by Calculated Risk on 2/14/2013 10:18:00 AM
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Report: U.S. Foreclosure Starts Decline in January due to new California Law
From RealtyTrac: U.S. Foreclosure Starts Fall to Six-Year Low in January
RealtyTrac® ... today released its U.S. Foreclosure Market Report™ for January 2013, which shows foreclosure filings — default notices, scheduled auctions and bank repossessions — were reported on 150,864 U.S. properties in January, a decrease of 7 percent from the previous month and down 28 percent from January 2012.This is a tale of different states, and different laws. Mostly the non-judicial states are resolving delinquent mortgages quicker since foreclosures don't have to go through the court system. However new laws - like the "Homeowners Bill of Rights" in California - are dramatically slowing foreclosures in some non-judicial states.
“The U.S. foreclosure landscape in January was profoundly altered by the effects of new legislation that took effect in California on the first of the year,” said Daren Blomquist, vice president at RealtyTrac. “Dubbed the Homeowners Bill of Rights, this legislation extends many of the principles in the national mortgage settlement — including a prohibition on so-called dual tracking and requiring a single point of contact for borrowers facing foreclosure — to all mortgage servicers operating in California. In addition the new law imposes fines of up to $7,500 per loan for filing of multiple unverified foreclosure documents. As a result, the downward foreclosure trend in California accelerated into hyper speed in January, decisively shifting the balance of power when it comes to the nation’s foreclosure activity.
“For the first time since January 2007 California did not have the most properties with foreclosure filings of any state. Instead that dubious distinction went to Florida, where January foreclosure activity increased on an annual basis for the 11th time in the last 13 months.”
The national decrease in foreclosure starts was caused in large part by a sharp drop in California notices of default (NOD) in January, down 62 percent from December and down 75 percent from January 2012 to the lowest level since October 2005.
Scheduled foreclosure auctions increased from the previous month in 26 states and the District of Columbia, hitting 12-month or more highs in several key judicial foreclosure states, including Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, although foreclosure starts were down on a year-over-year basis in Florida, Illinois and Pennsylvania.
Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims decline to 341,000
by Calculated Risk on 2/14/2013 08:30:00 AM
The DOL reports:
In the week ending February 9, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 341,000, a decrease of 27,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 368,000. The 4-week moving average was 352,500, an increase of 1,500 from the previous week's revised average of 351,000.The previous week was revised up from 366,000.
The following graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since January 2000.

Click on graph for larger image.
The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims increased to 352,500.
Weekly claims were below the 360,000 consensus forecast, and the 4-week average is close to the lowest level since early 2008.
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Thursday: Weekly Unemployment Claims
by Calculated Risk on 2/13/2013 09:13:00 PM
Jim Hamilton at Econbrowser discusses Brent, WTI, and the price of gasoline: Prices of gasoline and crude oil
West Texas Intermediate is a particular grade of crude oil whose price is usually quoted in terms of delivery in Cushing, Oklahoma. Brent is a very similar crude from Europe's North Sea. As similar products, you'd expect them to sell for close to the same price, and up until 2010 they usually did. But an increase in production in Canada and the central U.S. combined with a decrease in U.S. consumption has led to a surplus of oil in the central U.S. This overwhelmed existing infrastructure for cheap transportation of crude from Cushing to the coast, causing a big spread to develop between the prices of WTI and Brent.See Hamilton's discussion for more ...
Thursday economic releases:
• At 8:30 AM ET, the initial weekly unemployment claims report will be released. The consensus is for claims to decrease to 360 thousand from 366 thousand last week.
CoStar: Commercial Real Estate prices up 4.3% Year-over-year
by Calculated Risk on 2/13/2013 04:52:00 PM
Here is a price index for commercial real estate that I follow. CoStar notes a few key trends: 1) Sales volume has increased significantly (highest since 2004), 2) the percent of distressed sales has declined, and 3) it appears price increases have moved beyond core properties (the first to recover). There is much more in the release.
From CoStar: U.S. commercial real estate posts record gain in sales volume and broadening pricing recovery to close 2012
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SALES VOLUME SURGED IN 2012: While rising steadily over the last four years, sales volume reached nearly $64 billion in 2012, a 22% increase from 2011 and the highest annual total since 2004. Activity spiked significantly in December as investors rushed to close deals prior to year-end. In fact, at 1,593, the number of repeat sales in December reached an all-time high since CoStar started tracking the property sales used in the CCRSI.
...
