by Calculated Risk on 1/04/2010 08:42:00 PM

Commentary from surferdude808:

Since August 7, 2009, each week an Unofficial Problem Bank List has been posted to Calculated Risk. The Unofficial Problem Bank List is an attempt to mirror the number of problem banks the FDIC reports each quarter.

The FDIC does not disclose the institutions on its Problem Bank List and CAMELS ratings are confidential. For the most part, institutions on the FDIC Problem Bank List have a CAMELS rating of 4 or 5. Normally, problem institutions or those with a CAMELS rating of 4 or 5 are subject to a safety & soundness formal enforcement action by their respective primary federal supervisor (Federal Reserve, FDIC, OCC, or OTS).

Since the last crisis, much to the consternation of the federal supervisory agencies, they are required to make all formal enforcement actions public. Historically, there is a high positive correlation between a safety & soundness formal enforcement action and a CAMELS rating of 4 or 5. This relationship is the basis for the Unofficial Problem Bank List, which is comprised of institutions operating under a safety & soundness formal enforcement action, and some institutions that have made public announcements that lead us to believe a formal enforcement action is likely.

With the passage of the year, we thought it would be of interest to analyze how the Unofficial Problem Bank List has changed since it was first published. The list had 389 institutions on August 7, 2009 and it finished the year at 575. During the past five months, there have been 277 additions and 91 deletions.

There are four ways to be removed from the list – failure, voluntary dissolution, merger with another institution (without FDIC assistance), or improvement in condition whereby the action is terminated. Of the 91 deletions, 74 are from failure, 9 are from termination of the enforcement action, and 8 are from an unassisted merger.

Of the 389 institutions on the August 7, 2009 list, 325 are still on the January 1, 2010 list as 64 were removed because of failure (48), action termination (9), and unassisted merger (7). Interestingly, 26 institutions that were added after August 7, 2009 failed before January 1, 2010.

So far, only 74 or 11.1 percent of the 666 institutions that have been on the list have failed. However, failure is the cause for 81.3 percent of all deletions. While failures only represent 11.1 percent of institutions that have appeared on the list, failed bank assets (quarter before failure) of $135.8 billion represent 30 percent of the $450.2 billion of assets that have been on the list. Moreover, failure is responsible for 98 percent of the $138.6 billion of assets of institutions deleted from the list. Thus, for the second half of 2009, failure was the primary way institutions and assets were removed from the list.

Unofficial Problem Bank List Change Summary
		Number of Institutions	Assets ($Thousands)
Start	(8/7/2009)	389	276,313,429
Additions		277	173,919,123
Subtractions
	Action Terminated	9	1,605,652
	Unassisted Merger	8	1,141,008
	Failures	74	135,814,823
	Asset Change		8,453,550
End	(1/01/2010)	575	303,217,519

by Calculated Risk on 1/04/2010 05:51:00 PM

From the NY Times: Oil Surges Above $81, Driven by Several Factors

A combination of frigid weather, expectations of an improving economy and new tensions between Russia and Belarus catapulted crude oil prices above $81 a barrel on Monday.

Higher prices could impact the U.S. economic recovery (it is probably time to start watching U.S. vehicle miles driven again). Here is a graph of nominal oil prices ...

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

These are spot prices for Cushing WTI from the EIA (source).

Back in the Spring of 2008, we started seeing many signs of potential demand destruction - including fewer U.S miles driven, Asian countries reducing gasoline subsidies, and China stock piling oil for the Olympics.

And maybe we are seeing the first signs of demand destruction again, since the Dept of Transportation reports that U.S. vehicle miles declined in October: Traffic Volume Trends

Travel on all roads and streets changed by -0.5% (-1.4 billion vehicle miles) for October 2009 as compared with October 2008. ...

Cumulative Travel for 2009 changed by +0.2% (4.8 billion vehicle miles).

The second graph shows the comparison of month to the same month in the previous year as reported by the DOT.

Miles driven in October 2009 were 0.5% less than in October 2008, the first year-over-year decline since May 2009.

Still - I haven't seen any stories like the following from the NY Times on June 28, 2008: Cruise Night, Without the Car

For car-loving American teenagers, this is turning out to be the summer the cruising died.
...
From coast to coast, American teenagers appear to be driving less this summer. Police officers who keep watch on weekend cruising zones say fewer youths are spending their time driving around in circles...

There couldn't have been a clearer sign of a top in oil!

by Calculated Risk on 1/04/2010 03:38:00 PM

This will be busy week for employment related reports culminating with the BLS report on Friday. Here is some info on the impact of Census 2010 on employment, and the relationship between the ISM manufacturing report and BLS reported manufacturing payroll jobs.

Click on photo for hi-res image in new window.

The Census Bureau kicked off the Census 2010 road tour today.

