by Calculated Risk on 4/12/2012 11:42:00 AM

In FHFA acting director Ed DeMarco's speech on Tuesday, he discussed the risk of "strategic modifiers". Felix Salmon and I have been discussing this via email. Here is Salmon's post this morning: Ed DeMarco and the spectre of strategic modifiers

A couple of definitions: A "strategic defaulter" is a borrower who is underwater on their home mortgage (they owe more than the house is worth), and who is willing to walk away from their home, even though they have the capacity to make the payments. Strategic defaulters intend to go to foreclosure - and probably will - even if offered a modification.

A "strategic modifier" is a borrower who intends to stay in their home, but is willing to miss some payments to qualify for a loan modification.

Salmon writes:

I don’t believe that the problem of strategic modifiers (over and above the problem of strategic defaulters) is likely to be huge. One reason is that I’ve been writing about the upside of strategic default for a long time, and it really hasn’t caught on, outside a few second homes and the like. Strategic default is not something that Americans like to do, and one of the main reasons is that they really care about their credit rating. Even if a strategic modifier keeps her house, she’ll suffer the same hit to her credit rating as a strategic defaulter would. And people don’t like that at all.

I disagree somewhat. First, someone who goes to foreclosure will take a much larger hit to their credit than someone who misses a few payments. So there is a difference - "strategic modifiers" will not take the same credit hit as "strategic defaulters".

Second, I think most people feel an obligation to pay their mortgage, if they can, even if they owe more than their home is worth. But some of those same people will be willing to stand in the "free money" line (principal reduction), even if that means missing a few payments.

So, depending on the guidelines, I think there will be a higher percentage of "strategic modifiers" than "strategic defaulters".

Salmon concludes:

[L]et’s try principal reductions in the real world, and see what happens. If they turn out to be incredibly expensive, then we can revisit the issue. But my guess for the most likely outcome is not a wave of strategic modifiers. Rather, it’s that the program turns out to be much like all other government attempts to deal with underwater borrowers: a damp squib where very little happens at all.

I think some sort of principal reduction program will be announced, with tight guidelines, but I agree with Salmon, I expect the program will have little impact.

by Calculated Risk on 4/12/2012 09:09:00 AM

The Department of Commerce reported:

[T]otal February exports of $181.2 billion and imports of $227.2 billion resulted in a goods and services deficit of $46.0 billion, down from $52.5 billion in January, revised. February exports were $0.2 billion more than January exports of $180.9 billion. February imports were $6.3 billion less than January imports of $233.4 billion

The trade deficit was well below the consensus forecast of $51.7 billion.

The first graph shows the monthly U.S. exports and imports in dollars through January 2012.

Click on graph for larger image.

Exports increased slightly in February, while imports decreased sharply. Exports are well above the pre-recession peak and up 9% compared to February 2011; imports are near the pre-recession high and imports are up about 8% compared to February 2011.

The second graph shows the U.S. trade deficit, with and without petroleum, through February.

The blue line is the total deficit, and the black line is the petroleum deficit, and the red line is the trade deficit ex-petroleum products.

Oil averaged $103.63 per barrel in February, down slightly from January. The decline in imports was a combination of less petroleum imports and less imports from China.

Exports to the European Union were $22.5 billion in February, up from $20.0 billion in February 2011.

by Calculated Risk on 4/12/2012 08:30:00 AM

The DOL reports:

In the week ending April 7, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 380,000, an increase of 13,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 367,000. The 4-week moving average was 368,500, an increase of 4,250 from the previous week's revised average of 364,250.

The previous week was revised up to 367,000 from 357,000.

The following graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since January 2000.

Click on graph for larger image.

The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims increased to 368,500.

The 4-week moving average has been moving sideways at this level for about two months.

And here is a long term graph of weekly claims:



This is the highest level for weekly claims since January.

All current Employment Graphs

by Calculated Risk on 4/12/2012 12:01:00 AM

From RealtyTrac: Q1 2012 Foreclosure Activity Lowest Since Q4 2007

RealtyTrac ... today released its U.S. Foreclosure Market Report™ for the first quarter of 2012, which shows foreclosure filings — default notices, scheduled auctions and bank repossessions — were reported on 572,928 properties during the quarter, down 2 percent from the previous quarter and down 16 percent from the first quarter of 2011.

