by Calculated Risk on 3/19/2012 03:53:00 PM
Monday, March 19, 2012
Lawler on FHA: Number of Seriously Delinquent SF Loans Down Slightly in February, Way Up from Year Ago
Some interesting data from economist Tom Lawler (the FHA remains a significant problem):
Updated data from the FHA’s early warning system shows that the number of FHA-insured SF loans serviced by entities with a combined FHA SF servicing portfolio of almost 7.4 million loans totaled 722,030 at the end of February, down from 732,775 in January. While this report doesn’t always exactly match other FHA reports, it tracks the “official” numbers pretty closely. Here, e.g., are the reported number of seriously delinquent FHA-insured SF loans from the EWS and from the FHA’s monthly Outlook Report.
| Seriously Delinquent FHA-Insured SF Loans | ||
|---|---|---|
| EWS | Outlook | |
| Oct-11 | 657,552 | 661,554 |
| Nov-11 | 690,271 | 689,346 |
| Dec-11 | 713,793 | 711,082 |
| Jan-12 | 732,775 | 733,844 |
| Feb-12 | 722,030 | |
Assuming the EWS numbers are reasonable estimates for February’s SDQ total, here is some historical data. In the table on the next page, the FHA insurance in force is number of loans, and is from the Monthly Report to the FHA Commissioner. These numbers differ from those in the FHA Outlook Report, for reasons unclear to me. The data on the number of SDQ loans in the Commissioner report and the Outlook report are the same save for March 2011, and I believe the Commissioner report has an incorrect number, so I used the March 2011 number from the Outlook report (aarrgh!).
| FHA SF Insured Portfolio | Seriously Delinquent | SDQ Rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2010 | 6,658,560 | 532,938 | 8.00% |
| 11/30/2010 | 6,724,304 | 588,947 | 8.76% |
| 12/31/2010 | 6,813,888 | 598,140 | 8.78% |
| 1/31/2011 | 6,889,701 | 612,443 | 8.89% |
| 2/28/2011 | 6,933,260 | 619,712 | 8.94% |
| 3/31/2011 | 6,984,580 | 580,480 | 8.31% |
| 4/30/2011 | 7,036,153 | 575,950 | 8.19% |
| 5/31/2011 | 7,079,820 | 578,933 | 8.18% |
| 6/30/2011 | 7,152,140 | 584,822 | 8.18% |
| 7/31/2011 | 7,203,809 | 598,921 | 8.31% |
| 8/31/2011 | 7,260,598 | 611,822 | 8.43% |
| 9/30/2011 | 7,288,440 | 635,096 | 8.71% |
| 10/31/2011 | 7,342,712 | 661,554 | 9.01% |
| 11/30/2011 | 7,378,126 | 689,346 | 9.34% |
| 12/31/2011 | 7,415,002 | 711,082 | 9.59% |
| 1/31/2012 | 7,464,533 | 733,844 | 9.83% |
| 2/29/2012 | 7,499,802 | 722,030 | 9.63% |
CR Note: Fannie and Freddie serious delinquencies are down year-over-year, but the FHA delinquencies are up from 8.94% in Feb 2011 to 9.63%.
Desktop Underwriter® Refi Plus and Wells Fargo
by Calculated Risk on 3/19/2012 01:08:00 PM
Over the weekend I noted that Fannie Mae has updated Desktop Underwriter® (DU) so that lenders can now use the automated system. There are several advantages to the automated system, one was that borrowers would now be able to apply for a "HARP 2.0" refinance with lenders other than the lender for their original mortgage.
This morning I read the Wells Fargo "Amended DU Refi PlusTM Policy and Effective Dates".