During the next four months, the tour will be part of the largest civic outreach and awareness campaign in U.S. history -- stopping and exhibiting at more than 800 events nationwide.

Of course most of the Census will be conducted by mail in March, with followup visits for non-respondents. As we discussed on Friday, the Census Bureau will hire temporary census takers for most of the followup work (See: Impact of Census on Employment and Unemployment Rate).

The key point is that Census 2010 will boost employment in March, April and especially in May. And this boost will mostly be unwound over the period June through September. The Census gives, and the Census takes.

To track the impact on employment, the BLS provides a monthly report of Census hiring. This graph is from the BLS report and shows the historical impact of the Census on Federal Government employment.

There was a small spike in employment in April 2009, and currently the decennial census has little impact on employment. This will be something to check every month - especially from March through September.

And from the ISM Manufacturing report this morning on employment:

ISM's Employment Index registered 52 percent in December, which is 1.2 percentage points higher than the 50.8 percent reported in November. This is the third month of growth in manufacturing employment, following 14 consecutive months of decline. An Employment Index above 49.7 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data on manufacturing employment.
emphasis added

The following graph shows the ISM Manufacturing Employment Index vs. the BLS reported monthly change in manufacturing employment (as a percent of manufacturing employment).

The graph includes data from 1948 through 2009. The earlier period (1948 - 1988) is in red, and the last 20 years is in blue.

This shows that the ISM employment index is related to changes in BLS employment.

The relationship is noisy, and the equation is for just the last 20 years. This suggest the ISM employment index of about 51.3 is consistent with an increase in BLS reported manufacturing employment. This is higher than the ISM estimate that appears to be based more on older data.

by Calculated Risk on 1/04/2010 01:09:00 PM

From Fed Governor Elizabeth Duke: The Economic Outlook

In my view, the outlook for economic activity depends importantly on our ability to build on the progress to date in improving the operation of financial markets and restoring the flow of credit to households and businesses.

Although household wealth has received a boost from the gains in the stock market over the last nine months and from the stabilization in house prices, household balance sheets remain weak. In 2009, household income received some temporary support from the tax cuts and transfer payments enacted with the fiscal stimulus package and from the extensions of unemployment insurance. Over the coming year, households should begin to see gains in income associated with an improvement in the labor market, and the drag on spending from past declines in real net worth should ease. As their income and balance sheets improve, consumers should have better access to credit. Favorable trends in income and employment should also bolster consumer confidence, although one risk I see to the outlook for household spending is the possibility of a rise in the personal saving rate as consumers choose to shore up their balance sheets rather than spend. While good in the long run, increased saving means consumers are providing less of a short-run boost to the economy.

The outlook for homebuilding will depend critically on the continuation of the uptrend in the demand for housing that began in early 2009. I anticipate that low mortgage rates and house prices that are still very low compared with the recent past will continue to provide important support for demand. And a shift in expectations from falling house prices to modest appreciation should encourage buyers to invest in houses. That said, the headwinds in housing and mortgage markets remain relatively strong and are likely to restrain the pace at which the residential construction sector recovers. Many of the existing homeowners who face payment problems are having trouble restructuring their loans, and the large backlog of foreclosed properties will likely take several years to resolve. Tighter standards for government-backed loans and still-restrictive credit conditions in private loan markets are also likely to slow the housing recovery. Nevertheless, with the inventory of new homes having been worked down to a relatively low level, even a gradual strengthening of demand should lead to an upturn in homebuilding.

Prospects for a recovery in business investment are getting better as we move into 2010. Typically, business confidence builds as firms see a sustained increase in sales and output. Various indicators of business sentiment rebounded over the second half of 2009 as economic activity accelerated, and the latest surveys of capital spending plans have been more positive. That said, the amount of unused capacity in the business sector is substantial, which implies that the recovery in spending on equipment and software will likely be more gradual than typically occurs during a cyclical recovery.
...
Unfortunately, the outlook for commercial real estate is much less favorable. Hit hard by the loss of businesses and employment, a good deal of retail, office, and industrial space is standing vacant. In addition, many businesses have cut expenses by renegotiating existing leases. The combination of reduced cash flows and higher rates of return required by investors leads to lower valuations, and many existing buildings are selling at a loss. As a result, credit conditions in this market are particularly strained. Commercial mortgage delinquency rates have soared. ...

In this environment, a turnaround in CRE is likely to lag the improvement in overall economic activity. However, compared with the situation in the early 1990s, the problems in this sector now appear to be due largely to poor business fundamentals rather than widespread overbuilding, suggesting that the performance of the CRE sector will gradually begin to improve as the economy continues to strengthen.

