by Calculated Risk on 8/28/2010 10:31:00 PM

A couple of earlier post that might be of interest:

Employment Report Preview: Will the unemployment rate spike higher?

Unofficial Problem Bank List increases to 840 institutions

From Peter Goodman at the NY Times: What Can Be Done to Cure the Ailing Economy?

THE American economy is once again tilting toward danger. ...

Yet even as vital signs weaken ... a sense has taken hold that government policy makers cannot deliver meaningful intervention. That is because nearly any proposed curative could risk adding to the national debt — a political nonstarter. The situation has left American fortunes pinned to an uncertain remedy: hoping that things somehow get better.
...
The growing impression of a weakening economy combined with a dearth of policy options has reinvigorated concerns that the United States risks sinking into the sort of economic stagnation that captured Japan during its so-called Lost Decade in the 1990s.
...
Six months ago, Alan Blinder, a former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve, and now an economist at Princeton, dismissed the idea that America’s political system would ever allow the country to sink into a Japan-style quagmire. “Now I’m looking at the political system turning itself into a paralyzed beast,” he says, adding that a lost decade now looms as “a much bigger risk.”
...
By default, muddling through has emerged as the prescription of the moment.

"Muddling through" and "hoping that things somehow get better" seems very defeatist - but I think it is an apt characterization of the current situation. There is always more that can be done ... and I think some people are confusing cyclical deficits with structural deficits. Oh well ...

by Calculated Risk on 8/28/2010 06:01:00 PM

From Tom Petruno at the LA Times: Time to let home prices fall?

A few excerpts:

[A] grim reality has set in: Despite the still-rich basket of tax breaks for residential property owners, and the lowest mortgage rates in a generation, the pool of willing or able buyers is dwindling. [CR note: These are the lowest mortgage rates in far more than a generation - these are the lowest since at least the '50s if not even longer. Freddie Mac's surveys only go back to 1971.]
...
Government policy has been aimed at slowing or stopping the decline in prices, for obvious reasons: A further drop in home values would push more owners underwater, meaning their homes would be worth less than their mortgage balance.
...
Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic Policy and Research in Washington, believes home prices still are overvalued by 15% to 20% in many areas.

For government to stand in the way of a further price decline is unfair to the next generation of buyers, he said. "The people who get hurt the most are those who are overpaying for houses today," he said.

Robert Shiller, co-creator of the S&P/Case-Shiller price indexes, said that although he doesn't forecast prices, "I think the scenario of declining home prices for years to come is underemphasized by people."

Supporting house prices has helped the banks, but I think the idea was generally flawed. The key to the housing market is to absorb the excess inventory. That means more households and fewer new housing units. Luckily housing starts are very low right now, but unfortunately there is very little job growth (and therefore little new household formation).

Petruno quotes NAHB economist David Crowe:

Historically, housing has led the way in recoveries. "But this is a case where housing is going to follow the economy, not lead it," [said David Crowe, chief economist for the National Assn. of Home Builders].

This is correct. Usually housing is a key engine of recovery, especially for jobs. But this time housing is going to follow the economy.

That means policy needs to be aimed at making sure that many existing households stay in place (like unemployment benefits, although I'd prefer something along the lines of Minsky's approach) and trying to add new jobs (like infrastructure jobs). More jobs mean more households. More households will absorb the excess inventory. And then eventually housing will recover and help the economy.

Let house prices fall.

by Calculated Risk on 8/28/2010 01:05:00 PM

The August employment report will be released next Friday, Sept 3rd. The consensus is for the loss of around 90,000 payroll jobs, and an increase in the unemployment rate to 9.6% (from 9.5% in July).

The decennial Census will subtract about 116,000 payroll jobs in August (estimate here), so the consensus is for about +26,000 payroll jobs ex-Census.

I will take the under on the number of payroll jobs. I think it is possible that we will see a negative payroll number, ex-Census, because of weak private hiring combined with state and local layoffs.

