by Calculated Risk on 11/05/2014 09:47:00 PM

From NDD: A little post-election-day economic balm

If Washington can simply manage to do absolutely nothing to the economy in the next two years, except to agree to pay already incurred debts (a/k/a lift the debt ceiling), then we are in the best position we have been in for nearly a decade for the economy by itself to improve the lot of the working and middle class appreciably.

Here's why:

• there is nothing in the long leading indicators to suggest that we are going to enter an economic downturn at any point in at least the next 9 months. If interest rates continue to drift lower and housing starts improve as a result, you can extend that forecast into 2016.

• continuing economic growth means continuing positive monthly jobs reports

• so long as there is positive jobs growth, and initial jobless claims stay at or near their current levels, the unemployment rate is going to continue to decline -- and that's not just the usual rate, but all the other variations on the unemployment rate as well.

• Because the unemployment rate should remain below 6.5% for the foreseeable future, that means that nominal wage growth, which has been improving for the last 18 months, will continue to improve further - i.e., to 2.5% YoY or 3.0% YoY.

• Also, incremental tightness in the labor market is going to mean that better paying jobs become an increasing share of employment - my hypothesis is that this recovery is no different from previous recoveries, where low wage jobs get added first, and higher wage jobs get added later. Like the expansion after the deep 1982 recession, there was so much slack that it took a long time for those higher paying jobs to show up. There is evidence from the last few jobs reports that it is beginning to happen.

• Unless there is a reversal in gas prices, this is going to mean significant real wage growth to the average working family.

In short, simply leaving the economy alone for the next 2 years is likely to mean a continued improvement in the jobs picture, and a significant improvement on the wage front. Or, if ever there was a time when laissez faire might be a perfectly decent policy, this point in the cycle is it.

Since Senator McConnell has already ruled out defaulting (Congress will raise the "debt ceiling") and another government shutdown, then doing next to nothing will probably be OK.

Thursday:
• Early: Trulia Price Rent Monitors for October. This is the index from Trulia that uses asking house prices adjusted both for the mix of homes listed for sale and for seasonal factors.

• At 8:30 AM ET, the initial weekly unemployment claims report will be released. The consensus is for claims to decrease to 283 thousand from 287 thousand.

by Calculated Risk on 11/05/2014 03:01:00 PM

Friday at 8:30 AM ET, the BLS will release the employment report for October. The consensus, according to Bloomberg, is for an increase of 240,000 non-farm payroll jobs in October (range of estimates between 200,000 and 282,000), and for the unemployment rate to be unchanged at 5.9%.

The BLS reported 248,000 jobs added in September.

Here is a summary of recent data:

• The ADP employment report showed an increase of 230,000 private sector payroll jobs in October. This was above expectations of 212,000 private sector payroll jobs added. The ADP report hasn't been very useful in predicting the BLS report for any one month, but in general, this suggests employment growth slightly above expectations.

• The ISM manufacturing employment index increased in October to 55.5%. A historical correlation between the ISM manufacturing employment index and the BLS employment report for manufacturing, suggests that private sector BLS manufacturing payroll jobs increased about 10,000 in October. The ADP report indicated a 15,000 increase for manufacturing jobs in October.

The ISM non-manufacturing employment index increased in October to 59.6%. A historical correlation (linear) between the ISM non-manufacturing employment index and the BLS employment report for non-manufacturing, suggests that private sector BLS non-manufacturing payroll jobs increased about 330,000 in October.  Note: There are only a couple of previous readings this high for the ISM non-manufacturing employment index - so this might be high.

Combined, the ISM indexes suggests employment gains of 340,000.

• Initial weekly unemployment claims averaged close to 287,000 in October, down from 295,000 in September. For the BLS reference week (includes the 12th of the month), initial claims were at 284,000; this was up from 281,000 during the reference week in September.

This suggests about the same low level of layoffs in October as in September.

• The final October Reuters / University of Michigan consumer sentiment index increased to 86,9 from the September reading of 84.6. This is frequently coincident with changes in the labor market, but there are other factors too - like sharply lower gasoline prices.

• On small business hiring: The small business index from Intuit showed a 15,000 increase in small business employment in October (up from 10,000 in September).