An important element of a sustained economic recovery will be an improvement in labor market conditions. Employment gains typically lag the recovery in sales and production in the early months of an economic upturn. In many cycles, the lag occurs because businesses need to restore productivity and are reluctant to hire until they are more confident that any pickup in sales will be maintained. In this cycle, the reductions in jobs and hours of work have been so deep, and the pressure to cut costs has been so strong, that businesses in the aggregate have already realized solid gains in productivity. As a result, I expect that businesses will begin to add jobs this year, but I anticipate that they will do so cautiously in order to hang on to their cost savings and efficiency gains.

Even as the unemployment rate begins to decline later this year, it likely will remain high by historical standards. Based on the experience of the last two economic recoveries, net gains of roughly 100,000 payroll jobs each month are needed to reduce the jobless rate by 0.1 percentage point. ...
emphasis added

I think Ms. Duke is somewhat too optimistic on housing and employment. It might take more payroll jobs to lower the unemployment rate this time because the Labor Force Participation Rate has declined so sharply; the BLS reported the participation rate as 65.0% in November (the percentage of the working age population in the labor force). This is the lowest level since the mid-80s, and I expect a number of people will rejoin the labor force at the first sign of an employment recovery, putting upward pressure on the unemployment rate.

by Calculated Risk on 1/04/2010 10:23:00 AM

Through November construction spending has followed the expected script for 2009: a likely bottom for residential construction spending, and a collapse in private non-residential construction.

Residential construction spending was off slightly in November, and is now only 5.8% above the bottom earlier in 2009. I expect some residential spending growth in 2010, but the increases in spending will probably be sluggish until the large overhang of existing inventory is reduced.

Non-residential appeared flat in November, but that was only because of a downward revision to October spending. The collapse in non-residential construction spending continues ...

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

The first graph shows private residential and nonresidential construction spending since 1993. Note: nominal dollars, not inflation adjusted.

Residential construction spending decreased in November, and nonresidential spending continued to decline.

Private residential construction spending is now 62.9% below the peak of early 2006.

Private non-residential construction spending is 22.5% below the peak of October 2008.

The second graph shows the year-over-year change for private residential and nonresidential construction spending.

Nonresidential spending is off 22.5% on a year-over-year (YoY) basis.

Residential construction spending is still off 22.2% from a year ago, but the negative YoY change is getting smaller.

For the first time since the housing bust started, nonresidential spending is off more on a YoY basis than residential.

Here is the report from the Census Bureau: November 2009 Construction at $900.1 Billion Annual Rate

by Calculated Risk on 1/04/2010 10:00:00 AM

PMI at 55.9% in December, from 53.6 in November, and down from 55.7 in October.

From the Institute for Supply Management: December 2009 Manufacturing ISM Report On Business®

Economic activity in the manufacturing sector expanded in December for the fifth consecutive month, and the overall economy grew for the eighth consecutive month, say the nation's supply executives in the latest Manufacturing ISM Report On Business®.

The report was issued today by Norbert J. Ore, CPSM, C.P.M., chair of the Institute for Supply Management™ Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. "The manufacturing sector grew for the fifth consecutive month in December as the PMI rose to 55.9 percent, its highest reading since April 2006 when it registered 56 percent. This month's report is quite strong as both the New Orders and Production Indexes are above 60 percent. The sector may be benefiting from an excessive destocking cycle as indicated by the recent performance of the Customers' Inventories Index. Customers' inventories have been 'too low' for nine consecutive months, and this month's index is the lowest reading since the inception of the index in January 1997. Overall, the recovery in manufacturing is continuing, but there are still some industries mired in the downturn as evidenced by the seven industries still in decline."
...
ISM's Employment Index registered 52 percent in December, which is 1.2 percentage points higher than the 50.8 percent reported in November. This is the third month of growth in manufacturing employment, following 14 consecutive months of decline. An Employment Index above 49.7 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data on manufacturing employment.
emphasis added

As noted, any reading above 50 shows expansion.

by Calculated Risk on 1/04/2010 08:40:00 AM

From Wyatt Buchanan at the San Francisco Chronicle: California leaders seek budget help from D.C.

California's political leaders, who are facing the daunting challenge of closing an estimated $20.7 billion budget deficit this year, are looking to Washington for help. Just don't call it a bailout.
...
"No one is looking for a bailout. We're looking for an investment," [Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg] said ...

On Friday, Schwarzenegger will release his initial budget proposal for the next fiscal year, and the Legislative Analyst's Office already has called on state leaders to "aggressively seek new federal assistance" to help close the projected deficit.

As the article notes, California sends far more to Washington D.C. then they receive (they are 43rd on the list of states) - we will probably hear more of that argument. Hey - it is an investment, not a bailout!

by Calculated Risk on 1/04/2010 12:29:00 AM

From Paul Krugman at the NY Times: That 1937 Feeling

The next employment report could show the economy adding jobs for the first time in two years. The next G.D.P. report is likely to show solid growth in late 2009. There will be lots of bullish commentary ...

