by Calculated Risk on 3/16/2010 02:15:00 PM

From the Fed:

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in January suggests that economic activity has continued to strengthen and that the labor market is stabilizing. Household spending is expanding at a moderate rate but remains constrained by high unemployment, modest income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight credit. Business spending on equipment and software has risen significantly. However, investment in nonresidential structures is declining, housing starts have been flat at a depressed level, and employers remain reluctant to add to payrolls. While bank lending continues to contract, financial market conditions remain supportive of economic growth. Although the pace of economic recovery is likely to be moderate for a time, the Committee anticipates a gradual return to higher levels of resource utilization in a context of price stability.

With substantial resource slack continuing to restrain cost pressures and longer-term inflation expectations stable, inflation is likely to be subdued for some time.

The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period. To provide support to mortgage lending and housing markets and to improve overall conditions in private credit markets, the Federal Reserve has been purchasing $1.25 trillion of agency mortgage-backed securities and about $175 billion of agency debt; those purchases are nearing completion, and the remaining transactions will be executed by the end of this month. The Committee will continue to monitor the economic outlook and financial developments and will employ its policy tools as necessary to promote economic recovery and price stability.

In light of improved functioning of financial markets, the Federal Reserve has been closing the special liquidity facilities that it created to support markets during the crisis. The only remaining such program, the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, is scheduled to close on June 30 for loans backed by new-issue commercial mortgage-backed securities and on March 31 for loans backed by all other types of collateral.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; James Bullard; Elizabeth A. Duke; Donald L. Kohn; Sandra Pianalto; Eric S. Rosengren; Daniel K. Tarullo; and Kevin M. Warsh. Voting against the policy action was Thomas M. Hoenig, who believed that continuing to express the expectation of exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period was no longer warranted because it could lead to the buildup of financial imbalances and increase risks to longer-run macroeconomic and financial stability.

The key language about rates stayed the same: "The Committee ... continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period."

Another key point was that the FOMC reiterated the ending dates for the MBS purchases. The Fed is giving advance warning that these purchases will expire as previously announced.

There is some concern about what will happen when the Fed stops buying agency MBS. The important thing to remember is that there will be buyers; it is just a matter of price. My guess is that mortgage rates will rise about 35 bps relative to the Ten Year treasury over several months after the Fed stops buying MBS. The Fed's Brian Sack and others have argued for 10 bps or less.

Another important point in the Fed statement was the recognition that the housing sector is not as strong as it appeared at the end of last year. Here is the language on housing over the last few statements:

Nov, 2009: "Activity in the housing sector has increased over recent months"

Dec, 2009: "The housing sector has shown some signs of improvement over recent months."

Jan, 2010: No comment.

March, 2010: housing starts have been flat at a depressed level

This was the first one day Fed meeting since September 16, 2008 - and that probably says something too.

by Calculated Risk on 3/16/2010 11:59:00 AM

From Dow Jones: FDIC Seeks Buyers for Three Puerto Rican Banks

According to two people familiar with the matter, the agency has hired an investment bank to try to find capital or outright purchasers for W Holding Co. Inc., R&G Financial Corp. and Eurobancshares Inc., three banks located in Puerto Rico with almost $21 billion in combined assets.

The three banks hold almost 30% of Puerto Rico's $62 billion of deposits, and their bank subsidiaries are operating under enhanced FDIC scrutiny.

This is a follow up to the report last month from José Carmona and John Marino at caribbeanbusinesspr.com: Feds expected to take action against island banks next month

Federal regulators are likely to begin taking action against troubled island banks sometime [in March], government and industry sources told CARIBBEAN BUSINESS.

Since the beginning of the year, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) has been beefing up its local ranks, recruiting accountants and auditors, leading to speculation about imminent action during this year’s first quarter.
...
There are three local banks operating under FDIC cease & desist orders—R-G Premier Bank, Eurobank and Westernbank.