• Trim Tabs reported:

TrimTabs Investment Research estimates that the U.S. economy added 314,000 jobs in October, up from 206,000 in September. ... TrimTabs’ employment estimates are based on analysis of daily income tax deposits to the U.S. Treasury from the paychecks of the 140 million U.S. workers subject to withholding.

• Conclusion: Below is a table showing several employment indicators and the initial BLS report (the first column is the revised employment). A few key points:

1) All but one of the revisions this year have been up (average about 21,000).

2) Unfortunately none of the indicators below is very good at predicting the initial BLS employment report.  

3) In general it looks like this should be another 200+ month (based on ADP, ISM, unemployment claims, and small business hiring).

There is always some randomness to the employment report.  And we have to remember that September employment was boosted by a one time factor (returning workers from a strike in August).
The consensus forecast is pretty strong, but I'll take the over again (above 240,000).

Employment Indicators (000s)
	BLS Revised	BLS Initial	ADP Initial	ISM	Weekly Claims Reference Week1	Intuit Small Business
Jan	144	113	175	236	329	10
Feb	222	175	139	-6	334	0
Mar	203	192	191	153	323	0
Apr	304	288	220	NA	320	25
May	229	217	179	130	327	35
Jun	267	288	281	NA	314	20
Jul	243	209	218	NA	303	15
Aug	180	142	204	285	299	0
Sep		248	213	NA	281	10
Oct		Friday	230	340	284	15
1Lower is better for Unemployment Claims

by Calculated Risk on 11/05/2014 12:23:00 PM

From the US Court: Fiscal Year Bankruptcy Filings Lowest in Seven Years

Bankruptcy cases filed in federal courts for the fiscal year 2014—the 12-month period ending September 30, 2014—totaled 963,739, down 13 percent from the 1.1 million bankruptcy filings in FY 2013, according to statistics released today by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. This is the lowest number of bankruptcy filings for any 12-month period since 2007.

The number of filings for the fiscal year ending Sept 2014 were the lowest since 2007.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the business and non-business bankruptcy filings by year since 1987.

The sharp decline in 2006 and 2007 was due to the so-called "Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005". (a good example of Orwellian named legislation since this was more a "Lender Protection Act").

Other than 2007, this was the lowest level for filings since 1995. This is another indicator of an economy mostly recovered from the housing bust and financial crisis.

by Calculated Risk on 11/05/2014 10:00:00 AM

The October ISM Non-manufacturing index was at 57.1%, down from 58.6% in September. The employment index increased in October to 59.6%, up from 58.5% in September. Note: Above 50 indicates expansion, below 50 contraction.

From the Institute for Supply Management: October 2014 Non-Manufacturing ISM Report On Business®

Economic activity in the non-manufacturing sector grew in October for the 57th consecutive month, say the nation’s purchasing and supply executives in the latest Non-Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business®.

The report was issued today by Anthony Nieves, CPSM, C.P.M., CFPM, chair of the Institute for Supply Management® (ISM®) Non-Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. "The NMI® registered 57.1 percent in October, 1.5 percentage points lower than the September reading of 58.6 percent. This represents continued growth in the non-manufacturing sector. The Non-Manufacturing Business Activity Index decreased to 60 percent, which is 2.9 percentage points lower than the September reading of 62.9 percent, reflecting growth for the 63rd consecutive month at a slower rate. The New Orders Index registered 59.1 percent, 1.9 percentage points lower than the reading of 61 percent registered in September. The Employment Index increased 1.1 percentage points to 59.6 percent from the September reading of 58.5 percent and indicates growth for the eighth consecutive month. The Prices Index decreased 3.1 percentage points from the September reading of 55.2 percent to 52.1 percent, indicating prices increased at a slower rate in October when compared to September. According to the NMI®, 16 non-manufacturing industries reported growth in October. The majority of the respondents’ comments reflect favorable business conditions; however, there is an indication that there continues to be a leveling off from the strong rate of growth of the preceding months."
emphasis added

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the ISM non-manufacturing index (started in January 2008) and the ISM non-manufacturing employment diffusion index.

This was below the consensus forecast of 58.0% and suggests slightly slower expansion in October than in September.