And I will also take the over on the unemployment rate. Here is why:

The unemployment rate is from the household survey, and is impacted by the participation rate - the percent of the civilian population in the labor force. The following graph shows the sharp decline in the participation rate during the current employment recession.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Note: y-axis starts at 64% to show the change.

The increase in the participation rate earlier this year was good news. This meant some workers who had given up were rejoining the labor force. The increase in the participation rate pushed up the unemployment rate, since the economy wasn't adding jobs fast enough to employ all the workers rejoining the labor force. But it was still good news that the participation rate was increasing.

However it was bad news when the participation rate started falling again over the last few months. The decline in the unemployment rate - from 9.9% in April to 9.5% in June and July - was related to the decline in the participation rate. And workers leaving the labor force is not great news.

But what will happen to the participation rate in August? The first guess, with the weak economy, is that the participation rate declined further in August, putting downward pressure on the unemployment rate.

But there are two reasons I think the participation rate might have increased.

Summer teen employment: As I noted in June, the record low number of teens joining the labor force appeared to push down the seasonally adjusted participation rate (and therefore pushed down the unemployment rate). I think this will start to unwind in August. As a lower than normal number of teens leave the labor force, the seasonally adjusted teen labor force will probably increase - my guess is by 100,000 to 150,000 workers. All else being equal, this would push up the participation rate, and also push up the unemployment rate to around 9.6%.

Unemployment Benefits: At the end of July, the qualification dates for the various tiers of Federal unemployment benefits were extended through November 30th. This extension was also made retroactive to June 2nd. Some people who have given up, might rejoin the labor force to collect additional benefits. If this happens, the participation rate might increase in August - and that would push up the unemployment rate. Although the number is uncertain, if 250,000 workers rejoin the labor force to collect benefits that would push the unemployment rate to 9.7%. If 500,000 workers rejoin the labor force, plus the 125,000 from the teen adjustment, the unemployment rate would increase to around 9.9%.

As noted above, the weak economy would normally lead to a lower participation rate, but these two reasons might push the participation rate up - and that could mean a higher than expected increase in the unemployment rate.

by Calculated Risk on 8/28/2010 08:44:00 AM

Note: this is an unofficial list of Problem Banks compiled only from public sources.

Here is the unofficial problem bank list for August 27, 2010.

Changes and comments from surferdude808:

The Unofficial Problem Bank List grew by more than five percent this week as the FDIC released its enforcement actions for July 2010. This week, there were 28 additions and 5 removals. Also, the list was updated to reflect assets as of the second quarter. For institutions on the list since the first quarter, aggregate assets declined by $13.9 billion. With these changes, the Unofficial Problem Bank List includes 840 institutions with aggregate assets of $410.3 billion.

Removals include First National Bank and Trust of Syracuse ($58 million), Town Center Bank ($40 million), and Peoples State Bank ($26 million), which were involved in unassisted mergers during July. Other removals from action termination include Independence Bank ($352 million) and Darien Rowayton Bank ($107 million).

Among the 28 additions are TIB Bank, Naples, FL ($1.7 billion); CB&S Bank, Inc., Russellville, AL ($1.3 billion); First Bank and Trust, New Orleans, LA ($944 million); Citizens Bank of Mukwonago, Mukwonago, WI ($627 million); and First Chatham Bank, Savannah, GA ($596 million). Geographically, the additions include 5 institutions from Illinois, 4 from Florida, and 3 from Minnesota.

Next week, the FDIC likely will release the Official Problem Bank List as of June 30th.

by Calculated Risk on 8/27/2010 08:20:00 PM

Prices are falling ... and Jim the Realtor says: "You won’t hear me say it’s a great time to buy, but ... it’s a great time to look.”

by Calculated Risk on 8/27/2010 04:03:00 PM

From the National Center for Health Statistics: Births, Marriages, Divorces, and Deaths: Provisional Data for 2009

The NCHS reports that U.S. births declined to 4.136 million in 2009, from 4.247 million in 2008. The birth rate declined to 13.5 from 13.9 in 2008 (births per 1000 total population).

Here is a long term graph of annual U.S. births through 2009 ...

