by Calculated Risk on 10/26/2012 03:32:00 PM

Note: The Case-Shiller report to be released next Tuesday is for August (really an average of prices in June, July and August).

Zillow Forecast: August Case-Shiller Composite-20 Expected to Show 1.7% Increase from One Year Ago

On Tuesday Oct. 30, the Case-Shiller Composite Home Price Indices for August will be released. Zillow predicts that the 20-City Composite Home Price Index (non-seasonally adjusted [NSA]) will be up by 1.7 percent on a year-over-year basis, while the 10-City Composite Home Price Index (NSA) will be up 1.2 percent on a year-over-year basis. The seasonally adjusted (SA) month-over-month change from July to August will be 0.2 percent for the 20-City Composite and 0.3 percent for the 10-City Composite Home Price Index (SA). All forecasts are shown in the table below and are based on a model incorporating the previous data points of the Case-Shiller series, the August Zillow Home Value Index data and national foreclosure re-sales.

As the housing market recovery continues, home prices are expected to modestly appreciate, with growth rates being below “normal” pre-housing recession levels. Zillow’s Home Value Index for September was released on Monday night and shows the largest quarterly appreciation since March 2006, showing that the market is regaining some of its strength. National home values are up 3.2 percent from year-ago levels and have now seen four consecutive quarters of appreciation. While the national housing market is showing consistent signs of improvement, the recovery is uneven across the country. Some markets, such as Phoenix, Riverside and Miami are doing exceptionally well, while St. Louis and Atlanta are still faltering. Part of the strong home value appreciation we are seeing is driven by acute inventory shortages in many markets with foreclosures and foreclosure re-sales down and many people still locked up in negative equity, limiting overall supply. In these last months of 2012, Case-Shiller indices are expected to moderate and likely report monthly declines toward the end of the year tracking the Zillow Home Value Index. Monthly depreciation toward the end of the year is largely a function of declining overall monthly sales volume, which will increase the percentage of foreclosure re-sales in the transactional mix being tracked by Case-Shiller.

Zillow's forecasts for Case-Shiller have been pretty close.

		Case Shiller Composite 10		Case Shiller Composite 20
		NSA	SA	NSA	SA
Case Shiller (year ago)	August 2011	156.51	153.49	142.97	140.11
Case-Shiller (last month)	July 2012	157.3	154.85	144.61	142.1
Zillow June Forecast	YoY	1.2%	1.2%	1.7%	1.7%
	MoM	0.7%	0.3%	0.5%	0.2%
Zillow Forecasts1		158.4	155.3	145.4	142.4
Current Post Bubble Low		146.52	149.19	134.10	136.45
Date of Post Bubble Low		Mar-12	Jan-12	Mar-12	Jan-12
Above Post Bubble Low		8.1%	4.1%	8.4%	4.4%
1Estimate based on Year-over-year and Month-over-month Zillow forecasts

by Calculated Risk on 10/26/2012 02:20:00 PM

Notes: I follow several house price indexes (Case-Shiller, CoreLogic, LPS, Zillow, FNC and more). The timing of different house prices indexes can be a little confusing. LPS uses August closings only (not a three month average like Case-Shiller or a weighted average like CoreLogic), excludes short sales and REOs, and is not seasonally adjusted.

From LPS: U.S. Home Prices Up 0.2 Percent for the Month; Up 2.6 Percent Year-Over-Year

Lender Processing Services ... today released its latest LPS Home Price Index (HPI) report, based on August 2012 residential real estate transactions. The LPS HPI combines the company’s extensive property and loan-level databases to produce a repeat sales analysis of home prices as of their transaction dates every month for each of more than 15,500 U.S. ZIP codes. The LPS HPI represents the price of non-distressed sales by taking into account price discounts for REO and short sales.

The LPS HPI is off 23.0% from the peak in June 2006.

In May, the LPS HPI was up 0.4% year-over-year, in June, the index was up 0.9% year-over-year, and 1.8% in July, and now 2.6% in August. This is steady improvement on a year-over-year basis. Note: Case-Shiller for August will be released this coming Tuesday.

by Calculated Risk on 10/26/2012 12:15:00 PM

The Q3 GDP report was weak, with 2.0% annualized real GDP growth, but slightly better than expected. Final demand increased in Q3 as personal consumption expenditures increased at a 2.0% annual rate (up from 1.5% in Q2), and residential investment increased at a 14.4% annual rate (up from 8.5% in Q2).

