by CalculatedRisk on 12/28/2009 12:31:00 AM
Monday, December 28, 2009
NY Times: Recession Cases Flooding Courts
A couple of earlier posts:
From William Glaberson at the NY Times: The Recession Begins Flooding Into the Courts (ht Liam)
New York State’s courts are closing the year with 4.7 million cases — the highest tally ever — and new statistics suggest that courtrooms are now seeing the delayed result of the country’s economic collapse.And this is apparently happening all across the country.
...
New York’s judges are wading into these types of cases by the tens of thousands, according to the new statistics, cases involving not only bad debts and soured deals, but also filings that are indirect but still jarring measures of economic stresses, like charges of violence in families torn apart by lost jobs and homes in jeopardy.
[T]he broad impact of the recession is clear in hundreds of thousands of new cases across the judicial system, including people challenging their real estate taxes, home foreclosures, contract disputes and family offenses.I've been tracking the surge in personal bankruptcy filings, and an increase in business disputes always happens during a recession, but what is really is sad is all the family disputes.
Sunday, December 27, 2009
Krugman: Another Contraction Possible
by CalculatedRisk on 12/27/2009 09:39:00 PM
From ABC News: Krugman: 'Reasonably High Chance' the Economy Will Contract (see link for short video)
After being asked about Stiglitz suggestion that the economy might contract in the 2nd half of 2010, Paul Krugman responds:
Yeah, its a reasonably high chance - its less than 50/50 odds - but we have now a recovery that ... is being driven by fiscal stimulus which is going to fade out in the 2nd half of next year, and by inventory bounce ...On the fading out of stimulus, Menzie Chinn writes: Levels versus Growth Rates and the Impact of ARRA with a graph of the impact on GDP level and GDP growth from the stimulus. Professor Krugman has a good explanation too: Stimulus timing
Note: I discussed the transitory impact of changes in inventory yesterday: Inventories and Q4 GDP
Government Housing Support Update
by CalculatedRisk on 12/27/2009 05:52:00 PM
Note: Scroll down or click for Last Week Summary and a Look Ahead
As everyone knows there has been a massive government effort to support house prices. Some of this has been aimed at limiting supply (modification programs, various foreclosure moratoria), and some has been aimed at increasing demand (tax credit, lower mortgage rates, loose lending standards).
Here is a quote from Secretary Geithner from a recent Newsweek interview by Daniel Gross:
"We were very careful from the beginning ... to say that we are going to focus the bulk of the financial force on bringing interest rates and mortgage rates down to cushion the fall in housing prices and help stabilize home values, which will feed into people's basic sense of financial stability."To help keep this straight, here is a list of the status of a number of programs:
Proponents of the $8,000 credit for first-time buyers and the $6,500 credit for move-up buyers made it clear during the debate on Capitol Hill that the benefits would not be renewed when they expire. And a lobbyist for the National Assn. of Realtors confirmed that at the group's annual convention last month.
Lawmakers "made us promise practically in blood that we would not come back" for another extension, Linda Goold, the Realtor group's director of tax policy, told her members.
During the debate, Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), a former real estate broker and a longtime proponent of the tax credit, promised his colleagues, "This is the last extension."
[T]he Federal Reserve is in the process of purchasing $1.25 trillion of agency mortgage-backed securities and about $175 billion of agency debt. In order to promote a smooth transition in markets, the Committee is gradually slowing the pace of these purchases, and it anticipates that these transactions will be executed by the end of the first quarter of 2010.
The program that Treasury established under HERA to support the mortgage market by purchasing Government-Sponsored Enterprise (GSE) -guaranteed mortgage-backed securities (MBS) will end on December 31, 2009. By the conclusion of its MBS purchase program, Treasury anticipates that it will have purchased approximately $220 billion of securities across a range of maturities.
In order to provide servicers an opportunity to remain focused on converting eligible borrowers to permanent HAMP modifications, effective today and lasting through January 31, 2010, Treasury is implementing a review period for all active HAMP trial modifications scheduled to expire on or before January 31, 2010. Active HAMP trial modifications include trial modifications that have been submitted to the Treasury system of record that have not been cancelled by the servicer.
