by Calculated Risk on 3/11/2013 03:26:00 PM

Economist Tom Lawler sent me the table below of short sales and foreclosures for several selected cities in February. 

Look at the right two columns in the table below (Total "Distressed" Share for Feb 2013 compared to Feb 2012). In every area that has reported distressed sales so far, the share of distressed sales is down year-over-year - and down significantly in most areas. 

Also there has been a decline in foreclosure sales just about everywhere. Look at the middle two columns comparing foreclosure sales for Feb 2013 to Feb 2012. Foreclosure sales have declined in all these areas, and some of the declines have been stunning (the Nevada sales were impacted by the new foreclosure law). 

Also there has been a shift from foreclosures to short sales. In all of these areas, short sales now out number foreclosures.

I think this is important: Imagine that the number of total existing home sales doesn't change over the next year - some people would argue that is "bad" news and the housing market isn't recovering. But also imagine that the share of distressed sales declines 20%, and conventional sales increase to make up the difference. That would be a positive sign - and that is what appears to be happening.

An example would be Sacramento (I posted data on Sacramento earlier today).  In Sacramento, total sales were down 14% in Feb 2013 compared to Feb 2012, but conventional sales were up 42%!  I'd say that is a positive sign.

	Short Sales Share		Foreclosure Sales Share		Total "Distressed" Share
	13-Feb	12-Feb	13-Feb	12-Feb	13-Feb	12-Feb
Las Vegas	37.9%	29.3%	10.2%	42.0%	48.1%	71.3%
Reno	37.0%	28.0%	13.0%	42.0%	50.0%	70.0%
Phoenix	15.0%	28.1%	13.8%	23.3%	28.8%	51.4%
Sacramento	30.3%	31.9%	13.5%	33.9%	43.8%	65.8%
Mid-Atlantic (MRIS)	13.6%	16.4%	12.1%	17.5%	25.6%	33.9%
Hampton Roads					34.2%	36.0%
Charlotte					15.9%	18.7%
Memphis*			27.8%	36.6%
*share of existing home sales, based on property records

by Calculated Risk on 3/11/2013 12:10:00 PM

Last November, I mentioned a recession probability chart from the St Louis Fed that was making the rounds, and that some people were misusing the chart to argue a new recession was starting in the US.  Below is an update to the chart.

A few weeks later - also in November - the author, University of Oregon Professor Jeremy Piger, posted some FAQs and data for the chart online. Professor Piger writes:

2. How should I interpret these probabilities as a recession signal?

Historically, three consecutive months of smoothed probabilities above 80% has been a reliable signal of the start of a new recession, while three consecutive months of smoothed probabilities below 20% has been a reliable signal of the start of a new expansion. For an analysis of the performance of the model for identifying new turning points in real time, see:

Chauvet, M. and J. Piger, “A Comparison of the Real-Time Performance of Business Cycle Dating Methods,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2008.

Click on graph for larger image.

Here is the current chart from FRED at the St Louis Fed.

Right now, by this method, the odds of the US currently being in a recession are very low (close to zero). Some day I'll be on recession watch again (not in the near future), and this is one of the tools I'll be using.

by Calculated Risk on 3/11/2013 10:06:00 AM

Note: I've been following the Sacramento market to look for changes in the mix of house sales in a distressed area over time (conventional, REOs, and short sales). The Sacramento Association of REALTORS® started breaking out REOs in May 2008, and short sales in June 2009.

Over the last two years there was a dramatic shift from REO to short sales, and the percentage of distressed sales declined.

This data suggests continued improvement in the Sacramento market.

In February 2013, 43.8% of all resales (single family homes and condos) were distressed sales. This was down from 44.5% last month, and down from 65.8% in February 2012. This is the lowest percentage of distressed sales - and therefore the highest percentage of conventional sales - since the association started tracking the data.

The percentage of REOs decreased to 13.5%, and the percentage of short sales was unchanged at 30.3%.

Here are the statistics.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the percent of REO sales, short sales and conventional sales.

There has been an increase in conventional sales recently, and there were more than twice as many short sales as REO sales in February. 

Total sales were down from February 2012, but conventional sales were up 42% compared to the same month last year. This is exactly what we expect to see in an improving distressed market - flat or even declining overall sales as distressed sales decline, and conventional sales increase.

Active Listing Inventory for single family homes declined 51.1% from last February.

Cash buyers accounted for 39.5% of all sales (frequently investors), and median prices were up sharply year-over-year (the mix has changed).

This continues to move in the right direction, although the market is still in distress. A "normal" market would be mostly blue on the graph, and this market is a long way from "normal". We are seeing a similar pattern in other distressed areas, with a move to more conventional sales, and a shift from REO to short sales. This is a sign of a recovering market.

by Calculated Risk on 3/10/2013 10:30:00 PM

Weekend:
• Summary for Week Ending March 8th
• Schedule for Week of March 10th

The Asian markets are mixed tonight with the Nikkei up 0.7%, and Shanghai Composite down 0.3%.

From CNBC: Pre-Market Data and Bloomberg futures: the S&P futures and Dow futures are mostly flat (fair value).

Oil prices are down a little with WTI futures at $91.73 per barrel and Brent at $110.43 per barrel.

Below is a graph from Gasbuddy.com for nationwide gasoline prices. Nationally prices are down about 7 cents over the last two weeks after increasing more than 50 cents per gallon from the low last December.

If you click on "show crude oil prices", the graph displays oil prices for WTI, not Brent; gasoline prices in most of the U.S. are impacted more by Brent prices.