Investment in equipment and software was flat in Q3, and investment in non-residential structures was negative.   However, it appears the drag from state and local governments will end soon (after declining for 3 years).

Overall this was another weak report indicating sluggish growth.

The following graph shows the contribution to GDP from residential investment, equipment and software, and nonresidential structures (3 quarter centered average). This is important to follow because residential investment tends to lead the economy, equipment and software is generally coincident, and nonresidential structure investment trails the economy.

For the following graph, red is residential, green is equipment and software, and blue is investment in non-residential structures. So the usual pattern - both into and out of recessions is - red, green, blue.

The dashed gray line is the contribution from the change in private inventories.

Click on graph for larger image.

Residential Investment (RI) made a positive contribution to GDP in Q3 for the sixth consecutive quarter. Usually residential investment leads the economy, but that didn't happen this time because of the huge overhang of existing inventory, but now RI is contributing. The good news: Residential investment has clearly bottomed.

The contribution from RI will probably continue to be sluggish compared to previous recoveries, but the ongoing positive contribution to GDP is a significant story.

Equipment and software investment was unchanged in Q3 (compared to Q2). This followed twelve consecutive quarters with a positive contribution.

The contribution from nonresidential investment in structures was negative in Q3. Nonresidential investment in structures typically lags the recovery, however investment in energy and power has masked the ongoing weakness in office, mall and hotel investment (the underlying details will be released next week).

The second graph shows the contribution to percent change in GDP for residential investment and state and local governments since 2005.

The blue bars are for residential investment (RI), and RI was a significant drag on GDP for several years. Now RI has added to GDP growth for the last 6 quarters (through Q3 2012).

However the drag from state and local governments is ongoing, although the drag in Q3 was very small. State and local governments have been a drag on GDP for twelve consecutive quarters. Although not as large a negative as the worst of the housing bust (and much smaller spillover effects), this decline has been relentless and unprecedented. The good news is the drag appears to be ending.

In real terms, state and local government spending is now back to 2001 levels, even with a larger population.

Residential Investment as a percent of GDP is up from the record lows during the housing bust. Usually RI bounces back quickly following a recession, but this time there is a wide bottom because of the excess supply of existing vacant housing units.

Last year the increase in RI was mostly from multifamily and home improvement investment. Now the increase is from most categories including single family. I'll break down Residential Investment (RI) into components after the GDP details are released this coming week. Note: Residential investment (RI) includes new single family structures, multifamily structures, home improvement, broker's commissions, and a few minor categories.

The last graph shows non-residential investment in structures and equipment and software.

I'll add details for investment in offices, malls and hotels next week.

The key story is that residential investment is continuing to increase, and I expect this to continue (although the recovery in RI will be sluggish compared to previous recoveries). Since RI is the best leading indicator for the economy, this suggests no recession this year or in 2013 (with the usual caveats about Europe and policy errors in the US).

Earlier with revision graphs:
• Real GDP increased 2.0% annual rate in Q3

by Calculated Risk on 10/26/2012 09:55:00 AM

Note: I'll have much more on GDP soon.


Click on graph for larger image.

The final Reuters / University of Michigan consumer sentiment index for October declined to 82.6 from the preliminary reading of 83.1, and was up from the September reading of 78.3.

This was slightly below the consensus forecast of 83.1. Overall sentiment is still weak - probably due to a combination of the high unemployment rate and the sluggish economy - but consumer sentiment has been improving.

by Calculated Risk on 10/26/2012 08:38:00 AM

From the BEA:

Real gross domestic product -- the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States -- increased at an annual rate of 2.0 percent in the third quarter of 2012 (that is, from the second quarter to the third quarter), according to the "advance" estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the second quarter, real GDP increased 1.3 percent.

The increase in real GDP in the third quarter primarily reflected positive contributions from personal consumption expenditures (PCE), federal government spending, and residential fixed investment that were partly offset by negative contributions from exports, nonresidential fixed investment, and private inventory investment. Imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, decreased.

The acceleration in real GDP in the third quarter primarily reflected an upturn in federal government spending, a downturn in imports, an acceleration in PCE, a smaller decrease in private inventory investment, an acceleration in residential fixed investment, and a smaller decrease in state and local government spending that were partly offset by downturns in exports and in nonresidential fixed investment.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the quarterly real GDP growth (at an annual rate) for the last 30 years.