During this review period, servicers should continue to convert eligible borrowers in active HAMP trial modifications to permanent HAMP modifications as quickly as possible in accordance with existing program guidance. Servicers may not cancel an active HAMP trial modification during this period for any reason other than failure to meet the HAMP property eligibility requirements.
Treasury is now amending the [Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements (PSPAs)] to allow the cap on Treasury's funding commitment under these agreements to increase as necessary to accommodate any cumulative reduction in net worth over the next three years. At the conclusion of the three year period, the remaining commitment will then be fully available to be drawn per the terms of the agreements.
•Focus on enforcement and lender accountability
•Reduce the maximum seller concession from 6% to 3%.
•Raise the minimum FICO score.
•Increase the up-front cash for borrower (it isn't clear if this is an increase in the downpayment, currently a minimum of 3.5%, or requiring the borrower to pay more fees).
•Increase FHA insurance premiums.
There is probably more ...
Weekly Summary and a Look Ahead
by CalculatedRisk on 12/27/2009 12:58:00 PM
The key economic report this holiday week is the Case-Shiller house price index for October that will be released on Tuesday. The Case-Shiller index is actually an average for 3 months and the concensus is for further gains, although the house price index from LoanPerformance showed a decline in October.
In other economic news, the Chicago PMI will be released on Wednesday. Other recent regional indicators - the New York Fed's Empire State Manufacturing Survey and Richmond Fed’s Survey of Manufacturing Activity - have suggested a slowing in the manufacturing sector.
The monthly trucking and restaurant surveys will also be released this week.
And a summary of last week ...
The NAR reports: Another Big Gain in Existing-Home Sales as Buyers Respond to Tax Credit
Existing-home sales – including single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops – rose 7.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 6.54 million units in November from 6.09 million in October, and are 44.1 percent higher than the 4.54 million-unit pace in November 2008.
Click on graph for larger image in new window.This graph shows existing home sales, on a Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR) basis since 1993.
Sales in Nov 2009 (6.54 million SAAR) were 7.4% higher than last month, and were 44% higher than Nov 2008 (4.54 million SAAR).
Here is more on existing home sales.
The Census Bureau reports New Home Sales in November were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 355 thousand. This is a sharp decrease from the revised rate of 400 thousand in October (revised down from 430 thousand).
The second graph shows New Home Sales vs. recessions for the last 45 years. New Home sales fell off a cliff, but after increasing slightly, are now only 8% above the low in January. Sales of new one-family houses in November 2009 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 355,000 ... This is 11.3 percent (±11.0%) below the revised October rate of 400,000 and is 9.0 percent (±15.3%)* below the November 2008 estimate of 390,000.See this post for more on New Home sales.
The following graph shows the ratio of existing home sales divided by new home sales through November.
This ratio has increased again to a new all time high. The ratio of existing to new home sales increased at first because of the flood of distressed sales. This kept existing home sales elevated, and depressed new home sales since builders couldn't compete with the low prices of all the foreclosed properties.
The recent increase in the ratio was partially due to the timing of the first time homebuyer tax credit (before the extension) - and partially because the tax credit spurred existing home sales more than new home sales.
From commentary on home sales see: Residential Investment: Moving Sideways
From Bloomberg: U.S. Commercial Real Estate Index Falls 1.5%
Here is a comparison of the Moodys/REAL Commercial Property Price Index (CPPI) and the Case-Shiller composite 20 index.
CRE prices only go back to December 2000.The Case-Shiller Composite 20 residential index is in blue (with Dec 2000 set to 1.0 to line up the indexes).
CRE prices peaked in late 2007 and have fallen 44% from the peak and are now back to September 2002 levels.
Servicers can’t cancel an active Home Affordable trial modification scheduled to expire before Jan. 31 for any reason other than property eligibility requirements, according to a posting today on a government Web site.
The Treasury said it would provide capital as needed to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over the next three years, in a move aimed at soothing investors' concerns about the government's continued support of the mortgage giants.