Pricing gains in the value-weighted U.S. Composite Index began earlier in the recovery and have been consistently stronger than pricing gains in its equal-weighted counterpart throughout much of the recovery. This reflects the more rapid recovery at the high end of the market for larger, more expensive properties. It also mirrors the trend in the recent recovery of market fundamentals for commercial property, in which demand for Four-Star and Five-Star office buildings, luxury apartments and modern big-box warehouses has outpaced the broader market. However, pricing trends suggest this may be shifting.
Despite the recent dominance of larger, more-expensive properties in pricing gains, momentum appears to be shifting to the broader market dominated by smaller, less-expensive properties. This shift is apparent in the value-weighted U.S. Composite Index, which posted a 4.3% year-over-year gain in December 2012, slowing from its double-digit growth rate throughout 2011. At the same time, year-over-year growth in the equal-weighted U.S. Composite Index accelerated in the second half of 2012 and registered 8.1% for the year. Taken together, the two trends signify that investors are moving beyond core properties and driving up pricing at the lower end of the market.
Distressed sales made up only 11.5% of observed trades in December 2012, the lowest level witnessed since the end of 2008. This reduction in distressed deal volume has been driving higher, more consistent pricing.
emphasis added
Click on graph for larger image.This graph from CoStar shows the Value-Weighted and Equal-Weighted indexes. As CoStar noted, the Value-Weighted index is up 37.1% from the bottom (showing the demand for higher end properties) and up 4.3% year-over-year. However the Equal-Weighted index is only up 12.8% from the bottom, and up 8.1% year-over-year.
Note: These are repeat sales indexes - like Case-Shiller for residential - but this is based on far fewer pairs.
DataQuick: January Home Sales in SoCal highest in Six Years
by Calculated Risk on 2/13/2013 12:59:00 PM
One of the housing markets I follow closely is southern California. I highlighted a couple of key points in this article: 1) Activity is picking up, especially in the move-up markets, 2) there should be a "supply response" to more activity and rising prices (I expect more supply to come on the market), and 3) foreclosure resales are at the lowest level since 2007.
From DataQuick: Southland Begins 2013 With Sales and Price Gains Vs. Year Earlier
Southern California's housing market started 2013 with the highest January home sales in six years as sales to investors and cash buyers hovered near record levels and move-up activity remained relatively brisk. ...
A total of 16,058 new and resale houses and condos sold in Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego, Ventura, San Bernardino and Orange counties last month. ... Last month’s sales were the highest for the month of January since 18,128 homes sold in January 2007, though they were 8.8 percent below the January average of 17,609 sales. The low for January sales was 9,983 in 2008, while the high was 26,083 in 2004.
“This fledgling housing recovery has momentum. Already, price hikes have caused some to question whether it's sustainable, whether it's a 'bubble.' Let's not forget, though, that we're still climbing out of a deep hole from the housing downturn. Regional home sales remain sub-par and prices in many areas are at least 30 to 40 percent below their peaks. That's not to say we don't see risks. Sharp price gains can attract speculation, which could lead to unsustainable, short-term gains in certain submarkets. A lot of today's housing demand is fueled not by spectacular job growth and soaring consumer confidence, but by super-low mortgage rates and unusually high levels of investor and cash purchases. Take away any one of those elements and it will matter,” said John Walsh, DataQuick president.
“For the overall market, price pressures should gradually ease as more homeowners react to rising values. This is the 'supply response' many analysts expect. The idea is that many who've held out for higher prices will be tempted to stick a for-sale sign in the front yard. Fewer will owe more than their homes are worth, enabling them to sell. Construction is already rising, and we could see lenders clear backlogs of distressed properties faster, adding to the supply.”
The move-up market continued to post sizeable sales gains last month. January sales between $300,000 and $800,000 – a range that would include many first-time move-up buyers – shot up 49.6 percent year-over-year. Sales over $500,000 jumped 74.0 percent from one year earlier, while sales over $800,000 rose 84.2 percent compared with January 2012.
Last month foreclosure resales – properties foreclosed on in the prior 12 months – accounted for 15.0 percent of the Southland resale market. That was up slightly from 14.2 percent the month before and down from 32.6 percent a year earlier. In recent months foreclosure resales have been at the lowest level since September 2007. In the current cycle, foreclosure resales hit a high of 56.7 percent in February 2009.
Short sales – transactions where the sale price fell short of what was owed on the property – made up an estimated 25.9 percent of Southland resales last month. That was down from an estimated 26.5 percent the month before and 27.2 percent a year earlier.
Emphasis added
MBA: Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest Weekly Survey
by Calculated Risk on 2/13/2013 10:04:00 AM
From the MBA: Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
The Refinance Index decreased 6 percent from the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 10 percent from one week earlier.
