by Calculated Risk on 6/06/2014 04:34:00 PM
Friday, June 06, 2014
Public and Private Sector Payroll Jobs: Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama
By request, here is an update on an earlier post through the May employment report.
Important: There are many differences between these periods. Overall employment was smaller in the '80s, so a different comparison might be to look at the percentage change. Of course the participation rate was increasing in the '80s (younger population and women joining the labor force), and the participation rate is declining now. But these graphs give an overview of employment changes.
The first graph shows the change in private sector payroll jobs from when each president took office until the end of their term(s). President George H.W. Bush only served one term, and President Obama is just starting the second year of his second term.
Mr. G.W. Bush (red) took office following the bursting of the stock market bubble, and left during the bursting of the housing bubble. Mr. Obama (blue) took office during the financial crisis and great recession. There was also a significant recession in the early '80s right after Mr. Reagan (yellow) took office.
There was a recession towards the end of President G.H.W. Bush (purple) term, and Mr Clinton (light blue) served for eight years without a recession.
Click on graph for larger image.
The first graph is for private employment only.
The employment recovery during Mr. G.W. Bush's (red) first term was very sluggish, and private employment was down 841,000 jobs at the end of his first term. At the end of Mr. Bush's second term, private employment was collapsing, and there were net 462,000 private sector jobs lost during Mr. Bush's two terms.
Private sector employment increased slightly under President G.H.W. Bush (purple), with 1,510,000 private sector jobs added.
Private sector employment increased by 20,955,000 under President Clinton (light blue), by 14,717,000 under President Reagan (yellow), and 9,041,000 under President Carter (dashed green).
There were only 1,998,000 more private sector jobs at the end of Mr. Obama's first term. Sixteen months into Mr. Obama's second term, there are now 5,197,000 more private sector jobs than when he initially took office.
A big difference between the presidencies has been public sector employment. Note the bumps in public sector employment due to the decennial Census in 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2010.
The public sector grew during Mr. Carter's term (up 1,304,000), during Mr. Reagan's terms (up 1,414,000), during Mr. G.H.W. Bush's term (up 1,127,000), during Mr. Clinton's terms (up 1,934,000), and during Mr. G.W. Bush's terms (up 1,744,000 jobs).
However the public sector has declined significantly since Mr. Obama took office (down 710,000 jobs). These job losses have mostly been at the state and local level, but more recently at the Federal level. This has been a significant drag on overall employment.
Looking forward, I expect the economy to continue to expand for the next few years, so I don't expect a sharp decline in private employment as happened at the end of Mr. Bush's 2nd term (In 2005 and 2006 I was warning of a coming recession due to the bursting of the housing bubble).
A big question is when the public sector layoffs will end. It appears the cutbacks are over at the state and local levels in the aggregate, but there are ongoing cutbacks at the Federal level. Right now I'm expecting some increase in public employment in 2014.
Employment Recovery: Great Recession, Great Depression, and other Financial Crises
by Calculated Risk on 6/06/2014 01:58:00 PM
As a follow-up to my earlier posts comparing employment recoveries from recent recessions, here is a graph comparing the recent recovery to other financial crises.
Even though it took 6+ years to exceed the previous employment peak, this is actually better than most recoveries from a financial crisis. (Note: this recovery was during a period of declining participation - partially due to demographics - and that makes this milestone even better).
From Josh Lehner today: U.S. Jobs Are Back … To Pre-Recession Levels
With the May jobs report, the U.S. economy is now back to pre-recession peak levels of employment. While this is the longest post WWII recovery the U.S. has experienced — by a good margin — it is important to keep in mind that financial crises are different. When comparing the Great Recession against other advanced economies’ financial crises in recent decades, the current U.S. cycle has outperformed in terms of employment, even as most other measures of financial crises were just as bad — home prices, stock prices, GDP per capita, government debt and the like.
This graph from Lehner shows employment recoveries for several different financial crises. The U.S. Great Recession is in red.
The Great Depression is in dark blue.
Comment: U.S. Employment at All Time High
by Calculated Risk on 6/06/2014 10:10:00 AM
First, I promised the headline for this post last week!
Second, this means I'll be retiring the graph many called the "scariest jobs chart ever" (first graph in previous post).
Earlier: May Employment Report: 217,000 Jobs, 6.3% Unemployment Rate
Now some numbers: Through the first five months of 2014, the economy has added 1,068,000 payroll jobs - slightly better than during the same period in 2013 even with the severe weather early this year. (For comparison, there were 1,020,000 payroll jobs added during the first five months of 2013). My expectation at the beginning of the year was the economy would add between 2.4 and 2.7 million payroll jobs this year, and that still looks about right.
Here is a table of the annual change in total nonfarm and private sector payrolls jobs since 1999. The last three years have been near the best since 1999 (2005 was the best year for total nonfarm, and 2011 the best for private jobs).
It is possible that 2014 will be the best year since 1999 for both total nonfarm and private sector employment.
| Change in Payroll Jobs per Year (000s) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Total, Nonfarm | Private | |
| 1999 | 3,177 | 2,716 |
| 2000 | 1,946 | 1,682 |
| 2001 | -1,735 | -2,286 |
| 2002 | -508 | -741 |
| 2003 | 105 | 147 |
| 2004 | 2,033 | 1,886 |
| 2005 | 2,506 | 2,320 |
| 2006 | 2,085 | 1,876 |
| 2007 | 1,140 | 852 |
| 2008 | -3,576 | -3,756 |
| 2009 | -5,087 | -5,013 |
| 2010 | 1,058 | 1,277 |
| 2011 | 2,083 | 2,400 |
| 2012 | 2,236 | 2,294 |
| 2013 | 2,331 | 2,365 |
| 20141 | 2,563 | 2,527 |
| 1 2014 is current pace annualized (through May). | ||
Also employment has reached another milestone: total employment is now 98,000 above the previous peak, and and at a new all time high in May. Of course the labor force has continued to increase over the last 6+ years, and there are still millions of workers unemployed - so the economy still has a long way to go.