First, Wells Fargo has decided to limit HARP 2.0 to loans that Wells services. If Wells is not the current servicer, then Wells will limit LTV to 105% - the same as HARP 1.0 guidelines. Well Fargo wrote:
"After further assessment of the new parameters for DU Refi Plus transactions, and the current market environment, Wells Fargo has reconsidered our policy regarding loans not currently serviced by Wells Fargo. As a result we will not offer unlimited LTV/CLTV options for Loans not currently serviced by Wells Fargo."This is a significant change from just a few weeks ago.
On timing of DU Refi Plus:
"Loans with the expanded parameters defined above may not be submitted for Prior Approval underwriting until April 23, 2012, when loans can be delivered to Wells Fargo."So any increase in refinance activity associated with the automated DU system, will start in late April for Wells Fargo.
NAHB Builder Confidence index unchanged in March
by Calculated Risk on 3/19/2012 10:00:00 AM
The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) reports the housing market index (HMI) was unchanged in March at 28 (February was revised dwon from 29). Any number under 50 indicates that more builders view sales conditions as poor than good.
From the NAHB: Builder Confidence Unchanged in March
Builder confidence in the market for newly built, single-family homes was unchanged in March from a revised level of 28 on the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI), released today. This means that following five consecutive months of gains, the HMI is now holding at its highest level since June of 2007.
“While builders are still very cautious at this time, there is a sense that many local housing markets have started to move in the right direction and that prospects for future sales are improving,” said Barry Rutenberg, chairman of the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) and a home builder from Gainesville, Florida. “This is demonstrated by the fact that the HMI component measuring builder expectations continued climbing for a sixth straight month in March, to its highest level in more than four years.”
“Builder confidence is now twice as strong as it was six months ago, and the West was the only region to experience a decline this month following an unusual spike in February,” observed NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. “That said, many of our members continue to cite obstacles on the road to recovery, including persistently tight builder and buyer credit and the ongoing inventory of distressed properties in some markets.”
While the HMI component gauging current sales conditions declined one point to 29 in March, the component gauging sales expectations in the next six months gained two points to 36 and the component gauging traffic of prospective buyers held unchanged at 22.
Click on graph for larger image.This graph compares the NAHB HMI (left scale) with single family housing starts (right scale). This includes the March release for the HMI and the January data for starts (February housing starts will be released tomorrow).
Both confidence and housing starts had been moving sideways at a very depressed level for several years - but confidence has been moving up recently, and it appears starts are increasing a little too.
This is still very low, but this is the highest level since June 2007.
Residential Remodeling Index increases 11% year-over-year in January
by Calculated Risk on 3/19/2012 08:35:00 AM
From BuildFax:
Residential remodels authorized by building permits in the United States in January were at a seasonally-adjusted annual rate of 2,998,000. This is 13 percent above the revised December rate of 2,653,000 and is 11 percent above the January 2011 estimate of 2,705,000.
“Residential remodeling this winter is as strong as it has been in more than five years. We expect residential remodeling to continue to grow throughout 2012,” said Joe Emison, Vice President of Research and Development at BuildFax.
The BuildFax Remodeling Index (BFRI) is based on construction permits for residential remodeling projects filed with local building departments across the country. The index estimates the number of properties permitted. The national and regional indexes are based upon a subset of representative building departments in the U.S. and population estimates from the U.S. Census.
Click on graph for larger image.This graph shows the Remodeling Index since January 2000 on a seasonally adjusted basis. Earlier release were not seasonally adjusted.
Remodeling is below the peak levels of the housing boom - with all the equity extraction - but up 29% from the bottom in May 2009.
Note: Permits are not adjusted by value, so this doesn't mean there is more money being spent, just more permit activity. Also some smaller remodeling projects are done without permits and the index will miss that activity.
For residential investment, multi-family construction and home improvement have already picked up, and it appears single family construction will increase in 2012.
Sunday, March 18, 2012
HARP Update: Fannie Mae updates Desktop Underwriter® (DU)
by Calculated Risk on 3/18/2012 08:29:00 PM
This is significant ...
Back in October, the FHFA announced some changes to HARP to allow homeowners with GSE loans and with negative or near negative equity - and who are current on their mortgages - to refinance into lower interest rate loans.
