by Bill McBride on 5/24/2016 07:42:00 PM
Tuesday, May 24, 2016
• At 7:00 AM ET, he Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will release the results for the mortgage purchase applications index.
• At 9:00 AM, FHFA House Price Index for March 2016. This was originally a GSE only repeat sales, however there is also an expanded index. The consensus is for a 0.5% month-to-month increase for this index.
From the ACC: Chemical Activity Barometer Accelerated for Third Consecutive Month
The Chemical Activity Barometer (CAB), a leading economic indicator created by the American Chemistry Council (ACC), expanded 1.0 percent in May following a revised 0.8 percent increase in April and 0.1 percent increase in March. All data is measured on a three-month moving average (3MMA). Accounting for adjustments, the CAB remains up 2.3 percent over this time last year, a marked deceleration of activity from one year ago when the barometer logged a 2.7 percent year-over-year gain from 2014. On an unadjusted basis the CAB jumped 0.3 percent in May, following a solid 1.7 percent gain in April.This is a leading indicator for industrial production and suggests increases in Industrial Production later this year.
Applying the CAB back to 1919, it has been shown to provide a lead of two to 14 months, with an average lead of eight months at cycle peaks as determined by the National Bureau of Economic Research. The median lead was also eight months. At business cycle troughs, the CAB leads by one to seven months, with an average lead of four months. The median lead was three months. The CAB is rebased to the average lead (in months) of an average 100 in the base year (the year 2012 was used) of a reference time series. The latter is the Federal Reserve’s Industrial Production Index.
by Bill McBride on 5/24/2016 03:08:00 PM
As part of the new home sales report, the Census Bureau reported the number of homes sold by price and the average and median prices.
From the Census Bureau: "The median sales price of new houses sold in April 2016 was $321,100; the average sales price was $379,800."
The following graph shows the median and average new home prices.
Click on graph for larger image.
During the housing bust, the builders had to build smaller and less expensive homes to compete with all the distressed sales. When housing started to recovery - with limited finished lots in recovering areas - builders moved to higher price points to maximize profits.
The average price in April 2016 was $379,800 and the median price was $321,100. Both are above the bubble high (this is due to both a change in mix and rising prices).
The median is at a new high.
The second graph shows the percent of new homes sold by price.
Less than 2% of new homes sold were under $150K in April 2016. This is down from 30% in 2002. The under $150K new home is probably going away.
The $400K+ bracket has increased significantly.
by Bill McBride on 5/24/2016 12:41:00 PM
The new home sales report for April was very strong at 619,000 on a seasonally adjusted annual rate basis (SAAR), and combined sales for January, February and March were revised up by 44 thousand SAAR.
This was the highest sales rate since January 2008.
Sales were up 23.8% year-over-year (YoY) compared to April 2015. And sales are up 9.0% year-to-date compared to the same period in 2015.
Earlier: New Home Sales increased sharply to 619,000 Annual Rate in April.
Click on graph for larger image.
This graph shows new home sales for 2015 and 2016 by month (Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate). Sales to date are up 9.0% year-over-year, mostly because of the strong sales in April.
Overall I expect lower growth this year, probably in the 4% to 8% range. Slower growth is likely this year because Houston (and other oil producing areas) will have a problem this year. Inventory of existing homes is increasing quickly and prices will probably decline in those areas. And that means new home construction will slow in those areas too.
And here is another update to the "distressing gap" graph that I first started posting a number of years ago to show the emerging gap caused by distressed sales. Now I'm looking for the gap to close over the next several years.
The "distressing gap" graph shows existing home sales (left axis) and new home sales (right axis) through April 2016. This graph starts in 1994, but the relationship had been fairly steady back to the '60s.
Following the housing bubble and bust, the "distressing gap" appeared mostly because of distressed sales.
I expect existing home sales to move more sideways, and I expect this gap to slowly close, mostly from an increase in new home sales.
However, this assumes that the builders will offer some smaller, less expensive homes. If not, then the gap will persist.
Another way to look at this is a ratio of existing to new home sales.
This ratio was fairly stable from 1994 through 2006, and then the flood of distressed sales kept the number of existing home sales elevated and depressed new home sales. (Note: This ratio was fairly stable back to the early '70s, but I only have annual data for the earlier years).
In general the ratio has been trending down, and this ratio will probably continue to trend down over the next several years.
Note: Existing home sales are counted when transactions are closed, and new home sales are counted when contracts are signed. So the timing of sales is different.
by Bill McBride on 5/24/2016 11:10:00 AM
Household indebtedness continued to advance during the first three months of 2016 according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit, which was released today. ...Click on graph for larger image.
