by Calculated Risk on 1/13/2010 11:17:00 AM
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
City Budgets under Stress
One of the ways California made it through 2009 was by cutting aid to cities, and that has led to severe cutbacks in local spending. I've been seeing more and more article like these ...
Riverside County: Massive county layoffs likely, chief exec says
Anaheim: City cuts 11 jobs, slashes tourism funds
And this will probably be a problem nationwide, from Reuters: Shortfalls for US cities could reach $56 bln-report
U.S. cities will face a collective budget shortfall of at least $56 billion over the next two years, with the current recession not seen hitting bottom until 2011, according to a report on Wednesday.
...
States are also threatening to cut another lifeline for cities -- direct aid transfers. As they attempt to reconcile their own battered budgets, states are saying they can send less money to cities. California, for one, has already taken back aid it had granted.
MBA: Mortgage Purchase Applications Flat
by Calculated Risk on 1/13/2010 08:39:00 AM
The MBA reports: Mortgage Refinance Applications Increase While Purchase Applications Remain Flat
The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) today released its Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending January 8, 2010. The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, increased 14.3 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier. ...
The Refinance Index increased 21.8 percent from last week’s holiday adjusted index ... The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index increased 0.8 percent from one week earlier.
...
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 5.13 percent from 5.18 percent, with points decreasing to 1.17 from 1.28 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value (LTV) ratio loans.
Click on graph for larger image in new window.This graph shows the MBA Purchase Index and four week moving average since 1990.
The four week moving average is now at the lowest level since July 1997.
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Hearings Start Tomorrow
by Calculated Risk on 1/12/2010 10:41:00 PM
From Dow Jones: Financial-Crisis Panel Set To Grill Wall Street Executives
Wednesday's hearing marks the first of two days of testimony before the financial-crisis commission.The purpose of this commission is to determine the causes of the crisis, and I hope they don't spend the entire day on pay. I think they should spend a significant amount of time discussing the entire chain of the originate-to-distribute model and other financial innovations (such as automated underwriting), the interaction with the credit agencies, and what regulators were asking and being told.
...
Top executives from Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), Bank of America Corp. (BAC) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) are likely to come under stiff questioning from members of the bipartisan Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.
...
Top policymakers, including Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary Schapiro and Attorney General Eric Holder, are scheduled to appear on Thursday.
The tendency will be to focus on pay and gotcha type questions (and that makes good theater), but asking question about the process would be far more helpful.
Here is the FCIC website.
More on Option ARMs
by Calculated Risk on 1/12/2010 07:24:00 PM
From Mark Koba at CNBC: More Homeowners Struggling As Option ARMs Reset Higher
From Diana Olick at CNBC: Walkaways, Pay Option ARMS Hit Banks Bad
And from my earlier post: Option ARM Recast Update
This impact is still being debated, but the Option ARM fallout will hit the mid-to-high end bubble areas because it was used as an affordability product.
UPDATE: As Laurie Goodman at Amherst Securities noted yesterday, Option ARM borrowers were a self selecting group (people stretching to buy homes) and most have negative equity in their homes. The "payment shock" is unclear because of low interest rates and because of modifications. Many lenders will be willing to extend the term, and some lenders like Wells Fargo has reduced principal on a case-by-case basis.
Click on graph for larger image in new window.
On negative equity, this graph from Amherst shows the CLTV for various mortgage products. Note that subprime and Alt-A had a somewhat higher percent of borrowers with negative equity than prime - but Option ARMs (red) borrowers are mostly in negative equity!
HUD Probes FHA Lenders
by Calculated Risk on 1/12/2010 04:14:00 PM
From HUD: HUD Inspector General Probes Morgage Companies with Significant Claim Rates
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Inspector General Kenneth M. Donohue and Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Commissioner David H. Stevens announced today an initiative focusing on mortgage companies with significant claim rates against the Federal Housing Administration mortgage insurance program.HUD has a great tool to track FHA lender performance: Neighborhood Watch Early Warning System
HUD Office of Inspector General (OIG) subpoenas were served to the corporate offices of 15 mortgage companies across the country demanding documents and data related to failed loans which resulted in claims paid out by the FHA mortgage insurance fund.
