by Calculated Risk on 5/07/2015 03:15:00 PM

Yesterday I discussed several indicators: Preview: Employment Report for April

Some excerpts from a research piece by Goldman Sachs economist David Mericle:

We expect nonfarm payroll job growth of 230k in April ... We expect the unemployment rate to decline by one-tenth to 5.4% and average hourly earnings to rise 0.2%.
...
Based on our method for estimating the payrolls effect of deviations in weather conditions from seasonal norms, we expect that warmer temperatures should be a substantial positive factor for April payrolls. The weeks leading into the March reference week were much colder than usual, while the weeks leading into the April reference period were quite a bit warmer than usual. Furthermore, the change in employment in both the construction and leisure and hospitality industries was about 30k below trend in March.
...
We also see some upside risk to our baseline forecast from a calendar effect. There were five rather than four weeks between the reference weeks for the March and April payrolls surveys this year. While the relevant history is limited and the BLS's seasonal adjustment procedure does attempt to control for the four-versus-five week effect, we have found that five-week Aprils tend to see above-trend payroll growth. Moreover, we have found that this calendar effect is not fully captured by other employment-related data. We expect an unusually large and positive calendar effect this month.

by Calculated Risk on 5/07/2015 01:15:00 PM

Yesterday I pointed out that a blog post on demographics at the Financial Times would make more sense if it had been written a decade ago.

A decade ago it was obvious that demographics would be a drag on the economy. Even without the financial crisis, we would have expected a slowdown in growth.

But now the prime working age population is growing again, and we can expect growth to pick up over the next decade.

Here is a graph of the prime working age population (this is population, not the labor force) from 1948 through March 2015 - with projections from the Census Bureau through 2040.

Click on graph for larger image.

In the '80s, the prime working age population was growing 2% or more per year.   Over the last 10 years (March 2005 through March 2015), the prime working age population was mostly unchanged (up less than 1% for the decade).

That is key reason that growth has slowed (see Demographics and GDP: 2% is the new 4%).  Add the residual effects of the financial crisis to the drag from demographics - and the last decade was no surprise.

Going forward, the prime working age population will grow at a 0.5% to 1.0% annual rate (Census projections).  This isn't the 2%+ per year of the 1980s, but it is still decent growth.

Demographics are now improving in the U.S..

by Calculated Risk on 5/07/2015 10:31:00 AM

This is a key distressed market to follow since Las Vegas has seen the largest price decline of any of the Case-Shiller composite 20 cities.

The Greater Las Vegas Association of Realtors reported GLVAR reports local housing market seeing steady growth this spring

According to GLVAR, the total number of existing local homes, condominiums and townhomes sold in April was 3,379, up from 3,358 in March and up from 3,215 one year ago. Compared to the previous month, GLVAR reported that sales were up 1.7 percent for single-family homes, but down 3.8 percent for condos and townhomes. Compared to April 2014, 5.3 percent more homes and 4.3 percent more condos and townhomes sold this April.
...
GLVAR has been reporting fewer distressed sales and more traditional home sales, where lenders are not controlling the transaction. In April, 7.2 percent of all local sales were short sales – which occur when lenders allow borrowers to sell a home for less than what they owe on the mortgage. That’s down from 8.3 percent in March and from 12.4 percent one year ago. Another 8.3 percent of April sales were bank-owned, down from 9.3 percent in March and down from 11.4 percent last April.
...
The total number of single-family homes listed for sale on GLVAR’s Multiple Listing Service in April was 13,750, up 1.6 percent from 13,532 in March, but down 0.6 percent from one year ago. GLVAR tracked a total of 3,626 condos, high-rise condos and townhomes listed for sale on its MLS in April, up 0.4 percent from 3,613 in March, but down 1.9 percent from one year ago.

By the end of April, GLVAR reported 7,296 single-family homes listed without any sort of offer. That’s up 0.5 percent from March and up 13.6 percent from one year ago. For condos and townhomes, the 2,437 properties listed without offers in April represented a 0.3 percent decrease from March and a 7.6 percent increase from one year ago.
emphasis added

There are several key trends that we've been following:

1) Overall sales were up 5.1% year-over-year.

2) Conventional(equity, not distressed) sales were up 16.5% year-over-year.  In April 2014, only 76.2% of all sales were conventional equity.  In April 2015, 84.5% were standard equity sales.   Note: In April 2013 (two years ago), only 57.5% were equity!  A significant change.