The first quarter total was the lowest quarterly total since the fourth quarter of 2007, when 527,740 properties with foreclosure filings were reported.

Foreclosure filings were reported on 198,853 U.S. properties in March, a 4 percent decrease from February and a 17 percent decrease from March 2011. March’s total was the lowest monthly total since July 2007, and also the first monthly total below 200,000 since July 2007.

“The low foreclosure numbers in the first quarter are not an indication that the massive reservoir of distressed properties built up over the past few years has somehow miraculously evaporated,” said Brandon Moore, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “There are hairline cracks in the dam, evident in the sizable foreclosure activity increases in judicial foreclosure states over the past several months, along with an increase in foreclosure starts in many judicial and non-judicial states in March. The dam may not burst in the next 30 to 45 days, but it will eventually burst, and everyone downstream should be prepared for that to happen — both in terms of new foreclosure activity and new short sale activity.”
...
The nationwide decrease in foreclosure activity was caused primarily by decreasing activity in states that use the non-judicial foreclosure process. These 24 states combined, along with the District of Columbia, had 329,854 properties with foreclosure filings during the quarter, more than half the national total — but a decrease of 8 percent from the previous quarter and a decrease of 28 percent from the first quarter of 2011.
...
Meanwhile foreclosure activity increased in states that primarily use the judicial foreclosure process. These 26 states combined accounted for 243,074 properties with foreclosure filings during the quarter, an increase of 8 percent from the previous quarter and an increase of 10 percent from the first quarter of 2011.

Judicial states posting some of the biggest year-over-year increases in foreclosure activity in the first quarter included Indiana (up 45 percent), Connecticut (up 38 percent), Massachusetts (up 26 percent), Florida (up 26 percent), South Carolina (up 26 percent), and Pennsylvania (up 23 percent).

The mortgage settlement was just signed off last week, so we really have to wait until April or May to see the impact of the settlement. Obviously RealtyTrac thinks the dam is about to burst and the market will be flooded again with foreclosures. My feeling is this will have more of an impact on the judicial states because of the huge backlog in those states.

by Calculated Risk on 4/11/2012 07:15:00 PM

Fed Vice Chair Janet Yellen argues that the Fed is falling "far short" of the "maximum employment objective", and that inflation will be "at or below the FOMC's longer-run goal of 2 percent". She discusses reasons for considering keeping the Fed funds rate close to zero "until late 2015" as opposed to the current 2014.

On QE3, she discussed additional stimulus "if the recovery faltered or inflation drifted down", but then added "doing so involves costs and risks."

From Fed Vice Chair Janet Yellen: The Economic Outlook and Monetary Policy. Excerpt:

I see no good reason to doubt that our nation's high unemployment rate indicates a substantial degree of slack in the labor market. Moreover, while I recognize the significant uncertainty surrounding such forecasts, I anticipate that growth in real gross domestic product (GDP) will be sufficient to lower unemployment only gradually from this point forward, in part because substantial headwinds continue to restrain the recovery.

One headwind comes from the housing sector, which has typically been a driver of business cycle recoveries. We have seen some improvement recently, but demand for housing is likely to pick up only gradually given still-elevated unemployment, uncertainties over the direction of house prices, and mortgage credit availability that seems likely to remain very restricted for all but the most creditworthy buyers. When housing demand does pick up more noticeably, the huge overhang of both unoccupied dwellings and homes in the foreclosure pipeline will likely allow demand to be met for a time without a sizable expansion in homebuilding.

A second headwind comes from fiscal policy. State and local governments continue to face extremely tight budget situations in light of the weak economy, depressed home prices, and the phasing out of federal stimulus grants, though overall tax revenues have been improving and that should continue as the economy expands further. At the federal level, stimulus-related policies are scheduled to wind down, while both real defense and nondefense purchases are expected to decline over the next several years under the spending caps put in place last year.

A third factor weighing on the outlook is the sluggish pace of economic growth abroad. Strains in global financial markets have eased somewhat since late last year, an improvement that reflects in part policy actions taken by European authorities. Nonetheless, risk premiums on sovereign debt and other securities are still elevated in many European countries, while European banks continue to face pressure to shrink their balance sheets, and concerns about the outlook for the region remain. A further slowdown in economic activity in Europe and in other foreign economies would inhibit U.S. export growth.

