by Calculated Risk on 7/09/2010 07:11:00 PM

New Century Bank?
Customer First / U.S.A.?
Who's in control here?

Home, Bank on the range
Where Bair, and the banksters play....
Cloudy sky ahead.
by Soylent Green is People
From the FDIC: New Century Bank, Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, Assumes All of the Deposits of USA Bank, Port Chester, New York

As of March 31, 2010, USA Bank had approximately $193.3 million in total assets and $189.9 million in total deposits.
...
The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $61.7 million. Compared to other alternatives, ... USA Bank is the 89th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the third in New York. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was The Park Avenue Bank, New York, on March 12, 2010.

From the FDIC: RCB Bank, Claremore, Oklahoma, Assumes All of the Deposits of Home National Bank, Blackwell, Oklahoma

As of March 31, 2010, Home National Bank had approximately $644.5 million in total assets and $560.7 million in total deposits.
...
The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $78.7 million. ... Home National Bank is the 90th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the first in Oklahoma. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was First State Bank of Altus, Altus, on July 31, 2009.

by Calculated Risk on 7/09/2010 05:10:00 PM

Bay National... zip
Ideal Federal... whoosh
A trifecta miss : - (
by Soylent Green is People
From the FDIC: FDIC Approves the Payout of the Insured Deposits of Ideal Federal Savings Bank, Baltimore, Maryland

As of March 31, 2010, Ideal Federal Savings Bank had approximately $6.3 million in total assets and $5.8 million in total deposits.
...
he cost to the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund is estimated to be $2.1 million. Ideal Federal Savings Bank is the 88th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the third in Maryland. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Bay National Bank, Baltimore, earlier today.

Pretty small. Not ideal.

by Calculated Risk on 7/09/2010 04:36:00 PM

From the FDIC: Bay Bank, FSB, Lutherville, Maryland, Assumes all of the Deposits of Bay National Bank, Baltimore, Maryland

As of March 31, 2010, Bay National Bank had approximately $282.2 million in total assets and $276.1 million in total deposits.
...
The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $17.4 million. .. Bay National Bank is the 87th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the second in Maryland. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Waterfield Bank, Germantown, on March 5, 2010.

A quick start ...

by Calculated Risk on 7/09/2010 04:00:00 PM

This has been a light week for economic news, but the pace will pick up again next week ... I guess no news is good news for the stock market:

Here is a graph from Doug Short of dshort.com (financial planner).

Click on graph for interactive version in new window.

The graph has tabs to look at the different bear markets - "now" shows the current market - and there is also a tab for the "four bears".

by Calculated Risk on 7/09/2010 01:38:00 PM

The following article confuses "liar loans" with underwriting based on the "Three C's": creditworthiness, capacity, and collateral.

From Forbes: 'Liar Loans' Make a Comeback

Did you think the housing collapse killed off "liar loans"--those infamous bubble-era mortgages for which people were allowed to get creative in portraying their ability to make the payments? Well, they're back, and that may be a good thing.

First, this article doesn't provide evidence that liar loans have made a comeback, although low-doc loans based on collateral are being offered. And, second, if "liar loans" were coming back that would be a BAD BAD thing.

From the article:

Case in point: One of [Dave] Dessner's people is toiling now on a loan application from a hedge fund manager wishing to borrow $800,000 against a $4 million home purchase. The hedge's fund did poorly last year, so as a sign of good faith for his investors he's drawing no salary. Good for his business, perhaps, but rotten for a conventional mortgage application.

This guy made $5 million in 2007 and 2008. He's liquid for $10 million, and he's borrowing 20% LTV (loan-to-value)," says Dessner. A no-doc loan to that kind of borrower shouldn't be political dynamite ...

This is not stated income (liar loan) or even no-doc. The lender has apparently verified the borrower's collateral (a 20% LTV), and has verified the borrower's capacity ("liquid for $10 million"), and I assume the borrower's credit is solid.

The above example sounds like solid underwriting.

Tanta explained why there is no need for stated income better than I can (see below), but low-doc based on collateral are not "liar loans". The article even quotes Dessner on this distinction:

Dessner insists it would be a mistake to associate the loans GuardHill and its bank network are originating with the doomed liar loans ... "I'd be on my soapbox railing against those loans," says Dessner. "The people in government who are now screaming about liar loans aren't looking at the quality of the loans we're making."

He isn't making stated income loans, so I'm not sure why the headline and lead paragraph are so misleading.

From Tanta:

Just Say No To Stated Income

Reflections on Alt-A