by Calculated Risk on 12/09/2011 08:30:00 AM

The Department of Commerce reports:

[T]otal October exports of $179.2 billion and imports of $222.6 billion resulted in a goods and services deficit of $43.5 billion, down from $44.2 billion in September,
revised. October exports were $1.5 billion less than September exports of $180.6 billion. October imports were $2.2 billion less than September imports of $224.8 billion.

The trade deficit was at the consensus forecast of $43.5 billion.

The first graph shows the monthly U.S. exports and imports in dollars through October 2011.

Click on graph for larger image.

Both exports and imports decreased in October. Imports have been mostly moving sideways for the past six months (seasonally adjusted). Exports are well above the pre-recession peak and up 12% compared to October 2010; imports have stalled recently but are still up about 11% compared to October 2010.

The second graph shows the U.S. trade deficit, with and without petroleum, through October.

The blue line is the total deficit, and the black line is the petroleum deficit, and the red line is the trade deficit ex-petroleum products.

Oil averaged $98.84 per barrel in October, and import oil prices have been declining slowly from $108.70 per barrel in May. The trade deficit with China was unchanged at $28 billion.

Imports have been moving sideways for the last several months - partially due to slightly lower oil prices. However the trade deficit with China continues to be a significant issue.

by Calculated Risk on 12/08/2011 11:51:00 PM

The ECB disappointed today, and the EU will probably under deliver again tomorrow.

The following is no surprise - no one expected all 27 countries to agree, just the 17 eurozone countries plus a few more ...

From CNBC: EU Fails to Agree on Treaty Change Among 27 States: Diplomats

The European Union failed to secure backing from all 27 countries to change the EU treaty at a summit on Friday, meaning any deal will now likely involve the 17 euro zone countries plus any others that want to join, three EU diplomats said.

From the NY Times: After Rate Cut, Gloom as Europe Leaders Meet

Late Thursday, European leaders here were circulating the draft of a new “fiscal compact” for the currency union, including tighter control of public finances. Disagreement persisted about whether any deal would cover all 27 European Union member states or just the 17-member euro zone, and about whether it would involve amendments to the euro treaty. Leaders were also discussing whether a permanent bailout fund, set to begin operation as early as July, should function as a licensed banker.

Earlier in the day in Washington, President Obama voiced frustration that Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany and other European leaders were focusing on the wrong problem by negotiating long-term changes to the euro treaty, rather than reassuring the markets and staving off a recession by taking bold short-term action.
...
Adding to the anxiety, European regulators said on Thursday that many of the region’s biggest banks, including the German giants Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank, needed to raise more money as reserves against potential losses.

The amounts to be set aside are much higher than regulators had estimated as recently as October, and the inclusion of German banks in the roundup was a reminder that even the region’s richest nation was not immune from the debt crisis contagion.

President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, in Marseille on Thursday before heading here, said, “If we don’t have an agreement Friday, there won’t be a second chance.”

I'm sure there will be some sort of agreement, but it appears they will under deliver once again.

The Asian markets are all red tonight. The Nikkei is down about 1%, the Hang Seng is off 2.6%.

From CNBC: Pre-Market Data and Bloomberg futures: the S&P 500 futures are up slightly and the Dow futures are up 25.

by Calculated Risk on 12/08/2011 07:30:00 PM

I've been following the Sacramento market to look for changes in the mix of house sales in a distressed area over time (conventional, REOs, and short sales). The Sacramento Association of REALTORS® started breaking out REOs in May 2008, and short sales in June 2009.

This will be interesting once something changes - and not much has changed yet. At some point, the number and percent of distressed sales should start to decline (excluding seasonal factors and market distortions like the home buyer tax credit).

The percent of distressed sales in Sacramento was unchanged in November compared to October. In November 2011, 64.1% of all resales (single family homes and condos) were distressed sales. This was down slightly from 66.1% in November 2010.

Here are the statistics.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the percent of REO sales, short sales and conventional sales. There is a seasonal pattern for conventional sales (stronger in the spring and summer), and distressed sales happen all year - so the percentage of distressed sales decreases every summer and the increases in the fall and winter.

Total sales were up 14.6% compared to November 2010. Active Listing Inventory were down 38.1% from last November, although "short sale contingent" has increased. Cash buyers accounted for 27.4% of all sales (frequently investors), and median prices are off about 8% from last November.

