by Calculated Risk on 11/13/2009 12:30:00 AM

Earlier this week I mentioned a possible "upside surprise" for GDP in 2010:

With unemployment above 10%, there will be significant political pressure for another stimulus package - especially if the economy starts to slow in the first half of 2010. This next package could be several hundred billion (maybe $500 billion) and could increase GDP growth in 2010 above my forecast.

From The Hill: Senator Reid tees up 2010 jobs bill

Senate Democrats will take up a new job-creation bill in the wake of the 10.2 percent unemployment rate, Majority Leader Harry Reid told his colleagues Tuesday.

And from the LA Times: Obama announces forum -- a brainstorming session on job creation

Next month, Obama said he would gather chief executives, small-business owners, economists, labor leaders and others to discuss ways to create jobs and grow the economy.

It appears the idea of another stimulus package is gaining momentum ...

by Calculated Risk on 11/12/2009 08:17:00 PM

From Bloomberg: Barofsky Says TARP ‘Almost Certainly’ Will Bring Loss (ht jb)

Neil Barofsky ... said the [TARP] will “almost certainly” result in a loss to U.S. taxpayers.
...
“Tens of billions of dollars are likely to be lost on the automotive bailout,” Barofsky said. In addition, some banks that received TARP money are failing, so the aid they received will be wiped out.

The TARP lost $2.33 billion on CIT and another $299 b million on the failure of UCBH Holdings (United Commercial Bank) last week.

And there are a growing number of banks not paying their TARP dividends (33 banks as of August - not all will fail, but that is a bad sign).

And this is the quote of the day:

“When I first took office, I can’t tell you how many times I’d be having a sit-down and warning about potential fraud in the program and I would hear a response basically saying, ‘Oh, they’re bankers, and they wouldn’t put their reputations at risk by committing fraud,’” he said.

“I think we’ve done a good job of instilling a greater degree of skepticism that what comes from Wall Street isn’t necessarily the Holy Grail,” he said.

by Calculated Risk on 11/12/2009 05:56:00 PM

Update: Title corrected to October.

From the Association of American Railroads: Rail Time Indicators

In October 2009, U.S. freight railroads originated 1,100,714 carloads, an average of 275,179 carloads per week. That’s down 15.3% from October 2008 (when the weekly average was 324,836 carloads) and down 0.3% from September 2009 (when the weekly average was 276,137 carloads). Average weekly carloads have now declined for two straight months.

The following graph from the AAR shows average weekly carloads in the U.S.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Rail traffic fell off a cliff at the end of 2008, and it appears traffic has stabilized at a lower level.

Traffic will probably decline in November and December (the normal seasonal pattern).

The second graph shows the year-over-year change for rail traffic.

This is now a two year slump (like for the hotel occupancy rate), so the year-over-year decline will be significantly less in November and December.

The AAR report has a number of other graphs for various sectors like autos and housing. As an example they compare U.S. Housing Starts with U.S. and Canadian Rail Carloads
of Lumber, Wood & Forest Products.

For additional rail traffic, and a break down by carriers, see the Railfax report (ht Bob_in_MA)

by Calculated Risk on 11/12/2009 03:11:00 PM

The FHA commented on the damage caused by the Downpayment Assistance Programs (DAPs) today. These DAPs circumvented the FHA down payment requirements by having the seller funnel the "down payment" to the buyer through a "charity" (for a small fee of course). The FHA attempted to stop this practice, but thanks to Congress, the DAPs led to billions of losses:

FHA was also adversely selected from 2000 through 2008 because it was the only guarantor willing to accept loans using seller-funded downpayments. Such downpayments were channeled through nonprofit organizations in order to meet FHA requirements on direct sources of funds. Those facilities created too many homeowners in the FHA portfolio that were not equipped for the financial responsibilities of home ownership. Indeed, the FY 2009 MMI Fund actuarial study for single-family loans notes that, if FHA had not insured any loans with seller-funded downpayment assistance, the net capital ratio today would still be above the statutory required two percent. FHA’s estimated economic net worth would be $10.4 billion higher today were it not for those loans. ... Their claim rates have consistently been between 2.5 and three times those of other FHA-insured home purchase loans.
emphasis added

This is still important today. The DAPs have been banned, but the first-time home buyer tax credit has probably created another group of "homeowners not equipped for the financial responsibilities of home ownership". Oh well ...