Best wishes to all.
Chinese Premier: No Change to Exchange Rate Policy
by CalculatedRisk on 12/27/2009 09:14:00 AM
From the Financial Times: Wen resolute on strength of currency
The Financial Times quotes Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao as saying: ”We will not yield to any pressure of any form forcing us to appreciate. ... The purpose [of these calls for appreciation] is to hold back China’s development."
In recent weeks the demands for China to appreciate its currency in order to help a rebalancing of the global economy have increased to include not only the US and the European Union but also developing nations such as Brazil and Russia.This is one of the key global imbalances and it looks like China will still not allow their currency to appreciate.
excerpted with permission
Saturday, December 26, 2009
Jim the Realtor: "Flippers Galore"
by CalculatedRisk on 12/26/2009 09:17:00 PM
A flipper is trying for $1 million profit on this ocean front home. Jim says this guy has flipped 271 properties this year ...
Inventories and Q4 GDP
by CalculatedRisk on 12/26/2009 05:49:00 PM
Back in October, as a preview to the Q3 GDP report, I wrote: Inventory Restocking and Q3 GDP
I noted that GDP growth in Q3 and Q4 weren't in question because of a transitory boost from changes in private inventories and from stimulus spending.
Here is a repeat of the graph showing the contributions to GDP from changes in private inventories for the last several recessions. The blue shaded area is the last two quarters of each recession, and the light area is the first four quarters of each recovery.
Click on graph for larger image in new window.
The Red line is the median of the last 5 recessions - and indicates about a 2% contribution to GDP from changes in inventories, for each of the first two quarters coming out of a recession.
The key is this boost is transitory.
Last quarter I thought a 1% to 2% contribution from changes in inventories was possible. The actual contribution was 0.69%. I suspect that changes in inventories will add more to Q4; probably closer to 2%.
I also thought Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) would be fairly strong in Q3, especially because of the cash-for-clunkers program. My guess was "3% PCE growth in Q3, and that would mean a contribution to GDP of about 2%." The final numbers were 2.8% and a contribution of 1.96%.
The following graph shows real Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) through November 2009 (in 2005 dollars). Note that the y-axis doesn't start at zero to better show the change.
The quarterly change in PCE is based on the change from the average in one quarter, compared to the average of the preceding quarter.
The colored rectangles show the quarters, and the blue bars are the real monthly PCE.
Using the "two-month method" for estimating Q4 PCE growth gives an estimate of just under 1%. However - note that PCE in August was distorted by the cash-for-clunkers program (and that impacts the two-month method). So my guess is PCE growth in Q4 will be around 1.7% or a contribution to GDP of 1.2% or so. (less than the growth in Q3).
As I've noted, residential investment has been moving sideways, although that will show up more in Q1 2010 than in Q4. So we can add in a positive contributions from net exports, some increase in residential investment (although smaller than in Q3), an increase in equipment and software investment - and subtract out investment in non-residential structures - and Q4 should look pretty healthy.
In a reserach note this week, Ed McKelvey at Goldman Sachs called the 2nd half "ho-hum":
"At a time of the year when ho-ho-ho is the catchword, the first six months of the US economic recovery look distinctly ho-hum following the latest reports. ... Although we continue to estimate a 4% growth rate for the fourth quarter, with upside risk to that figure, the composition of this growth is not strong. Almost half of it comes from a sharp slowing in the rate at which inventories are being drawn down ..."
And it is probably a good time to repeat this graph from economy.com's Mark Zandi suggesting the greatest impact from the stimulus package is now behind us.This suggests that all of the growth in Q3 was due to the stimulus package (and then some), and the impact is now waning - only 2% in Q4, and 1.5% in Q1 2010 - and then the impact on GDP growth will be negative in the 2nd half of 2010.
As "ho-hum" as the 2nd half of 2009 was, I expect GDP growth to be more sluggish in 2010 for the following reasons:
So I still think GDP growth will be sluggish in 2010, with downside risks.
Note: There are several upside and downside risks to this view.