For these reasons, I anticipate that the U.S. economy will continue to recover only gradually and that labor market slack will remain substantial for a number of years to come.

And on inflation:

Let me now turn to inflation. Overall consumer price inflation has fluctuated quite a bit in recent years, largely reflecting movements in prices for oil and other commodities. ...

In my view, the subdued inflation environment largely reflects two factors. First, the substantial slack in the labor market has restrained inflation by holding down labor costs. Second, and of critical importance, longer-term inflation expectations have been remarkably stable.

Conclusion:

In summary, I expect the economic recovery to continue--indeed, to strengthen somewhat over time. Even so, over the next several years, I anticipate that we will fall far short in achieving our maximum employment objective, and I expect inflation to remain at or below the FOMC's longer-run goal of 2 percent.

by Calculated Risk on 4/11/2012 02:00:00 PM

Fed's Beige Book:

Reports from the twelve Federal Reserve Districts indicated that the economy continued to expand at a modest to moderate pace from mid-February through late March. Activity in the Boston, Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, and San Francisco Districts grew at a moderate pace, while Cleveland and St. Louis cited modest growth. New York reported that economic growth picked up somewhat. Philadelphia and Richmond cited improving business conditions. The economy in Minneapolis grew at a solid pace and Kansas City's economy expanded at a faster pace.

And on real estate:

Residential real estate activity improved in most Districts, though Cleveland and San Francisco noted that activity remained lackluster or at low levels. The St. Louis and Minneapolis Districts reported increases in building permits. The construction of multi-family housing units, including apartments and senior housing, expanded in many Districts. Home prices continued to decline in Boston, New York, and Minneapolis, but were largely flat in San Francisco. Contacts in Boston, Philadelphia, and Kansas City indicated that mild weather had boosted real estate activity.

Non-residential construction activity improved in the Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, and St. Louis Districts, though many of these contacts characterized the improvement as slow. Boston, New York, and San Francisco characterized non-residential real estate activity as unchanged or steady. The energy and high-tech sectors were driving much of the demand in the Dallas District. San Francisco noted a rise in the demand for office space from the technology sector. Cleveland and Chicago saw a boost in healthcare-related construction. Projects related to the education sector are showing growth in Boston, Cleveland, Philadelphia, and Richmond. The outlook of builders is described as positive or slowly improving in the Philadelphia, Cleveland, Atlanta, and Kansas City Districts, and as cautiously optimistic in Boston.

Prepared by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland based on information collected on or before April 2, 2012. Mostly sluggish growth, but some positive comments on residential real estate ...

by Calculated Risk on 4/11/2012 11:38:00 AM

BLS economist Mitra Toossi released some new projections for the participation rate as of January 2012: Labor force projections to 2020: a more slowly growing workforce. This post updates a couple of graphs with these projections.

A key issue is what will happen to the labor force participation rate as the economy slowly recovers. In 2010 I looked at some of the cyclical and long term trends for the participation rate: Labor Force Participation Rate: What will happen? I concluded that a majority of the recent decline in the participation rate is due to changes in demographics.

Changes in population and the participation rate can significantly impact the unemployment rate. If the Civilian noninstitutional population (over 16 years old) grows by about 2 million per year - and the participation rate stays flat - the economy will need to add about 94 thousand jobs per month to keep the unemployment rate steady at 8.2%.

However if the population grows faster (say 2.5 million per year), and/or the participation rate rises, it could take significantly more jobs per month to hold the unemployment rate steady. As an example, if the working age population grows 2.5 million per year and the participation rate rises to 65% (from 63.8%) over the next two years, the economy will need to add 227 thousand jobs per month to hold the unemployment rate steady.

A big difference!

Note: These calculations were done with the Atlanta Fed Jobs Calculator.

That is why forecasting the participation rate is important - and why reports of the number of jobs needed to hold the unemployment rate steady are all over the place and can be very confusing.

Here is an update to a couple of graphs based on Toossi's projections.

Click on graph for larger image.

Note that Toossi is expecting a couple of recent trends to continue: lower participation rates for people in the 16 to 24 year age group (I think this decline is mostly due to more people attending college), and an increase in the participation for older age groups (I think this increase is due to several factors including less physically strenuous jobs, and, unfortunately, financial need).