The Red column (and dashed line) is the advance estimate for Q3 GDP.

A few comments:
• Consumer spending picked up a little. Real personal consumption expenditures increased 2.0 percent in the third quarter, compared with an increase of 1.5 percent in the second.

• Residential investment increased. Real residential fixed investment increased 14.4 percent, compared with an increase of 8.5 percent.

• State and local government made a negative contribution to GDP for the twelfth straight quarter, but the negative contribution was very minor.

This was slightly above expectations. I'll have more on GDP later ...

by Calculated Risk on 10/25/2012 09:06:00 PM

Expectations for Q3 GDP are pretty low ... and moving lower. From the WSJ: GDP Estimates Move Lower Following Durables Report

The consensus estimate of economists surveyed by Dow Jones Newswires is that Friday’s report will show the economy grew at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.8% in the July-to-September quarter. But after Thursday’s figures on business investment, some economists said they are bracing for a weaker GDP report than the consensus figure.

Wells Fargo — pointing out that shipments of core capital goods fell at an annual pace of 4.9% over three months — lowered its estimate of third-quarter GDP growth to an annual rate of 1.4% from 1.6%. J.P. Morgan Chase lowered its forecast to 1.6% from 1.8%.

“The downside risks are mounting to our already below-consensus estimate that GDP increased by only 1.3% in the third quarter,” Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at London-based Capital Economics, said in a note to clients. “At 1.8%, the consensus forecast looks way to high.”

Friday:
• At 8:30 AM ET, the advance release for Q3 GDP will be released by the BEA. The consensus is that real GDP increased 1.9% annualized in Q3.

• At 9:55 AM, the Reuters/University of Michigan's Consumer sentiment index (final for October). The consensus is for no change from the preliminary reading of 83.1.


Another question for the October economic prediction contest (Note: You can now use Facebook, Twitter, or OpenID to log in).

by Calculated Risk on 10/25/2012 04:17:00 PM

From economist Tom Lawler:

Several publicly-traded home builders posted results for the quarter ended September 30th this week, and the general theme was strong net orders, slightly lower cancellation rates, higher margins/lower concessions, and higher home sales prices. Below are some summary stats.

Average sales prices, of course, don’t necessarily reflect gains in “constant-quality” homes, but are affected by changes in the type of homes sold and the regional mix of homes sold. Nevertheless, most home builders appear to be selling homes at “effective” prices well above a year ago.

The combined order backlog of the five builders on September 30th, 2012 was 17,907, up 42.2% from last September.

	New Orders			Settlements
Qtr. Ended:	9/30/2012	9/30/2011	% Chg	9/30/2012	9/30/2011	% Chg
PulteGroup	4,544	3,564	27.5%	4,418	4,198	5.2%
NVR	2,558	2,218	15.3%	2,656	2,255	17.8%
The Ryland Group	1,507	1,008	49.5%	1,322	1,015	30.2%
Meritage Homes	1,204	906	32.9%	1,197	840	42.5%
M/I Homes	757	587	29.0%	746	582	28.2%
Total	10,570	8,283	27.6%	10,339	8,890	16.3%

	Average Closing Price
Qtr. Ended:	9/30/2012	9/30/2011	% Chg
PulteGroup	$279,000	$262,000	6.5%
NVR	$321,700	$308,900	4.1%
The Ryland Group	$264,000	$249,000	6.0%
Meritage Homes	$280,000	$259,000	8.1%
M/I Homes	$266,000	$238,000	11.8%
Total	$287,229	$270,558	6.2%

by Calculated Risk on 10/25/2012 02:28:00 PM

Apparently some people think if existing home sales go flat, or even decline, the housing recovery is in trouble ... or something ...

From Diana Olick at CNBC: Why Today's Housing Report Spooked Investors So Much

[T]he National Association of Realtors reported no change in signed contracts to buy existing homes in September. ...

It wasn't so much the slight disappointment in the monthly index, it was more the comment from the Realtors' chief economist Lawrence Yun:

"This means only minor movement is likely in near-term existing-home sales, but with positive underlying market fundamentals they should continue on an uptrend in 2013.”

Not exactly a rave.

We know we're coming off the bottom of the housing crash, but over the summer it felt to some like we were rocketing off the bottom. Now, not so much.
...
Existing home sales are coming off lows from last year, but last year was the hangover from the 2010 home buyer tax credit ...