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Births have declined for two consecutive years, and are now 4.2% below the peak in 2007. I suspect certain segments of the population were under stress before the recession started - like construction workers - and even more families were in distress in 2008 and 2009. Of course it takes 9 months to have a baby, so families in distress in 2009 probably put off having babies in 2010 too.

Notice that the number of births started declining a number of years before the Great Depression started. Many families in the 1920s were under severe stress long before the economy collapsed. By 1933 births were down by almost 23% from the early '20s levels.

Of course economic distress isn't the only reason births decline - look at the huge decline following the baby boom that was driven by demographics. But it is common for births to slow or decline during tough economic times in the U.S. - and that appears to be happening now.

Last year I guessed that we'd see further declines in births in 2009 (now confirmed) and probably in 2010. But I don't think the declines in births will be anything like what happened during the 1920s.

by Calculated Risk on 8/27/2010 12:49:00 PM

The Census Bureau released the weekly payroll data for the week ending August 14th this week (ht Bob_in_MA). If we subtract the number of temporary 2010 Census workers in the week containing the 12th of the month, from the same week for the previous month - this provides a close estimate for the impact of the Census hiring on payroll employment.

The Census Bureau releases the actual number with the employment report.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the number of Census workers paid each week. The red labels are the weeks of the BLS payroll survey.

The Census payroll decreased from 200,346 for the week ending July 17th to 83,955 for the week ending August 14th.

So my estimate for the impact of the Census on August payroll employment is minus 116 thousand (this will probably be close). The employment report will be released on September 3rd, and the headline number for August - including Census numbers - will probably be negative again. But a key number will be the hiring ex-Census (so we will add back the Census workers again this month).

The following table compares the weekly payroll report estimate to the monthly BLS report on Census hiring (the weekly report is revised slightly, so the correlation looks better than in real time):

	Payroll, Weekly Pay Period	Payroll, Monthly BLS	Change based on weekly report	Actual Change (monthly)
Jan	25	24
Feb	41	39	16	15
Mar	96	87	55	48
Apr	156	154	61	67
May	574	564	418	410
Jun	344	339	-230	-225
Jul	200	196	-144	-143
Aug	84		-116
All thousands

This is the last large monthly decline in temporary Census workers; most of the remaining workers will be let go over the next several months. I'll have more on August employment this Sunday in the weekly schedule.

by Calculated Risk on 8/27/2010 11:22:00 AM

Just some quick thoughts on Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke's speech today.

Bernanke has a political problem on the FOMC. I believe this is why the recent FOMC discusssions were leaked to Jon Hilsenrath at the WSJ: Fed Split on Move to Bolster Sluggish Economy

Bernanke is saying the economy is weak but that he still expects growth to improve in 2011:

For a sustained expansion to take hold, growth in private final demand--notably, consumer spending and business fixed investment--must ultimately take the lead. On the whole, in the United States, that critical handoff appears to be under way. ... the pace of that growth recently appears somewhat less vigorous than we expected. ... Incoming data on the labor market have remained disappointing. ... Overall, the incoming data suggest that the recovery of output and employment in the United States has slowed in recent months, to a pace somewhat weaker than most FOMC participants projected earlier this year. ... I expect the economy to continue to expand in the second half of this year, albeit at a relatively modest pace.

Despite the weaker data seen recently, the preconditions for a pickup in growth in 2011 appear to remain in place.

So it will take further disinflation or a weaker economy for the Fed to act. Bernanke discussed the when of QE2:

Under what conditions would the FOMC make further use of these or related policy tools? At this juncture, the Committee has not agreed on specific criteria or triggers for further action, but I can make two general observations.

First, the FOMC will strongly resist deviations from price stability in the downward direction. ... It is worthwhile to note that, if deflation risks were to increase, the benefit-cost tradeoffs of some of our policy tools could become significantly more favorable.

Second, regardless of the risks of deflation, the FOMC will do all that it can to ensure continuation of the economic recovery. Consistent with our mandate, the Federal Reserve is committed to promoting growth in employment and reducing resource slack more generally. Because a further significant weakening in the economic outlook would likely be associated with further disinflation, in the current environment there is little or no potential conflict between the goals of supporting growth and employment and of maintaining price stability.

And Bernanke made his preference clear for QE2:

A first option for providing additional monetary accommodation, if necessary, is to expand the Federal Reserve's holdings of longer-term securities. As I noted earlier, the evidence suggests that the Fed's earlier program of purchases was effective in bringing down term premiums and lowering the costs of borrowing in a number of private credit markets. I regard the program (which was significantly expanded in March 2009) as having made an important contribution to the economic stabilization and recovery that began in the spring of 2009. Likewise, the FOMC's recent decision to stabilize the Federal Reserve's securities holdings should promote financial conditions supportive of recovery.

I believe that additional purchases of longer-term securities, should the FOMC choose to undertake them, would be effective in further easing financial conditions.

Bernanke was not as positive on changes to the "extended period" language or reducing the interest rate on excess reserves.

Summary: I think Bernanke is paving the way for QE2, although he probably feels he needs more evidence of a slowing economy or further disinflation to persuade other members of the FOMC. A warning from a large tech company is probably significant at this point, like from MarketWatch: Intel cuts sales forecast citing weaker consumer PC market

"Revenue is being affected by weaker than expected demand for consumer PCs in mature markets," the company said in a statement.

Or perhaps the unemployment rate ticking up in the August employment report next Friday might be enough. There will be plenty of data released before the September 21 FOMC meeting (and if the data is weaker, the meeting might be expanded to two days). Or perhaps the FOMC will wait until November, but it does appears Bernanke is preparing everyone for QE2.

by Calculated Risk on 8/27/2010 10:02:00 AM

From Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke: The Economic Outlook and Monetary Policy. Excerpt on monetary policy:

Policy Options for Further Easing
...
I will focus here on three that have been part of recent staff analyses and discussion at FOMC meetings: (1) conducting additional purchases of longer-term securities, (2) modifying the Committee's communication, and (3) reducing the interest paid on excess reserves. I will also comment on a fourth strategy, proposed by several economists--namely, that the FOMC increase its inflation goals.

A first option for providing additional monetary accommodation, if necessary, is to expand the Federal Reserve's holdings of longer-term securities. ...

A second policy option for the FOMC would be to ease financial conditions through its communication, for example, by modifying its post-meeting statement. ...

A third option for further monetary policy easing is to lower the rate of interest that the Fed pays banks on the reserves they hold with the Federal Reserve System. Inside the Fed this rate is known as the IOER rate, the "interest on excess reserves" rate. The IOER rate, currently set at 25 basis points, could be reduced to, say, 10 basis points or even to zero. ...

A rather different type of policy option, which has been proposed by a number of economists, would have the Committee increase its medium-term inflation goals above levels consistent with price stability. I see no support for this option on the FOMC.

Paving the way for QE2.

Update: Bernanke also addressed WHEN the FOMC will act:

Each of the tools that the FOMC has available to provide further policy accommodation--including longer-term securities asset purchases, changes in communication, and reducing the IOER rate--has benefits and drawbacks, which must be appropriately balanced. Under what conditions would the FOMC make further use of these or related policy tools? At this juncture, the Committee has not agreed on specific criteria or triggers for further action, but I can make two general observations.

First, the FOMC will strongly resist deviations from price stability in the downward direction. Falling into deflation is not a significant risk for the United States at this time, but that is true in part because the public understands that the Federal Reserve will be vigilant and proactive in addressing significant further disinflation. It is worthwhile to note that, if deflation risks were to increase, the benefit-cost tradeoffs of some of our policy tools could become significantly more favorable.

Second, regardless of the risks of deflation, the FOMC will do all that it can to ensure continuation of the economic recovery. Consistent with our mandate, the Federal Reserve is committed to promoting growth in employment and reducing resource slack more generally. Because a further significant weakening in the economic outlook would likely be associated with further disinflation, in the current environment there is little or no potential conflict between the goals of supporting growth and employment and of maintaining price stability.

by Calculated Risk on 8/27/2010 08:48:00 AM

From the BEA: Gross Domestic Product, 2nd quarter 2010 (second estimate)

The following table shows the changes from the advance release (this is the Contributions to Percent Change in Real Gross Domestic Product).

The largest downward revisions were to the change in private inventories, imports, and non-residential structure investment. Personal consumption expenditures and investment in Equipment and software were revised up.

	Advance	2nd Estimate (Revision)	Change
Percent change at annual rate:
Gross domestic product	2.4	1.6	-0.8
Percentage points at annual rates:
Personal consumption expenditures	1.15	1.38	0.23
Goods	0.79	0.82	0.03
Durable goods	0.53	0.49	-0.04
Nondurable goods	0.25	0.33	0.08
Services	0.36	0.56	0.20
Gross private domestic investment	3.14	2.75	-0.39
Fixed investment	2.09	2.12	0.03
Nonresidential	1.50	1.54	0.04
Structures	0.14	0.01	-0.13
Equipment and software	1.36	1.53	0.17
Residential	0.59	0.58	-0.01
Change in private inventories	1.05	0.63	-0.42
Net exports of goods and services	-2.78	-3.37	-0.59
Exports	1.22	1.08	-0.14
Imports	-4.00	-4.45	-0.45
Government consumption expenditures and gross investment	0.88	0.86	-0.02
Federal	0.72	0.72	0.00
National defense	0.4	0.39	-0.01
Nondefense	0.33	0.32	-0.01
State and local	0.16	0.14	-0.02

by Calculated Risk on 8/26/2010 10:10:00 PM

Tomorrow the Q2 GDP revision will be released, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke will speak at the Jackson Hole conference, and perhaps the FDIC will release the Q2 Quarterly Banking Profile ...

From Binyamin Applebaum at the NY Times Economix: An Autopsy of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

Here’s a last-minute option for summer reading material: An autopsy on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by their overseer, the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

The report aims to inform the continuing debate in Washington about the future of the government’s role in housing finance. It’s not hard sledding, just 15 pages of bullet points and charts. And it does a good job of making a few key points:

1. Fannie and Freddie did not cause the housing bubble. ...

2. This was not for a lack of trying. ...

3. Importantly, the companies’ losses are mostly in their core business of guaranteeing loans, not in their investment portfolios.

From the Atlanta Fed: Financial Highlights

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

From the Atlanta Fed:

Peripheral European bond spreads (over German bonds) have risen since the August FOMC meeting.

In fact the Greece-to-Germany, and the Ireland-to-Germany, bond spreads are near the levels reached during the May financial crisis.

Here is my post on the MBA Q2 delinquency report: 14.42% of Mortgage Loans Delinquent or in Foreclosure . This graph (from the earlier post) shows the delinquency rate by "bucket" (30 days, 60 days, 90+ days, and in foreclosure process):

The total percent of loans delinquent or in the foreclosure process declined only slightly in Q2 from Q1 - and the rate is the second highest on record.

Loans 30 days delinquent increased to 3.51%, and this is about the same levels as in Q4 2008 (slightly below the peak of 3.77% in Q1 2009).

Delinquent loans decreased in all other buckets - especially in the 90+ day bucket. MBA Chief Economist Jay Brinkmann suggested the decline in the 90+ day bucket was because of some successful modifications - since the lenders reported the loans as delinquent until the modification was made permanent.

CoreLogic reports on negative equity in Q2. Here is my earlier post CoreLogic: 11 Million U.S. Properties with Negative Equity in Q2

This graph shows the negative equity and near negative equity by state.

Although the five states mentioned above have the largest percentage of homeowners underwater, 10 percent or more of homeowners with mortgages in 33 states and the D.C. have negative equity.

by Calculated Risk on 8/26/2010 07:13:00 PM

From Jeff Horwitz and Kate Berry at American Banker: Procrastination on Foreclosures, Now 'Blatant,' May Backfire

[S]ervicers are not initiating or processing foreclosures at the pace they could be.