The second graph shows the actual annual participation rate and two forecasts based on changes in demographics. Now that the leading edge of the baby boom generation is starting to retire, the participation rate is declining and will probably continue to decline for the next 20 years.

This suggests that any bounceback in the participation rate as the economy recovers will probably be fairly small, and the number of jobs needed to hold the unemployment rate steady is probably closer to 100 thousand per month than the frequently report 150+ thousand per month.

Here is the paper with the longer term projection, from Austin State University Professor Robert Szafran in September 2002: Age-adjusted labor force participation rates, 1960–2045 (these projections were made before the recession).

by Calculated Risk on 4/11/2012 08:29:00 AM

From the MBA: Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey

The Refinance Index decreased 3.1 percent from the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 0.5 percent from one week earlier. ... There was no adjustment made for Good Friday.

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($417,500 or less) decreased to 4.10 percent from 4.16 percent, with points remaining unchanged at 0.43 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value ratio (LTV) loans. This is the lowest 30-year fixed rate since March 9, 2012.

Yesterday, the FHFA acting director Ed DeMarco commented on HARP refinances:

"[M]any of the largest lenders are seeing tremendous homeowner interest [in HARP]. FHFA and the Enterprises expect the volume of HARP loans to increase in the very near future."

by Calculated Risk on 4/10/2012 07:29:00 PM

Here is a very good overview (and fairly short) of US mortgage and foreclosure law by Zachary Kimball and Paul Willen at The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics.

This article discusses title and liens, the differences between judicial states and non-judicial states, judgments and recourse, the Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS) and much more.

Here is an excerpt:

Two types of foreclosure by sale emerged in US law. The first is foreclosure by judicial sale, in which the lender petitions the court and the court orders a foreclosure auction. Judicial sale is available in every jurisdiction. The alternative approach is that, when the mortgage is originated, the borrower gives the lender the right to carry out a foreclosure auction in the event of default, a right known as the ‘power of sale’ (Osborne, 1951, p. 992). Although rare in the early 19th century, power-of-sale foreclosure became more common in the USA over time (Osborne, 1951, p. 993).

Power-of-sale foreclosure is available in a majority of states. In general, states in the south and west of the country offer power of sale and states in the north and east are judicial; whether power-of-sale or judicial foreclosure is the preferred method aligns almost exactly with whether the state follows title or lien theory, respectively. Of the states with the most severe foreclosure problems in the current crisis, Arizona, California and Nevada all allow power-of-sale foreclosure, while Florida only allows judicial foreclosure. Other notable judicial states include Illinois, New York and New Jersey. For fuller discussion of judicial and power-of-sale foreclosure, see Gerardi et al. (2011) and National Consumer Law Center (2010).

by Calculated Risk on 4/10/2012 04:45:00 PM

This is a key distressed market to follow since Las Vegas has seen the largest price decline of any of the Case-Shiller composite 20 cities. Prices, as of the January report, were off 61.8% from the peak according to Case-Shiller, and off 9.1% over the last year.

Sales in 2011 were at record levels - even more than during the bubble - and it looks like 2012 will be an even stronger year, even with some new rules that slow the foreclosure process.

From the LVGAR: GLVAR reports local home prices, sales rising as inventory shrinks

According to GLVAR, the total number of local homes, condominiums and townhomes sold in March was 4,388. That’s up from 3,794 in February, and up from 4,316 total sales in March 2011.
...
Compared to one year ago, home sales were up 4.4 percent, while condo and townhome sales were down 8.4 percent.
...
The total number of homes listed for sale on GLVAR’s Multiple Listing Service again decreased from February to March, with a total of 18,200 single-family homes listed for sale at the end of the month. That’s down 3.6 percent from 18,870 single-family homes listed for sale at the end of February and down 18.0 percent from one year ago.
...
By the end of March, GLVAR reported 4,901 single-family homes listed without any sort of offer. That’s down 25.1 percent from 6,543 such homes listed in February and down 56.8 percent from one year ago.
...
“Our inventory is really dropping,” said GLVAR President Kolleen Kelley, a longtime local REALTOR®. “Based on current demand, we’re looking at a six-week supply of homes on the market. This is making new homes more attractive and creating a window of opportunity for home builders.”