Westernbank is a subsidiary of W Holding Company mentioned in the Dow Jones article.

by Calculated Risk on 3/16/2010 11:10:00 AM

Last night I mentioned the astounding DTI (Debt-to-income) of HAMP modification borrowers who were converted to a permanent modification: 2010: REOs or Short Sales?

Click on chart for larger image in new window.

If we look at the HAMP program stats (see page 6), the median front end DTI (debt to income) before modification was 45%, and the back end DTI was an astounding 76.4%!

Just imagine the characteristics of the borrowers who can't be converted!

Here is a table putting the numbers in dollars:

Median Characteristics of HAMP Permanent Modification
	Before Modification	After Modification
Monthly Income	$2,702.77	$2,702.77
Front End (PITI & HOA)	$1,216.25	$837.86
Back End (total)	$2,064.92	$1,616.26
After Debt Income	$637.85	$1,086.52

Front end DTI includes Principal, Interest, Taxes and Insurance (PITI) plus any homeowners association fees.

The back end DTI includes PITI and HOA, plus installment debt, alimony, 2nd liens, and other fixed payments.

That left the median borrower before modification with only $637.85 not including payroll taxes ($206.76), income taxes, utilities, food, and other monthly expenses. No wonder the borrowers were delinquent.

Now these median borrowers have $1,086.52 to pay all those expenses after the to 59.8% DTI bank end ratio. Remember this is gross, and is before the $206,76 in payroll taxes and an income taxes). Although this is an improvement, I expect many of these borrowers to redefault.

by Calculated Risk on 3/16/2010 08:30:00 AM

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Total housing starts were at 575 thousand (SAAR) in February, down 5.9% from the revised January rate, and up 20% from the all time record low in April 2009 of 479 thousand (the lowest level since the Census Bureau began tracking housing starts in 1959). Starts had rebounded to 590 thousand in June, and have moved mostly sideways for nine months.

Single-family starts were at 499 thousand (SAAR) in February, down 0.6% from the revised January rate, and 40% above the record low in January and February 2009 (357 thousand). Just like for total starts, single-family starts have been at about this level for nine months.

Here is the Census Bureau report on housing Permits, Starts and Completions.

Housing Starts:
Privately-owned housing starts in February were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 575,000. This is 5.9 percent (±10.0%)* below the revised January estimate of 611,000, but is 0.2 percent (±9.8%)* above the February 2009 rate of 574,000.

Single-family housing starts in February were at a rate of 499,000; this is 0.6 percent (±10.6%)* below the revised January figure of 502,000. The February rate for units in buildings with five units or more was 58,000.

Housing Completions:
Privately-owned housing completions in February were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 700,000. This is 5.4 percent (±20.2%)* above the revised January estimate of 664,000, but is 15.5 percent (±13.6%) below the February 2009 rate of 828,000.

Single-family housing completions in February were at a rate of 458,000; this is 4.3 percent (±13.7%)* above the revised January rate of 439,000. The February rate for units in buildings with five units or more was 236,000.

This level of starts is both good news and bad news. The good news is the excess housing inventory is being absorbed - a necessary step for housing (and the economy) to recover.

The bad news is economic growth will probably be sluggish - and unemployment elevated - until residential investment picks up.

Note: on the February snow storms, starts were up in the West and Midwest, and down in the Northeast and South (includes D.C. and Virginia), so the snow probably did impact starts. Of course some builders started spec homes to beat the tax credit expiration - and that boosted starts temporarily.

by Calculated Risk on 3/15/2010 11:20:00 PM

Paul Jackson has a great post at HousingWire: Housing Recovery is Spelled R-E-O

[U]sing LPS data, for all loans more than 90 days in arrears, the average days delinquent is now at 272 days—up from 204 days in early 2008. For loans in foreclosure, the aging numbers are even more staggering: loans in this bucket average 410 days delinquent, up from 260 days delinquent in early 2008.