By postponing the date at which they lock in losses, banks and other investors positioned themselves to benefit from the slow mending of the real estate market. But now industry executives are questioning whether delaying foreclosures — a strategy contrary to the industry adage that "the first loss is the best loss" — is about to backfire. With home prices expected to fall as much as 10% further, the refusal to foreclose quickly on and sell distressed homes at inventory-clearing prices may be contributing to the stall of the overall market seen in July sales data.
...
Banks have filed fewer notices of default so far this year in California ... than they did 2009 or 2008, according to data gathered by [RadarLogic]. Foreclosure default notices are now at their lowest level since the second quarter of 2007, when the percentage of seriously delinquent loans in the state was one-sixth what it is now.

New data from LPS Applied Analytics in Jacksonville, Fla., suggests that the backlog is no longer worsening nationally — but foreclosures are not at the levels needed to clear existing inventory.
...
"The industry as a whole got into a panic mode and was worried about all these loans going into foreclosure and driving prices down, so they got all these programs, started Hamp and internal mods and short sales," said John Marecki, vice president of East Coast foreclosure operations for Prommis Solutions ... "Now they're looking at this, how they held off and they're getting to the point where maybe they made a mistake in that realm."
...
"The math doesn't bode well for what is ultimately going to occur on the real estate market," said Herb Blecher, a vice president at LPS. "You start asking yourself the question when you look at these numbers whether we are fixing the problem or delaying the inevitable."

There is much more in the article.

Note: The LPS delinquency data for July will be released tomorrow. Here are some of the findings (no link):

• July showed an astounding 24.5% month-over-month increase in foreclosure starts, which dovetails with Treasury's latest report on HAMP cancellations (approx. 50% according to Treasury's numbers)
• Abysmal foreclosure rates in NV, FL and CA have led to much higher level equity loss for homeowners in those states as compared to the rest of the country.
• Cure rates remain steady, but seriously delinquent (6 mos.+) cures have declined significantly, by approximately 25%
• Origination remains depressed due to much stricter underwriting guidelines and low purchase activity, but what is being originated is of good quality.
• Until the deterioration ratio improves from its steady two deteriorations for every one improvement, it's hard to see how we're going to get out of the hole.

The report shows the GSEs are stepping up foreclosures.

by Calculated Risk on 8/26/2010 03:32:00 PM

Note that the slight decline in homeowners with negative equity was mostly due to foreclosures.

First American CoreLogic released the Q2 2010 negative equity report today.

CoreLogic reports that 11 million, or 23 percent, of all residential properties with mortgages were in negative equity at the end of the second quarter of 2010, down from 11.2 million and 24 percent from the first quarter of 2010. Foreclosures, rather than meaningful price appreciation, were the primary driver in the change in negative equity. An additional 2.4 million borrowers had less than five percent equity. Together, negative equity and near negative equity mortgages accounted for nearly 28 percent of all residential properties with a mortgage nationwide.
...
"Negative equity continues to both drive foreclosures and impede the housing market recovery. With nearly 5 million borrowers currently in severe negative equity, defaults will remain at a high level for an extended period of time," said Mark Fleming, chief economist with CoreLogic.

From the report:

Negative equity remains concentrated in five states: Nevada, which had the highest percentage negative equity with 68 percent of all of its mortgaged properties underwater, followed by Arizona (50 percent), Florida (46 percent), Michigan (38 percent) and California (33 percent).

The declines were primarily due to foreclosures, not the stabilization or small increases in prices in some markets. The largest decrease in negative equity occurred among those with loan-to-value (LTV) ratios in excess of 125 percent, where the number of negative equity borrowers fell to 4.8 million, down from 5 million last quarter.

Click on image for larger graph in new window.

This graph shows the negative equity and near negative equity by state.

Although the five states mentioned above have the largest percentage of homeowners underwater, 10 percent or more of homeowners with mortgages in 33 states and the D.C. have negative equity.

Note: Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, South Dakota, Vermont, West Virginia and Wyoming are NA on the graph above.

CoreLogic also released a negative equity report for 164 metro areas (excel file) (with a minimum of 50,000 mortgages). Las Vegas is at the top with 72.8% of homeowners with mortgages in negative equity (another 3.3% are close) - and the top of the list is dominated by Nevada, California, Arizona and Florida - but it is amazing how widespread the problem is!