Such blips are often, in part, statistical illusions. But even more important, they’re usually caused by an “inventory bounce.” ... Unfortunately, growth caused by an inventory bounce is a one-shot affair unless underlying sources of demand, such as consumer spending and long-term investment, pick up.

Which brings us to the still grim fundamentals of the economic situation.
...
There can’t be a new housing boom while the nation is still strewn with vacant houses and apartments left behind by the previous boom, and consumers — who are $11 trillion poorer than they were before the housing bust — are in no position to return to the buy-now-save-never habits of yore.

... A boom in business investment would be really helpful right now. But it’s hard to see where such a boom would come from: industry is awash in excess capacity, and commercial rents are plunging in the face of a huge oversupply of office space.

Can exports come to the rescue? ... But the deficit is widening again, in part because China and other surplus countries are refusing to let their currencies adjust.

So the odds are that any good economic news you hear in the near future will be a blip, not an indication that we’re on our way to sustained recovery.

A couple months ago I suggested a few possible upside surprises and downside risks to the 2010 outlook, and I suppose the most likely upside surprise would come from consumer spending. As Dr. Yellen noted in November: "Consumers have surprised us in the past with their free-spending ways and it’s not out of the question that they will do so again."

Note: I wrote that post when we though Q3 GDP growth was 3.5%, and I expected Q4 to be about the same. Since Q3 was revised down substantially, I now expect more of a transitory boost to Q4 GDP growth.

And I still think a sluggish 2010 is the most likely scenario. Dr. Krugman's concern is that policy makers will buy into the bullish commentary after a solid Q4, and repeat the mistakes of 1937.

by Calculated Risk on 1/03/2010 09:41:00 PM

From PIMCO's Paul McCulley: PIMCO’s Cyclical 2010 Outlook

The first issue is the peg between the Chinese yuan and the U.S. dollar, which essentially gives us a one-size-fits-all monetary policy in a very differentiated world. Progress, or lack of progress, on this issue could lead to several outcomes. If China were to let its currency appreciate, it could regain a degree of monetary policy autonomy and a better ability to manage the risk of overheating and asset price inflation. Another outcome, however, is that China refuses to let the yuan appreciate, essentially maintaining too easy of a monetary policy for itself and the developing countries that shadow Chinese policies. This would create bubble risk, particularly for assets such as emerging market (EM) equities and commodities.

The second major uncertainty is what will happen when the Fed completes its mortgage-backed securities (MBS) buying programs. We know that it will have an unfriendly effect on the interest rate markets, but we don’t know the magnitude, because it’s too hard to isolate the supply and demand dynamics between fundamentals and the stimulus programs. ...

The third uncertainty is any change in the Fed’s pre-commitment language, which is currently committed to keeping the fed funds rate exceptionally low for an “extended period.” We don’t think the Fed is going to tighten any time in 2010, but long before the FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) actually does the deed, it will have to change its language. That could very well happen in 2010, and there is genuine uncertainty over how quickly and strongly the market will anticipate a tightening process. Our gut feeling is that the moment the Fed changes any one of its words, it’s going to be a very unpleasant experience, because the marketplace has very little patience and a very big imagination. The most important book at the Fed right now is a thesaurus, and it’s probably sitting on top of Paul Samuelson’s Foundations of Economic Analysis.
emphasis added

Professor Krugman discussed the Chinese peg a few days ago: Chinese New Year

China has become a major financial and trade power. But it doesn’t act like other big economies. Instead, it follows a mercantilist policy, keeping its trade surplus artificially high. And in today’s depressed world, that policy is, to put it bluntly, predatory.
...
My back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that for the next couple of years Chinese mercantilism may end up reducing U.S. employment by around 1.4 million jobs.

And the Fed MBS purchase program is just one of several government housing support programs that is scheduled to end in the next six months (the MBS program is scheduled to be complete by the end of Q1). My estimate is mortgage rates will rise by about 35 to 50 bps relative to the Ten Year treasury yield when the Fed stops buying MBS.

And on the Fed Funds rate, it is very unlikely that the Fed will raise rates in 2010. However McCulley thinks the Fed might change the wording of the statement - and he believes "it’s going to be a very unpleasant experience, because the marketplace has very little patience and a very big imagination".

I think jobs and the housing market (prices, supply and demand) are the two biggest economic issues in the U.S. this year.

by Calculated Risk on 1/03/2010 05:19:00 PM

Note: Here is weekly summary and a look ahead.

From Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke: Monetary Policy and the Housing Bubble

And reports on the speech:
From the WSJ: Bernanke Says Rate Increases Must Be an Option
From the NY Times: Bernanke Blames Weak Regulation for Financial Crisis

Dr. Bernanke said that monetary policy (a low Fed Funds rate) was probably not to blame for the housing bubble, and he used data from other countries to make this argument: "the relationship between the stance of monetary policy and house price appreciation across countries is quite weak".