However a reading of 57.1 still suggests solid expansion in October, and the employment index, at 59.6, was especially strong.

by Calculated Risk on 11/05/2014 08:10:00 AM

From ADP:

Private sector employment increased by 230,000 jobs from September to October according to the October ADP National Employment Report®. ... The report, which is derived from ADP’s actual payroll data, measures the change in total nonfarm private employment each month on a seasonally-adjusted basis.
...
Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics, said, “The job market is steadily picking up pace. Job growth is strong and broad-based across industries and company sizes. At this pace of job growth unemployment and underemployment is quickly declining. The job market will soon be tight enough to support a meaningful acceleration in wage growth.”

This was above the consensus forecast for 212,000 private sector jobs added in the ADP report. 

The BLS report for October will be released on Friday.

by Calculated Risk on 11/05/2014 07:00:00 AM

From the MBA: Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey

Mortgage applications decreased 2.6 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending October 31, 2014. ...

The Refinance Index decreased 6 percent from the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index increased 3 percent from one week earlier.
...
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($417,000 or less) increased to 4.17 percent from 4.13 percent, with points increasing to 0.22 from 0.21 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value ratio (LTV) loans.
emphasis added

Click on graph for larger image.


The first graph shows the refinance index.

The refinance index is down 70% from the levels in May 2013.

Even with the recent slight increase in activity - as people who purchased in the last year or so refinance - refinance activity is very low this year and 2014 will be the lowest since year 2000.


The second graph shows the MBA mortgage purchase index.  

According to the MBA, the unadjusted purchase index is down about 13% from a year ago.

by Calculated Risk on 11/04/2014 08:15:00 PM

From the WSJ: What Falling Exports Mean for U.S. Economic Growth

In response to Tuesday’s trade report (in addition to weak construction and factory orders data), economists are reducing the estimates for third-quarter real GDP growth. Economists at BNP Paribas now track third-quarter GDP at 2.8% and J.P. Morgan forecasters think the rate will be revised to 2.9%, while the econ shops at Goldman Sachs, Royal Bank of Scotland and Capital Economics think the rate will fall to about 3%.

The BEA will release the 2nd revision of GDP on November 25th, but so far it looks like GDP will be revised down.

Wednesday:
• At 7:00 AM ET, the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will release the results for the mortgage purchase applications index.

• At 8:15 AM, the ADP Employment Report for October. This report is for private payrolls only (no government). The consensus is for 212,000 payroll jobs added in October, down from 213,000 in September.

• At 10:00 AM, the ISM non-Manufacturing Index for October. The consensus is for a reading of 58.0, down from 58.6 in September. Note: Above 50 indicates expansion.

by Calculated Risk on 11/04/2014 04:49:00 PM

Here is another graph on framing lumber prices. Early in 2013 lumber prices came close to the housing bubble highs.

The price increases in early 2013 were due to a surge in demand (more housing starts) and supply constraints (framing lumber suppliers were working to bring more capacity online).

Prices didn't increase as much early in 2014 (more supply, smaller "surge" in demand), however prices didn't fall as sharply either.

Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.

This graph shows two measures of lumber prices: 1) Framing Lumber from Random Lengths through last week (via NAHB), and 2) CME framing futures.

Right now Random Lengths prices are down about 5% from a year ago, and CME futures are down 12% year-over-year.

by Calculated Risk on 11/04/2014 02:31:00 PM

From housing economist Tom Lawler:

The National Association of Realtors released the results of its 2014 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers, which are based on a survey of buyers who purchased a home between July 2013 and June 2014. The survey is sent to the address of the home purchased, and the virtually all respondents purchased a home for their primary residence. Thus, characteristics of buyers from the survey reflect characteristics of primary residence purchases, and not all home purchases.

According to the 2014 survey, the first-time home buyer share of primary residence home purchases over the 12 month period ending June 2014 was 33%, down from 38% a year earlier and the lowest share since the NAR has attempted to measure the share. The first-time buyer share from this survey includes both new and existing homes.

Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.

As noted above, the first-time buyer share from the Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers is an estimate of the first-time buyer share of primary residence purchases. The first-time buyer share reported in the NAR’s monthly existing home sales press release, in contrast, is an estimate of the first-time buyer share of total existing home sales, and is based on the buyer characteristics of the last home transaction in a given month of realtors who respond to the survey. When folks say that the “normal” first-time home buyer share is around 40%, they either are or should be referring to the first-time buyer share of homes sold to buyers of their primary residences. Obviously, the “normal” first-time buyer share of total home sales is lower, though it is not clear by how much, because there are no good, reliable data on the investor/second home share of total home sales.

Here are a few other “snippets” from the 2014 PHBS.

• Eighty-eight percent of primary residence buyers financed their home purchase, and for those who financed their purchase, the buyers “typically” financed 90 percent. Ninety-five percent of first-time buyers financed their purchase, compared to 84 percent of repeat buyers.

Comment: The implied “all-cash” share of primary residence purchases seems way too low, and the implied average LTV for purchase mortgage originations seems way too high. That has been true of past reports as well.

• The typical home seller had lived in his/her home for 10 years, and 17 percent of recent sellers had delayed selling their home because the value of their home was below their outstanding mortgage balance. In 2006 and 2007 the typical seller had lived in his/her home for six years.

• Buyers “expect” to live in their homes for 12 years, compared to 8 years in 2006.

Comment: this statistic reflects the “median” expected length of tenure in home purchased, and excludes a sizable “don’t know” category that has grown over time. I don’t have the full 2014 report, but here is a comparison of buyers’ responses on their expected “length of tenure” from the 2013 PHBS compared to the 2006 PHBS.

Expected Length of Tenure in Home Purchased by Age Group, NAR 2006 PHBS (percent of group)
	All Buyers	18-24	25-44	45-64	65+
<=3 Years	12%	18	14	9	7
4 to 5 years	18	36	23	11	5
6 to 10 years	19	23	21	20	12
11+ Years	26	10	24	32	27
Don't Know	24	12	18	28	49
"Median" (years)	8 years	5	6	9	12

Expected Length of Tenure in Home Purchased by Age Group, NAR 2013 PHBS (percent of group)
	All Buyers	18-24	25-44	45-64	65+
<=3 Years	3%	5	4	5	3
4 to 5 years	9	11	12	6	5
6 to 10 years	18	24	20	15	12
11+ Years	33	28	33	37	27
Don't Know	37	31	32	37	54
"Median" (years)	15 years	10	10	20	15

In 2006, when mortgage credit was easy and when consumer expectations for future home price growth were high, an exceptionally large percentage of home buyers, especially among “young adults” (and probably first time buyers) expected to remain in their recently purchased home for less than 3-5 years. In 2013, when credit was “tight” and when expectations for home price growth were “subdued,” there apparently were a lot fewer buyers who expected to live in their purchased home for less than five years – which makes sense, given the high transactions costs associated both with buying and with selling a home.

by Calculated Risk on 11/04/2014 11:31:00 AM

Notes: This CoreLogic House Price Index report is for September. The recent Case-Shiller index release was for August. The CoreLogic HPI is a three month weighted average and is not seasonally adjusted (NSA).

From CoreLogic: CoreLogic Reports Home Prices Rose by 5.6 Percent Year Over Year in September 2014

Home prices nationwide, including distressed sales, increased 5.6 percent in September 2014 compared to September 2013. This change represents 31 months of consecutive year-over-year increases in home prices nationally. On a month-over-month basis, home prices nationwide, including distressed sales, dropped by 0.1 percent in September 2014 compared to August 2014.
...
Excluding distressed sales, home prices nationally increased 5.2 percent in September 2014 compared to September 2013 and 0.1 percent month over month compared to August 2014. Also excluding distressed sales, 49 states and the District of Columbia showed year-over-year home price appreciation in August, with Mississippi being the only state to experience a year-over-year decline (-0.9 percent). Distressed sales include short sales and real estate owned (REO) transactions. ...

“Home prices continue to rise compared with this time last year but the rate of growth is clearly slowing as we exit 2014,” said Anand Nallathambi, president and CEO of CoreLogic.
emphasis added

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the national CoreLogic HPI data since 1976. January 2000 = 100.

The index was down 0.1% in September, and is up 5.6% over the last year.

This index is not seasonally adjusted, and - as I predicted last month - the index turned slightly negative month-to-month in September (this is the beginning of the seasonally weak period for house prices).


The second graph is from CoreLogic. The year-over-year comparison has been positive for thirty one consecutive months suggesting house prices bottomed early in 2012 on a national basis (the bump in 2010 was related to the tax credit).

The YoY increases continue to slow.

This index was up 11.8% YoY in February 2014, and the YoY increase has been slowing since then. In July, the YoY increase was 6.4%, in August 5.8% and now, in September, the increase was 5.6%.