion relates to changes unlikely to be repeated, such as the temporarily large effect of certain tax provisions.
emphasis added
Current fiscal policy is really in "uncharted territory".
Phoenix Real Estate in January: Sales up 3%, Inventory down 11% YoY
by Calculated Risk on 2/18/2018 10:04:00 AM
This is a key housing market to follow since Phoenix saw a large bubble / bust followed by strong investor buying.
The Arizona Regional Multiple Listing Service (ARMLS) reports (table below):
1) Overall sales in January were up 2.8% year-over-year (including homes, condos and manufactured homes).
2) Active inventory is now down 10.7% year-over-year.
More inventory (a theme in most of 2014) - and less investor buying - suggested price increases would slow in 2014. And prices increases did slow in 2014, only increasing 2.4% according to Case-Shiller.
In 2015, with falling inventory, prices increased a little faster. Prices were up 6.3% in 2015 according to Case-Shiller. With flat inventory in 2016, prices were up 4.8%.
This is the fifteenth consecutive month with a YoY decrease in inventory, and prices rose a little faster in 2017 compared to 2016 (5.0% through November or 5.5% annual rate).
| January Residential Sales and Inventory, Greater Phoenix Area, ARMLS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | YoY Change Sales | Cash Sales | Percent Cash | Active Inventory | YoY Change Inventory | |
| Jan-08 | 2,907 | --- | 553 | 19.0% | 56,8741 | --- |
| Jan-09 | 4,736 | 62.9% | 1,625 | 34.3% | 53,581 | -5.8% |
| Jan-10 | 5,789 | 22.2% | 2,475 | 42.8% | 41,506 | -22.5% |
| Jan-11 | 6,539 | 13.0% | 3,263 | 49.9% | 42,881 | 3.3% |
| Jan-12 | 6,455 | -1.3% | 3,198 | 49.5% | 25,025 | -41.6% |
| Jan-13 | 5,790 | -10.3% | 2,555 | 44.1% | 22,090 | -11.7% |
| Jan-14 | 4,799 | -17.1% | 1,740 | 36.3% | 28,630 | 29.6% |
| Jan-15 | 4,785 | -0.3% | 1,529 | 32.0% | 27,238 | -4.9% |
| Jan-16 | 5,199 | 8.7% | 1,425 | 27.4% | 25,736 | -5.5% |
| Jan-17 | 6,028 | 15.9% | 1,631 | 27.1% | 23,762 | -7.7% |
| Jan-18 | 6,197 | 2.8% | 1,668 | 26.9% | 21,226 | -10.7% |
| 1 January 2008 probably included pending listings | ||||||
Saturday, February 17, 2018
Schedule for Week of Feb 18, 2018
by Calculated Risk on 2/17/2018 08:11:00 AM
The key economic report this week is January existing home sales.
All US markets are closed in observance of the Presidents' Day holiday.
No major economic releases scheduled.
7:00 AM ET: The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will release the results for the mortgage purchase applications index.
10:00 AM: Existing Home Sales for January from the National Association of Realtors (NAR). The consensus is for 5.65 million SAAR, up from 5.57 million in December.The graph shows existing home sales from 1994 through the report last month.
Housing economist Tom Lawler expects the NAR to report sales of 5.48 million SAAR for January.
During the day: The AIA's Architecture Billings Index for January (a leading indicator for commercial real estate).
2:00 PM: FOMC Minutes, Meeting of January 30-31, 2018
8:30 AM ET: The initial weekly unemployment claims report will be released. The consensus is for 230 thousand initial claims, unchanged from 230 thousand the previous week.
11:00 AM: the Kansas City Fed manufacturing survey for February.
No major economic releases scheduled.
Friday, February 16, 2018
Oil Rigs "Continued gains in rig counts"
by Calculated Risk on 2/16/2018 07:42:00 PM
A few comments from Steven Kopits of Princeton Energy Advisors LLC on Feb 16, 2018:
• Total US oil rigs saw another solid week, +7 to 798
• Horizontal oil rigs were up even better, +10 to 696
...
• All the action was in the inscrutable ‘Other’ plays, which added 12 horizontal oil rigs, compared to a loss of 2 across the major plays
• The oil price stabilized this past week, and the Brent spread has recovered a bit to about $3.30 / barrel
Click on graph for larger image.CR note: This graph shows the US horizontal rig count by basin.
Graph and comments Courtesy of Steven Kopits of Princeton Energy Advisors LLC.