Ponder those numbers for just a second. On average, severely delinquent borrowers have gone more than 9 months without making a mortgage payment—and yet foreclosure has not yet started for them. For those borrowers who are in the foreclosure process, it’s been an average of 13.6 months—more than one full year—since they last made any payment on their mortgage.

Ahhh ... the "Squatter Stimulus Plan" - live mortgage free (but not worry free).

But Paul thinks foreclosures (REOs) will be the answer, not short sales:

For some, short sales will be an important solution—but don’t kid yourself: the hype currently surrounding short sales and the HAFA program will prove to be short-lived ...

He gives two main reasons for foreclosures over short sales: 1) 2nd liens, and 2) that HAFA has the same qualifications as HAMP. I agree that 2nd liens pose a serious problem, but on the qualifications, Paul writes:

The HAFA program, going into effect on April 5, is getting plenty of attention—and the program’s heart is in the right place. But most are forgetting that it’s an extension of HAMP, the government’s loan modification program that has seen tepid success at best thus far. A loan must first be HAMP-eligible in order for anyone (borrower, servicer, or investor) to qualify for the program’s various incentive payments for short sale or deed-in-lieu.

Which means any of the guidelines applicable to the HAMP program—loan in default or default imminent, within UPB [CR: unpaid principal balance] guidelines, owner-occupied, and originated prior to 2009—still apply.

But lets review the qualifications for HAFA:

The property is the borrower’s principal residence;

The mortgage loan is a first lien mortgage originated on or before January 1, 2009;

The mortgage is delinquent or default is reasonably foreseeable;

The current unpaid principal balance is equal to or less than $729,7501; and

The borrower’s total monthly mortgage payment (as defined in Supplemental Directive
09-01) exceeds 31 percent of the borrower’s gross income.

If we look at the HAMP program stats (see page 6), the median front end DTI (debt to income) for permanent mods was 45%, and the back end DTI was an astounding 76.4%! And these are the borrowers who made it to permanent status!

Many borrowers who meet the HAMP qualifications never even get a trial program because their DTI ratios are so high there is just no way they will make it to a permanent mod. The servicers turn them down on the spot. These are the borrowers eligible for the HAFA program right away - and looking at the HAMP DTI stats I suspect this is a much larger group of borrowers than will ever get a permanent mod. So, although I think REOs will play a key role, I think short sales will also be very important.

More on Short Sales at HousingWire:

from Jacob Gaffney: LPS Starts New Short Sale Service

As 2010 gears up to be the ‘Year of the Short Sale,’ Lenders Processing Service (LPS), the integrated technology provider, is jumping on opportunities such a situation offers by launching its own short sale service to clients.

from Jon Prior: Equator Oversees 125,000 Automated Short Sales in Four Months

In a report that may be considered numerical ammunition to the argument that short sales are heating up faster than modifications, Equator announced that it ushered along more than 125,000 short sale transactions, from November to February, since launching an automated short sale platform.

Note: Yes, I predicted that 2010 would be the year of the short sale, although I think economist Tom Lawler was first.

by Calculated Risk on 3/15/2010 08:15:00 PM

For those interested, here is the text of the proposed bill.

It is only 1,336 pages long ...

Some overviews:
From Sewell Chan at the NY Times:

Mr. Dodd said he believed there was substantial bipartisan agreement on 9 of the bill’s 11 provisions, the exceptions being consumer protection and corporate governance.
...
The major flashpoints will include, among other things, the scope of authority for a new Consumer Financial Protection bureau to be established within the Fed; the scope of exemptions under new rules governing the trade of derivatives; and the mechanism by which the government could seize and dismantle a large company on the verge of failure.

The bill includes a provision intended to curb Wall Street’s influence over the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Its president would be appointed by the president of the United States, not by a board that includes representatives of member banks.

From the WSJ: Finance Overhaul Sets Up Winners, Losers

Among the winners, community banks and small credit unions would be financially able to compete, for perhaps the first time, against large competitors reined in by new restrictions on capital, complexity and size. The Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. would see their powers redefined, and in many ways expanded.