Economist Tom Lawler sent me the following table for several distressed areas that have reported so far for March.

CR Note: This could be very useful data over the next several months (and years) as we try to track the impact of the mortgage servicer settlement and to see if the markets are improving. For all of the areas, the distressed share of sales is down from March 2011, the share of short sales has increased and the share of foreclosure sales are down - and down significantly in some areas.

Look at Phoenix: Short sales have increased from 19.1% to 25.7%, and foreclosures have declined from 46.2% to 21.1%.

Note: The table is a percentage of total sales.

	Short Sales Share		Foreclosure Sales Share		Total "Distressed" Share
	12-Mar	11-Mar	12-Mar	11-Mar	12-Mar	11-Mar
Las Vegas	26.6%	23.6%	40.7%	47.6%	67.3%	71.2%
Reno	34.0%	30.0%	32.0%	41.0%	66.0%	71.0%
Phoenix	25.7%	19.1%	21.1%	46.2%	46.7%	65.3%
Mid-Atlantic (MRIS)	13.2%	13.1%	14.7%	26.3%	27.9%	39.5%

by Calculated Risk on 4/10/2012 02:43:00 PM

From Andrew Ross at the San Francisco Chronicle: Hot 'spec' deal 1st in S.F. since recession began

It's not every day that a parking lot goes for $41 million. In cash.
...
Late last week, New York's Tishman Speyer Properties closed escrow on the space, which, by the end of next year will be transformed into a 10-story, 286,000-square-foot office building ...

Two distinguishing aspects of the deal: It's the first "spec development" (i.e. built from the ground up with no signed tenants) in the city since the onset of the recession in 2007, and no debt financing is involved. The land, architectural plans and construction costs - the latter estimated between $180 million and $185 million - is "funded with all equity," said [Allen Palmer, managing director at Tishman Speyer's San Francisco office].

Last week Reis reported that the office vacancy rate (major markets) declined slightly to 17.2% in Q1 from 17.3% in Q4 2011. Reis noted:

Weak supply growth remains a tailwind for improvement in the office sector. During the first quarter of 2012 only 1.917 million square feet of office space were completed [in the markets Reis tracks]. This represents the lowest quarterly level on record since Reis began tracking quarterly market data in 1999.

There has been some new construction here and there (like the PIMCO tower in Newport Beach), but very little spec building. And this building in San Francisco is being built with no financing.

by Calculated Risk on 4/10/2012 10:20:00 AM

From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary

The number of job openings in February was 3.5 million, little changed from January. Although the number of job openings remained below the 4.3 million openings when the recession began in December 2007, the number of job openings has increased 46 percent since the end of the recession in June 2009.
...
In February, the hires rate was essentially unchanged at 3.3 percent
for total nonfarm. ... The quits rate can serve as a measure of workers’ willingness or ability to change jobs. In February, the quits rate was little changed for total nonfarm, total private, and government. The
number of quits rose to 2.1 million in February from 1.8 million at the end of the recession in June 2009, although it remained below the 2.9 million recorded when the recession began in December 2007.

The following graph shows job openings (yellow line), hires (dark blue), Layoff, Discharges and other (red column), and Quits (light blue column) from the JOLTS.

This is a new series and only started in December 2000.

Note: The difference between JOLTS hires and separations is similar to the CES (payroll survey) net jobs headline numbers. This report is for February, the most recent employment report was for March.

Click on graph for larger image.

Notice that hires (dark blue) and total separations (red and light blue columns stacked) are pretty close each month. When the blue line is above the two stacked columns, the economy is adding net jobs - when it is below the columns, the economy is losing jobs.

Jobs openings increased slightly in February, and the number of job openings (yellow) has generally been trending up, and are up about 16% year-over-year compared to February 2011.

Quits increased in February, and quits are now up about 9% year-over-year and quits are now at the highest level since 2008. These are voluntary separations and more quits might indicate some improvement in the labor market. (see light blue columns at bottom of graph for trend for "quits").
All current employment graphs

by Calculated Risk on 4/10/2012 09:33:00 AM

UPDATE: Here are DeMarco's Remarks as Prepared for Delivery (with table and figures)
Some key comments on "strategic modifiers":

As I have noted the NPV results alone are not the sole basis for the decision on whether the Enterprises should pursue principal forgiveness. One factor that needs to be considered is the borrower incentive effects. That means, will some percentage of borrowers who are current on their loans, be encouraged to either claim a hardship or actually go delinquent to capture the benefits of principal forgiveness?