Note: Private payroll employment increased 216,000 in May and private employment is now 617,000 above the previous peak (the unprecedented large number of government layoffs has held back total employment).
Overall this was another solid employment report.
Employment-Population Ratio, 25 to 54 years old
Since the overall participation rate declined recently due to cyclical (recession) and demographic (aging population, younger people staying in school) reasons, an important graph is the employment-population ratio for the key working age group: 25 to 54 years old.In the earlier period the participation rate for this group was trending up as women joined the labor force. Since the early '90s, the participation rate has mostly moved sideways (with a downward drift started around '00) - and with ups and downs related to the business cycle.
The 25 to 54 participation rate was unchanged in May at 80.8%, and the 25 to 54 employment population ratio decreased to 76.4% from 76.5%. As the recovery continues, I expect the participation rate for this group to increase.
Percent Job Losses During Recessions
This graph shows the job losses from the start of the employment recession, in percentage terms - this time aligned at maximum job losses. Employment is now back above pre-recession levels and this graph will be retired until the next recession (Of course this doesn't include population growth).
In the earlier post, the graph showed the job losses aligned at the start of the employment recession.
Part Time for Economic Reasons
From the BLS report:The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers), at 7.3 million, changed little in May. These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full-time job.The number of persons working part time for economic reasons declined in May to 7.269 million from 7.465 million in April. This suggests significantly slack still in the labor market. These workers are included in the alternate measure of labor underutilization (U-6) that decreased to 12.2% in May from 12.3% in April. This is the lowest level for U-6 since October 2008.
Unemployed over 26 Weeks
This graph shows the number of workers unemployed for 27 weeks or more. According to the BLS, there are 3.374 million workers who have been unemployed for more than 26 weeks and still want a job. This was down from 3.452 in April. This is trending down, but is still very high. This is the lowest level for long term unemployed since March 2009.
Long term unemployment remains one of the key labor problems in the US.
State and Local Government
This graph shows total state and government payroll employment since January 2007. State and local governments lost jobs for four straight years. (Note: Scale doesn't start at zero to better show the change.) In May 2014, state and local governments added 6,000 jobs. State and local government employment is now up 107,000 from the bottom, but still 637,000 below the peak.
It appears state and local employment employment is now increasing. Of course Federal government layoffs are ongoing (another 5,000 jobs lost in May).
May Employment Report: 217,000 Jobs, 6.3% Unemployment Rate
by Calculated Risk on 6/06/2014 08:30:00 AM
From the BLS:
Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 217,000 in May, and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 6.3 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today.
...
After revision, the change in total nonfarm employment for March remained +203,000, and the change for April was revised from +288,000 to +282,000. With these revisions, employment gains in March and April were 6,000 lower than previously reported.
Click on graph for larger image.The headline number was at expectations of 213,000 payroll jobs added.
The first graph shows the job losses from the start of the employment recession, in percentage terms, compared to previous post WWII recessions. The dotted line is ex-Census hiring.
This shows the depth of the recent employment recession - worse than any other post-war recession - and the relatively slow recovery due to the lingering effects of the housing bust and financial crisis.
Total employment is now 98 thousand above the pre-recession peak and at an all time high. It is probably time to retire this graph - until the next recession.
NOTE: The second graph is the change in payroll jobs ex-Census - meaning the impact of the decennial Census temporary hires and layoffs is removed to show the underlying payroll changes.
The third graph shows the employment population ratio and the participation rate.
The Labor Force Participation Rate was unchanged in May at 62.8%. This is the percentage of the working age population in the labor force. A large portion of the recent decline in the participation rate is due to demographics.The Employment-Population ratio was unchanged in May at 58.9% (black line).
I'll post the 25 to 54 age group employment-population ratio graph later.
The fourth graph shows the unemployment rate. The unemployment rate was unchanged in May at 6.3%.
This was a solid employment report, and total non-farm employment is now at a new all time high.
I'll have much more later ...
Thursday, June 05, 2014
Friday: Jobs, Jobs, Jobs
by Calculated Risk on 6/05/2014 09:47:00 PM
Some great graphs from Nick Timiraos at the WSJ: Mortgage Rates Are Falling, So Where Are the Home Buyers?
True, mortgage rates are low—as low as they’ve been in almost 12 months. But in the same way that shoppers may not be lured by “low prices” at a department store that is always advertising a sale, mortgage rates at 4.1% may not be seen as a steal by buyers who lived with rates that were even lower for all of 2012 and the first half of 2013—especially considering that prices have moved higher.Check out the graphs!
Friday:
• At 8:30 AM ET, the Employment Report for May. The consensus is for an increase of 213,000 non-farm payroll jobs in May, down from the 288,000 non-farm payroll jobs added in April. The consensus is for the unemployment rate to increase to 6.4% in May. There are 406 thousand more private sector jobs now than when the recession started in 2007, but total employment is still 113 thousand below the pre-recession peak.
• At 3:00 PM, Consumer Credit for April from the Federal Reserve. The consensus is for credit to increase $15.5 billion.


