by Calculated Risk on 4/18/2010 10:03:00 PM

Several articles tonight ...

From Gretchen Morgenson and Landon Thomas Jr. at the NY Timmes: A Glare on Goldman, From U.S. and Beyond

“We request that S.E.C., with all due haste, pursue investigations into the remaining 24 Abacus transactions for securities fraud, evaluate the extent of any receipt, by Goldman Sachs, of fraudulently generated A.I.G.-issued credit default swap payments, and vigorously pursue the recovery of such payments on behalf of the U.S. taxpayer,” the [Representatives Elijah E. Cummings and Peter DeFazio] wrote to Mary L. Schapiro, the head of the [S.E.C.], in a letter dated April 19. Mr. Cummings and Mr. DeFazio are still gathering signatures from other members of Congress to add to their letter, so it has not yet been sent.

From Trish Regan at CNBC: Pursuing Banking Fraud is 'Top Priority': SEC'S Khuzami

In the Securities and Exchange Commission's first public statement since its press conference announcing charges against Goldman Sachs on Friday, S.E.C. Enforcement Director Robert Khuzami told CNBC, "We have brought and will continue to pursue cases involving the products and practices related to the financial crisis." ... a wide range of cases are currently being investigated.

From Carrick Mollenkamp, Serena Ng, Scott Patterson, and Gergory Zuckerman the WSJ: SEC Investigating Other Soured Deals

The Securities and Exchange Commission ... is investigating whether other mortgage deals arranged by some of Wall Street's biggest firms may have crossed the line into misleading investors.

From Edward Wyatt at the NY Times: S.E.C. Puts Wall St. on Notice

In the last few years, the Securities and Exchange Commission seemed like the cop in the doughnut shop, sitting idly by while the likes of Lehman Brothers and Bernard L. Madoff ran amok.
...
In interviews this weekend, Mary L. Schapiro, the commission’s chairwoman, and Robert Khuzami, its new director of enforcement, said the agency was stepping up both its rule-making and its investigations in the wake of the financial crisis.

And from John Emshwiller at the WSJ: Countrywide Probe Shows Signs of Life

Federal criminal investigators looking into the collapse of Countrywide Financial Corp. have been calling witnesses before a grand jury, say people familiar with the matter. Such a step suggests that the investigation of the one-time mortgage giant, which has been continuing for about two years, could be moving closer to a resolution.

by Calculated Risk on 4/18/2010 07:00:00 PM

Ryan Avent discusses the Minsky Conference in The Economist: First, define the problem

I HAVE been meaning to summarise my thoughts on financial regulatory reform in the wake of the Hyman Minsky conference on same. I have to say, it has left me with a sense of resigned cycnicism.
...
On to more specific thoughts. The Federal Reserve is very unhappy with the prospect of losing its regulatory authority over all but the largest financial institutions. ... I found this all to be exasperating. None of the attending presidents adequately explained how a Fed that completely failed to prevent dangerous consolidation before the crisis should now be viewed as a credible enemy of too-big-to-fail after the crisis. None of the attending presidents provided tangible evidence of internal changes designed to make the Fed a more credible regulator. Each was asked about the odd disconnect between the Fed's pre-crisis actions and its post-crisis rhetoric, and each responded by saying little more than "we've learned our lesson, now trust us".... If it believes it can regulate most effectively, [the Fed] should be explicit about how it might do that. ... If the incentives were in place to turn a blind eye before, and little has changed, then "we've learned our lesson" will not make for a sustainable model of competent regulation.

... several of the conference's speakers made the point that regulators had about 90% of the tools they needed to prevent a serious crisis before the crisis hit. They just didn't use them. A lack of needed tools is a convenient excuse for everyone who failed to do their job before the crash, which is everyone, and so you see the reform debate focusing on which new rules or institutions or regulators or authorities are needed that weren't previously around. In some cases, the new tools argument makes sense, but most of the time the real problem was that the people in charge were unwilling to do their jobs.

I think we need an explanation of how the financial reform would have caught the bubble earlier.

by Calculated Risk on 4/18/2010 11:50:00 AM

There will be two key housing reports released at the end of this week: Existing Home sales on Thursday and New Home sales on Friday.

Early in the week, the LoanPerformance house price index (for February) will be released. This will probably show further price declines in February (not seasonally adjusted). Other reports that will be released this week include the Moodys/REAL Commercial Property Price Index (for February), DOTs Vehicle Miles Driven for February, and the DataQuick's Q1 Notice of Defaults (NODs) report for California.

On Monday, the Conference Board's index of leading indicators for March will be released at 10 AM.

On Wednesday, the AIA's Architecture Billings Index for March will be released (a leading indicator for commercial real estate). Also the weekly MBA Mortgage Purchase Applications index will be released.