Even with foreclosures reducing the number of negative equity mortgages, I expect the number of homeowners with negative equity will increase as prices fall later this year.

by Calculated Risk on 8/26/2010 01:30:00 PM

The MBA reports that 14.42 percent of mortgage loans were either one payment delinquent or in the foreclosure process in Q2 2010 (seasonally adjusted). This is down slightly from the record 14.69 percent in Q1 2010.

From the MBA: Delinquencies and Foreclosure Starts Decrease in Latest MBA National Delinquency Survey

The delinquency rate for mortgage loans on one-to-four-unit residential properties dropped to a seasonally adjusted rate of 9.85 percent of all loans outstanding as of the end of the second quarter of 2010, a decrease of 21 basis points from the first quarter of 2010, and an increase of 61 basis points from one year ago, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) National Delinquency Survey.
...
The percentage of loans in the foreclosure process at the end of the second quarter was 4.57 percent, a decrease of six basis points from the first quarter of 2010, but an increase of 27 basis points from one year ago.

Note: 9.85% (SA) and 4.57% equals 14.42%.

Much was made at the end of 2009 about the decline in the 30 day delinquency "bucket" (percent of loans between 30 and 60 days delinquent). Unfortunately the seasonally adjusted 30 day delinquency rate increased again in Q2 2010.

And much was made on the conference call this morning about the declines in the other "buckets", however the total percent of loans delinquent or in the foreclosure process declined only slightly in Q2 from Q1 - and is the second highest on record.

Note: there are some questions about the seasonal adjustment, especially for the 90 day bucket since we've never seen numbers this high before, but the adjustment for the 30 and 60 day periods are probably reasonable.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Loans 30 days delinquent increased to 3.51%, and this is about the same levels as in Q4 2008 (slightly below the peak of 3.77% in Q1 2009).

Delinquent loans decreased in all other buckets - especially in the 90+ day bucket. MBA Chief Economist Jay Brinkmann suggested the decline in the 90+ day bucket was because of some successful modifications - since the lenders reported the loans as delinquent until the modification was made permanent.

The second graph shows the delinquency rate by state (red is seriously delinquent: 90+ days or in foreclosure, blue is delinquent less than 90 days).

Clearly Florida and Nevada have a large percentage of loans delinquent or in foreclosure. But the delinquency problem is widespread with 36 states and D.C. all having total delinquency rates above 10%.

When asked if he expected the slight improvements to continue, Brinkmann said "Improvements are more of a hope". He said the problem is jobs, and he is revising down his economic forecasts. He also the improvement in the 90+ day bucket might be because of modifications - and that might not continue.

With house prices falling - and growth slowing - the delinquency rate will probably increase later this year.

by Calculated Risk on 8/26/2010 11:25:00 AM

Usually I don't post all the regional manufacturing surveys, but it appears manfuacturing is slowing right now - and the regional surveys provide early clues ...

From the Kansas City Fed:

Tenth District manufacturing activity slowed in August, and producers were somewhat less optimistic than in previous months.
...
The net percentage of firms reporting month-over-month increases in production in August was 0, down from 14 in July ... The shipments, new orders, and employment indexes dropped into negative territory, and the order backlog index slipped from -2 to -16.

This is the lowest level for the Kansas City survey since August 2009.

Yesterday I compared the ISM PMI (to be released next week) with the regional Fed surveys, and based on these surveys, I expect the PMI to fall further in August.

Note on MBA: I'll post analysis of the MBA Q2 delinquency data after I receive the material (some sort of glitch this morning).

by Calculated Risk on 8/26/2010 11:06:00 AM

On the MBA conference call concerning the "Q2 2010 National Delinquency Survey", MBA Chief Economist Jay Brinkmann said this morning:

Survey covers about 88% of mortgage market.

Mixed news in Q2.

Percent of loans in foreclosure down.

Foreclosure starts fell.