Inspector General Donohue said, “The goal of this initiative is to determine why there is such a high rate of defaults and claims with these companies and whether there is wrongdoing involved. We aren’t making any accusations at this time, we have no evidence of wrongdoing, but we will aggressively pursue indicators of fraud. We are members of the President's Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force and today’s activities reflect our commitment to seeking information on red flags that may arise from data analysis.
...
“The FHA market share has skyrocketed,” Inspector General Donohue further said. “Our job is oversight. We work for the American taxpayer. Each loan on this list will be thoroughly examined and we will track down the reasons why it failed. Once we determine the causes, we will look to see whether there is a need for further review or remedial action. We want to send a message to the industry that as the mortgage landscape has shifted we are watching very carefully and that we are poised to take action against bad performers."
The default rates shown are for loans made during the last two years. As an example, according to the FHA, 15.97% of the loans originated by Pine State Mortgage Corporation of Atlanta, GA are in default or were claim terminated. The rate is 14.4% for Alacrity Financial Services, LLC of Southlake, TX, and 11.23% for Assurity Financial Services, LLC of Englewood, CO. All three have default rates well above the national average for loans originated during the last two years (5.05%), and all received subpoenas today.
Option ARM Recast Update
by Calculated Risk on 1/12/2010 01:58:00 PM
Laurie Goodman and others at Amherst Securities released a new research note yesterday: Option ARMs - Performance and Pricing
They make several important points (quoted section are from Amherst):
Click on graph for larger image in new window.This chart shows the expected payment shock coming in 2010 and 2011 from Option ARMs. This chart includes projected increases in LIBOR (if LIBOR stays low, the shock will not be as high), and the recast due to reamortizing the loan over the remaining period.
Update: There is question on the size of the payment "shock". The report suggests many payments will double, but other estimate are much lower.
China Increases Bank Reserve Requirements
by Calculated Risk on 1/12/2010 12:39:00 PM
From the Financial Times: China raises bank reserve requirements (ht James)
China on Tuesday increased the required amount of deposits banks must keep as reserves in the clearest signal yet that the central bank was trying to tighten monetary conditions amid mounting concerns of overheating and inflation as a result of the ongoing credit boom.More from the WSJ: China Cuts Amount Banks Can Lend, in Sign of Inflation Worries
excerpted with permission
As it orders banks to lock up more cash, Beijing is demonstrating it is on guard against asset bubbles that can accompany inflation. The initial impact may be to knock back China's stock market, which gained 80% last year according to the Shanghai Composite Index. ...That calls for a graph ...
A sharp spike in bank lending starting in late 2008 was the central element to Beijing's effort to escape the global financial crisis. The forceful policy may have worked too well, allowing companies to gorge on easy credit and speculate on properties and stocks.
Click on graph for larger image in new window.This graph shows the Shanghai SSE Composite Index and the S&P 500 (in blue).
The SSE Composite Index closed at 3,273.97, up about 90% from the low in 2008.
BLS: Near Record Low Job Openings in November
by Calculated Risk on 1/12/2010 10:00:00 AM
From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary
There were 2.4 million job openings on the last business day of November 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The job openings rate was little changed over the month at 1.8 percent. The openings rate has held relatively steady since March 2009. The hires rate (3.2 percent) and the separations rate (3.3 percent) were essentially unchanged in November.Note: The difference between JOLTS hires and separations is similar to the CES (payroll survey) net jobs headline numbers. Remember the CES (Current Employment Statistics, payroll survey) is for positions, the CPS (Current Population Survey, commonly called the household survey) is for people. See Jobs and the Unemployment Rate for a comparison of the two surveys.
The following graph shows job openings (yellow line), hires (purple Line), Quits (light blue bars) and Layoff, Discharges and other (red bars) from the JOLTS. Red and light blue added together equals total separations.
Unfortunately this is a new series and only started in December 2000.