The bulk of the $136 billion (1.1 percent) aggregate debt increase came from mortgages, which increased $120 billion from the fourth quarter of 2015 to a four and a half year high. The median credit score for newly originating mortgages increased slightly, and 58 percent of all new mortgage dollars went to borrowers with credit scores over 760. ...
Overall repayment rates generally improved in the first quarter of this year. Five percent of outstanding debt was in some stage of delinquency, the lowest amount since the second quarter of 2007.
"Delinquency rates and the overall quality of outstanding debt continue to improve," said Wilbert van der Klaauw, senior vice president at the New York Fed. "The proportion of overall debt that becomes newly delinquent has been on a steady downward trend and is at its lowest level since our series began in 1999. This improvement is in large part driven by mortgages."
Here are two graphs from the report:
The first graph shows aggregate consumer debt increased in Q1. Household debt peaked in 2008, and bottomed in Q2 2013.
Mortgage debt increased in Q1, from the NY Fed:
Mortgage balances, the largest component of household debt, increased in the first quarter. Mortgage balances shown on consumer credit reports stood at $8.37 trillion, a $120 billion increase from the fourth quarter of 2015. Balances on home equity lines of credit (HELOC) dropped by $2 billion, to $485 billion. Non-housing debt balances rose somewhat in the first quarter; increases of $7 billion and $29 billion in auto and student loans, respectively, were offset by a $21 billion decline in credit card balances.The second graph shows the percent of debt in delinquency. The percent of delinquent debt is declining, although there is still a large percent of debt 90+ days delinquent (Yellow, orange and red).
The overall delinquency rate decreased in Q1 to 5.0%. From the NY Fed:
Overall delinquency rates improved in 2016Q1. As of March 31, 5.0% of outstanding debt was in some stage of delinquency. Of the $613 billion of debt that is delinquent, $436 billion is seriously delinquent (at least 90 days late or “severely derogatory”).There are a number of credit graphs at the NY Fed site.
by Bill McBride on 5/24/2016 10:14:00 AM
The Census Bureau reports New Home Sales in April were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 619 thousand.
The previous three months were revised up by a total of 44 thousand (SAAR).
"Sales of new single-family houses in April 2016 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 619,000, according to estimates released jointly today by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. This is 16.6 percent above the revised March rate of 531,000 and is 23.8 percent above the April 2015 estimate of 500,000."Click on graph for larger image.
The first graph shows New Home Sales vs. recessions since 1963. The dashed line is the current sales rate.
Even with the increase in sales since the bottom, new home sales are still fairly low historically.
The second graph shows New Home Months of Supply.
The months of supply decreased in April to 4.7 months.
The all time record was 12.1 months of supply in January 2009.
This is now in the normal range (less than 6 months supply is normal).
"The seasonally adjusted estimate of new houses for sale at the end of April was 243,000. This represents a supply of 4.7 months at the current sales rate."On inventory, according to the Census Bureau:
"A house is considered for sale when a permit to build has been issued in permit-issuing places or work has begun on the footings or foundation in nonpermit areas and a sales contract has not been signed nor a deposit accepted."Starting in 1973 the Census Bureau broke this down into three categories: Not Started, Under Construction, and Completed.
The third graph shows the three categories of inventory starting in 1973.
The inventory of completed homes for sale is still low, and the combined total of completed and under construction is also low.
The last graph shows sales NSA (monthly sales, not seasonally adjusted annual rate).
In April 2016 (red column), 55 thousand new homes were sold (NSA). Last year 48 thousand homes were sold in April.
The all time high for April was 116 thousand in 2005, and the all time low for April was 30 thousand in 2011.
This was well above expectations of 523,000 sales SAAR in April, and prior months were revised up. A very strong report. I'll have more later today.
by Bill McBride on 5/24/2016 08:09:00 AM
• At 58,700, April 2016 saw the lowest number of foreclosure starts since April 2006According to Black Knight's First Look report for April, the percent of loans delinquent increased 3.8% in April compared to March, and declined 10.3% year-over-year.
• National delinquency rate is up from a 9-year low in March, but still 10 percent below last year’s level
• Prepayment speeds (historically a good indicator of refinance activity) fell in April, despite interest rates being near 3-year lows
• Active foreclosure inventory has now dropped below 600,000 for the first time since 2007
The percent of loans in the foreclosure process declined 5.9% in April and were down 27.8% over the last year.
Black Knight reported the U.S. mortgage delinquency rate (loans 30 or more days past due, but not in foreclosure) was 4.24% in April, up from 4.08% in Maarch.
