by Calculated Risk on 9/08/2009 12:46:00 PM

Here is an interesting resource from Google: Domestic Trends. (ht Brian) Google is tracking search trends for several specific sectors of the economy.

As an example, below is a screen capture of the Auto Buyers Index.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This shows the seasonality of car buying, plus the Cash-for-clunkers surge in searches. Click on link for interactive graph - you can also plot the data YoY.

I also recommend real estate, rental (still weak) and unemployment.

by Calculated Risk on 9/08/2009 11:09:00 AM

From The Times: Recession is over but stagnation may follow

Britain’s economy grew for the first time over a three-month period since May last year, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) said today but warned that the end of recession could turn to a period of stagnation. ...

"This is the first time our GDP indicator has been higher over a three-month average since May of 2008 and reinforces our view that the recession ended in May of this year." ... However, NIESR added: "There may well be a period of stagnation now, with output rising in some months and falling in others; the end of the recession should not be confused with a return to normal economic conditions."
emphasis added

And from Bloomberg: German Industrial Output Fell in July After June Gain

German industrial output fell in July after rising in June, suggesting the recovery from recession may be gradual.

Production declined 0.9 percent from June, when it rose a revised 0.8 percent, the Economy Ministry in Berlin said today.

by Calculated Risk on 9/08/2009 08:53:00 AM

From Manpower: Manpower Employment Outlook Survey Projects a Weak Hiring Pace for Q4 2009

"The hiring intentions of U.S. companies continue to be sluggish," said Manpower Inc. Chairman and CEO Jeff Joerres. "While there are areas within the U.S. which are showing an uptick, we have yet to see the robust hiring intentions that would indicate a full labor market recovery."

Of the more than 28,000 employers surveyed, a significant 69% expect no change in their October – December hiring plans. Twelve percent anticipate an increase in staff levels, while 14% expect a decrease in payrolls, resulting in a Net Employment Outlook of -2%. After seasonal adjustment, the Net Employment Outlook becomes -3%, the weakest in the history of the survey, which began in 1962. The final 5% of employers indicated they were undecided about their hiring intentions.

“Despite some moderating signs, such as the considerable number of employers that plan to maintain or increase staff levels, there will continue to be challenges for both job seekers and employers in the coming months,” said Jonas Prising, Manpower president of the Americas. “Hiring in the Wholesale & Retail Trade sector, for instance, is expected to be down in the fourth quarter, suggesting that employers will not be adding the quantity of holiday hires they have in the past.”
emphasis added

by Calculated Risk on 9/08/2009 12:19:00 AM

Reuters is reporting comments by State Councillor Ma Kai indicating China will continue with their stimulative policies.

"The trend of economic stabilisation is still not firm, not solidified, not balanced, and we still face many difficulties and problems," Ma [said] ... "We will maintain the consistency and stability of macroeconomic policies and fully implement and constantly improve a package of plans."

Futures are up ...

Futures from barchart.com

Bloomberg Futures.

CBOT mini-sized Dow

And the Asian markets are mostly up.

Best to all.

by Calculated Risk on 9/07/2009 09:31:00 PM

Another laugh from Jim ... "and if you get busted, you can always say you lost your mind because ..."

by Calculated Risk on 9/07/2009 05:50:00 PM

This story has it all: negative equity, Option ARM, health problems, a modification horror story and more - all with one family in Orange County.

From the O.C. Register: Family faces loss of home amid health crisis

... the Kempffs' option adjustable-rate mortgage payment skyrocketed to $4,300 a month from $2,500 last December. Seeing no way to afford the new payments, the Kempffs opted for a loan modification from their bank, IndyMac which was later purchased by OneWest from the FDIC in March.
...
The Kempffs said they were told by an IndyMac representative on the phone that they had to miss three payments before a deal could be worked out. ... For a family that had never missed payments in 14 years of being homeowners, purposely skipping payments was hard for the Kempffs, but they consented.

I'm curious about the timing in the article. IndyMac was seized by the FDIC on July 11, 2008, and was then run by the FDIC until March of 2009. Did this happen when IndyMac was being used by the FDIC to demonstrate how to modify loans? Tanta correctly predicted that the FDIC would discover that modifying loans was not easy, see: IndyMac-FDIC Mortgage Modification Plan: Still in the Real World

I wrote a snotty post at the end of August after Sheila Bair's plan for "affordability modifications" of the former IndyMac loans was announced, the burden of snot wisdom of which was my prediction that Bair was going to discover that it's a lot harder than she thinks to get successful mortgage modifications done on a wide scale in a very short period of time. However, I did express the hope that the Bair plan would prove remarkably successful and indicated my willingness to eat my words should it prove necessary.

Looks like I'll have to stick to my usual dry toast and bananas after all.

Back to the article:

A OneWest Bank spokesperson said the Kempffs didn't qualify for a loan modification because the amount they owed on their first mortgage was more than $729,750.

The unpaid amount on the Kempffs' loan is $786,802.59, short of qualifying for a modification by about $60,000.

Since the Kempffs purchased their home in 2002, they took out loans and refinanced their mortgage. The equity from those transactions enabled the Kempff family to fix their cracked pool, remedy a slipping backyard slope by putting in three retaining walls, help three children pay for college and pay for the medical bills of their youngest son who had malignant melanoma.
...
Juergen Kempff, 65, has battled leukemia and lymphoma for a decade, on and off. His bone marrow has been debilitated from his treatments, and his oncologist has given him about six months to live.
...
Desperate to stall the foreclosure process, the Kempffs declared bankruptcy.