Click on graph for larger image in new window.Notice that hires (purple line) and separations (red and light blue together) are pretty close each month. When the purple line is above total separations, the economy is adding net jobs, when the blue line is below total separations, the economy is losing net jobs.
According to the JOLTS report, there were 4.176 million hires in November, and 4.340 million separations, or 164 thousand net jobs lost. The comparable CES report showed a gain of 4 thousand jobs in November (after revisions).
Openings near a series low can't be a positive sign. Separations have declined sharply, but hiring has not picked up. This also suggests that eventually (possibly when the March 2010 benchmark revision is announced in Feb 2011), the November net change in employment will be revised down.
Trade Deficit Increases in November
by Calculated Risk on 1/12/2010 08:31:00 AM
The Census Bureau reports:
The ... total November exports of $138.2 billion and imports of $174.6 billion resulted in a goods and services deficit of $36.4 billion, up from $33.2 billion in October, revised. November exports were $1.2 billion more than October exports of $137.0 billion. November imports were $4.4 billion more than October imports of $170.2 billion.
Click on graph for larger image.The first graph shows the monthly U.S. exports and imports in dollars through November 2009.
Both imports and exports increased in November. On a year-over-year basis, exports are off 2.3% and imports are off 5.5%.
The second graph shows the U.S. trade deficit, with and without petroleum, through November.
The blue line is the total deficit, and the black line is the petroleum deficit, and the red line is the trade deficit ex-petroleum products.Import oil prices increased to $72.54 in November - up 85% from the low in February (at $39.22).
Oil import volumes are off 8% from last November.
Overall trade continues to increase, although both imports and exports are still off significantly from the pre-financial crisis levels. Net export growth had been one of the positives for the U.S. economy - but now imports are growing faster than exports.
Monday, January 11, 2010
The Depression of 1948?
by Calculated Risk on 1/11/2010 10:55:00 PM
It is always nice to be mentioned. Henry Blodget called the graph comparing the percent job losses in post WWII recessions "The Scariest Jobs Chart Ever"1. And then Glenn Beck mentioned the graph too, but ... uh, the Depression wasn't in 1948!
If we had the data, the percent job losses during the Great Depression (in the '30s) would probably have been 20% or more - far worse than the current employment recession. It was the Great Depression that led to the expansion of the BLS program to track employment. From the BLS:
With the deepening economic crisis in 1930, President Herbert C. Hoover appointed an Advisory Committee on Employment Statistics, which recommended extension of the BLS program to include the development of hours and earnings series. In 1932, the U.S. Congress granted an increase in the BLS appropriation for the survey. In 1933, average hourly earnings and average weekly hours were published for the first time for total manufacturing, for 90 manufacturing industries, and for 14 nonmanufacturing categories.
During the Great Depression, there was controversy concerning the actual number of unemployed people; no reliable measures of employment or unemployment existed. This confusion stimulated efforts to develop comprehensive estimates of total wage and salary employment in nonfarm industries, and BLS survey data produced such a figure for the first time in 1936.
Click on graph for larger image in new window.Although there is some data on unemployment during the Great Depression, it is based on very rough estimates.
As an example, this graph from Northern Trust shows an estimate of the unemployment rate from 1929 through 1947.
And here is a repeat of the "scariest chart ever".Even after the benchmark revision is added next month, the job losses for the current recession as a percent of peak employment are only about one fourth of the losses in the Great Depression.
1Note: The total jobs lost does not include the preliminary benchmark payroll revision of minus 824,000 jobs. (This is the preliminary estimate of the final benchmark revision that will be announced on February 5, 2010).
CRE: "Almost FREE"
by Calculated Risk on 1/11/2010 07:56:00 PM
Talk about falling rents ... Doug in Chicago sends along this photo "a storefront in a normally bustling neighborhood retail district on North Clark St in Chicago, about a mile south of Wrigley Field". (telephone number blacked out)
Distressed Sales: Sacramento as an Example
by Calculated Risk on 1/11/2010 04:56:00 PM
NOTE: I expect the use of short sales to increase nationwide in 2010. Since the Sacramento Association of REALTORS® is breaking out monthly resales by equity sales (conventional resales), and distressed sales (Short sales and REO sales), I'm following this series as an example to see changes in the mix in a former bubble area.