On Thursday the closely watched initial weekly unemployment claims will be released at 8:30 AM. The consensus is for a decline to 460K this week from 484K last week. The NAR will release Existing Home sales for March at 10 AM. The consensus is for an increase in sales to 5.25 million (SAAR) from 5.02 million (SAAR) in February. The FHFA house price index will be released on Thursday (although Case-Shiller and LoanPerformance are probably the most followed).

On Friday, March Durable Goods Orders will be released at 8:30 AM. The consensus is for a 0.4% increase. New Home sales for March will be released at 10 AM, and consensus is for an increase to 330 thousand (SAAR) from the record low 308 thousand SAAR in February.

Also on Friday the FDIC might close several more banks ...

And a summary of last week:

Housing Starts in March

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Total housing starts were at 626 thousand (SAAR) in March, up 1.6% from the revised February rate, and up 30% from the all time record low in April 2009 of 479 thousand (the lowest level since the Census Bureau began tracking housing starts in 1959).

Single-family starts were at 531 thousand (SAAR) in March, down 0.9% from the revised February rate, and 49% above the record low in January and February 2009 (357 thousand).

Here is the Census Bureau report on housing Permits, Starts and Completions

NAHB Builder Confidence increases in April

This graph shows the builder confidence index from the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB).

The housing market index (HMI) was at 19 in April. This is an increase from 15 in March. The increase this month was driven by traffic of prospective buyers and current sales - and this was the last month that buyers can take advantage of the housing tax credit - so this increase was no surprise.

Note: any number under 50 indicates that more builders view sales conditions as poor than good.

Industrial Production, Capacity Utilization increase in March

From the Fed: Industrial production and Capacity Utilization

This graph shows Capacity Utilization. This series is up 7.2% from the record low set in June 2009 (the series starts in 1967).

Capacity utilization at 73.2% is still far below normal - and 9.1% below the the pre-recession levels of 80.5% in November 2007.

Note: y-axis doesn't start at zero to better show the change.

Also - this is the highest level for industrial production since Dec 2008, but production is still 9.6% below the pre-recession levels at the end of 2007.

Retail Sales increase sharply in March

On a monthly basis, retail sales increased 1.6% from February to March (seasonally adjusted, after revisions), and sales were up 7.6% from March 2009 (easy comparison).

This graph shows retail sales since 1992. This is monthly retail sales, seasonally adjusted (total and ex-gasoline).

The red line shows retail sales ex-gasoline and shows the increase in final demand ex-gasoline has been sluggish.

Retail sales are up 8.3% from the bottom, but still off 4.4% from the peak.

Trade Deficit increases in February


The Census Bureau reports:

[T]otal February exports of $143.2 billion and imports of $182.9 billion resulted in a goods and services deficit of $39.7 billion, up from $37.0 billion in January, revised.

The graph shows the monthly U.S. exports and imports in dollars through February 2010.

On a year-over-year basis, exports are up 14% and imports are up 20%. This is an easy comparison because of the collapse in trade at the end of 2008 and into early 2009. This is the first time since late 2008 that imports are up a greater percentage than exports on a YoY basis as export growth appears to have slowed.

March State Unemployment Rates

From the BLS: Regional and State Employment and Unemployment Summary

This graph shows the high and low unemployment rates for each state (and D.C.) since 1976. The red bar is the current unemployment rate (sorted by the current unemployment rate).

Fifteen states and D.C. now have double digit unemployment rates. New Jersey and Indiana are close.

Four states and set new series record highs: California, Florida, Nevada and Georgia.

Other Economic Stories ...

From the SEC: SEC Charges Goldman Sachs With Fraud in Structuring and Marketing of CDO Tied to Subprime Mortgages

From Kirsten Grind and Alwyn Scott at Puget Sound Business Journal: Federal regulators testify about seizing WaMu

From the National Federation of Independent Business: Small Business Optimism Declines in March

From UCLA Anderson Forecast and Ceridian March PCI Increase Indicates U.S. Economy on 4 Percent Growth Track

Official report on Iceland Bank Failures.

From RealtyTrac: Foreclosure Activity Increases 7 Percent in First Quarter

From Tom Lawler: BoA and Chase on Second Mortgages

Unofficial Problem Bank List hits 698

Best wishes to all.

by Calculated Risk on 4/18/2010 09:28:00 AM

From Reuters: UK's Brown wants investigation into Goldman Sachs (ht jb)

Prime Minister Gordon Brown said on Sunday he wanted Britain's financial watchdog to investigate U.S. bank Goldman Sachs ...

