by Calculated Risk on 10/14/2009 09:54:00 PM

From Austin Kilgore at Housing Wire: Chances Are, Most HAMP Mods Won’t Work: Amherst

The Making Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) adds another layer of uncertainty for private label securitization investors, making it more difficult to predict cash flows, according to a report by analysts at Amherst Securities Group, who added they expect relatively few HAMP workouts to be successful.

Additionally, it’s taking longer for bad mortgages to move from last payment to liquidation, and the pace varies by servicer: “The trial modification period essentially holds the loan in a suspended state for 90 days, making it difficult to assess what is happening with modifications,” the report said ...

While HAMP workouts are keeping the pools of real estate owned (REO) property relatively small, Amherst predicts a low percentage of eventual success of HAMP modifications is inevitable.
emphasis added

A few comments:

The trial period has been extended for an additional 60 days - so make it suspended animation for 150 days! See One Company Responsible For Nearly Half Of All Permanent Mortgage Modifications

Treasury and COP note that many of those temporary modifications may be in process of getting paperwork submitted in order for them to achieve permanent status. Treasury granted a two-month extension -- on top of the three-month trial -- for borrowers and servicers to get their documentation ready.

Much depends on the success of HAMP. If many of these modifications don't become permanent there will be another flood of foreclosures on the market. BofA has already promised a "spike" in foreclosure at the end of this year, see: Delayed Foreclosures Stalk Market

We are going to see a spike from now to the end of the year in foreclosures as we take people out of the running" for a loan modification or other alternatives, says a Bank of America Corp. spokeswoman.

In many areas the "the pools of real estate owned (REO) property" has all but dried up. The HAMP program is restricting supply.

Note: On the demand side, the first-time homebuyer tax credit combined with loose FHA underwriting, is boosting demand. Restricted supply and more demand has created a buying frenzy and pushed up prices in some low end areas.

by Calculated Risk on 10/14/2009 06:20:00 PM

The real estate market has gone crazy. At the low end we've been seeing many offers per house for some time, and recently agents have been telling me there is almost no inventory. Jim the Realtor has been reporting on this in San Diego, see: Hot All Over and The “Euphoria Express”

And from Diana Olick at CNBC today: Lunacy in Las Vegas Housing (ht Larry)

Olick include an email from a real estate agent to a client "Katie":

- This market is crazy and many things are just not going to make any sense.
...
- Properties are selling in the blink of an eye.

- Properties are getting multiple offers within a few days of being on the market, the most offers I’ve heard a house had recently was 44 offers (I know, crazy).
...
- 40% of all transactions are cash purchases, which makes it harder for the buyers who are financing to get their offers accepted.

- We have 1/2 the inventory we had a year ago and 4 times as many buyers as we did a year ago.

And more ...

It definitely seems crazy.

by Calculated Risk on 10/14/2009 04:00:00 PM

From March 29, 1999: A CNBC Promo ...

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph is from Doug Short of dshort.com (financial planner): "Four Bad Bears".

Note that the Great Depression crash is based on the DOW; the three others are for the S&P 500.

by Calculated Risk on 10/14/2009 02:00:00 PM

There are several key points here:

The pace of economic growth in 2009 and 2010 "was unlikely to reduce the unemployment rate appreciably".

There are different views on future asset purchases, although they agreed to remain "flexible" and will expand the asset purchase programs "should the economic outlook deteriorate".

There is "considerable uncertainty" about economic growth once government "supports were withdrawn or their effects waned".

Here are the September FOMC minutes. Committee Policy Action:

With respect to the large-scale asset purchase programs, some members thought that an increase in the maximum amount of the Committee's purchases of agency MBS could help to reduce economic slack more quickly than in the baseline outlook. Another member believed that the recent improvement in the economic outlook could warrant a reduction in the Committee's maximum purchases. ... Members discussed the importance of maintaining flexibility to expand the asset purchase programs should the economic outlook deteriorate or to scale back the programs should economic and financial conditions improve more than anticipated.
emphasis added

Economic outlook:

In their discussion of the economic situation and outlook, meeting participants agreed that the incoming data and information received from business contacts suggested that economic activity had picked up following its severe downturn; most thought an economic recovery was under way. Many participants noted that since August, they had revised up their projections for the second half of 2009 and for subsequent years. A number of factors were expected to support growth over the next few quarters: Activity in the housing sector was evidently rising, and house prices had apparently stabilized or even increased; ; reports from business contacts and regional surveys were consumer spending seemed to be in the process of leveling outconsistent with firms making progress in bringing inventories into better alignment with sales and with production stabilizing or beginning to rise in many sectors; the outlook for growth abroad had also improved, auguring well for U.S. exports; and financial market conditions had continued to improve over the past several months. Despite these positive factors, many participants noted that the economic recovery was likely to be quite restrained. Credit from banks remained difficult to obtain and costly for many borrowers; these conditions were expected to improve only gradually. In light of recent experience, consumers were likely to be cautious in spending, and business contacts indicated that their firms would also be cautious in hiring and investing even as demand for their products picked up. Some of the recent gains in activity probably reflected government policy support, and participants expressed considerable uncertainty about the likely strength of the upturn once those supports were withdrawn or their effects waned. Overall, the economy was projected to expand over the remainder of 2009 and during 2010, but at a pace that was unlikely to reduce the unemployment rate appreciably. Subsequently, as the housing market picked up further and financial conditions improved, economic growth was expected to strengthen, leading to more-substantial increases in resource utilization over time.

by Calculated Risk on 10/14/2009 12:23:00 PM

The WSJ has an article today on Stuy Town: An Apartment Complex Teeters

One of the biggest, most high-profile deals of the commercial real-estate boom is in danger of imminent default ... signaling the beginning of what is expected to be a wave of commercial-property failures.

According to Lingling Wei and Craig Karmin at the WSJ the interest reserve could be depleted by the end of the year, and that could put the property in default.

According to Realpoint, the property is worth less than 40% of the $5.4 billion purchase price.

Here is a September article from the NY Times: Buyers of Huge Manhattan Complex Face Default Risk

Tishman Speyer and BlackRock spent $6.3 billion — the $5.4 billion purchase price and the creation of four reserve funds totaling $890 million — to buy Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village from the original owner, Metropolitan Life.
...
At Stuyvesant Town, there is a $3 billion first mortgage, or commercial mortgage-backed security, and a $1.4 billion second loan held by SL Green and others.

Finally, there is $1.9 billion in equity put up by Tishman Speyer, BlackRock and their investors.

The equity and the second loan will probably be wiped out.