Click on graph for larger image in new window.
Here is the December data.
They started breaking out REO sales in 2008, but they have only broken out short sales since June 2009. About 66 percent of all resales (single family homes and condos) were distressed sales in December.
The second graph shows the percent of REO and short sales (and total distressed sales). The percent of REOs has been declining, but the percent of short sales has been steadily increasing, from 16.7% in June to 24.7% in December.
When the trial modification period ends, the REO sales will probably increase. Also, I expect short sales to be higher in 2010 than in 2009 (there is more emphasis on short sales and deed-in-lieu of foreclosure now).
Total sales in December were off 14.3% compared to December 2008; the seventh month in a row with declining YoY sales.
On financing, over half the sales were either all cash (24.6%) or FHA loans (27.5%), suggesting most of the activity in distressed former bubble areas like Sacramento is first time home buyers using government-insured FHA loans, and investors paying cash.
Fed Economic Letter: "Global Household Leverage, House Prices, and Consumption"
by Calculated Risk on 1/11/2010 02:21:00 PM
From Reuven Glick and Kevin J. Lansing at the San Francisco Fed: Global Household Leverage, House Prices, and Consumption (ht Amir)
"[O]ver-investment and over-speculation are often important; but they would have far less serious results were they not conducted with borrowed money." —Irving Fisher (1933)And a couple of graphs from the paper. The first graph plots the change in house prices vs. the change in household leverage.
In the United States and many other industrial countries, the recent financial crisis contributed to the longest and most severe economic contraction since the Great Depression. The rapid expansion in the use of borrowed money, or leverage, by households in recent years, is one factor that may help account for the virulence of the downturn.
In the years leading up to the crisis, a combination of factors, including low interest rates, lax lending standards, a proliferation of exotic mortgage products, and the growth of a global market for securitized loans fueled a rapid increase in household borrowing. An influx of new and often speculative homebuyers with access to easy credit helped bid up U.S. house prices to unprecedented levels relative to rents or disposable income. U.S. household leverage, as measured by the ratio of debt to personal disposable income, reached an all-time high, exceeding 130% in 2007 (see Glick and Lansing 2009). National house prices peaked in 2006 and have since dropped by about 30%. The bursting of the housing bubble set off a chain of events that pushed the U.S. economy into a severe recession that started in December 2007.
This Economic Letter shows that the recent U.S. experience is by no means unique. Household leverage in many industrial countries increased dramatically in the years prior to 2007. Countries with the largest increases in household leverage tended to experience the fastest rise in house prices over the same period. Moreover, these same countries tended to experience the most severe declines in consumption once house prices started falling. The common patterns observed across countries suggest that, as in the United States, the unwinding of excess household leverage via increased saving or increased default rates could be a significant drag on consumption and bank lending going forward, possibly muting the vigor of the economic recovery.
Note: this is on a national basis. Professors Atif Mian and Amir Sufi (both University of Chicago Booth School of Business and NBER) published a paper last year showing the same result across U.S. counties), see: The Household Leverage-Driven Recession of 2007 to 2009 or my post last September for excerpts and graphs: MEW and the Wealth Effect
Click on graph for larger image in new window. Figure 3 ... shows that countries exhibiting the largest increases in household leverage from 1997 to 2007 also tended to experience the fastest rise in house prices over same period. The pattern suggests that the link between easy mortgage credit and rising house prices held on a global scale.The second graph shows the change in consumption following the financial crisis vs. the change in household leverage prior to the crisis:

Figure 4 shows that countries experiencing the largest increases in household leverage before the crisis tended to experience the most severe recessions, where severity is measured by the percentage decline in real consumption from the second quarter of 2008 to the first quarter of 2009. Consumption fell most sharply in Ireland (-6.7%) and Denmark (-6.3%), both of which saw huge increases in household leverage prior to the crisis. Consumption was flat or fell only slightly in Germany, Austria, Belgium, and France, which were among the countries that saw the smallest increases in household leverage before the crisis. Overall, the data suggest that recession severity in a given country reflects the degree to which prior growth was driven by an unsustainable borrowing trend.Not a surprise, but this suggests growth will be sluggish in the U.S., and regulators should be alert to rapid increases in household leverage.