And some FHA stats ...

"86 percent of homebuyers relying upon FHA mortgage insurance in FY 2009 had downpayments of less than five percent."

"79 percent of FHA’s purchase-loan borrowers were first-time homebuyers."

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the recent boom in FHA originations. The MBA estimates that there will be about $2 trillion in orginations this year, so the FHA insured loans were probably just under 20% of originations.

The second graph shows delinquencies by year.

Overall 17.71% of FHA insured loans are delinquent, and 8.52% seriously delinquent. Note: Seriously delinquent "Includes all loans 90-days past due plus all in-bankruptcy and in-foreclosure cases."

The 2009 vintage is just getting started, but the FHA has tightened standards (higher FICO scores), and DAPs were banned at the end of 2008 - and that will help. Also the stabilization in house prices is helping with fewer delinquencies.

However many of these recent homebuyers probably aren't ready to be homeowners, and the delinquency rate will probably rise sharply - especially if house prices start falling again.

by Calculated Risk on 11/12/2009 01:20:00 PM

From HotelNewsNow.com: Boston leads RevPAR gains in STR weekly numbers

Overall, in year-over-year measurements, the industry’s occupancy fell 3.6 percent to 54.8 percent, average daily rate dropped 8.5 percent US$97.19, and RevPAR decreased 11.8 percent to US$53.29.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the occupancy rate by week for each of the last four years (2006 through 2009 labeled by start of month).

Notes: the scale doesn't start at zero to better show the change. Thanksgiving was late in 2008, so the dip doesn't line up with the previous years.

Data Source: Smith Travel Research, Courtesy of HotelNewsNow.com

This is a two year slump for the hotel industry. Although occupancy is off 3.6% compared to 2008, occupancy is off about 17% compared to 2006 and 2007.

The occupancy rate really fell off a cliff in October 2008, and the good news is the occupancy rate for 2009 is tracking closer and closer to 2008.

Smith Travel Research is now predicting a slight uptick in occupancy rates in 2010 to 55.8% from an estimate of 55.2% in 2009. However average daily room rates (ADR), and revenue per available room (RevPAR) are expected to continue to decline slightly in 2010. The "good news" for the hotel industry is supply coming online is dropping sharply, and is expected to stay low for a few years. Of course that is bad news for construction workers ...

by Calculated Risk on 11/12/2009 11:08:00 AM

From David Streitfeld at the NY Times: Housing Agency Says Cash Reserves Are Down Sharply

The Federal Housing Administration said Thursday morning that its cash reserves had dwindled significantly in the last year after a record drop in home prices.
...
The results of the F.H.A.’s annual audit showed the agency’s capital reserves to be 0.53 percent, far under the 2 percent minimum mandated by Congress. A year ago, the capital reserves were 3 percent.

From the FHA: Annual Actuarial Study Shows Capital Reserve Ratio Below Mandated Level; FHA Credit Policy Reforms Expected to Address Risk, Raise Reserve Levels

The independent study shows that FHA has sustained significant losses from loans made before 2009, and the capital reserve ratio has fallen below the congressionally mandated threshold, but concludes that under most economic scenarios considered FHA’s reserves would remain above zero.

FHA’s capital reserve ratio, which is determined through findings from the independent actuarial study, measures reserves held in excess of those needed to cover projected losses over the next 30 years. The review projects the capital reserve ratio to be 0.53 percent of total insurance in force this year, below the two-percent statutory threshold. This capital ratio fell from 3 percent in the fall of 2008, reflecting difficult conditions in the housing market. The 0.53 percent capital ratio (which represents the funds held in the Capital Reserve Account) is in addition to the auditor’s base case estimate of the 30-year reserves needed to pay for losses on existing loans (which are held in the Financing Account). Combining those two accounts, FHA holds $31 billion in its total reserves today, or more than 4.5 percent of total insurance-in-force.
...
As part of its efforts to manage risk, FHA is modeling more extreme scenarios than those used by the actuary, including scenarios showing the reserves going below zero. FHA is committed not only to understanding its risks, but also to developing policy responses appropriate to addressing that risk.
emphasis added

More links:

Annual Report to Congress Regarding the Financial Status of the FHA Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund

FHA Fiscal Year 2009 Actuarial Review Briefing

by Calculated Risk on 11/12/2009 09:05:00 AM

The MBA reports: Mortgage Refinance Applications Increase, Purchase Applications at Nine Year Low

The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, increased 3.2 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier. ...