...
The refinance share of mortgage activity of total applications was unchanged at 78 percent from the previous week. The HARP share of refinance applications was unchanged from last week at 28 percent. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity increased to 4 percent of total applications.
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($417,500 or less) increased to 3.75 percent, the highest rate since September 2012, from 3.73 percent, with points unchanged at 0.43 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value ratio (LTV) loans.
Click on graph for larger image.The first graph shows the refinance index.
The refinance activity is down over the last three weeks, but activity is still very high - and has remained high for over a year.
There has been a sustained refinance boom, and 78 percent of all mortgage applications are for refinancing.
The second graph shows the MBA mortgage purchase index. The purchase index was off last week - and is still very low, but the index has generally been trending up over the last six months.This index will probably continue to increase as conventional home purchase activity increases.
Retail Sales increased 0.1% in January
by Calculated Risk on 2/13/2013 08:48:00 AM
On a monthly basis, retail sales increased 0.1% from December to January (seasonally adjusted), and sales were up 4.7% from January 2012. From the Census Bureau report:
The U.S. Census Bureau announced today that advance estimates of U.S. retail and food services sales for January, adjusted for seasonal variation and holiday and trading-day differences, but not for price changes, were $416.6 billion, an increase of 0.1 percent from the previous month and 4.4 percent above January 2012. ... The November to December 2012 percent change was unrevised from +0.5 percent.
Click on graph for larger image.Sales for December were unrevised at a 0.5% gain.
This graph shows retail sales since 1992. This is monthly retail sales and food service, seasonally adjusted (total and ex-gasoline).
Retail sales are up 25.7% from the bottom, and now 9.9% above the pre-recession peak (not inflation adjusted)
The second graph shows the same data, but just since 2006 (to show the recent changes). Retail sales ex-autos increased 0.2%.
Excluding gasoline, retail sales are up 22.8% from the bottom, and now 10.3% above the pre-recession peak (not inflation adjusted).
The third graph shows the year-over-year change in retail sales and food service (ex-gasoline) since 1993.
Retail sales ex-gasoline increased by 4.8% on a YoY basis (4.4% for all retail sales).
This was at the consensus forecast of a 0.1% increase, and might indicate some slowdown in retail spending growth related to the payroll tax increase.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Wednesday: Retail Sales
by Calculated Risk on 2/12/2013 08:44:00 PM
On the deficit, from Jed Graham at investors.com:
Here's a pretty important fact that virtually everyone in Washington seems oblivious to: The federal deficit has never fallen as fast as it's falling now without a coincident recession.This fits with the graph I posted last week:
To be specific, CBO expects the deficit to shrink from 8.7% of GDP in fiscal 2011 to 5.3% in fiscal 2013 if the sequester takes effect and to 5.5% if it doesn't. Either way, the two-year deficit reduction — equal to 3.4% of the economy if automatic budget cuts are triggered and 3.2% if not — would stand far above any other fiscal tightening since World War II.
Until the aftermath of the Great Recession, there were only three such periods in which the deficit shrank by a cumulative 2% of GDP or more. The 1960-61 and 1969-70 episodes both helped bring about a recession.
Click on graph for larger image.This graph shows the actual (purple) budget deficit each year as a percent of GDP, and an estimate for the next ten years based on estimates from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
The CBO deficit estimates are even lower than my projections.
After 2015, the deficit will start to increase again according to the CBO, but as I've noted before, we really don't want to reduce the deficit much faster than this path over the next few years, because that will be too much of a drag on the economy.
Wednesday economic releases:
• At 7:00 AM ET, the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will release the results for the mortgage purchase applications index.
• At 8:30 AM ET, Retail sales for January will be released. The consensus is for retail sales to increase 0.1% in January, and to increase 0.2% ex-autos.
• 10:00 AM, the Manufacturing and Trade: Inventories and Sales (business inventories) report for December will be released. The consensus is for a 0.3% increase in inventories.
Lawler: Table of Short Sales and Foreclosures for Selected Cities in January
by Calculated Risk on 2/12/2013 03:40:00 PM
Economist Tom Lawler sent me the table below of short sales and foreclosures for several selected cities in January.
Look at the right two columns in the table below (Total "Distressed" Share for Jan 2013 compared to Jan 2012). In every area that reports distressed sales, the share of distressed sales is down year-over-year - and down significantly in most areas.
Also there has been a decline in foreclosure sales just about everywhere. Look at the middle two columns comparing foreclosure sales for Jan 2013 to Jan 2012. Foreclosure sales have declined in all these areas, and some of the declines have been stunning (the Nevada sales were impacted by a new foreclosure law).