Orange County Historical Gas Price Charts Provided by GasBuddy.com

by Calculated Risk on 3/10/2013 02:44:00 PM

I've been asked several times about the recent ECRI recession call (obviously I disagreed with their incorrect recession call in 2011 - I wasn't even on recession watch then and I'm not on recession watch now - and I also think ECRI is wrong about a recession starting in mid-2012). Several people have written about ECRI's call, see Menzie Chinn at Econbrowser, NDD at the Bonddad blog, and Henry Blodget at Business Insider.

It seems to me ECRI is trying to make this an academic exercise and hoping for some significant downward revisions. Right now the data doesn't indicate a recession in 2012, but, as Menzie Chinn notes, "all of these series will be revised, so one wouldn’t want to state definitively we are not in a recession – therein lies the path to embarrassment. But the case still has to be made for recession."

But why do we care? Here is a repeat of a post I wrote in early 2011 (with updated tables and charts):

From 2011 [updates in brackets]: Here is something very different. This is NOT intended as investment advice.

Why is there so much focus on the business cycle? For companies, especially cyclical companies, the reason is obvious – it helps with planning, staffing and investment. [Update: Most cyclical companies are expanding now]

But why are investors so focused on the business cycle? Obviously earnings decline in a recession, and stock prices fall too. The following graph shows the year-over-year (YoY) change in the S&P 500 (using average monthly prices) since 1970. Notice that the market usually declines YoY in a recession.

Note: Because this is “year-over-year” there is a lag to the S&P 500 data. [Graph updated to March 2013]

Click on graph for larger image.

So calling a recession isn’t just an academic exercise, there is some opportunity to preserve capital.

Not all downturns in the stock market are associated with recessions. As an example, the 1987 market crash was during an economic expansion. And the stock bubble collapse lasted from March 2000 through early 2003 – and the only official economic recession during that period was 7 months in 2001.

Although I don’t give investment advice, I think investors should measure their performance with some index. Warren Buffett likes to use the S&P 500 index, so I also used the S&P 500 for this exercise.

Imagine if we could call recessions in real time, and if we could predict recoveries in advance. The following table shows the performance of a buy-and-hold strategy (with dividend reinvestment), compared to a strategy of market timing based on 1) selling when a recession starts, and 2) buying 6 months before a recession ends.

For the buy and sell prices, I averaged the S&P 500 closing price for the entire month (no cherry picking price – just cherry picking the timing with 20/20 hindsight).

I assumed an investor started at four different times, in January of 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000 [UPDATE: added 2010 start].

S&P 500 Annualized Return, including dividends
Return from Start Date			Recession Timing Sensitivity
Start Investing	Buy and Hold	Recession Timing	Two Months Early	One Month Early	One Month Late	Two Months Late
Jan-70	8.92%	13.09%	12.15%	12.81%	13.01%	12.46%
Jan-80	9.90%	13.52%	13.37%	13.38%	13.71%	12.97%
Jan-90	7.80%	12.30%	11.91%	12.20%	12.23%	11.65%
Jan-00	1.37%	6.88%	7.49%	7.22%	7.02%	7.17%
Jan-10	11.18%	11.18%	---	---	---	---

The “recession timing” column gives the annualized return for each of the starting dates. Timing the recession correctly always outperforms buy-and-hold. The last four columns show the performance if the investor is two months early (both in and out), one month early, one month late, and two months late. The investor doesn’t have to be perfect!

Note: This includes dividends, but not taxes. Also I assumed no interest earned when the investor is out of the market (money in the mattress).

The second table provides the same information, but this time in dollars (assuming a $10,000 initial investment). Notice that someone could have bought the S&P 500 index in January 2000, and they’d be up about $150 [March 2013 Update: Up $1,970] now using buy-and-hold even though the market is still below the January 2000 average price of 1425 [Update: Now above January 2000]. The positive return is due to dividends.

S&P 500: Value of $10,000 Investment, including dividends
Value based on Start Date			Recession Timing Sensitivity
Start Investing	Buy and Hold	Recession Timing	Two Months Early	One Month Early	One Month Late	Two Months Late
Jan-70	$399,910	$1,582,190	$1,120,170	$1,426,530	$1,537,910	$1,257,860
Jan-80	$228,630	$520,810	$499,670	$500,540	$549,080	$447,700
Jan-90	$56,920	$116,550	$108,230	$114,250	$115,050	$103,010
Jan-00	$11,970	$21,020	$22,400	$21,770	$21,330	$21,680
Jan-10	$13,990	$13,990	---	---	---	---

Unfortunately forecasters have a terrible record of predicting downturns. The running joke is that forecasters have predicted 9 of the last 5 recessions! Although a forecaster doesn’t have to be perfect, they still have to be right. And that is very rare.

As economist Victor Zarnowitz said way back in 1960: “The record of predicting turning points — changes in the direction of economic activity — is on the whole poor." Forecasting hasn't improved much since then.

As an example, here are some comments from then Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan in 1990 (a recession began in July 1990):

“In the very near term there’s little evidence that I can see to suggest the economy is tilting over [into recession].”
Chairman Greenspan, July 1990

“...those who argue that we are already in a recession I think are reasonably certain to be wrong.”
Greenspan, August 1990

“... the economy has not yet slipped into recession.”
Greenspan, October 1990

I'd say he missed that downturn. Of course Wall Street and Fed Chairmen are notoriously bad at calling downturns.

But the track record for calling recoveries isn’t much better. ... Calling recessions is a mug’s game, but I like to play. I was very lucky with the recent recession, but the key wasn’t calling the end in June 2009 (I thought it ended in July), but looking for the bottom in early 2009 (that is why I posted several times in early 2009 that I was looking for the sun).

This is NOT intended as investment advice. I am NOT an investment advisor. Just some (hopefully) fun musing ...

[Final Update: If investors sold when ECRI first made their recession call in Sept 2011, they would have a missed around a 30% increase in the market  This shows why trying to add recession timing is difficult; investors have to be correct on the business cycle].