The Refinance Index increased 11.3 percent from the previous week and the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 11.7 percent from one week earlier. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index is at its lowest level since December 2000.
...
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 4.90 percent from 4.97 percent, with points increasing to 1.03 from 1.01 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value (LTV) ratio loans.

It appears the post home buyer tax credit slump had started, although the tax credit will be extended and the eligibility expanded - so the slump might be delayed ... also existing home sales in October will probably be very strong - that is not good news for housing and the economy (since it was just demand from marginal buyers pulled forward at a very high cost).

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the MBA Purchase Index and four week moving average since 2002.

Note: The increase in 2007 was due to the method used to construct the index: a combination of lender failures, and borrowers filing multiple applications pushed up the index in 2007, even though activity was actually declining.

by Calculated Risk on 11/12/2009 08:30:00 AM

The DOL reports weekly unemployment insurance claims decreased to 502,000:

In the week ending Nov. 7, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 502,000, a decrease of 12,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 514,000. [revised from 512,000] The 4-week moving average was 519,750, a decrease of 4,500 from the previous week's revised average of 524,250.
...
The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment during the week ending Oct. 31 was 5,631,000, a decrease of 139,000 from the preceding week's revised level of 5,770,000.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since 1971.

The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims decreased this week by 4,500 to 519,750, and is now 139,000 below the peak in April. The significant decline from the peak strongly suggests that initial weekly claims have peaked for this cycle.

The level is still very high suggesting continuing job losses.

by Calculated Risk on 11/11/2009 10:08:00 PM

Yesterday I posted some excerpt from Freddie Mac's 10-Q:

We believe that several of our mortgage insurance counterparties are at risk of falling out of compliance with regulatory capital requirements, which may result in regulatory actions that could threaten our ability to receive future claims payments, and negatively impact our access to mortgage insurance for high LTV loans.

The WSJ has more tonight, including the risks to Fannie Mae: Fannie, Freddie Warn on More Losses

Fannie Mae has about $109.5 billion of mortgage-insurance coverage in force ... Freddie Mac had $63.4 billion in mortgage insurance and $12.2 billion in bond insurance.

And this a key sentence:

The reduction in private insurance coverage has contributed to the rise in the volume of loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration ...

Instead of using private mortgage insurance for loans greater than 80% LTV, low down payment borrowers are now using FHA insurance.

That will probably end well ...

Also - the WSJ has more on the new FDIC "Prudent Commercial Real Estate Loan Workouts" guidance issued Oct 30th: Banks Hasten to Adopt New Loan Rules. Here is the new FDIC guidance that states performing loans "made to creditworthy borrowers" will not require write downs "solely because the value of the underlying collateral declined".

by Calculated Risk on 11/11/2009 07:25:00 PM

From The Times: The worst is over, says Bank of England Governor

Better-than-expected unemployment figures and a rosier growth forecast from the Bank of England raised hopes yesterday that Britain was beginning to claw its way towards economic recovery.
...
Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank, said Britain had “only just started along the road to recovery” and that it would be “a long hard haul” back to regain the level of activity of two years ago before the financial crisis hit.

The following graphs are from the BofE November 2009 Inflation Report. The first graph shows the projections for GDP.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Note that GDP isn't expect to return to pre-recession levels until sometime in 2011 (mean estimate).

Note from BofE: To the left of the first vertical dashed line, the distribution reflects the likelihood of revisions to the data over the past; to the right, it reflects uncertainty over the evolution of GDP growth in the future. The second dashed line is drawn at the two-year point of the projection.

The second graph shows the projections for inflation.

The BofE expects a short-term increase in inflation because of higher oil prices, but then below trend inflation through most of 2011.

Note that the line is drawn at the 2% target inflation rate (not zero).

From the BofE: Price stability is defined by the Government’s inflation target of 2%.