by Bill McBride on 4/23/2014 10:00:00 AM
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
The Census Bureau reports New Home Sales in March were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 384 thousand.
February sales were revised up from 440 thousand to 449 thousand, and January sales were revised up from 455 thousand to 470 thousand.
The first graph shows New Home Sales vs. recessions since 1963. The dashed line is the current sales rate.
Sales of new single-family houses in March 2014 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 384,000, according to estimates released jointly today by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. This is 14.5 percent below the revised February rate of 449,000 and is 13.3 percent below the March 2013 estimate of 443,000.Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.
Even with the increase in sales over the last two years, new home sales are still near the bottom for previous recessions.
The second graph shows New Home Months of Supply.
The months of supply increased in March to 6.0 months from 5.0 months in February.
The all time record was 12.1 months of supply in January 2009.
This is now in the normal range (less than 6 months supply is normal).
"The seasonally adjusted estimate of new houses for sale at the end of March was 193,000. This represents a supply of 6.0 months at the current sales rate."On inventory, according to the Census Bureau:
"A house is considered for sale when a permit to build has been issued in permit-issuing places or work has begun on the footings or foundation in nonpermit areas and a sales contract has not been signed nor a deposit accepted."Starting in 1973 the Census Bureau broke this down into three categories: Not Started, Under Construction, and Completed.
This graph shows the three categories of inventory starting in 1973.
The inventory of completed homes for sale is still low, but moving up. The combined total of completed and under construction is also very low.
The last graph shows sales NSA (monthly sales, not seasonally adjusted annual rate).
In March 2014 (red column), 36 thousand new homes were sold (NSA). Last year 41 thousand homes were also sold in March. The high for March was 127 thousand in 2005, and the low for March was 28 thousand in 2011.
This was well below expectations of 455,000 sales in March.
I'll have more later today .
by Bill McBride on 4/23/2014 07:01:00 AM
Mortgage applications decreased 3.3 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending April 18, 2014. ...Click on graph for larger image.
The Refinance Index decreased 4 percent from the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 3 percent from one week earlier. ...
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($417,000 or less) increased to 4.49 percent from 4.47 percent, with points increasing to 0.50 from 0.32 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value ratio (LTV) loans.
The first graph shows the refinance index.
The refinance index is down 74% from the levels in May 2013 (almost one year ago).
With the mortgage rate increases, refinance activity will be significantly lower in 2014 than in 2013.
The second graph shows the MBA mortgage purchase index.
The 4-week average of the purchase index is now down about 18% from a year ago.
The purchase index is probably understating purchase activity because small lenders tend to focus on purchases, and those small lenders are underrepresented in the purchase index.
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
by Bill McBride on 4/22/2014 08:35:00 PM
From Catherine Rampell at the WaPo: Americans think owning a home is better for them than it is
Over the past century, housing prices have grown at a compound annual rate of just 0.3 percent once one adjusts for inflation, according to my calculations using Shiller’s historical housing data. Over the same period, the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index has had comparable annual returns of about 6.5 percent.First, as I've pointed out several times, Shiller used several estimates for changes in house prices. As an example, for the decade prior to 1987 (when the Case-Shiller index started), Shiller used the FHFA index. However this index was for a small percentage of loans. If he had used CoreLogic instead, the real return over the period Rampell analyzed would have been closer to 1.5% (much higher than 0.3%).
Yet Americans still think it’s financially savvy to dump all their savings into a single, large, highly illiquid asset.
Second, Rampell assumes the buyer paid cash - a much better model would have assumed 10% down, and would have had the buyer refinance every few years as mortgage rates declined. This also means there would be far less invested in the S&P500 than Rampell assumed.
Third, a young person might be happy with a $400 apartment in 1982, but I doubt they'd want to live in the equivalent apartment for 30+ years (marriage, raise kids, etc.). The model should assume a move-up buyer and renter at certain points.
I'm confident a more complicated and thorough model would produce the opposite result over the period in question.
• At 7:00 AM ET, the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will release the results for the mortgage purchase applications index.
• At 10:00 AM, the New Home Sales report for March from the Census Bureau. The consensus is for an in increase in sales to 455 thousand Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR) in March from 440 thousand in February
• During the day, the AIA's Architecture Billings Index for March (a leading indicator for commercial real estate).
by Bill McBride on 4/22/2014 02:40:00 PM
Economist Tom Lawler sent me the updated table below of short sales, foreclosures and cash buyers for several selected cities in March. Lawler writes: "Note the increase in the foreclosure sales share in Florida."
From CR: The decline in "distressed" share was one of the positives I mentioned in the previous post. Total "distressed" share is down in all of these markets, mostly because of a sharp decline in short sales.