"The year-over-year gain was the smallest of the year and comps against last year when the housing market was in a full blown double-dip mode," notes analyst Mark Hanson.

The number of existing home sales is just part of the story.

Let me repeat what I wrote earlier this year: Home Sales Reports: What Matters: "When we look at sales for existing homes, the focus should be on the composition between conventional and distressed. Total sales are probably close to the normal level of turnover, but the composition of sales is far from normal - sales are still heavily distressed sales. Over time, existing home sales will probably settle around 5 million per year, but the percentage of distressed sales will eventually decline. Those looking at the number of existing home sales for a recovery in housing are looking at the wrong number. Look at inventory and the percent of conventional sales."

Unfortunately I have little confidence in the NAR's estimate of conventional sales, but most local data shows a fairly strong increase in conventional sales (as opposed to short sales and foreclosures). As an example, the percent of conventional sales in Phoenix increased from 35.9% in September 2011 to 60.1% in September 2012. Now overall sales were down sharply - the Arizona Regional MLS reported sales in September were down 17.9% from September 2011, but conventional sales were up 37%. I think this is a positive.

Of course the key housing numbers for the economy and jobs are housing starts and new home sales. Also house prices matter too.   But the housing report this morning (pending home sales) was mostly irrelevant.

by Calculated Risk on 10/25/2012 11:00:00 AM

A few miscellaneous releases:

• From the NAR: September Pending Home Sales Show Slight Improvement

The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contract signings, edged up 0.3 percent to 99.5 in September from 99.2 in August and is 14.5 percent above September 2011 when it was 86.9. The data reflect contracts but not closings.

Contract signings usually lead sales by about 45 to 60 days, so this is for sales in October and November.

• From the Kansas City Fed: Tenth District Manufacturing Activity Declined Slightly

Tenth District manufacturing activity declined slightly in October, and producers’ expectations for future activity fell considerably but remained slightly positive. Several producers commented on growing uncertainty related to the upcoming election and fiscal situation, which has put a hold on many customers’ orders and spending. Price indexes were mixed, with minimal changes overall.

The month-over-month composite index was -4 in October, down from 2 in September and 8 in August, and the lowest in over three years ... The employment index moved into negative territory for the first time this year, while the shipments index inched higher but still remained negative.

“We saw factories pull back this month for the first time in quite a while, which many firms attributed to the impact of the uncertain political and fiscal situation on customers’ willingness to order” said [Chad Wilkerson, vice president and economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City]. “Expectations also weakened considerably for production and employment but, encouragingly, factories’ capital spending plans for early next year remained largely intact.”

Another weak regional manufacturing survey.

• From the NAHB: Remodeling Market Index Climbs Five Points, Returns to 2005 Levels

The Remodeling Market Index (RMI) climbed to 50 in the third quarter of 2012, up from 45 in the previous quarter, according to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB). Released today, the RMI is at its highest point since the third quarter of 2005, tracking the positive trends recently seen in the rest of the housing sector.
...
“The improvement in the RMI provides more evidence that the remodeling industry is making the orderly recovery from its low point in 2009 as we’ve been expecting,” said NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. “Although remodeling projects over $25,000 are now showing some signs of strength, they are still lagging behind smaller property alterations and maintenance and repair jobs."

by Calculated Risk on 10/25/2012 09:58:00 AM

The Chicago Fed released the national activity index (a composite index of other indicators): Economic Activity improved in September

Led by improvements in production-related indicators, the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) increased to 0.00 in September from –1.17 in August. All four broad categories of indicators that make up the index increased from August, and each one except the consumption and housing category made a positive contribution to the index in September.

The index’s three-month moving average, CFNAI-MA3, increased from –0.53 in August to –0.37 in September—its seventh consecutive reading below zero. September’s CFNAI-MA3 suggests that growth in national economic activity was below its historical trend. The economic growth reflected in this level of the CFNAI-MA3 suggests subdued inflationary pressure from economic activity over the coming year.

This graph shows the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (three month moving average) since 1967.

Click on graph for larger image.

This suggests economic activity improved, but growth was still below trend in September.

According to the Chicago Fed:

A zero value for the index indicates that the national economy is expanding at its historical trend rate of growth; negative values indicate below-average growth; and positive values indicate above-average growth.