"I want a special investigation done into the entanglement of Goldman Sachs and the companies there with other banks and what happened," Brown told BBC television.

"There are hundreds of millions of pounds have been traded here and it looks as if people were misled about what happened. I want the Financial Services Authority (FSA) to investigate it immediately," he said.

"I know that the banks themselves will be considering legal action," Brown said, apparently referring to European banks that lost money ...

From Bloomberg: Germany to Review Possible Legal Steps Against Goldman: Wilhelm

Germany may take legal action against Goldman Sachs Group Inc., German government spokesman Ulrich Wilhelm said today by phone.

Piling on begins ...

by Calculated Risk on 4/17/2010 07:54:00 PM

If we look at a long term graph of housing starts, we notice that there were more starts at the peak in the '70s than during the recent housing bubble. If we plotted housing starts per capita, or per total households, the surge in housing starts during the last decade would not look extraordinary at all (ht Dave).

But it was extraordinary ...

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

First, here is the long term graph of both total housing starts and single unit starts. Obviously there were many more multi-unit housing starts in the '70s - and that is a clue.

The key is household formation.

Household formation is a function of changes in population, and also of changes in household size. During the '70s, the baby boomers started moving out of their parents' homes, and there was a dramatic decrease in the number of persons per household. And that lead to a huge demand for apartments (the surge in total starts).

The second graph shows the persons per household since 1947. Persons per household has been declining for over a century, but there was a fairly sharp decline starting in the late '60s and all through the '70s.

More recently persons per household had been fairly flat. And there has been some recent research that suggests the household formation was lower, and therefore persons per household might even be higher, than the Census Bureau estimates. See from Amy Hoak at MarketWatch: Number of U.S. households falls by 1.2 million

Caveat: All of this data is rough, and it is difficult to get an accurate count of the housing stock.

Using the Census Bureau data we can calculate the impact the number of households needed because of 1) population growth, and 2) changes in household size:

Households Added due to Population Growth and Changes in Household Size
Decade	Due to Population Growth (millions)	Due to Change in Household Size (millions)	Persons per household, ending
50s	8.4	1.0	3.34
60s	8.0	2.5	3.19
70s	8.0	9.4	2.78
80s	8.5	4.9	2.62
90s	12.2	0.4	2.61
00s	11.0	1.7	2.57
Source: Persons per Household, Census Bureau XLS file

Because of the changes in household size, the U.S. needed far more additional housing units in the '70s and '80s than in the '90s and '00s. If we could normalize the housing start chart by household formation, we would see that the last decade was indeed extraordinary!

by Calculated Risk on 4/17/2010 03:12:00 PM

From Christina Romer, Chairman Council of Economic Advisers: Back to a Better Normal: Unemployment and Growth in the Wake of the Great Recession

My first and most fundamental point is that when it comes to the economy we are very far from normal. The unemployment rate is currently 9.7 percent. I find it distressing that some observers talk about unemployment remaining high for an extended period with resignation, rather than with a sense of urgency to find ways to address the problem. Behind this fatalism, there seems to be a view that perhaps the high unemployment reflects structural changes or other factors not easily amenable to correction. High unemployment in this view is simply “the new normal.” I disagree.

The high unemployment that the United States is experiencing reflects a severe shortfall of aggregate demand. Despite three quarters of growth, real GDP is approximately 6 percent below its trend path. Unemployment is high fundamentally because the economy is producing dramatically below its capacity. That is, far from being "the new normal," it is “the old cyclical."

In this regard, I am reminded of a frustration I have felt many times when people write books and organize conferences about the unemployment problem in the Great Depression -- as if the high unemployment were somehow separate or distinct from the rest of the Depression. Then, as now, the economy had been through a wrenching crisis that had caused demand and production to plummet. Unemployment was a consequence of the collapse of demand, not a separate, coincident problem.

Now, to be fair, the unemployment rate has risen somewhat more during this recession than conventional estimates of the relationship between GDP and unemployment would lead one to expect. In this year’s Economic Report of the President, we presented estimates that suggest that the unemployment rate in the fourth quarter of 2009 was perhaps 1.7 percentage points higher than the behavior of GDP would lead one to expect. Some of that unexpected rise goes away when one takes a more sophisticated view of GDP behavior. The Bureau of Economic Analysis estimates GDP in two ways -- one by adding up everything that is produced in the economy and the other by adding up all of the income received. These two measures should be identical. But in this recession, the income-side estimates have fallen substantially more than the product-side ones. Therefore some, but not all, of the anomalous rise in unemployment may be due to the fact that the true decline in GDP may have been deeper than the conventional estimates suggest.

