by Calculated Risk on 2/04/2005 06:30:00 PM

Froomkin's WaPo article, "Avoiding the Tough Questions" is excellent.
An excerpt:

"... there are some serious and legitimate concerns that need to be addressed about Bush's Social Security proposals and how they are being characterized.

One overarching issue is that the White House is talking about Social Security as if it were one big underperforming 401(k) program. In other words, they're implying that workers right now get back what they put in plus interest -- and that the interest rate they're getting is not so hot.

But it's not that way, not by a long shot. Social Security is a complex social insurance program that uses payroll taxes from current workers to pay benefits to the elderly, the disabled and their families in a progressive manner that guarantees an income floor below which the least fortunate are not allowed to sink."

Ahhh ... a Safety Net?

An excellent analysis worth reading.

by Calculated Risk on 2/01/2005 11:32:00 PM

Advertisements: Thank you for your interest!

Advertising space is limited and available on a fixed price per month basis.

A maximum of three banner ads will run at any one time in the upper portion of the right side bar.

A banner is 190 X 120 pixels.

If the advertiser hosts the graphic (recommended), they are welcome to change the image as often as they like.

If you'd like to place a banner ad on Calculated Risk, please contact me for pricing.

by Calculated Risk on 2/01/2005 11:11:00 PM

Calculated Risk: a senior executive, retired from a public company, with a background in investing, finance and economics.

Tanta: Tanta passed away in December 2008. Please see: Tanta: In Memoriam for more.

For media requests: Please feel free to quote from the blog (with a reference). I'm not looking for any personal publicity, but I'm happy to discuss economic and housing issues for background (emails or phone calls). Please feel free to email me. Please see Tanta's piece: Media Inquiries Policy.

by Calculated Risk on 2/01/2005 10:43:00 PM

Thank you for the tip!

Your transaction has been completed, and a receipt has been emailed to you by PayPal.

Best Wishes.

Click here to return to the main page.

by Calculated Risk on 2/01/2005 09:53:00 PM

The GAO released a report on their recent forum addressing long term fiscal challenges. Three key points:

1) Today's fiscal policy is unsustainable.

2) Health Care Is the Largest and Perhaps Most Difficult Part of the Long-Term Fiscal Challenge.

"Health care is a bigger problem than Social Security. Participants acknowledged the need for Social Security reform but emphasized that Social Security is a relatively small part of the long-term fiscal challenge when compared to spending on health care. One participant noted that the estimated Social Security shortfall is about one-third the estimated cost of recent tax cuts if made permanent. Several participants observed that few members of the public are aware of this. Rather, the general public impression is that solving Social Security would solve most of the longterm fiscal challenge, and this is not correct. Indeed, one forum participant stated that it was only by attending this forum that he had learned that health care spending was a much more important, and potentially far more difficult, component of the long-term fiscal challenge than Social Security.

Participants expressed the view that in characterizing the long-term fiscal outlook, several key distinctions needed to be made between Social Security and the largest federal health programs, Medicare and Medicaid. Participants observed that the public was largely unaware that health spending accounted for a much larger share of the long-term fiscal problem than did Social Security."

3) We need to elevate the public discourse to address the problem. There is a serious lack of leadership, especially in the White House.

"Participants agreed that a key moral context is the impact federal budget deficits will have on future generations. Another key moral context is integrity. Some participants called for greater integrity, e.g., transparency, in the federal budget process."

And a table of fiscal exposures (billions of dollars, End of 2003):
See page 50, GAO-05-282SP CG Forum

Selected Fiscal Exposures: Sources and Examples

Explicit Liabilities
Publicly held debt ($3,913)
Military and civilian pension and post-retirement health ($2,857)
Veterans benefits payable ($955)
Environmental and disposal liabilities ($250)
Loan guarantees ($35)

Explicit Financial commitments
Undelivered orders ($596)
Long-term leases ($47)

Financial contingencies
Unadjudicated claims ($9)
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ($86)
Other national insurance programs ($7)
Government corporations e.g., Ginnie Mae

Exposures implied by current policies or the public's expectations about the role of government
Debt held by government accounts ($2,859)b
Future Social Security benefit payments ($3,699)c
Future Medicare Part A benefit payments ($8,236)c
Future Medicare Part B benefit payments ($11,416)c
Future Medicare Part D benefit payments ($8,119) c
Life cycle cost including deferred and future maintenance and operating costs (amount unknown)
Government Sponsored Enterprises e.g., Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac