by Calculated Risk on 4/24/2009 10:00:00 AM

The Census Bureau reports New Home Sales in March were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 356 thousand. This is slightly below the upwardly revised rate of 358 thousand in February.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

The first graph shows monthly new home sales (NSA - Not Seasonally Adjusted).

Note the Red columns for 2009. This is the lowest sales for March since the Census Bureau started tracking sales in 1963. (NSA, 34 thousand new homes were sold in March 2009; the previous low was 36 thousand in March 1982).

As the graph indicates, sales in March 2009 are substantially worse than the previous years.

The second graph shows New Home Sales vs. recessions for the last 45 years. New Home sales have fallen off a cliff.

Sales of new one-family houses in March 2009 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 356,000, according to estimates released jointly today by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

This is 0.6 percent (±19.0%)* below the revised February rate of 358,000 and is 30.6 percent (±10.7%) below the March 2008 estimate of 513,000.

And one more long term graph - this one for New Home Months of Supply.

There were 10.7 months of supply in March - significantly below the all time record of 12.5 months of supply set in January.

The seasonally adjusted estimate of new houses for sale at the end of March was 311,000. This represents a supply of 10.7 months at the current sales rate.

The final graph shows new home inventory.

Note that new home inventory does not include many condos (especially high rise condos), and areas with significant condo construction will have much higher inventory levels.

Although sales were at a March record low, there are positives in this report - especially considering the upward revisions for previous months. It appears the months-of-supply has peak, and there is a reasonable chance that new home sales has bottomed for this cycle - however any recovery in sales will be modest because of the huge overhang of existing homes for sale. I'll have more soon.

by Calculated Risk on 4/24/2009 08:36:00 AM

From CNBC: Ford Loss Narrower than Expected

Ford Motors posted a smaller-than-expected first-quarter loss and said it was on track to at least break even in 2011 and did not expect to seek U.S. government loans ...

"We are really turning the tide in North America," Mulally said, adding that the industry may have hit bottom.

In response to that, Ford will increase production in the U.S. by 25 percent in the second quarter, he added.

Ford is probably being helped by the threat of bankruptcy at GM and Chrysler. At the same time Ford is increasing production, GM is considering shutting down factories for several weeks - so I wouldn't read too much into the Ford increase in production.

Meanwhile, durable goods orders were down in March, the seventh decline in the past eight months.

by Calculated Risk on 4/24/2009 01:07:00 AM

A late night thread ...

Here is the letter from Cuomo to Congress today (2.0 MB PDF). And a Bloomberg discussion:

by Calculated Risk on 4/23/2009 10:09:00 PM

From Floyd Norris at the NY Times: Subprime Loans, Corporate-Style, Will Fuel Defaults

It appears that defaults on leveraged loans and corporate bonds will soon rise to levels not seen since the Great Depression.
...
The default rate on leveraged loans and speculative grade bonds is rising rapidly. “We expect the default rate to get to the range of 14 percent by the end of the year,” said Kenneth Emery, a senior vice president of Moody’s. That compares to peak default rates of 10 to 12 percent during the last two recessions ...

How did we get into this mess? The story is remarkably similar to the tale of subprime mortgages.

Just another area with rapidly rising defaults. Norris also discusses toggle-PIKs (kind of like Option ARMs for corporations).

Note: PIK stands for Payment-in-kind (i.e. pay interest with more debt). These were used in the '80s LBO craze with predictable results (high defaults). Toggle means the borrower has the choice of paying in cash or PIK.

There were negatively amortizing loans everywhere: Option ARMs for homeowners, toggle PIKs for corporations, and of course interest reserves for Construction & Development loans (always common, but are blowing up on lenders).

by Calculated Risk on 4/23/2009 07:10:00 PM

From Brian on AmEx Conference Call:

They expect to see writeoff rates climb from 8.5% to 10.5-11.0% in Q2 and up another 50 BP in Q3 and flattening out in Q4. Part of the driver of writeoff rates is their denominator is falling fairly quickly as charge volumes decline (denominator for CC cos will drop faster than for mortgages and other loan categories). They are assuming 9.7% unemployment in December 09.

They are seeing some improvement in early stage DQ and roll rates. There is probably some seasonality involved, but they also think that there is some non seasonal improvement. 30DQ increase for last 4 Q’s (starting with Q2 08) are +10BP, +60BP, +80BP, +40BP – so it isn’t going down, it’s just another second derivative thing.

And some CC comments:

Analyst: American Express has more exposure as we all know in California and Florida and some of the housing states where you have higher income as well and I think credit maybe started to go bad in the fourth quarter of '07, maybe a little bit ahead of the competition because of your exposure in some of those states, and as you looked closely and I think tightened sooner than others did because of that, when you're looking at your roll rates improving and understanding there's seasonality and it's too early to get too constructive on that, but are you seeing signs of improvement in more so in states that went bad earlier because of the tightening? You know, where are you seeing that improvement?

AmEx: I would say that early in the cycle I think that housing was a significant driver of higher delinquencies and writeoff rates and we certainly did see that in states that had larger drops in housing. However, at this juncture, I really think that unemployment has taken over as the primary driver of delinquency and writeoff rates, so I think that's what we will need to see for a real turn. I think stabilization in the housing market will be important. I think consumer confidence will be critically important, people have to feel comfortable that we are going to retain their job and when those things start to happen, I think is when we will really start to see some notable improvements.
emphasis added

by Calculated Risk on 4/23/2009 06:31:00 PM

A friend called me up early last year and told me that she had just put a significant amount of money in Auction Rate Securities with Wells Fargo. She started to tell me what a great deal it was, and I interrupted her: "Hang up. Call Wells Fargo. Get out now." She called Wells Fargo immediately, and she couldn't sell - and she has been stuck in this "investment" ever since.

From the LA Times: Wells Fargo accused of securities fraud by state lawsuit

California today sued investment subsidiaries of Wells Fargo & Co. for securities fraud, alleging that the San Francisco financial services company misled investors by selling $1.5 billion worth of risky securities that it peddled as being as safe as cash.

The securities "were sold to customers on the basis that they were like cash and people could get their money back in eight days," Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown said in an interview. "Now, it turns out they were not like cash and people can't get their money back even after many, many months, and they're mad as hell."

My friend was also told these securities were "as good as cash" and she could get her money back with eight days notice. It is especially irritating to see a Wells Fargo spokesperson say:

"We fully understand and deeply regret the effects this prolonged liquidity crisis has had on our clients," Charles W. Daggs, chief executive of Wells Fargo Investments, said in a statement.

"Wells Fargo could not have predicted these extraordinary circumstances, and even with the benefit of hindsight is not responsible for them."

Yeah, hoocoodanode?

by Calculated Risk on 4/23/2009 04:40:00 PM

The Federal Reserve released the Factors Affecting Reserve Balances today. Total assets increased to $2.2 trillion.

The Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) is off to a slow start, with just under $6.4 billion in assets.


Click on graph for larger image in new window.

After spiking last year to $2.31 trillion the week of Dec 18th, the Federal Reserve assets then declined somewhat. Now the Federal Reserve is starting to expand their balance sheet again.

Three trillion here we come!

Note: the graph shows Total Factors Supplying Federal Reserve Funds and is an available series that is close to assets.

Most of the increase this week in factors supplying reserve funds came from the Fed buying MBS (increased by $75 billion). This is still pushing down mortgage rates: see Freddie Mac: Long-term rates Now Lower than Short-term

Freddie Mac (NYSE:FRE) today released the results of its Primary Mortgage Market Survey® (PMMS®) in which the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaged 4.80 percent with an average 0.7 point for the week ending April 23, 2009, down from last week when it averaged 4.82 percent. Last year at this time, the 30-year FRM averaged 6.03 percent.

by Calculated Risk on 4/23/2009 03:36:00 PM

From the NY Times: U.S. Is Said to Prepare Filing for Chrysler Bankruptcy

The Treasury Department is preparing a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing for Chrysler that could come as soon as next week ...

This appears to be a prepackaged bankruptcy with the U.S. government providing DIP (Debtor-In-Possession) financing.

It sounds like Fiat would buy Chrysler's assets out of bankruptcy and the U.S. would be responsible for pensions and retiree health care benefits. According to the article, the only unresolved issue is what happens to Chrysler’s lenders.

by Calculated Risk on 4/23/2009 01:55:00 PM

From HotelNewsNow.com: STR reports U.S. data for week ending 18 April 2009

In year-over-year measurements, the industry’s occupancy fell 10.7 percent to end the week at 57.4 percent. Average daily rate dropped 10.3 percent to finish the week at US$97.25. Revenue per available room [RevPAR] for the week decreased 19.9 percent to finish at US$55.83.
emphasis added

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the YoY change in the occupancy rate (3 week trailing average).

The three week average is off 11.1% from the same period in 2008.

The average daily rate is down 10.3%, so RevPAR is off 19.9% from the same week last year.

When the Q1 advance GDP report is released on Wednesday (April 29th), I expect to see a sharp in decline in non-residential structure investment. The underlying details will be released a couple of days later, and I expect investment in lodging to be hit especially hard. Why build new hotels when the occupancy rate is 57%?

Data Source: Smith Travel Research, Courtesy of HotelNewsNow.com

by Calculated Risk on 4/23/2009 12:22:00 PM

UPDATE: Here is the letter from Cuomo to Congress (2.0 MB PDF). (Updated - linked to wrong letter initially)

It was widely rumored that there was some sort of backroom deal holding the BofA and Merrill deal together. From CNBC: BofA's Lewis Says He Was Told To Be Quiet on Merrill

Bank of America Chief Executive Kenneth Lewis told the New York attorney general he believed former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke wanted him to keep quiet about the worsening terms of the bank's acquisition of Merrill Lynch, according to testimony reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

Here are some excerpt of Lewis' testimony before New York's attorney general in February from the WSJ: 'It Wasn't Up to Me': Excerpts From Ken Lewis's Testimony

Mr. Lewis: I remember, for some reason, we wanted to follow up and see if any progress -- as I recall, we actually, had not agreed to call a MAC [material adverse condition] after the conversation that we had, and so I tried to get in touch with Hank, and, as I recall, I got a number that was somebody at the Treasury kind of guard-like thing. He had a number for Hank, and Hank was out, I think, on his bike, and he -- this is vague; I won't get the words exactly right -- and he said, "I'm going to be very blunt, we're very supportive of Bank of America and we want to be of help, but" -- I recall him saying "the government," but that may or may not be the case -- "does not feel it's in your best interest for you to call a MAC, and that we feel strongly," -- I can't recall if he said "we would remove the board and management if you called it" or if he said "we would do it if you intended to." I don't remember which one it was, before or after, and I said, "Hank, let's deescalate this for a while. Let me talk to our board." And the board's reaction was one of "That threat, okay, do it. That would be systemic risk."

Q: Did you ask for any agreement from them?

Mr. Lewis: There was a point after that that the board brought up the fact that we're relying on the words that obviously has some very prominent people and honorable people, but, boy, what if they don't come through? So I called Bernanke -- I don't know why I called him versus Hank -- and said, "Would you be willing to put something in writing?" And he said, "Let me think about it." As I recall, he didn't call me back, but Hank called me back. And Hank said two things: He said, "First, it would be so watered down, it wouldn't be as strong as what we were going to say to you verbally, and secondly this would be a disclosable event and we do not want a disclosable event."

This raises serious questions and will probably lead to shareholder lawsuits.