by Calculated Risk on 5/22/2010 09:01:00 AM
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Fed's Dudley on the Economy
From NY Fed President William Dudley's commencement speech at New College of Florida:
[T]he recovery is not likely to be as robust as we would like for several reasons.A few comments:
First, households are still in the process of deleveraging. The housing boom created paper wealth that households borrowed against. This pushed the consumption share of nominal gross domestic product to a record high of about 70 percent. When the boom turned into a bust, those paper gains evaporated. In fact, many households now find that the value of their homes is less than the amount of their mortgage debt. This has created a difficult time for many families and has caused the hangover to last longer.
Second, the banking system is still under significant stress. This is particularly the case for small- and medium-sized banks that have significant exposure to commercial real estate loans. This stress means that banks have been slow to ease credit standards as the economy has moved from recession to recovery.
Third, some of the sources that have supported the nascent recovery are temporary. The big swing from inventory liquidation during the recession back to accumulation will soon end as inventory levels come back into better balance with sales. And fiscal stimulus from the federal government is subsiding and will soon reverse.
...
In this environment, finding a job will be tough, but when you hit the pavement remember that the job market is improving. Don't get discouraged.
First, the household "deleveraging" seemed to start last year, but consumers were back to spending more than they earned in Q1. Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) increased to over 71% of GDP in Q1 - higher than the 70% during the boom that Dudley mentioned. Some of this increase in PCE was due to government transfer payments (all of the increase in income in Q1 came from government transfer payments). I still think the personal saving rate will rise over the next year or two - and that will keep growth in PCE below the growth in income.
Second, I think the transitory inventory boost is about over. There were hints of this in the manufacturing surveys last week from the Federal Reserve Banks of Philadelphia and New York - and also in the Census Bureau's Manufacturing and Trade inventories report for March. Also, as Dudley notes, the boost from the stimulus "is subsiding and will soon reverse" (the peak stimulus spending is right now - in Q2 2010).
These are significant headwinds, and I think growth will slow in the 2nd half of 2010.
Friday, May 21, 2010
Unofficial Problem Bank list hits 737
by Calculated Risk on 5/21/2010 11:49:00 PM
This is an unofficial list of Problem Banks compiled only from public sources.
Here is the unofficial problem bank list for May 21, 2010.
Changes and comments from surferdude808:
As anticipated, the OCC released its actions for April 2010, which contributed to an increase in the number of institutions on the Unofficial Problem Bank List. The list includes 737 institutions with aggregate assets of $363.5 billion, up from 725 institutions with assets of $363.1 billion last week.
The FDIC released its industry profile this week and they reported 775 institutions with assets of $431 billion on the official problem bank list. With the industry release, we were able to update assets for the first quarter of 2010. For institutions on the unofficial list last week, their combined assets fell by $8.3 billion during the quarter.
Notable additions this week include City National Bank of Florida, Miami, FL ($4.6 billion); The National Republic Bank of Chicago, Chicago, IL ($1.3 billion); Butte Community Bank, Chico, CA ($523 million Ticker: CVLL). Other additions include the add back of Mountain West Bank, National Association, Helena, MT ($795 million Ticker: MTWF); and Pikes Peak National Bank, Colorado Springs, CO ($84 million), which were removed from the May 7th list when the OCC terminated their respective Supervisory Agreements. These agreements were replaced by stronger Consent Orders.
The only removal is the failed Pinehurst Bank. Other changes are for name changes with the Bank of Lenox, Lenox, GA now known as The Trust Bank; Goshen Community Bank, Goshen, IN now known as Indiana Community Bank; and Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, Wilmington, DE now known as Aurora Bank FSB.
"Love, Your Broken Home"
by Calculated Risk on 5/21/2010 10:01:00 PM
Since Sheila is done for the day ... a new song by Tim Miller on the mortgage crisis: "Love, Your Broken Home" (language)
Link to YouTube version if this doesn't load.
Bank Failure #73: Pinehurst Bank, St. Paul, Minnesota
by Calculated Risk on 5/21/2010 06:08:00 PM
The bill could not help Pinehurst.
Ineffectual
by Soylent Green is People
From the FDIC Coulee Bank, La Crosse, Wisconsin, Assumes All of the Deposits of Pinehurst Bank, St. Paul, Minnesota
As of March 31, 2010, Pinehurst Bank had approximately $61.2 million in total assets and $58.3 million in total deposits.Busy week ... but Friday is here!
...
The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $6.0 million.... Pinehurst Bank is the 73rd FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the sixth in Minnesota. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Access Bank, Champlin, on May 7, 2010.
Las Vegas land prices: 80% off peak
by Calculated Risk on 5/21/2010 04:13:00 PM
From Buck Wargo at the Las Vegas Sun: Foreclosures on land pushing prices back to 2003 levels
Since the peak of the market in 2007’s fourth quarter of $939,400 per acre for land not on the Strip, prices have fallen 80.6 percent, [Applied Analysis Principal Brian] Gordon said.And how about this ...
“I think we will continue to see downward pressure on prices for a while,” Gordon said. “The demand for raw land is somewhat weak. There is excess inventory of office, industrial and residential; and development activity has come to a near standstill in many of those sectors, so that they don’t need raw land.”
During the past year, many landowners have simply turned properties back to banks. ... “The reality is the landowners are finding themselves underwater and servicing their debt, and it has become a challenge,” Gordon said. “Many have opted to let the properties go back to the bank, not unlike what we have seen in the housing market.”More strategic defaults.