3) The percent of cash sales has declined year-over-year from 41.4% in April 2014 to 30.4% in April 2015. (investor buying appears to be declining).

4) Non-contingent inventory is up 7.6% year-over-year. The table below shows the year-over-year change for non-contingent inventory in Las Vegas. Inventory declined sharply through early 2013, and then inventory started increasing sharply year-over-year. It appears the inventory build is slowing  - but still ongoing.

Las Vegas: Year-over-year Change in Non-contingent Inventory
Month	YoY
Jan-13	-58.3%
Feb-13	-53.4%
Mar-13	-42.1%
Apr-13	-24.1%
May-13	-13.2%
Jun-13	3.7%
Jul-13	9.0%
Aug-13	41.1%
Sep-13	60.5%
Oct-13	73.4%
Nov-13	77.4%
Dec-13	78.6%
Jan-14	96.2%
Feb-14	107.3%
Mar-14	127.9%
Apr-14	103.1%
May-14	100.6%
Jun-14	86.2%
Jul-14	55.2%
Aug-14	38.8%
Sep-14	29.5%
Oct-14	25.6%
Nov-14	20.0%
Dec-14	18.0%
Jan-15	12.9%
Feb-15	15.8%
Mar-15	12.2%
Apr-15	7.6%

by Calculated Risk on 5/07/2015 08:30:00 AM

The DOL reported:

In the week ending May 2, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 265,000, an increase of 3,000 from the previous week's unrevised level of 262,000. The 4-week moving average was 279,500, a decrease of 4,250 from the previous week's unrevised average of 283,750. This is the lowest level for this average since May 6, 2000 when it was 279,250.

There were no special factors impacting this week's initial claims.

The previous week was unrevised.

The following graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since January 2000.

Click on graph for larger image.


The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims decreased to 279,500.

This was well below the consensus forecast of 285,000, and the low level of the 4-week average suggests few layoffs. This is the lowest 4-week average in 15 years (since May 2000).

by Calculated Risk on 5/06/2015 06:46:00 PM

The Financial Times blogs has a blog post about the demographic impact on the U.S. economy: The US economy’s demographic dividend is fast turning into a deficit. A few excerpts.

Demographic change is creating major headwinds for the US economy ... One key factor is that there are more older people than ever before, due to a combination of the ageing of the US baby boomer generation (those born between 1946 and 1964) and increasing life expectancy. Older people tend to spend less, as they already own most of what they need and their incomes decline as they enter retirement.

Equally important is the collapse that has occurred in US fertility rates since the peak of the baby boom. These have nearly halved from the 3.33 babies/woman level of the mid-1950s to just 1.97 babies/woman today, below the level required to replace the population. As a result, the size of the 25-54 age group, historically the main wealth creators, has plateaued in the US.

If this post had been written a decade ago, it would make more sense.

Last year, I posted some demographic data for the U.S., see: Census Bureau: Largest 5-year Population Cohort is now the "20 to 24" Age Group, Decline in the Labor Force Participation Rate: Mostly Demographics and Long Term Trends, and The Future's so Bright ...

I pointed out that "even without the financial crisis we would have expected some slowdown in growth this decade (just based on demographics). The good news is that will change soon."

Changes in demographics are an important determinant of economic growth, and although most people focus on the aging of the "baby boomer" generation, the movement of younger cohorts into the prime working age is another key story in coming years. Here is a graph of the prime working age population (this is population, not the labor force) from 1948 through March 2015.

Click on graph for larger image.

There was a huge surge in the prime working age population in the '70s, '80s and '90s - and the prime age population has been mostly flat recently (even declined a little).

The prime working age labor force grew even quicker than the population in the '70s and '80s due to the increase in participation of women. In fact, the prime working age labor force was increasing 3%+ per year in the '80s!

So when we compare economic growth to the '70s, '80, or 90's we have to remember this difference in demographics (the '60s saw solid economic growth as near-prime age groups increased sharply).

The prime working age population peaked in 2007, and appears to have bottomed at the end of 2012.  The good news is the prime working age group has started to grow again, and should be growing solidly by 2020 - and this should boost economic activity in the years ahead.

Demographics are improving in the U.S.!