Lawler: Early Read on Existing Home Sales in January
by Calculated Risk on 2/16/2018 03:35:00 PM
From housing economist Tom Lawler:
Based on publicly-available local realtor/MLS reports from across the country released through today, I project that existing home sales as estimated by the National Association of Realtors ran at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.48 million in January, down 1.6% from December’s preliminary estimate and down 3.7% from last January’s seasonally-adjusted pace. Unadjusted sales should show a much smaller YOY decline, reflecting the higher business day count this January compared to last January.
(Note that the January EHS report will include updated seasonal factors which will result in revisions to the seasonally-adjusted data for the past several years. I have attempted to incorporate seasonal factor revisions in my forecast).
On the inventory front, realtor/MLS data suggest that home listings showed a smaller YOY decline last month compared to December, and my “best guess” is that the NAR’s estimate of the inventory of existing homes for sale in January will be 1.54 million, up 4.1% from the December estimate and down 8.3% from a year ago.
Finally, local realtor/MLS data would be consistent with a YOY increase in the NAR’s estimate of the median existing SF home sales price of about 6.5%.
CR Note: Existing home sales for December are scheduled to be released on Wednesday, February 21st. The consensus is for sales of 5.60 million SAAR.
Quarterly Housing Starts by Intent, Q4 2017
by Calculated Risk on 2/16/2018 01:22:00 PM
In addition to housing starts for January, the Census Bureau also released the Q4 "Started and Completed by Purpose of Construction" report today.
It is important to remember that we can't directly compare single family housing starts to new home sales. For starts of single family structures, the Census Bureau includes owner built units and units built for rent that are not included in the new home sales report. For an explanation, see from the Census Bureau: Comparing New Home Sales and New Residential Construction
We are often asked why the numbers of new single-family housing units started and completed each month are larger than the number of new homes sold. This is because all new single-family houses are measured as part of the New Residential Construction series (starts and completions), but only those that are built for sale are included in the New Residential Sales series.However it is possible to compare "Single Family Starts, Built for Sale" to New Home sales on a quarterly basis.
The quarterly report released today showed there were 149,000 single family starts, built for sale, in Q4 2017, and that was above the 139,000 new homes sold for the same quarter, so inventory increased in Q4 (Using Not Seasonally Adjusted data for both starts and sales).
This graph shows the NSA quarterly intent for four start categories since 1975: single family built for sale, owner built (includes contractor built for owner), starts built for rent, and condos built for sale.
Click on graph for larger image.Single family starts built for sale were up about 8% compared to Q4 2016.
Owner built starts were mostly unchanged year-over-year. And condos built for sale not far above the record low. (this is curious).
The 'units built for rent' (blue) has increased significantly in recent years, but is now moving more sideways.
Comments on January Housing Starts
by Calculated Risk on 2/16/2018 10:50:00 AM
Earlier: Housing Starts increased to 1.326 Million Annual Rate in January
The housing starts report released this morning showed starts were up 9.7% in January compared to December, and starts were up 7.3% year-over-year compared to January 2017.
This first graph shows the month to month comparison between 2017 (blue) and 2017 (red).
Click on graph for larger image.
Starts were up 7.3% in January compared to January 2017.
Total starts are up 18.1% compared to January 2016 (two years ago). That is solid growth.
Single family starts were up 7.6% year-over-year, and up 3.6% compared to December.
Multi-family starts were up 6.7% year-over-year, and up 23.7% compared to December (multi-family is volatile month-to-month).
Below is an update to the graph comparing multi-family starts and completions. Since it usually takes over a year on average to complete a multi-family project, there is a lag between multi-family starts and completions. Completions are important because that is new supply added to the market, and starts are important because that is future new supply (units under construction is also important for employment).
These graphs use a 12 month rolling total for NSA starts and completions.
The blue line is for multifamily starts and the red line is for multifamily completions.
The rolling 12 month total for starts (blue line) increased steadily over the last few years - but has turned down recently. Completions (red line) have lagged behind - and completions have caught up to starts (more deliveries).
Completions lag starts by about 12 months, so completions will probably turn down in a year or so.
As I've been noting for a couple of years, the growth in multi-family starts is behind us - multi-family starts peaked in June 2015 (at 510 thousand SAAR).
The second graph shows single family starts and completions. It usually only takes about 6 months between starting a single family home and completion - so the lines are much closer. The blue line is for single family starts and the red line is for single family completions.
Note the low level of single family starts and completions. The "wide bottom" was what I was forecasting following the recession, and now I expect a few more years of increasing single family starts and completions.