Bubbles and Employment
by Calculated Risk on 1/11/2010 12:18:00 PM
The following graph is from a forthcoming paper by Natalia Cohen, a senior at Barnard College.
Note: the price-earnings and price-rent portion is based on a graph by Paul Krugman, "The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008", pg. 145
The graph shows the 10 year stock price-earnings ratio as calculated by Robert Shiller (see here for data and an explanation).
The price-rent ratio is based on work by Fed economist John Krainer and researcher Chishen Wei: "House Prices and Fundamental Value". This calculation uses the American CoreLogic LoanPerformance House Price Index and Owners' Equivalent Rent (Jan 2000 = 25 for convenience).
The unemployment rate is from the BLS.
Click on graph for larger image.
The graph clearly shows the recent stock and house price bubbles. The smaller late '80s housing bubble is also evident.
The overlay of the unemployment rate on the graph (green) suggests that asset bubbles push down the unemployment rate, and then when the bubbles burst, the unemployment rate increases significantly. There are other factors too, but the bursting of the bubble probably leads to higher sustained unemployment because many workers have non-transferable skills and need to acquire a new skill set.
A good example of this would be construction employment in the recent bubble.
The second graph shows residential building construction employment and the price-rent ratio. The increase in residential construction employment in the late '90s was probably due to the stock bubble, but there was a clear increase in employment related to the housing bubble in the late '80s, and the also during the more recent housing bubble.
Note: Scales do not start at zero to better show the change. Also this is just residential building construction employment - unfortunately the BLS didn't track residential speciality construction employment separately until 2001.
The third graph compares total construction employment and the price-rent ratio. Some of the increase in the late '90s was due to non-residential construction.
As we know, there were bubble in both residential and non-residential investment. This pushed up both key categories of construction employment.
Since the recovery in residential construction will probably be sluggish, and private non-residential construction spending is declining rapidly - construction employment will probably continue to decline even with more public spending.
A construction industry group is now arguing that almost one-in-four construction workers is unemployed. But that reality is many of these jobs are not coming back any time soon because the bubbles in residential and non-residential investment pushed construction employment up way too high - and now many of these "unemployed" construction workers will need to develop new skill sets and find alternative employment.
This wasn't the workers fault - they were just responding to the market demand, and construction employment was probably the highest paying job available. However this does suggest that the Fed needs to consider asset bubbles when trying to follow their dual mandate of price stability and maximum sustainable employment. Asset bubbles play a key role in employment, and trying to clean up after the bubble is short term thinking and is not promoting sustainable employment.
Fitch: U.S. CMBS Delinquencies up; Peak Not Until 2012
by Calculated Risk on 1/11/2010 09:53:00 AM
Press Release: Fitch: U.S. CMBS Delinquencies up 42bps; Peak Not Until 2012 (ht ron at Wallstreetpit)
Rising defaults among all property types led to a 42 basis point (bp) increase in U.S. CMBS delinquencies to close out 2009 at 4.71%, according to the latest Loan Delinquency Index results from Fitch Ratings.With rising vacancy rates and falling rents, the CMBS delinquency rates will keep rising; Fitch estimates the rate will rise until 2012.
'Though delinquencies have increased approximately five times from a year ago, they may not peak until 2012', said Managing Director Mary MacNeill. 'An increased amount of loans are coming due over the next two years that will result in delinquencies possibly peaking at 12%.' Fitch's surveillance criteria reflect a forward looking view of performance. Therefore, the current ratings on CMBS transactions recently reviewed by Fitch incorporate significantly higher delinquency rates.