Also there has been a shift from foreclosures to short sales. In most areas, short sales now out number foreclosures (Minneapolis is an exception).
I think this is important: Imagine that the number of total existing home sales doesn't change over the next year - some people would argue that is "bad" news and the housing market isn't recovering. But also imagine that the share of distressed sales declines 20%, and conventional sales increase to make up the difference. That would be a positive sign - and that is what appears to be happening.
An example would be Sacramento (I posted data on Sacramento yesterday). In Sacramento, total sales were down 9% in Jan 2013 compared to Jan 2012, but conventional sales were up 51%! I'd say that market is still unhealthy, but recovering.
| Short Sales Share | Foreclosure Sales Share | Total "Distressed" Share | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13-Jan | 12-Jan | 13-Jan | 12-Jan | 13-Jan | 12-Jan | |
| Las Vegas | 36.2% | 28.1% | 12.5% | 45.5% | 48.7% | 73.6% |
| Reno | 41.0% | 37.0% | 10.0% | 40.0% | 51.0% | 77.0% |
| Phoenix | 17.6% | 29.8% | 16.2% | 27.9% | 33.8% | 57.7% |
| Sacramento | 30.3% | 32.1% | 14.2% | 34.5% | 44.5% | 66.6% |
| Minneapolis | 10.6% | 16.2% | 32.3% | 39.0% | 42.9% | 55.2% |
| Mid-Atlantic (MRIS) | 13.1% | 16.4% | 12.7% | 16.9% | 25.8% | 33.3% |
| Hampton Roads | 34.9% | 37.2% | ||||
| Charlotte | 18.1% | 21.0% | ||||
| Metro Detroit | 36.3% | 54.5% | ||||
| Memphis* | 25.9% | 36.6% | ||||
| *share of existing home sales, based on property records | ||||||
More Research on Construction Employment
by Calculated Risk on 2/12/2013 12:24:00 PM
A key economic question this year is how many construction jobs will be added. Here are a few excerpts from analysis Kris Dawsey and Hui Shan at Goldman Sachs: Housing Sector Jobs Poised for a Comeback
Although many indicators of housing activity improved during 2012, employment in the sector remains close to post-bubble lows. Looking only at residential construction jobs, employment declined by 1.5 million (-42%) from its peak in 2006 to its recent trough in early 2011 and edged up only a modest 100 thousand since then. However, direct residential construction employment is only a part of all residential investment-related employment. Adding in housing-related employment in manufacturing, wholesale trade, retailing, and finance & real estate, employment dropped by 2.8 million (-31%) from its peak, and gained a bit less than 300 thousand from its trough to the present ...So their analysis suggests construction companies have been increasing hours worked for current employees, but now they need to hire more workers.
[R]eal residential investment declined somewhat more sharply than housing-related employment in the downturn, resulting in a decline in real value added per residential investment-related worker, according to our proxy measure, from more than $80,000 in 2006 to a bit less than $60,000 in Q4:2012, in chained 2005 dollars. This pattern of declining productivity during a downturn is called "labor hoarding" by economists (although labor hoarding is probably not what most people think of during a period of sharp job cuts) and reflects businesses' reluctance to fire workers at a rate commensurate with the decline in their sales.
The flip side of this phenomenon is more sluggish employment growth than would otherwise be the case once business activity turns around. On top of the only modest turnaround in activity, this secondary effect also argues for only a modest rebound in residential investment-related employment early on in the recovery. However, this effect may shortly be coming to an end. Hours per worker in the construction industry now exceed pre-crisis highs, suggesting that room to increase output on the "intensive margin" (i.e. more hours per worker) is diminishing, and that pushing on the "extensive margin" (hiring more workers) will likely account for a larger share of future increases in residential investment output.
...
Given that we expect real residential investment to continue growing at a roughly stable 10%-15% rate in 2013 and 2014, and that the effects of labor hoarding should be dissipating, what is our forecast for residential investment-related employment growth over the coming several years? In order to answer this question, we estimated two different econometric models: (1) an error correction model of national-level real residential investment and residential investment-related employment, and (2) a state-level panel analysis of the relationship between construction activity and employment. Both models suggest an increase in the rate of housing-related employment growth in 2013 and 2014 relative to 2012, probably to a rate around 25 to 30k per month.
emphasis added
Earlier articles on construction employment:
• From Michelle Meyer at Merrill Lynch: Construction Coming Back
• From Jed Kolko at Trulia: Here are the “Missing” Construction Jobs
• From Professor Tim Duy at EconomistsView: Employment Report Nothing If Not Consistent