On the other side of the ledger, large financial companies overseen by the Fed would have to pay into a $50 billion fund to pay for the collapse of failed financial firms.

From Elizabeth Warren, via Firedoglake:

“Since bringing our economy to the brink of collapse, Wall Street has spent more than a year and hundreds of millions of dollars in an all-out effort to block financial reform. Despite the banks’ ferocious lobbying for business as usual, Chairman Dodd took an important step today by advancing new laws to prevent the next crisis. We’re now heading toward a series of votes in which the choice will be clear: families or banks.”

by Calculated Risk on 3/15/2010 05:02:00 PM

Carolyn Said at the San Francisco Chronicle writes: Short sale tax shortchanges ex-homeowners (ht picosec)

California legislators last week passed a bill that ... mirrors a federal law that excludes "forgiven debt" on a principal residence from being considered taxable income. It covers short sales, foreclosures, deeds in lieu of foreclosure and loan modifications that reduce the principal due.

However, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has until March 23 to sign the bill, indicated that he is likely to veto it based on an unrelated provision regarding tax fraud.
...
When the foreclosure crisis started, Congress passed the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 so foreclosed homeowners would not be liable for their canceled debt. It is in force through 2012. California had a similar law, but it expired at the end of 2008, leaving Californians who lost their homes in 2009 potentially liable for big state tax bills.
...
Tax experts advise people who lost their homes in 2009 to file for an extension in hopes that California will rectify matters.

It is important to remember the Federal exemption only applies to "money used to purchase, build or fix up a home". That exemption makes sense - and California will probably fix the current tax law.

However the exemption doesn't apply to those who used the Home ATM for toys or trips ... that debt forgiveness is taxable by both the federal government and the state.

From Diana Olick at CNBC: Loans Going Bad Faster Than the Fixes

Lender Processing Services put out its Mortgage Monitor report today, and the numbers are really staggering.

Loans delinquent/in foreclosure process: 7.5 million
REO/Post-sale foreclosure: 1 million
Loans that were current 1/1/09 and 60+ days delinquent 1/1/10: 2.5 million

That last one is interesting, because it shows how much faster loans are going bad than are being modified.
...
Tomorrow on CNBC we're going to devote a full day to the current state of the housing market, from what has failed to what is promising on the horizon.

From Reuters: Ex-NY bank president first accused of TARP fraud

The former president of New York's privately held Park Avenue Bank was arrested and charged on Monday ... A 10-count criminal complaint accused Charles Antonucci of devising "an elaborate round-trip loan transaction" that he told others was his own $6.5 million investment in the bank, misleading state bank regulators and the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
...
"Antonucci is the first person ever to be charged with attempting to defraud the TARP and we expect he will not be the last," Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said at a news conference.

by Calculated Risk on 3/15/2010 03:16:00 PM

Last year, included in the "Worker, Homeownership and Business Assistance Act of 2009" that extended the popular unemployment benefits were two unpopular and ineffective tax credits: the home buyer tax credit, and a net operating loss carryback extension to allow businesses to write off current losses against profits up to 5 years ago - the profitable years for home builders.

Zach Fox at SNL Financial has an update on the carryback: Builders record $2.30B in tax benefits

In all, homebuilders recorded $2.30 billion in income tax benefits during their most recent quarters, according to SNL Financial. ... The tax benefit was so large that it might have been the only reason two builders did not go under, Vicki Bryan, a senior high-yield analyst at Gimme Credit, told SNL.

"This is so important that it might have saved the weakest ones, Hovnanian [Enterprises Inc.], Beazer [Homes USA Inc.] They looked like they were headed to bankruptcy," she said.
excerpts with permission

Zach has much more on the home builders, and here are some comments from Chris Thornberg on the effectiveness of the tax credit:

[Christopher Thornberg] said the net operating loss carryback extension and expansion will do nothing to mend the housing market.