The key to this program for the lenders was that the lender was not responsible for any of the representations and warranties associated with the original loan (this is huge for the lenders). The elimination of Reps and warrants for the original loans applies to the automated Desktop Underwriter® (DU) (see Selling Guide Announcement SEL-2011-12)
According to Fannie Mae, the updates to Desktop Underwriter® were completed yesterday. Now lenders can use the automated system (and borrowers will now be able to apply for a "HARP 2.0" refinance with lenders other than the lender for their original mortgage).
I expect having the automated system - with the elimination of reps and warrants - will lead to surge in refinance activity.
Note: We will not see the increase in the MBA refinance index reported this week, because that was for last week. We will have to wait until the end of March to see if there is a surge in refinance activity.
Oil and Gasoline Prices
by Calculated Risk on 3/18/2012 05:25:00 PM
From MarketWatch: Gasoline prices rise for 9th straight day
The national average price for a gallon of gas rose to $3.838, according to motorist group AAA’s fuel gauge report.From the WSJ: No Relief in Sight at Pump
That’s up from about $3.53 a month ago.
...
The nation’s record high of $4.11 was set in July 2008, [CNN] said.
U.S. gasoline prices jumped 6% in February, and market experts predict they will climb higher because critical refining operations in the Northeast are shutting down.From the WSJ: Economy Hasn't Slipped on Oil Prices—Yet
...
Gasoline futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange are up 22% this year, and settled Friday at a 10-month high of $3.3569 a gallon. Average pump prices tend to follow futures by a few weeks, averaging about 70 cents a gallon more, after taxes and transport costs. Based on futures, retail prices should average above $4 a gallon soon.
Professor Hamilton had some thoughts earlier this month on the impact on the economy: Oil prices and the U.S. economy
Although the prices of oil and gasoline have risen significantly from their values in October, they are still not back to the levels we saw last spring or in the summer of 2008. There is a good deal of statistical evidence ... that an oil price increase that does no more than reverse an earlier decline has a much more limited effect on the economy than if the price of oil surges to a new all-time high.It definitely hurts at the pump!
One reason for this is that much of the impact on the economy of an increase in oil prices comes from abrupt changes in the patterns of consumer spending. ... ut if consumers have recently seen even higher prices than they're paying at the moment, their spending plans and firms' production plans are likely already to have incorporated that reality.
... based on what has happened to oil prices so far, I find myself in the unusual position of being less concerned about the impact of oil prices on the U.S. economy than many other analysts.
Note: The graph below shows oil prices for WTI; gasoline prices in most of the U.S. are impacted more by Brent prices.
| Orange County Historical Gas Price Charts Provided by GasBuddy.com |
Yesterday:
• Summary for Week ending March 16th
• Schedule for Week of March 18th
Some humor from Jim the Realtor
by Calculated Risk on 3/18/2012 03:14:00 PM
Yesterday:
• Summary for Week ending March 16th
• Schedule for Week of March 18th
From Jim the Realtor:
"Here is another contender for the cover of curb appeal magazine"
"Thank you mister neighbor (about a boat in the neighbors backyard). Thankfully its for sale. I'm sure he won't have any trouble selling it while it sits right there in the backyard, because people flying over this property will be throwing money - suitcases of money - at him to buy that boat. So don't worry about that ..."
Hard to believe this one sold in 2 weeks ... enjoy.
Public and Private Sector Payroll Jobs: Bush and Obama
by Calculated Risk on 3/18/2012 10:34:00 AM
This is a followup to the previous post showing the year-over-year change in private and public sector payroll jobs. With public sector jobs down over the last few years (state and local layoffs), several readers have asked if I could compare public sector hiring / firing to the early '00s.
The following two graphs compare public and private sector job losses (or added) for President George W. Bush's first term (following the stock market bust), and for President Obama's current term (following the housing bust and financial crisis).
