by Calculated Risk on 11/04/2014 11:31:00 AM

Notes: This CoreLogic House Price Index report is for September. The recent Case-Shiller index release was for August. The CoreLogic HPI is a three month weighted average and is not seasonally adjusted (NSA).

From CoreLogic: CoreLogic Reports Home Prices Rose by 5.6 Percent Year Over Year in September 2014

Home prices nationwide, including distressed sales, increased 5.6 percent in September 2014 compared to September 2013. This change represents 31 months of consecutive year-over-year increases in home prices nationally. On a month-over-month basis, home prices nationwide, including distressed sales, dropped by 0.1 percent in September 2014 compared to August 2014.
...
Excluding distressed sales, home prices nationally increased 5.2 percent in September 2014 compared to September 2013 and 0.1 percent month over month compared to August 2014. Also excluding distressed sales, 49 states and the District of Columbia showed year-over-year home price appreciation in August, with Mississippi being the only state to experience a year-over-year decline (-0.9 percent). Distressed sales include short sales and real estate owned (REO) transactions. ...

“Home prices continue to rise compared with this time last year but the rate of growth is clearly slowing as we exit 2014,” said Anand Nallathambi, president and CEO of CoreLogic.
emphasis added

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the national CoreLogic HPI data since 1976. January 2000 = 100.

The index was down 0.1% in September, and is up 5.6% over the last year.

This index is not seasonally adjusted, and - as I predicted last month - the index turned slightly negative month-to-month in September (this is the beginning of the seasonally weak period for house prices).


The second graph is from CoreLogic. The year-over-year comparison has been positive for thirty one consecutive months suggesting house prices bottomed early in 2012 on a national basis (the bump in 2010 was related to the tax credit).

The YoY increases continue to slow.

This index was up 11.8% YoY in February 2014, and the YoY increase has been slowing since then. In July, the YoY increase was 6.4%, in August 5.8% and now, in September, the increase was 5.6%.

by Calculated Risk on 11/04/2014 08:43:00 AM

Earlier the Department of Commerce reported:

[T]otal September exports of $195.6 billion and imports of $238.6 billion resulted in a goods and services deficit of $43.0 billion, up from $40.0 billion in August, revised. September exports were $3.0 billion less than August exports of $198.6 billion. September imports were $0.1 billion more than August imports of $238.6 billion.

The trade deficit was larger than the consensus forecast of $40.7 billion and the trade deficit was revised down slightly for August.

The first graph shows the monthly U.S. exports and imports in dollars through September 2014.

Click on graph for larger image.

Imports increased slightly and exports decreased in August.  

Exports are 18% above the pre-recession peak and up 3% compared to September 2013; imports are 3% above the pre-recession peak, and up about 3% compared to September 2013. 

The second graph shows the U.S. trade deficit, with and without petroleum, through September.

The blue line is the total deficit, and the black line is the petroleum deficit, and the red line is the trade deficit ex-petroleum products.

Oil imports averaged $92.54 in September, down from $96.32 in August, and down from $102.00 in September 2013.  The petroleum deficit has generally been declining and is the major reason the overall deficit has declined since early 2012.  Oil prices will really decline in the October and November reports!

The trade deficit with China increased to $35.6 billion in September, from $30.6 billion in September 2013.  The deficit with China is almost all of the overall deficit.

by Calculated Risk on 11/03/2014 09:00:00 PM

Two weeks ago, Professor James Hamilton wrote: How will Saudi Arabia respond to lower oil prices? (read entire piece!).  Hamilton wrote:

it’s primarily a question of responding to surging output of U.S. tight oil. My guess is that Saudi Arabia would lower prices rather than cut production ...

And today from the WSJ: Oil Skids as Saudis Adjust Prices

U.S. oil prices tumbled to a fresh two-year low Monday on news that Saudi Arabia cut its selling price for oil to the U.S., suggesting that the kingdom is trying to compete with U.S. shale oil.

Bloomberg shows WTI down to $78.24 a barrel, and Brent down to $84.78. So gasoline prices should continue to decline (currently $2.96 per gallon national average).

Tuesday:
• At 8:30 AM ET, the Trade Balance report for September from the Census Bureau. The consensus is for the U.S. trade deficit to be at $40.7 billion in September from $40.1 billion in August.

• At 10:00 AM, the Manufacturers' Shipments, Inventories and Orders (Factory Orders) for September. The consensus is for a 0.7 decrease in September orders.

by Calculated Risk on 11/03/2014 05:12:00 PM

From the Federal Reserve: The October 2014 Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Lending Practices

Regarding loans to businesses, the October survey results indicated that only a modest net fraction of banks eased their standards for commercial and industrial (C&I) loans to firms of all sizes, but generally larger net fractions of banks eased each of the pricing terms listed in the survey and some non-price terms. Banks also reported having eased standards for construction and land development loans, a category of commercial real estate (CRE) loans included in the survey. On the demand side, modest net fractions of banks reported stronger demand for C&I loans to larger firms; similar net fractions experienced stronger demand for all three categories of CRE loans covered in the survey.
...
Regarding loans to households, some large banks reported having eased standards on closed-end mortgage loans, but respondents generally indicated little change in standards and terms for other types of loans to households. Reported changes in loan demand were mixed. Moderate net fractions of banks reported stronger demand for auto loans and weaker demand for nontraditional closed-end mortgage loans. Demand for other types of loans to households was about unchanged at most banks.
emphasis added

Click on graph for larger image.

Here are some charts from the Fed.

This graph shows the change in lending standards and for CRE (commercial real estate) loans.

Banks are loosening their standards for CRE loans, and for various categories of CRE (right half of graph).  Multifamily is seeing slightly tighter standards for the second consecutive quarter.

The second graph shows the change in demand for CRE loans.

Banks are seeing a pickup in demand for all categories of CRE.

This suggests (along with the Architecture Billing Index) that we will see a further increase in commercial real estate development.

by Calculated Risk on 11/03/2014 02:30:00 PM

Based on an WardsAuto estimate, light vehicle sales were at a 16.35 million SAAR in October. That is up 7% from October 2013, and unchanged from the 16.34 million annual sales rate last month.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the historical light vehicle sales from the BEA (blue) and an estimate for October (red, light vehicle sales of 16.35 million SAAR from WardsAuto).

This was below the consensus forecast of 16.6 million SAAR (seasonally adjusted annual rate).

The second graph shows light vehicle sales since the BEA started keeping data in 1967.

Note: dashed line is current estimated sales rate.

This was the sixth consecutive month with a sales rate over 16 million.