Foreclosures are down in most of these areas too, although foreclosures are up in the mid-Atlantic area and Florida (judicial foreclosure) - and a little in Las Vegas (there was a state law change that slowed foreclosures dramatically in Nevada at the end of 2011 - so it isn't a surprise that foreclosures are up a little year-over-year).
The All Cash Share (last two columns) is mostly declining year-over-year. As investors pull back, the share of all cash buyers will probably decline. Toledo, Des Moines and Wichita's cash share is up. The cash share in Florida is still very high.
In general it appears the housing market is slowly moving back to normal.
|Short Sales Share||Foreclosure Sales Share||Total "Distressed" Share||All Cash Share|
|Bay Area CA*||5.0%||15.0%||4.5%||10.2%||9.5%||25.2%||25.0%||31.0%|
|Lee County, FL**||4.0%||11.3%||15.5%||11.9%||19.5%||23.2%|
|*share of existing home sales, based on property records|
**Single Family Only
by Bill McBride on 4/22/2014 01:35:00 PM
A decline in existing home sales doesn't mean the housing recovery is over. Far from it! For existing home sales we need to look at the composition of sales (distressed vs. conventional), and the percent of conventional sales are increasing (even as investor buying has slowed too). That is a positive sign.
For the "housing recovery", we need to look more at housing starts and new home sales (housing starts and new home sales have a larger impact on GDP and employment than existing home sales). Both starts and new home sales are off to a slow start in 2014 compared to 2013, but I expect new home sales and starts to be up solidly year-over-year soon (there was a surge in starts at the beginning of 2013, and the comparisons will be easier going forward).
There are many positives for housing right now: 1) distressed sales are down sharply year-over-year, 2) delinquencies are down sharply, 3) inventory is up (this is a positive right now because there is too little inventory), 4) negative equity has declined significantly. Overall the housing market is improving.
Probably the most important number in the NAR existing home sales report is inventory. This morning the NAR reported that inventory was up 3.1% year-over-year in March. This is a smaller increase than other sources suggest, and it is important to note that the NAR inventory data is "noisy" (and difficult to forecast based on other data). A few other points:
• The headline NAR inventory number is NOT seasonally adjusted (and there is a clear seasonal pattern).
• Inventory is still very low, and with the low level of inventory, there is still upward pressure on prices.
• I expect inventory to increase in 2014, and I expect the year-over-year increase to be in the 10% to 15% range by the end of 2014.
• However, if inventory doesn't increase, prices will probably increase a little faster than expected (a key reason to watch inventory right now).
Click on graph for larger image.
The NAR does not seasonally adjust inventory, even though there is a clear seasonal pattern. Trulia chief economist Jed Kolko sent me the seasonally adjusted inventory (see graph of NAR reported and seasonally adjusted).
This shows that inventory bottomed in January 2013 (on a seasonally adjusted basis), and inventory is now up about 5.8% from the bottom. On a seasonally adjusted basis, inventory was up in March compared to February.
Important: The NAR reports active listings, and although there is some variability across the country in what is considered active, most "contingent short sales" are not included. "Contingent short sales" are strange listings since the listings were frequently NEVER on the market (they were listed as contingent), and they hang around for a long time - they are probably more closely related to shadow inventory than active inventory. However when we compare inventory to 2005, we need to remember there were no "short sale contingent" listings in 2005. In the areas I track, the number of "short sale contingent" listings is also down sharply year-over-year.
Another key point: The NAR reported total sales were down 7.5% from March 2013, but normal equity sales were probably up from March 2013, and distressed sales down. The NAR reported that 14% of sales were distressed in March (from a survey that isn't perfect):
Ten percent of March sales were foreclosures, and 4 percent were short sales.Last year the NAR reported that 21% of sales were distressed sales.
A rough estimate: Sales in March 2013 were reported at 4.96 million SAAR with 21% distressed. That gives 1.04 million distressed (annual rate), and 3.92 million equity (conventional). In March 2014, sales were 4.59 million SAAR, with 14% distressed. That gives 0.64 million distressed, and 3.95 million conventional. Although this survey isn't perfect, this suggests distressed sales were down sharply - and normal sales up slightly (even with less investor buying).
The following graph shows existing home sales Not Seasonally Adjusted (NSA).
Click on graph for larger image.
Sales NSA in March (red column) were above the sales for March 2011, and below sales for 2010, 2012 and 2013.
Overall this report was as expected (fewer distressed sales pulling down overall sales).
• Existing Home Sales in March: 4.59 million SAAR, Inventory up 3.1% Year-over-year