He suggested the primary cause was the lack of effective regulation associated with non-traditional mortgage products.

I noted earlier that the most important source of lower initial monthly payments, which allowed more people to enter the housing market and bid for properties, was not the general level of short-term interest rates, but the increasing use of more exotic types of mortgages and the associated decline of underwriting standards. That conclusion suggests that the best response to the housing bubble would have been regulatory, not monetary. Stronger regulation and supervision aimed at problems with underwriting practices and lenders' risk management would have been a more effective and surgical approach to constraining the housing bubble than a general increase in interest rates. Moreover, regulators, supervisors, and the private sector could have more effectively addressed building risk concentrations and inadequate risk-management practices without necessarily having had to make a judgment about the sustainability of house price increases.
emphasis added

Here are his two slides about exotic mortgages:

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Slide 7 also shows initial monthly payments for some alternative types of variable-rate mortgages, including interest-only ARMs, long-amortization ARMs, negative amortization ARMs (in which the initial payment does not even cover interest costs), and pay-option ARMs (which give the borrower considerable flexibility regarding the size of monthly payments in the early stages of the contract). These more exotic mortgages show much more significant reductions in the initial monthly payment than could be obtained through a standard ARM. Clearly, for lenders and borrowers focused on minimizing the initial payment, the choice of mortgage type was far more important than the level of short-term interest rates.

The availability of these alternative mortgage products proved to be quite important and, as many have recognized, is likely a key explanation of the housing bubble. Slide 8 shows the percentage of variable-rate mortgages originated with various exotic features, beginning in 2000. As you can see, the use of these nonstandard features increased rapidly from early in the decade through 2005 or 2006. Because such features are presumably not appropriate for many borrowers, Slide 8 is evidence of a protracted deterioration in mortgage underwriting standards, which was further exacerbated by practices such as the use of no-documentation loans. The picture that emerges is consistent with many accounts of the period: At some point, both lenders and borrowers became convinced that house prices would only go up. Borrowers chose, and were extended, mortgages that they could not be expected to service in the longer term. They were provided these loans on the expectation that accumulating home equity would soon allow refinancing into more sustainable mortgages.

But it seems Bernanke left out a couple key points.

Bernanke used data from other countries to suggest monetary policy was not a huge contributor to the bubble ... however, Bernanke didn't discuss if non-traditional mortgage products contributed to housing bubbles in other countries. This would seem like a key missing part of the speech.

Bernanke didn't discuss how the current regulatory structure missed this "protracted deterioration in mortgage underwriting standards" (even though many people were pointing it out in real time). And Bernanke didn't discuss specifically how the new regulatory structure would catch this deterioration in standards. How about some specific example of how the previous regulatory structure missed underwriting problems, and how the new structure would have caught the problem?

I'm more interested in what Dr. Bernanke didn't say.

by Calculated Risk on 1/03/2010 01:58:00 PM

The first week of the new year will be chock-full of economic data, culminating with the December employment report on Friday. Expectations are for the BLS to report somewhere between 50,000 jobs lost or gained, with a consensus of no change in net jobs and the unemployment rate to remain steady.

On Monday, the ISM manufacturing index and construction spending will be released. The highlight for Tuesday will be auto sales and on Wednesday the ISM non-manufacturing index will be released.

Other economic releases include the number of personal bankruptcy filings for December, the apartment vacancy rate for Q4, factory orders, and various employment reports.

And a summary of last week ...

Case-Shiller house price index increased slightly in October

S&P/Case-Shiller released their monthly Home Price Indices for October. The following graph shows the Seasonally Adjusted data - some sites report the NSA data.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

The first graph shows the nominal seasonally adjusted Composite 10 and Composite 20 indices (the Composite 20 was started in January 2000).

The Composite 10 index is off 30.5% from the peak, and up about 0.4% in October.

The Composite 20 index is off 29.5% from the peak, and up 0.4% in October.

NOTE: S&P reported this as "flat", but they were using the NSA data.

Case-Shiller house prices by City

The seconrd graph shows the price declines from the peak for each city included in S&P/Case-Shiller indices.

Prices decreased (SA) in 9 of the 20 Case-Shiller cities in October.

In Las Vegas, house prices have declined 56.3% from the peak. At the other end of the spectrum, prices in Dallas are only off about 5.4% from the peak - and up slightly in 2009. Prices have declined by double digits from the peak in 18 of the 20 Case-Shiller cities.

Fannie Mae reported delinquencies increased sharply in October



Fannie Mae reported that the rate of serious delinquencies - at least 90 days behind - for conventional loans in its single-family guarantee business increased to 4.98% in October, up from 4.72% in September - and up from 1.89% in October 2008.

Other Economic Stories ...

From Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke today: Monetary Policy and the Housing Bubble

House Prices: Stress Test, Price-to-Rent, and More

From the WSJ: Treasury Ends TARP Bank Investments

From Dow Jones: Revisions Show Chicago PMI At 58.7 In December. Note: the Chicago Institute for Supply Management revised down the Chicago PMI to 58.7 on Thursday from the announced reading of 60.0 on Wednesday. The most significant change was to the employment index that now shows contraction at 47.6 compared to the announced 51.2.

From the American Trucking Association: ATA Truck Tonnage Index Jumped 2.7 Percent In November

Restaurant Index Shows Contraction in November

Unofficial Problem Bank List Increases to 575

Best wishes and Happy New Year to all.

by Calculated Risk on 1/03/2010 10:31:00 AM

The FDIC is on bank failure holiday until Jan 8th, but surferdude808 is still working!

This is an unofficial list of Problem Banks compiled only from public sources.

Changes and comments from surferdude808:

The Unofficial Problem Bank List increased this week by 30 institutions to 575 primarily because the FDIC released its actions for November 2009.

Aggregate assets increased by $7.6 billion. There were no removals this week from closure, action termination, or unassisted merger.

Among the additions are Torrey Pines Bank, San Diego, CA ($1.1 billion); United Bank & Trust Company, Versailles, KY ($761 million); Peninsula Bank, Englewood, FL ($646 million); Viking Bank, Seattle, WA ($632 million); and Northwest Georgia Bank, Ringgold, GA ($586 million).

Also, the FDIC issued a Cease & Desist Order against Legacy Bank, Scottsdale, AZ ($194 million), which is a subsidiary of Peotone Bancorp, Inc. Legacy Bank and its sister bank, Peotone Bank and Trust Company, which also is operating under a formal enforcement action, are controlled by an ownership group that had seven banks closed on July 2, 2009 that cost the FDIC $314 million.

In 1989, the FDIC received authority to assess affiliates for resolution costs under what is commonly referred to as cross-guaranty. The FDIC used cross guaranty to close still solvent banks controlled by FBOP Corp. on October 30, 2009. It is interesting that the FDIC has not applied cross guaranty to the remaining banking subsidiaries of Peotone Bancorp.

The list is compiled from regulator press releases or from public news sources (see Enforcement Action Type link for source). The FDIC data is released monthly with a delay, and the Fed and OTC data is more timely. The OCC data is a little lagged. Credit: surferdude808.

See description below table for Class and Cert (and a link to FDIC ID system).

For a full screen version of the table click here.

The table is wide - use scroll bars to see all information!

NOTE: Columns are sortable - click on column header (Assets, State, Bank Name, Date, etc.)



Class: from FDIC

The FDIC assigns classification codes indicating an institution's charter type (commercial bank, savings bank, or savings association), its chartering agent (state or federal government), its Federal Reserve membership status (member or nonmember), and its primary federal regulator (state-chartered institutions are subject to both federal and state supervision). These codes are:

N National chartered commercial bank supervised by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

SM State charter Fed member commercial bank supervised by the Federal Reserve

NM State charter Fed nonmember commercial bank supervised by the FDIC

SA State or federal charter savings association supervised by the Office of Thrift Supervision

SB State charter savings bank supervised by the FDIC

Cert: This is the certificate number assigned by the FDIC used to identify institutions and for the issuance of insurance certificates. Click on the number and the Institution Directory (ID) system "will provide the last demographic and financial data filed by the selected institution".

by Calculated Risk on 1/03/2010 09:16:00 AM

From Peter Goodman at the NY Times: Real Estate in Cape Coral, Fla., Is Far From a Recovery (ht Craig)

As we navigate this speculator’s paradise turned financial wasteland, Mr. Joseph stands at the front of the bus in a green polo shirt, highlighting specimens like this one: a white stucco house fronted by palm trees and topped by a Spanish tile roof on a canal emptying into the Gulf of Mexico. It last sold in 2005 for $850,000. Yours today for $273,000.

Goodman takes us along on a foreclosure tour and provides a few anecdotes about the MESS.

by Calculated Risk on 1/02/2010 11:01:00 PM

From Dina ElBoghdady at the WaPo: Cash-rich real estate investors trigger bidding wars, frustrate other buyers

Investors have reemerged with brute force in the Washington region's real estate market over the past few months, triggering bidding wars in some neighborhoods teeming with foreclosed properties and hindering traditional home buyers ...

"What's happening in this area reflects what's happening in other parts of the country," said Sam Khater, senior economist at First American CoreLogic, which plans to release a report soon on all-cash deals. "In markets where price declines have been steep, we've seen quite a bit of competition between the low-end, first-time home buyers and investors."
...
"There are bidding wars out there. It's like the 2005 market but at discount prices," said Stella Barbour, a real estate agent at Jobin Realty in Northern Virginia.

We've been seeing a competition all year between cash flow investors and first time home buyers in California. This has pushed up prices in many low end distressed areas (but not all).