Of the five main property types, each has seen an increase in delinquencies of over 195% since December 2008, ranging from multifamily with 196% increase, to hotel, with a 1,175% increase. Delinquency rates for these properties are as follows (along with total dollars delinquent versus total dollars delinquent as of December 2008):
--Office: 2.66% ($3.9 billion vs. $603.5 million);
--Hotel: 9.13% ($4.6 billion vs. $363.7 million);
--Retail: 4.25% ($5.7 billion vs. $1.2 billion);
--Multifamily: 7.54% ($5 billion vs. $1.6 billion);
--Industrial: 3.57% ($851.3 million vs. $186.2 million).
This is related to these recent commercial real estate stories:
First Foreclosure in Dubai
by Calculated Risk on 1/11/2010 09:00:00 AM
From Bloomberg: Dubai’s First Foreclosure May Open Floodgates in Worst Market (ht Nanoo-Nanoo, Steve)
Dubai’s housing rout sent prices down 52 percent in the past year, prompting some homeowners to abandon their cars and mortgage payments and flee the country. Not one received a foreclosure notice.It is amazing that this is the first foreclosure given all the skips (expats fleeing the country to avoid debtor prison). But Dubai has lacked a clear legal process to handle foreclosures. As reader Steve joked, it is not so much "walk away" in Dubai but "fly away" defaults.
Until now.
Barclays Plc won the sheikdom’s first foreclosure cases in court, clearing the way for lenders holding about $16 billion of Dubai home loans to take action when borrowers don’t pay.
...
Moody’s estimated in September that 12 percent of the 27,000 residential mortgages in the sheikdom would default within 12 to 18 months.
Banks and developers until now have avoided the process of reclaiming homes through the courts, barred by tradition and an arcane legal process that few understood. The Barclays and Tamweel cases may change that ...
Fed's Bullard: Focus on Quantitative Monetary Policy
by Calculated Risk on 1/11/2010 12:15:00 AM
From Bloomberg: Fed’s Bullard Says Asset-Purchase Adjustments Main Policy Issue (ht MrM)
[St. Louis Fed President] James Bullard said the main challenge for U.S. policy makers will be to adjust the asset-purchase program ...It is pretty clear that the Fed will not raise rates any time soon.
The Fed should retain flexibility by adopting a “state- contingent” policy that would allow for the adjustment of such purchases as new information becomes available ... He said it was “disappointing” that markets focus more on interest rates instead of the Fed’s quantitative monetary policy.
...
“Markets are still thinking of monetary policy strictly as changes in interest rates even though the Fed has been conducting successful policy this past year through quantitative easing,” Bullard said. “Markets should be focusing on quantitative monetary policy rather than interest rate policy.”
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Update on "Foreclosureville, U.S.A."
by Calculated Risk on 1/10/2010 09:28:00 PM
Note: Here is a weekly summary and look ahead.
Evelyn Nieves at HuffingtonPost has an update on Stockton, CA: Stockton, California Is Foreclosureville, USA, Has One Of The Worst Foreclosure Rates In The United Sates. A short excerpt:
Stockton is a changed place. Whole neighborhoods have been decimated by the mortgage disaster. The tax base has shrunken. City services and municipal jobs have been cut. Unemployment hovers at about 16 percent. Economists predict it will take years for Stockton to recover from the housing bust.A long way from normal ...
...
Housing developments built for commuters have been hit the hardest, since they were the ones to attract newcomers fleeing the huge spike in prices closer to the Bay area. Those whose livelihoods depend on a healthy housing environment – real estate brokers, contractors, day laborers – are barely holding on here.
...
The heart of Foreclosureville, U.S.A. – the Stockton subdivision that had more bank repossessions than any other place in the country for much of the last two years – is starting to look like its old self again.
The "For Sale" signs that overwhelmed Weston Ranch are mostly gone, and the lawns where weeds grew like corn stalks are shorn.
Foreclosure businesses that sprang up, including one that spray-painted brown lawns green and another that offered a foreclosure bus tour, have folded. Every time a foreclosure hits the market, bargain hunters snap it up.
But looks are deceiving. In Weston Ranch, financial devastation struck like a natural disaster and the ground has not yet settled. Speculators are buying houses to rent out. On streets where everyone knew everyone, no one knows anyone.
Fed MBS Purchases: 90% Complete
by Calculated Risk on 1/10/2010 06:28:00 PM
Note: Here is a weekly summary and look ahead.