"Of course not. They're not building any homes; there's still too many of them kicking around," Christopher Thornberg, a principal at Beacon Economics in Los Angeles, told SNL. "Permits, starts are still flat; they're still at a bottom. It's a bailout. It's a bailout for builders. It's a bailout for Robert Toll. They're bailing out Robert Toll. Repeat after me, they are bailing out Robert Toll. What's wrong with this picture?"

When asked whether there were any positives to come out of the net operating loss carryback extension and expansion, Thornberg said, "No, no, no, no, no, no, no. No. Nothing. There's nothing to build; there's an oversupply. If anything, they're making it worse because they're encouraging construction when we need to burn off our existing supply first."

As Thornberg notes, the only reason for a tax provision like this is to spur construction - something we don't need right now. It would be better if there was less capacity in the home building sector.

One thing is certain, the Return on Lobbying (ROL) for the home builders was awesome, as Gretchen Morgenson noted in the NY Times last year: Home Builders (You Heard That Right) Get a Gift

The Center for Responsive Politics reports that through Oct. 26 of this year, home builders paid $6 million to their lobbyists. ... Much of this year’s lobbying expenditures were focused on arguing for the tax loss carry-forward, documents show.

Among individual companies, Lennar spent $240,000 lobbying while companies affiliated with Hovnanian Enterprises spent $222,000. Pulte Homes spent $210,000 this year.

That’s some return on investment. After spending its $210,000, Pulte will receive $450 million in refunds. And Hovnanian, after spending its $222,000, will get as much as $275 million.

by Calculated Risk on 3/15/2010 01:00:00 PM

Note: any number under 50 indicates that more builders view sales conditions as poor than good.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the builder confidence index from the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB).

The housing market index (HMI) was at 15 in March. This is a decrease from 17 in February.

The record low was 8 set in January 2009. This is very low - and this is what I've expected - a long period of builder depression. The HMI has been in the 15 to 19 range since May 2009.

This second graph compares the NAHB HMI (left scale) with single family housing starts (right scale). This includes the March release for the HMI and the January data for starts (February starts will be released tomorrow, Tuesday March 16th).

This shows that the HMI and single family starts mostly move generally in the same direction - although there is plenty of noise month-to-month.

And right now they are moving sideways - at best.

I was looking back through some old posts - and it seems like yesterday - but it was last summer that I wrote about how starts would probably move sideways for some time because of the large overhang of existing housing units (both owner occupied homes and rental units). I added some emphasis later in the year:

"To be blunt: Those expecting a sharp rebound in starts from the bottom are wrong. And remember - residential investment is usually the best leading indicator for the economy."

That still seems correct today.

Press release from the NAHB: (added) Foreclosures Weigh on Builder Confidence in March

Builder confidence in the market for newly built, single-family homes fell back two points to 15 in March as poor weather conditions and distressed property sales posed increasing challenges to both builders and buyers, according to the latest National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI), released today.

“Unusually poor weather conditions certainly had a negative effect on builders’ business in February,” said NAHB Chairman Bob Jones, a home builder from Bloomfield Hills, Mich. “At the same time, the continual flow of distressed properties priced below the cost of production is having an adverse effect on new-home appraisals and also making it tough for builders’ customers to sell their existing homes.”

Not much snow in March ...

by Calculated Risk on 3/15/2010 10:56:00 AM

From Reuters: Capital One Credit Card Defaults Fall, but BofA's Rise

Capital One said the annualized net charge-off rate — debts the company believes it will never collect — for U.S. credit cards fell to 10.19 percent in February from 10.41 percent in January. ...

However, Bank of America said its defaults rate rose in February, up from 13.25 percent in January to 13.51 percent.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the COF annualized credit card charge-off rate since January 2005.

Notice the spike in 2005 - to 9.75% - associated with a surge in bankruptcy filings ahead of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA).

Capital One's credit card annualized net charge-off rate is now at 10.19% - down slightly from January, but still above that spike in 2005!

As Reuters notes, Capital One is usually the first to report monthly credit card charge-offs - so this is the one I track. The other major credit card issuers will report later today.