Back in early 2005, I drew a couple of rough supply-demand diagrams viewing the bubble era speculative buying as storage. This pushed up prices during the bubble (removing properties from supply), and pushed down prices during the bust (forced selling added to the supply). Unlike those speculators, many of the current cash flow investors are probably happy with the return and won't be forced sellers. But they could become sellers in the future, limiting future appreciation.

And it is important to remember that the numbers don't work for investors in the mid-to-high end areas (the rent to price ratio is lower), so this competition is mostly in the low end areas - the same areas that attract first time home buyers.

These bidding wars should be setting off some alarm bells with regulators - not because of the cash flow investors, but because of the loose lending standards for FHA loans.

by Calculated Risk on 1/02/2010 08:18:00 PM

Here is Professor Krugman's presentation to the Allied Social Science Associations this coming Monday: CRISES

Krugman discusses several currency crises and compares them to the current U.S. deleveraging cycle. Here is an excerpt (picking up near the conclusion):

Plunging prices of houses and CDOs ... don’t produce any corresponding macroeconomic silver lining. ... This suggests that we’re unlikely to see a phoenix-like recovery from the current slump. How long should recovery be expected to take?

Well, there aren’t many useful historical models. But the example that comes closest to the situation facing the United States today is that of Japan after its late-80s bubble burst, leaving serious debt problems behind. And a maximum-likelihood estimate of how long it will take to recover, based on the Japanese example, is ... forever. OK, strictly speaking it’s 18 years, since that’s how long it has been since the Japanese bubble burst, and Japan has never really escaped from its deflationary trap.

This line of thought explains why I’m skeptical about the optimism that’s widespread right now about recovery prospects. The main argument behind this optimism seems to be that in the past, big downturns in the world’s major economies have been followed by fast recoveries. But past downturns had very different causes, and there’s no good reason to regard them as good precedents.

Living in a crisis-ridden world

Looking back at U.S. commentary on past currency crises, what’s striking is the combination of moralizing and complacency. Other countries had crises because they did it wrong; we weren’t going to have one because we do it right.

As I’ve stressed, however, crises often – perhaps usually – happen to countries with great press. They’re only reclassified as sinners and deadbeats after things go wrong. And so it has proved for us, too.

And despite the praise being handed out to those who helped us avoid the worst, we are not handling the crisis well: fiscal stimulus has been inadequate, financial support has contained the damage but not restored a healthy banking system. All indications are that we’re going to have seriously depressed output for years to come. It’s what I feared/predicted in that 2001 paper: “[I]ntellectually consistent solutions to a domestic financial crisis of this type, like solutions to a third-generation currency crisis, are likely to seem too radical to be implemented in practice. And partial measures are likely to fail.”

Maybe policymakers will become wiser in the future. Maybe financial reform will reduce the occurrence of crises: major financial crises were much rarer between the end of World War II and the rise of financial deregulation after 1980 than they were before or since. Meanwhile, however, the fact is that the economic world is a surprisingly dangerous place.

by Calculated Risk on 1/02/2010 04:53:00 PM

Lauren Beale asks at the LA Times Money & Company blog: 2010: The year of the real estate auction?

Auctions gained traction in last year's down housing market as a way to sell real estate -- in all price ranges. It's a trend I expect to see more of in 2010, and not just for bank-owned homes.
...
Why I'm expecting to see more auctions in the mainstream: It gives the seller a defined time frame; if the house doesn't meet the "reserved price" the seller had in mind, then it can be always listed later; and the idea is still novel enough that the marketing is an attention-grabber for the house.

Ms. Beale features a high end home in her post (a very high end home!)

I think short sales will be a huge story in 2010 with the recent push by the Obama Administration. And I also expect short sale fraud be to be huge story (related party sales, under the table payments to sellers, and more)

by Calculated Risk on 1/02/2010 11:59:00 AM

From Roger Vincent at the LA Times: Retail space opens up as big chains shrink

Amid a still-tepid economic recovery, big retail chains are expected to continue closing their less productive stores and retrenching on expansion plans. But at the same time, others will be hurtling into the breach to take advantage of falling rents and vacancies in neighborhoods they couldn't get into a few years ago.

"The prediction for next year is more re-sizing and relocating of retailers," said real estate broker Richard Rizika of CB Richard Ellis.

There are almost 100 empty big-box retail stores in Los Angeles County, according to a study by Rizika. They have a combined total of 4.5 million square feet, or about 78 football fields' worth of vacant space for rent or sale. Most of that came from liquidated businesses Circuit City Inc., Mervyns and home furnishings chain Linens 'n Things Inc.

The vacancy rate is expected to rise further in 2010, and this will continue to push down rents - leading to more distressed retail properties - and also less investment in Multimerchandise shopping structures.