This is a particular concern for the Enterprises because unlike other mortgage market participants that can pick and choose where principal forgiveness makes sense, the Enterprises must develop the program to be implemented by more than one thousand seller/servicers. In addition, the Enterprises will have to publicly announce this program and borrower awareness of the possibility of receiving a principal reduction modification will be heightened among Enterprise borrowers. So as opposed to more targeted individual efforts, or the current opacity of the HAMP process, there is a greater possibility that borrower incentive effects would take place on an Enterprise-wide principal forgiveness program.

It is difficult to model these borrower incentive effects with any precision. What we can do is give a sense of how many current borrowers would have to become “strategic modifiers” for the NPV economic benefit provided by the HAMP triple PRA incentives to be eliminated. In this context, a “strategic modifier” would be a borrower that either claims a financial hardship or misses two consecutive mortgage payments in order to attempt to qualify for HAMP and a principal forgiveness modification.

Here is the webcast for the Speech by FHFA acting director Edward DeMarco: "Addressing the Weak Housing Market: Is Principal Reduction the Answer?" at the The Brookings Institution, 1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, DC.

Following the speech, there will be a discussion including
Moderator: Ted Gayer, Brookings Co-Director, Economic Studies

Mark Fleming, Chief Economist, CoreLogic

Paul Nikodem, Executive Director, Head of Mortgage Credit Research, Nomura Securities International

Anthony B. Sanders, Professor, George Mason University

Andrew Jakabovics, Senior Director, Policy Development and Research, Enterprise Community Partners, Inc.

by Calculated Risk on 4/10/2012 08:39:00 AM

From the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB): After Six Months of Increases, Small-Business Optimism Drops For Main Street, No New Jobs in the Months to Come

After six months of gains, the Small-Business Optimism Index fell by almost 2 points in March, settling at 92.5. After a promising start to the year, nine of ten index components dropped last month, most notably hiring plans and expected real sales growth each taking a significant dive, in spite of owners reporting the largest increase in new jobs per firm in a year.
...
Job creation in March was the bright spot in this month’s Index; the net change in employment per firm seasonally adjusted was 0.22, far above January’s “0” reading.
...
A lack of sales remains a problem for owners with 22 percent reporting “poor sales” as their top business problem.

Note: Small businesses have a larger percentage of real estate and retail related companies than the overall economy.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the small business optimism index since 1986. The index declined to 92.5 in March from 94.3 in February. This is slightly above the 91.9 reported in March 2011.

This index remains low - probably due to a combination of sluggish growth, and the high concentration of real estate related companies in the index. And the single most important problem remains "poor sales".

by Calculated Risk on 4/09/2012 07:40:00 PM

From Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke: Fostering Financial Stability. A few excerpts on shadow banking:

I've outlined a number of ongoing efforts, both domestic and international, to bring the shadow banking system into the sunlight, so to speak, and to impose tougher standards on systemically important financial firms. But even as we make progress on known vulnerabilities, we must be mindful that our financial system is constantly evolving, and that unanticipated risks to stability will develop over time. Indeed, an inevitable side effect of new regulations is that the system will adapt in ways that push risk-taking from more-regulated to less-regulated areas, increasing the need for careful monitoring and supervision of the system as a whole.
...
Unfortunately, data on the shadow banking sector, by its nature, can be more difficult to obtain. Thus, we have to be more creative to monitor risk in this important area. We look at broad indicators of risk to the financial system, such as measures of risk premiums, asset valuations, and market functioning. We try to gauge the risk of runs by looking at indicators of leverage (both on and off balance sheet) and tracking short-term wholesale funding markets, especially for evidence of maturity mismatches between assets and liabilities. We are also developing new sources of information to improve the monitoring of leverage. For example, in 2010, we began a quarterly survey on dealer financing (the Senior Credit Officer Opinion Survey on Dealer Financing Terms) that collects information on the leverage that dealers provide to financial market participants in the repo and over-the-counter derivatives markets. In addition, we are working with other agencies to create a comprehensive set of regulatory data on hedge funds and private equity firms.