The percent of loans in the foreclosure process declined in April 1.17%.
The number of delinquent properties, but not in foreclosure, is down 235,000 properties year-over-year, and the number of properties in the foreclosure process is down 225,000 properties year-over-year.
Black Knight will release the complete mortgage monitor for April on June 6th.
|Black Knight: Percent Loans Delinquent and in Foreclosure Process|
|Number of properties:|
|Number of properties that are delinquent, but not in foreclosure:||2,146,000||2,062,000||2,381,000||2,813,000|
|Number of properties in foreclosure pre-sale inventory:||595,000||631,000||820,000||1,064,000|
Monday, May 23, 2016
by Bill McBride on 5/23/2016 08:42:00 PM
• At 10:00 AM ET, New Home Sales for April from the Census Bureau. The consensus is for a increase in sales to 523 thousand Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR) in April from 511 thousand in March.
• Also at 10:00 AM, Richmond Fed Survey of Manufacturing Activity for May.
• At 11:00 AM, The New York Fed will release their Q1 2016 Household Debt and Credit Report
From Matthew Graham at Mortgage News Daily: Mortgage Rates Continue Sideways for 3rd Straight Day
Mortgage rates were relatively steady again, marking the third straight business day with almost no rate movement following last week's quick spike higher. That spike was all about financial markets quickly coming to terms with a higher probability of a Fed rate hike. Given that there hasn't been any movement since then, we can increasingly assume that markets took care of this business by Wednesday afternoon. While it's reassuring that we haven't seen any additional move higher in rates, neither have we seen any meaningful move lower. That leaves the average conventional 30yr fixed rate quote at 3.75%, but there are still quite a few lenders quoting 3.625%.
by Bill McBride on 5/23/2016 05:03:00 PM
Oil prices are "only" down about 20% year-over-year (YoY), and the YoY decline has been decreasing.
So I thought I'd look at the YoY change in oil prices over the last few decades.
Click on graph for larger image
This graph shows the year-over-year change in WTI based on data from the EIA.
Five times since 1987, oil prices have increased 100% or more YoY. And several times prices have almost fallen in half YoY.
Oil prices are volatile! And it seems likely the YoY change will turn positive later this year.
by Bill McBride on 5/23/2016 11:40:00 AM
In a research note released this morning, Goldman Sachs chief economist Jan Hatzius wrote: Superforecasting Fed Policy
"... 35% probability for a hike in June, a 35% probability for July, a 20% probability for September—our previous modal forecast—and a 10% probability for either a later hike or a cut."This suggests a cumulative forecast probability of 70% by the July meeting, and 90% by September.
The Fed has definitely changed expectations.
For amusement ... early in my career, as a scientist at SAIC in San Diego (my undergraduate degree is in chemistry), I was invited to a sales meeting to discuss potential new contracts. A senior salesperson discussed one potential contract, and he was asked the probability of obtaining the contract. He said it was 50%.
Asked how he came up with the odds, he said: "Either we get it or we don't."
The Fed is more data dependent than that salesperson. A pickup in inflation and a decent jobs report will increase the odds of a June rate hike. But I suspect that sales guy would put the odds at 50%: Either they hike or they don't!
by Bill McBride on 5/23/2016 09:35:00 AM
An interesting post from Archana Pradhan at CoreLogic Far Fewer Low Credit Score Applicants Than Before Housing Crisis. An excerpt:
One of the key factors used in mortgage underwriting as well as in our Housing Credit Index is the credit score. The average borrower credit score for home-purchase originations has increased from roughly 700 in 2005 to almost 750 in 2015 (Figure 2). In 2005, the credit score for the first percentile ranged from 520 to 540 and showed a dramatic rise during the Great Recession, and is currently running in a range of 620 to 630. By just gazing at the borrowers’ credit scores, one could conclude that mortgage originations were constrained as a result of tight underwriting standards. But how has loan demand changed, particularly for the borrowers with relatively low credit scores? The origination volume is the end result of an interplay between loan applicants’ demand and lenders’ risk tolerances. Is there a way to disentangle mortgage credit supply conditions from mortgage demand?Click on graph for larger image
This graph from CoreLogic shows the significant increase in credit scores for the first percentile of borrowers.
At first glance, this would appear to be due to tighter underwriting standards, but Pradhan looks at denial rates and asks: If Credit Underwriting Has Tightened, Why Have Denial Rates Fallen?
The data shows that demand has fallen for low credit score borrowers; either they are more cautious, or - more likely - they are discouraged from even applying. Interesting data.