This data might be helpful in determining when the market is improving. So far it looks like REO sales have declined (this is the lowest percentage of REO sales since Sacramento started breaking out REOs), offset by an increase in short sales, so overall there is no improvement.

by Calculated Risk on 12/08/2011 04:38:00 PM

On Sunday I posted Comments on the Employment-Population Ratio with a follow up yesterday: Labor Force Participation Rate by Age Group

Some people have wondered why the participation rate has been declining for the younger age groups.

First below is a repeat of the graph from yesterday showing the trends by age group since 1990.

Note: The participation rate is the percentage of the working age population in the labor force.

Click on graph for larger image.

Some of the recent decline in the participation rate for the '20 to 24' age group is probably related to the recession.

But probably the main reason for the decline in the participation rate for the younger age groups is that more people are pursuing higher education. (ht Rick Nevin) Nevin writes:

The decline in age-16-19 and age-20-24 labor force participation is the mirror image of the increase in school enrollment rates for those age groups. This trend is exactly what was anticipated by (promised by) research that supported the phase-out of lead in gasoline from the early-1970s through the mid-1980s, and subsequent lead paint hazard reduction requirements, including my 1999 Economic Analysis of HUD lead hazard reduction requirements.

Note: I do not know Rick Nevin, but I have read some research about the link between lead and crime (and IQ). As an example, from Professor Jessica Wolpaw Reyes: Environmental Policy as Social Policy? The Impact of Childhood Lead Exposure on Crime makes a strong argument that removing lead from gasoline from 1975 to 1985 led to lower crime rates.

More from Nevin:

The decline in labor force participation for ages 16-24 might be partly due to a short term “bad news” story about discouraged workers, but it is mainly due to a longer term “great news” story about ongoing gains in school enrollment and academic attainment.

This graph uses data from the BLS on participation rate, and the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) on enrollment rates.

This graph shows the participation and enrollment rates for the 18 to 19 year old age group. These two lines are a "mirror image".

Note: I added the participation rate for men and women too. One of the key labor stories in the 2nd half of the 1900s was the surge in participation by women.

The third graph shows the participation and enrollment rates for the 20 to 24 year old age group.

Once again the participation rate is declining as the enrollment rate is increasing. The participation rate (all) was rising in the '70s and early '80s because of the increase in women entering the labor force.

In the long run, more education is a positive for the economy (although I am concerned about the surge in student loans). This increase in education enrollment suggests we should look at the prime working age (25 to 54) for changes in the participation rate and employment-population ratio due to the recent recession.

But mostly it suggests that the kids are alright!

by Calculated Risk on 12/08/2011 12:01:00 PM

The Federal Reserve released the Q3 2011 Flow of Funds report today: Flow of Funds.

The Fed estimated that household net worth declined $2.4 trillion in Q3. Household net worth peaked at $66.8 trillion in Q2 2007, and then net worth fell to $50.4 trillion in Q1 2009 (a loss of $16.4 trillion). Household net worth was at $57.4 trillion in Q3 2011 (up $7.0 trillion from the trough, but down $2.4 trillion in Q3).

The Fed estimated that the value of household real estate fell $98 billion to $16.1 trillion in Q3 2011. The value of household real estate has fallen $6.6 trillion from the peak - and is still falling in 2011.

Click on graph for larger image.

This is the Households and Nonprofit net worth as a percent of GDP.

This includes real estate and financial assets (stocks, bonds, pension reserves, deposits, etc) net of liabilities (mostly mortgages). Note that this does NOT include public debt obligations.

This ratio was relatively stable for almost 50 years, and then we saw the stock market and housing bubbles.

This graph shows homeowner percent equity since 1952.

Household percent equity (as measured by the Fed) collapsed when house prices fell sharply in 2007 and 2008.

In Q3 2011, household percent equity (of household real estate) was at 38.7% - about the same as in Q2.

Note: about 30.3% of owner occupied households have no mortgage debt as of April 2010. So the approximately 52+ million households with mortgages have far less than 38.7% equity - and, according to CoreLogic, about 10.7 million households have negative equity.

The third graph shows household real estate assets and mortgage debt as a percent of GDP.

Mortgage debt declined by $54 billion in Q3. Mortgage debt has now declined by $730 billion from the peak. Studies suggest most of the decline in debt has been because of foreclosures (or short sales), but some of the decline is from homeowners paying down debt (sometimes so they can refinance at better rates).

Assets prices, as a percent of GDP, have fallen significantly and are only slightly above historical levels. However household mortgage debt, as a percent of GDP, is still historically very high, suggesting more deleveraging ahead for households.