A sympathetic borrower - a professor at the University of California, Irvine with a serious health issue - negative equity, using the home as an ATM, an Option ARM, a personal bankruptcy, miscommunication with the lender on a modification (apparently while the FDIC was running IndyMac) - and a home in the upper middle price range. This story has it all.

by Calculated Risk on 9/07/2009 01:05:00 PM

A frequent question is how do the 570,000 initial weekly unemployment claims, as reported by the Dept of Labor (DOL), correspond to the 216,000 in monthly job losses as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

If about 2.4 million people filed initial weekly claims in a month (570,000 X 4 weeks), how come the economy only lost 216 thousand net jobs in August?

First, I think it is helpful to look at total hires and separations each month. The BLS has a survey called "Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey" (JOLTS) that provides this information. The difference between JOLTS hires and separations is similar to the CES (payroll survey) net jobs headline numbers.

Note: Remember the CES (Current Employment Statistics, payroll survey) is for positions, the CPS (Current Population Survey, commonly called the household survey) is for people. See Jobs and the Unemployment Rate for a comparison of the two surveys.

The following graph shows hires (Green Line), Quits (blue bars) and Layoff, Discharges and other (red bars) from the JOLTS. Red and blue added together equals total separations.

Unfortunately this is a new series and only started in December 2000.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Notice that hires (green line) and separations (red and blue together) are pretty close each month. When the green line is above total separations, the economy is adding net jobs, when the green line is below total separations, the economy is losing net jobs.

Although initial claims are for people and JOLTS is for positions, this does show why initial claims are so high. In the first six months of 2009, an average of about 2.8 million jobs were lost involuntarily each month. If all of these people applied for unemployment claims, the average initial weekly unemployment claims would have been about 650,000 per week (2.8 million divided by 4.3 weeks per month). In fact weekly claims averaged just over 600,000 per week for the first six months of 2009. Note: "quits" don't receive unemployment insurance.

So even though there were about 4.2 million new hires each month during the first six months of 2009, people who lose their jobs involuntarily during a recession have a difficult time finding a new job right away, and most apply for unemployment benefits.

In better times, like 2005, about 2.26 million jobs were lost involuntarily each month, but weekly claims only averaged 330,000 per week (2.26 million divided by 4.3 week is 525,000). This shows when the economy is adding net jobs, a larger percentage of people can find new jobs right away and don't apply for unemployment insurance. But many people still do file for benefits.

Although we don't have JOLTS data for the '90s, even in the best of times for employment (like 1997), the U.S. averaged about 230 thousand initial unemployment claims per week - even though the economy added almost 3.4 million net jobs for the year. This just points out there is significant employment turnover in the U.S. economy, and many people lose their jobs involuntarily even in good times.

Final Note: Since weekly initial unemployment claims are related to involuntary separations - and the overall strength of the job market (Can people find a job right away?), there is no magic formula between initial claims and net jobs. It does appear that initial weekly claims will have to fall to about 400,000 per week before the economy starts adding jobs, see from Brad DeLong: Payroll Employment Starts Growing When Seasonally-Adjusted Unemployment Claims Fall Below 400K per Week or so...

This is the graph from DeLong's post (click on graph for larger image.)

by Calculated Risk on 9/07/2009 09:50:00 AM

From Michael Luo at the NY Times: Out of Work, Too Down to Search On, and Uncounted (ht Kai, Ann)

They were left out of the latest unemployment rate, as they are every month: millions of hidden casualties of the Great Recession who are not counted in the rate because they have stopped looking for work.

But that does not mean these discouraged Americans do not want to be employed. As interviews with several of them demonstrate, many desperately long for a job, but their inability to find one has made them perhaps the ultimate embodiment of pessimism as this recession wears on.
...
The official jobless rate, which garners the bulk of attention from politicians and the public, was reported on Friday to have risen to 9.7 percent in August. But to be included in that measure, which is calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics from a monthly nationwide survey, a worker must have actively looked for a job at some point in the preceding four weeks.

For an increasing number of people in this country who would prefer to be working, that is not the case.

Luo provides short stories about four people who have given up looking.

by Calculated Risk on 9/06/2009 08:34:00 PM

Laura Conaway at NPR Money highlights a new survey by the Rutgers University John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development.

From the Press Release:

A comprehensive national survey conducted among 1,200 Americans nationwide who have been unemployed and looking for a job in the past 12 months, including 894 who are still jobless, portrays a shaken, traumatized people coping with serious financial and psychological effects from an economic downturn of epic proportion.
...
The survey shows that the great recession of 2007-2009 may have long-lasting financial and psychological effects on millions of people, and therefore on the nation’s social fabric. Two thirds of respondents say they are depressed, over half have borrowed money from friends or relatives, and a quarter have skipped mortgage or rent payments. ...

More than half of the jobless think the changes in the economy will be fundamental and lasting, and when the unemployed are asked when the economy will recover, only 20% believe it will do so in the next year.

Here are the raw comments and stats from the survey.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

From the report:

Over half of the unemployed have lost their jobs for the first time ... Job loss is hitting more affluent workers and educated professionals hard — a metric of the recession’s seismic impact. More than one in four of those who were unemployed for the first time earned $75,000 or more in their previous job; one in four first-time unemployed workers have at least a four-year college degree.

by Calculated Risk on 9/06/2009 02:00:00 PM

A few posts of interest this last week:

Restaurants in July: 23rd Consecutive Month of Declining Traffic

Construction Spending in July

Light Vehicle Sales 14.1 Million (SAAR) in August

ISM Non-Manufacturing Index Shows Contraction in August

Problem Bank List (Unofficial) Sep 4, 2009 (5 more banks failed this week)

Employment Report: 216K Jobs Lost, 9.7% Unemployment Rate

Unemployment: Stress Tests, Unemployed over 26 Weeks, Diffusion Index

Employment-Population Ratio, Part Time Workers, Average Workweek

Enjoy the weekend!!! Best to all.