And his conclusion:

In the decades prior to the financial crisis, financial stability policy tended to be overshadowed by monetary policy, which had come to be viewed as the principal function of central banks. In the aftermath of the crisis, however, financial stability policy has taken on greater prominence and is now generally considered to stand on an equal footing with monetary policy as a critical responsibility of central banks. We have spent decades building and refining the infrastructure for conducting monetary policy. And although we have done much in a short time to improve our understanding of systemic risk and to incorporate a macroprudential perspective into supervision, our framework for conducting financial stability policy is not yet at the same level. Continuing to develop an effective set of macroprudential policy indicators and tools, while pursuing essential reforms to the financial system, is critical to preserving financial stability and supporting the U.S. economy.

Before the crisis, oversight and financial stability were not emphasized. Now the regulators are paying attention; hopefully, even after financial conditions finally recovers, regulators will remain vigilant (but I expect they will become complacent again).

by Calculated Risk on 4/09/2012 04:31:00 PM

High gasoline and oil prices are a downside risk for the economy. So far - as Professor Hamilton noted in the previous post - prices haven't been too "disruptive". With Memorial Day still a month and a half away (May 28th), and it seems a little early to call the peak in gasoline prices for the spring ...

From Ronald White at the LA Times: Gasoline prices may have finally peaked for now

[T]he uncertainty over whether prices have peaked comes from the fact that 15 of the 23 states with the most expensive gasoline are still higher than they were at this time last week. Still, there was some guarded optimism among analysts.

"Gasoline prices in the hardest-hit areas have finally shown signs of relief with prices falling now in Chicago as they have for a few weeks in California," said Patrick DeHaan, senior petroleum analyst for GasBuddy.com. "We may see an earlier peak than we have in prior years."

From the Chicago Sun-Times: Gasoline prices in Chicago area fall double digits from record highs

In the Chicago area, the average price of unleaded regular gas Monday was $4.34 a gallon, down 17 cents from the record high of $4.506 reached March 27 and down 11 cents from April 2, according to AAA, Wright Express and the Oil Price Information Service.

In the city of Chicago, the average price was down 8 cents from a week earlier at $4.57 a gallon and down 11 cents from the record high of $4.678, also reached on March 27.

Note: The graph shows oil prices for WTI; gasoline prices in most of the U.S. are impacted more by Brent prices.

Orange County Historical Gas Price Charts Provided by GasBuddy.com

by Calculated Risk on 4/09/2012 01:27:00 PM

Professor Hamilton reviews the current situation at Econbrowser: Current economic conditions

An excerpt on the impact oil and gasoline prices:

One of the big concerns of many analysts was that rising oil prices of the last 5 months might significantly slow down economic growth. My view is that the main mechanism by which oil prices can sometimes have a disproportionately disruptive effect on the economy is if they result in sudden shifts in the patterns of spending. One typical channel is a plunge in sales of the larger vehicles manufactured in the U.S., which then leads to further losses of income and jobs in the auto sector. But the evidence suggests that an oil price increase that just reverses a previous oil price decrease-- and that is basically what we've experienced so far in 2012-- is not nearly as disruptive as if the price were rocketing into uncharted territory. One reason for this is that recent consumers' vehicle purchase plans were already taking into account the possibility that $4 gas could soon return.

See Hamilton's post for much more on oil.

Hamilton concludes: "the economy undeniably continues to grow, the rate of that growth continues to disappoint".

by Calculated Risk on 4/09/2012 09:14:00 AM

Notes: The timing of different house prices indexes can be a little confusing. LPS uses January closings - other indexes usually report sales recorded in a month, and there is frequently a lag between closings and recording - so this is closer to what other indexes report for February (without the weighting of several months).

From LPS: LPS Home Price Index Shows U.S. Home Price Decline of 0.9 Percent in January; Early Data Suggests Slowing Likely in February, to 0.3 Percent Drop

LPS ...that starting with this month’s report, results are based on an updated view that more accurately tracks price changes for non-distressed homes. In addition to foreclosure price data the LPS HPI now accounts for the impact of short sale on estimates of normal market prices.

The updated LPS HPI national average home price for transactions during January 2012 declined 0.9 percent to a price level not seen since March 2003.