The Hartford Courant quoted Boston Fed President Eric S. Rosengren as saying he expects mortgage rates to rise 50 to 75 bps when the Fed MBS purchase program ends.
And that is an excuse to update the status of the program. From the Atlanta Fed weekly Financial Highlights:
Click on graph for larger image.
From the Atlanta Fed:
[T]he agency-backed MBS purchase program is ... onThe Fed purchased an additional $12 billion net in MBS over the last week, bringing the total to $1.127 trillion or just over 90% complete.
schedule, with more than $1.1 trillion purchased by year-end.The Fed purchased a net total of $9.3 billion of agency-backed MBS through the week of December 30. This brings its total purchases up to $1.115 trillion, and by the end of the first quarter 2010 the Fed will purchase $1.25 trillion (thus, it is 89% complete).
Weekly Summary and a Look Ahead
by Calculated Risk on 1/10/2010 01:59:00 PM
Economic news this week includes the trade report for November on Tuesday (consensus is for an increase in the trade deficit from $32.9 billion in October to around $35 billion in November). Retail sales for December will be released on Thursday (consensus is for 0.2% increase ex-auto), and CPI and Industrial Production / Capacity Utilization (for December) on Friday.
I expect the AAR rail traffic report, DOT's vehicle miles, and West coast port traffic data all to be released this week too.
And a summary of last week ...
Here are couple of graphs based on the employment report this week:
Click on graph for larger image.This graph shows the job losses from the start of the employment recession, in percentage terms (as opposed to the number of jobs lost). The current employment recession is the worst recession since WWII in percentage terms, and 2nd worst in terms of the unemployment rate (only early '80s recession with a peak of 10.8 percent was worse).
Note: The total jobs lost does not include the annual benchmark payroll revision that will be announced on February 5, 2010. The preliminary estimate is for a downward revision of 824,000 jobs - pushing the total jobs lost over 8 million.
The second graph (blue line) is the number of workers unemployed for 27 weeks or more. The red line is the same data as a percent of the civilian workforce.According to the BLS, there are a record 6.13 million workers who have been unemployed for more than 26 weeks (and still want a job). This is a record 4.0% of the civilian workforce. (note: records started in 1948).
For more on the employment report:
-> Employment Report: 85K Jobs Lost, 10% Unemployment Rate
-> Employment-Population Ratio, Part Time Workers, Temporary Workers
-> Unemployed over 26 Weeks, Diffusion Index, Seasonal Retail Hiring
This graph shows the office vacancy rate starting in 1991.Reis is reporting the vacancy rate rose to 17.0% in Q4, from 16.6% in Q3 and from 14.5% in Q4 2008. The peak following the previous recession was 16.9%.
-> On offices from Reuters: At 17 pct, US office vacancy rate hits 15-year high
-> On apartments from Reuters: U.S. apartment vacancy rate hits 30-year high
-> On malls from Reuters: US shopping center vacancies hit records - report
Residential construction spending was off slightly in November, and is now only 5.8% above the bottom earlier in 2009. Non-residential appeared flat in November, but that was only because of a downward revision to October spending. The collapse in non-residential construction spending continues ...
This graph shows private residential and nonresidential construction spending since 1993. Note: nominal dollars, not inflation adjusted.Private residential construction spending is now 62.9% below the peak of early 2006.
Private non-residential construction spending is 22.5% below the peak of October 2008.
U.S. Light Vehicle Sales 11.25 Million SAAR in December
This graph shows the historical light vehicle sales (seasonally adjusted annual rate) from the BEA (blue) and an estimate for December (red, light vehicle sales of 11.25 million SAAR from AutoData Corp).Excluding August (sales driven by "Cash-for-clunkers"), December was the strongest month since September 2008 (12.5 million SAAR) before sales fell off the final cliff.
The current level of sales are still very low, and are still below the lowest point for the '90/'91 recession (even with a larger population). On an annual basis, 2009 sales were probably just above the level of 1982 (10.357 million light vehicles).
Best wishes to all.