90+ day delinquent category dropped sharply. Some of this decline is because modifications were included as delinquent until the borrower had made several payments - and some of these borrowers with modifications are now being considered current.

However short term delinquencies are increasing again.

Delinquencies and foreclosure starts continue to move to prime fixed rate and FHA loans.

"Improvements are more of a hope". Some of the key factors leading to improvement "may not continue through the year".

From MarketWatch: Foreclosure inventory down, new delinquencies up

The percentage of mortgage loans somewhere in the foreclosure process was 4.57% in the second quarter, down from 4.63% in the first quarter; the percentage is still up from 4.3% a year ago. However, the percent of loans one payment behind is now a seasonally adjusted 3.51%, said Jay Brinkmann, the MBA's chief economist

Note: I have not received the press release or materials. Hopefully I'll have more later today.

by Calculated Risk on 8/26/2010 08:30:00 AM

The DOL reports on weekly unemployment insurance claims:

In the week ending Aug. 21, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 473,000, a decrease of 31,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 504,000. The 4-week moving average was 486,750, an increase of 3,250 from the previous week's revised average of 483,500.

The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment during the week ending Aug. 14 was 4,456,000, a decrease of 62,000 from the preceding week's revised level of 4,518,000.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since January 2000.

The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims increased this week by 3,250 to 486,750. This is the highest level since November 2009.

Weekly claims are very volatile, and most people follow the 4-week average to smooth out the weekly noise. It is good news that the number of initial claims declined from last week, but the level of claims - and the 4-week average - suggests a weak job market.

by Calculated Risk on 8/25/2010 10:51:00 PM

The 10-year Ireland-to-German bond spread has risen to 344 bps, up from 318 bps yesterday. This spread is larger than during the financial crisis in May when the spread peaked at 306 bps.

The 10-year Greece-to-German bond spread is now 926 bps, just below the peak level of 963 bps in May.

The MBA will release the Q2 2010 National Delinquency Survey (NDS) at 10 AM ET. I'll have a couple of post with graphs and conference call comments.

And a couple of posts today:

New Home Sales declined to Record Low in July

And a graph comparing the regional Fed manufacturing surveys and the ISM PMI. This shows why I think the PMI will decline further in August.

Best to all.

by Calculated Risk on 8/25/2010 06:31:00 PM

From the American Trucking Association: ATA Truck Tonnage Index Rose 1.5 Percent in July

The American Trucking Associations’ advance seasonally adjusted (SA) For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index increased 1.5 percent in July, although June’s reduction was revised from 1.4 percent to 1.6 percent. The latest improvement raised the SA index from 108.3 (2000=100) in June to 110 in July.
...
Compared with July 2009, SA tonnage climbed 7.4 percent, which matched June’s increase and was the eighth consecutive year-over-year gain. Year-to-date, tonnage is up 6.7 percent compared with the same period in 2009.

ATA Chief Economist Bob Costello said that July’s data didn’t change his outlook for subdued tonnage growth in the months ahead, stating, “The economy is slowing and truck freight tonnage has essentially gone sideways since April 2010.”

This graph from the ATA shows the Truck Tonnage Index since Jan 2006 (no larger image).

This index has been moving sideways for several months ...

by Calculated Risk on 8/25/2010 03:05:00 PM

Yesterday, in a short preview of coming negative news, I mentioned that the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) PMI will be released next week (Wed, Sept 1st) - and that the ISM PMI will probably continue to decline based on the regional manufacturing reports.

Gavyn Davies at the Financial Times posted a graph of the New York and Philly Fed surveys compared to the ISM's PMI (ht Paulo). This was referenced in Davies' article: US economy is slowing more than the Fed has recognised

Below is a similar graph.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

For this graph I averaged the New York and Philly Fed surveys (dashed green), and averaged five surveys including New York, Philly, Richmond, Dallas and Kansas City (blue). The August Kansas City survey will be released tomorrow, and the August Dallas survey will be released on Monday, August 30th.

The PMI (red) is through July.

Based on the regional surveys so far, it appears that the PMI will decline further in August - but still be above 50 (indicating expansion in August).