LPS excludes both foreclosures and short sales from the index - so this is non-distressed properties only. From LPS:

Among the 26 MSAs for which LPS and the Bureau of Labor Statistics both provide data, average prices in January increased only in Washington, D.C.

Fourteen of these MSAs saw declines of more than 1.0%, and three, San Francisco, Cleveland and Chicago declined more than 1.5%.

Note: Based on early data, LPS expects to report prices fell 0.3% in February.

by Calculated Risk on 4/08/2012 10:31:00 PM

A couple of updates to the weekly schedule:
Monday: LPS House Price Index for January.

Tuesday, 9:30 AM ET: Speech by FHFA acting director Edward DeMarco: "Addressing the Weak Housing Market: Is Principal Reduction the Answer?" at the The Brookings Institution, 1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, DC.

The Spanish 10 year yield is up to 5.76%.

The Asian markets are red tonight. The Nikkei is down about 1.1%, the Shanghai Composite is down 0.6%.

From CNBC: Pre-Market Data and Bloomberg futures: the S&P 500 futures are down 17, and Dow futures are down 140.

Oil: WTI futures are down to $101.99 and Brent is down to $122.38 per barrel.

Yesterday:
• Summary for Week Ending April 6th
• Schedule for Week of April 8th

by Calculated Risk on 4/08/2012 01:01:00 PM

On Friday I noted that Reis reported the mall vacancy rate declined slightly in Q1. The strip mall vacancy rate declined to 10.9% from 11.0% in Q4 2011, and the regional mall vacancy rate declined to 9.0% from 9.2% in Q4.

Here are a few more comments and a long term graph from Reis.

Comments from Reis Senior Economist Ryan Severino:

[Strip mall] Vacancies finally began to fall during the first quarter, declining by 10 bps. This is the first quarterly decline in the vacancy rate since the second quarter of 2005. In the periods leading up to the recession, excess building was to blame for the increase in vacancies. Since the advent of the recession, supply growth has been virtually nonexistent, but anemic demand drove vacancies upward.

Despite the first quarterly decline in vacancy since 2005, Reis is not yet convinced that a recovery for shopping centers has commenced. However, this says just as much about the limited increases in supply as it does about resurgent demand. New completions remain near historically low levels. With such low levels of supply growth, any semblance of healthy demand would have pushed vacancy rates downward in a more pronounced fashion. ... With construction projected to remain at low levels, Reis expects vacancies to begin moving downwards slowly in 2012 as demand for space slowly begins to return.
...
Regional malls posted relatively healthy results in the first quarter, with national vacancies declining by 20 bps to 9.0% This was the second consecutive quarter of vacancy declines. Asking rents grew by 0.2%, marking the third consecutive quarter of rent increases. Although regional malls are faring better then neighborhood and community centers at this juncture, this has as much to do with supply as demand. While demand for malls, particularly higher‐quality malls, is arguably stronger than demand for neighborhood and community center space, regional malls did not experience massive supply increases before the recession the way neighborhood and community centers did. In fact, the first new regional mall in the U.S. in six years opened during the first quarter of 2012.

The outlook for 2012 remains muddled. Although demand appears to be gathering strength, the developments are not uniformly positive. Best Buy recently announced that it was closing 50 big‐box stores, but opening 100 new, smaller Best Buy Mobile stores. Although the net effect is a reduction in occupied square footage, it will have a detrimental impact on power centers while benefitting other subtypes such as regional malls.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the strip mall vacancy rate starting in 1980 (prior to 2000 the data is annual). The regional mall data starts in 2000. Back in the '80s, there was overbuilding in the mall sector even as the vacancy rate was rising. This was due to the very loose commercial lending that led to the S&L crisis.

In the '00s, mall investment picked up as mall builders followed the "roof tops" of the residential boom (more loose lending). This led to a higher vacancy rate even before the recession, and then a sharp increase during the recession and financial crisis.

Mall investment has essentially stopped following the financial crisis.

The good news is, as Severino noted, mall "completions remain near historically low levels", and the vacancy rate will probably continue to decline slowly.

Mall vacancy data courtesy of Reis.

Yesterday:
• Summary for Week Ending April 6th
• Schedule for Week of April 8th