Important: There are many differences between the two periods. Both followed the bursting of a bubble (stock and housing), although the housing bust also led to a severe financial crisis. As Reinhart and Rogoff noted, recoveries from financial crisis are usually very sluggish. See: "The Aftermath of Financial Crises".
Click on graph for larger image.
The first graph shows the change in private sector payroll jobs from the beginning of Mr. Bush's first term compared to Mr. Obama's current term.
The employment recovery during Mr. Bush's first term was very sluggish, and private employment was down 913,000 jobs at the end of his first term. The recovery has been sluggish under Mr. Obama's presidency too, and there are still 247,000 fewer payroll jobs than when Mr. Obama's term started (although it appears this will turn positive in a couple of months).
A big difference between Mr. Bush's first term and Mr. Obama's presidency has been public sector employment. The public sector grew during Mr. Bush's term (up 900,000 jobs), but the public sector has declined since Obama took office (down 590,000 jobs). These job losses are at the state and local level, but they are still a significant drag on overall employment.
It appears the public sector jobs losses are slowing, and it looks likely that the decline in public payrolls will probably end mid-year 2012.
Yesterday:
• Summary for Week ending March 16th
• Schedule for Week of March 18th
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Year-over-year Change in Public and Private Payroll Employment
by Calculated Risk on 3/17/2012 11:11:00 PM
Jon Lansner at the O.C. Register wrote about looking at year-over-year changes:
Forget the debate about the true oomph of February's 227,000 job gain from January.That requires a graph! Instead of just looking at the year-over-year increase in total nonfarm payrolls, I divided the data into changes in private and public payrolls.
Look at this same data on a year-over-year basis! What do you learn?
American bosses added 2.021 million jobs in the year ended in February. That's a 1.5 percent job growth pace. It's the fastest bout of hiring since January 2007.
Click on graph for larger image.The red line is the year-over-year changes for private payrolls; the blue line is for public payrolls.
Whereas total payrolls are up 1.5 percent, private payrolls are up 2.0% year-over-year, the fastest rate of increase since early 2006.
However public payrolls are down 1.0%, and public payrolls have been falling since mid-2009 with the exception of the decennial Census hiring (note the spike every 10 years in public hiring).
Note: It looks likely that the decline in public payrolls will end mid-year 2012 (the year-over-year change will hit zero some time later).
Earlier:
• Summary for Week ending March 16th
• Schedule for Week of March 18th
Unofficial Problem Bank list declines to 952 Institutions
by Calculated Risk on 3/17/2012 04:25:00 PM
This is an unofficial list of Problem Banks compiled only from public sources.
Here is the unofficial problem bank list for March 16, 2012. (table is sortable by assets, state, etc.)
Changes and comments from surferdude808:
As expected, the OCC release its actions through mid-February 2012 this week, which contributed to several changes to the Unofficial Problem Bank List.
In all, there were six removals and two additions, which leaves the list with 952 institutions with assets of $379.1 billion. Among the removals are one unassisted merger -- Mainline National Bank, Portage, PA ($235 million). The other removals are for action terminations including City National Bank of Florida, Miami, FL ($3.97 billion); Edgewater Bank, Saint Joseph, MI ($137 million); Bank of the Rio Grande, National Association, Las Cruces, NM ($102 million); First National Bank in Mahnomen, Mahnomen, MN ($72 million); and The First National Bank of Wayne, Wayne, NE ($35 million). The two additions this week were Lee County Bank & Trust, National Association, Fort Madison, IA ($163 million) and Mutual Federal Bank, Chicago, IL ($83 million).
Click on graph for larger image.This graph shows the cumulative bank failures for each year starting in 2008. There have been 427 bank failures since the beginning of 2008, and so far closings this year are running at about half the rate of 2010 and 2011.
Earlier:
• Summary for Week ending March 16th
• Schedule for Week of March 18th