Reis is expected to report the U.S. mall vacancy rate for Q4 next week. Reis reported in October that the strip mall vacancy rate hit 10.3% in Q3 2009; the highest vacancy rate since 1992.

"Our outlook for retail properties as a whole is bleak," Victor Calanog, Reis director of research, said. "Until we see stabilization and recovery take root in both consumer spending and business spending and hiring, we do not foresee a recovery in the retail sector until late 2012 at the earliest."

by Calculated Risk on 1/02/2010 08:43:00 AM

Another "Lost Decade" story, this time in the WaPo by Neil Irwin: Aughts were a lost decade for U.S. economy, workers

It was, according to a wide range of data, a lost decade for American workers. ...

There has been zero net job creation since December 1999. ... Middle-income households made less in 2008, when adjusted for inflation, than they did in 1999 ... And the net worth of American households ... has also declined when adjusted for inflation ...

Click on graph for WaPo page in new window.

This graphic from the WaPo shows job growth by decade, change in GDP, and percent change in household wealth for every decade since 1940.

Hopefully the '10s will be much better.

by Calculated Risk on 1/01/2010 09:15:00 PM

From Peter Goodman at the NY Times: U.S. Loan Effort Is Seen as Adding to Housing Woes

The Obama administration’s $75 billion program to protect homeowners from foreclosure has been widely pronounced a disappointment, and some economists and real estate experts now contend it has done more harm than good.

... desperate homeowners have sent payments to banks in often-futile efforts to keep their homes, which some see as wasting dollars they could have saved in preparation for moving to cheaper rental residences. Some borrowers have seen their credit tarnished while falsely assuming that loan modifications involved no negative reports to credit agencies.

The article covers a number of topics, but I think these are key:

For the people that qualify - and aren't deep underwater on their homes - HAMP is a fine modification program. However there is no way this program will "reach up to 3 to 4 million at-risk homeowners". I noted HAMP would probably be a disappointment when it was announced early last year:

This probably leaves the homeowner far underwater (owing more than their home is worth). When these homeowners eventually try to sell, they will probably still face foreclosure - prolonging the housing slump. These are really not homeowners, they are debtowners / renters.

Treasury is terrified of a flood of new foreclosures. I believe that is why the Treasury issued a directive last week extending the trial modification period to at least the end of January.

There are several possible options:

More short sales. Short sale activity is already increasing, and the Treasury introduced the Foreclosure Alternatives Program to help with short sales and Deed-in-Lieu of Foreclosure transactions. However servicers are very afraid of short sale fraud (non-arm length transactions), and short sales are also distressed properties - pushing down prices - something Treasury is desperately trying to avoid.

Encouraging servicers to write down principal. This would be very expensive, and if paid for by taxpayers - it would be very unpopular because it would appear to favor speculators over the prudent. This is what Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's economy.com is supporting:

Mr. Zandi argues that the administration needs a new initiative that attacks a primary source of foreclosures: the roughly 15 million American homeowners who are underwater, meaning they owe the bank more than their home is worth.
...
Mr. Zandi proposes that the Treasury Department push banks to write down some loan balances by reimbursing the companies for their losses. ... “We want to overwhelm this problem,” he said. “If we do go back into recession, it will be very difficult to get out.”

Converting homeowners to renters. This is something Dean Baker suggested, and is kind of a Single Family Public Housing program. This would avoid the flood of foreclosures, and the banks could sell the homes over several years.

None of these programs is especially attractive, so I expect more delays and "can kicking" that will keep foreclosures elevated for years.

by Calculated Risk on 1/01/2010 05:54:00 PM

Nick Timiraos at the WSJ writes: Five Key Housing Issues to Watch in 2010

Here is his list:

Mortgage rates. Timiraos discusses what will happen to mortgage rates when the Fed stops buying MBS.

Fannie, Freddie and the FHA. Timiraos discusses the uncertainty about Fannie and Freddie, and the expected tightening of FHA lending standards.

Loan modifications. The HAMP program has converted few borrowers to permanent status. Will there be a new flood of foreclosures and distressed homes when the HAMP trial period ends?

More loan resets. This is really about recasts. The key index rates - like LIBOR and the one-year Treasury - are so low, the resets don't matter. But for those paying interest only or with a negatively amortizing loan, a recast could mean a significantly higher monthly payment.

Tax credit and home sales. Timiraos wonders about the impact on the market when the tax credit ends.

I reviewed the status of all these issues in Government Housing Support Update

Although all of these issues are important, I'd probably start from a different perspective:
1) What is the current supply situation and how will it be impacted in 2010?
2) What will happen to demand?
3) What will happen to prices?

As an example, the loan modifications and more loan recasts impact supply, whereas higher mortgage rates, tighter lending standards, and the end of the tax credit will all impact demand. I'll try to address these issues in a 2010 housing overview soon.