The reason that I have been emphasizing that the high unemployment we are experiencing is cyclical rather than structural is not to somehow minimize or downplay it. In fact, just the opposite. It is to shake people out of the complacency that says, "That’s just the way life is." It may be the way life is right now -- but it doesn’t have to be. We have the tools and the knowledge to counteract a shortfall in aggregate demand. We should be continuing to use them aggressively.

by Calculated Risk on 4/17/2010 11:30:00 AM

I've started an archive of large images for most of the graphs posted on this blog. You can access the archive when you click on a graph (the larger image is part of the archive), or by clicking on "Graph Archive" in the menu bar.

A few examples - here are the most recent graphs for: housing starts, percent job losses during recessions, and New Home sales (NSA).

Note: The graphs are free to use on websites or for presentations. All I ask is that online sites link to my site, http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/, and printed presentations credit www.calculatedriskblog.com.

There are several methods to search for images.
1) There are tags at the bottom (like employment or housing starts)
2) There is an image archive at the bottom.
3) You can scroll through the images with the "Next" or "Back" buttons.

Suggestions? Enjoy!

by Calculated Risk on 4/17/2010 08:48:00 AM

First from Reuters yesterday: Consumer mood unexpectedly worse in early April

U.S. consumer sentiment took a surprise negative turn in early April due to a persistently grim outlook on income and jobs, a private survey released on Friday showed.
...
The surveys' overall index on consumer sentiments slipped to 69.5 in early April -- the lowest in five months. This was below the 73.6 reading seen at the end of March and the 75.0 median forecast of analysts polled by Reuters.

The article says "consumer sentiment is seen as a proxy for consumer spending", but I'm not sure. In 2005, Dr. Dean Croushore of University of Richmond argued consumer confidence is "essentially useless for forecasting Americans' spending patterns. ... consumer confidence just reflects the past. You lose your job, your confidence falls. There's not really anything new there."

Every time I see "consumer confidence", I think employment and gasoline prices ... and here are a couple of graphs to show the relationship:

NOTE: On the following graphs, the unemployment rate and gasoline prices are inverted since they are inversely correlated to confidence.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

The first graph shows consumer confidence and the unemployment rate (inverted).

There is a strong correlation, although it appears confidence leads the unemployment rate (probably because layoffs stop before the unemployment rate starts falling). Maybe a better graph would be monthly changes in employment vs. confidence (I'll look at that later).

The second graph shows consumer confidence and real gasoline prices (CPI adjusted).

Although there are periods when confidence doesn't track gasoline prices, it does appear there is a relationship.

So my guess is the weak confidence reading tells us what we already know - unemployment is high and gasoline prices are rising.

by Calculated Risk on 4/16/2010 10:45:00 PM

This is an unofficial list of Problem Banks compiled only from public sources.

Here is the unofficial problem bank list for April 16, 2010.

Changes and comments from surferdude808:

The closures this week and publication of actions issued by the OCC during March contributed to a large number of changes in the Unofficial Problem Bank List this week.

There were 25 institutions with assets of $8.7 billion added this week while 9 institutions with assets of $6.4 billion were removed. The net of this activity results in an Unofficial Problem Bank List that has 698 institutions with combined assets of $366.5 billion, up from 682 institutions with assets of $364.1 billion last week.

The Unofficial Problem Bank List has mostly closed the gap with the latest FDIC Official Problem Bank List that included 702 institutions. Notable among the 25additions are Far East National Bank, Los Angeles, CA ($2 billion); BNC National Bank, Phoenix, AZ ($867 million Ticker: BNCC.PK); First Community Bank, National Association, Lexington, SC ($605 million Ticker: FCCO); Citizens National Bank of Paintsville, Paintsville, IL ($582 million Ticker: CZNL.OB); and Golden Bank, National Association, Houston, TX ($507 million).

The removals include an action termination by the Federal Reserve against KCB Bank ($143 million), and the 8 failures -- Riverside National Bank of Florida ($3.4 billion), City Bank ($1.1 billion), Tamalpais Bank ($629 million), First Federal Bank of North Florida ($393 million), Innovative Bank ($269 million), Butler Bank ($268 million), AmericanFirst Bank ($90 million), and Lakeside Community Bank ($53 million).

by Calculated Risk on 4/16/2010 09:28:00 PM

City Bank failure.
Not that one, nor that one...yet.
Not that one either.
by Soylent Green is People
From the FDIC: Whidbey Island Bank, Coupeville, Washington, Assumes All Of The Deposits Of City Bank, Lynnwood, Washington

As of December 31, 2009, City Bank had approximately $1.13 billion in total assets and $1.02 billion in total deposits.
...
The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $323.4 million.... City Bank is the 50th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the fifth in Washington. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Rainier Pacific Bank, Tacoma, February 26, 2010.