by Calculated Risk on 7/29/2010 08:30:00 AM

The DOL reports on weekly unemployment insurance claims:

In the week ending July 24, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 457,000, a decrease of 11,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 468,000. The 4-week moving average was 452,500, a decrease of 4,500 from the previous week's revised average of 457,000.
...
The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment during the week ending July 17 was 4,565,000, an increase of 81,000 from the preceding week's revised level of 4,484,000.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since January 2000.

The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims decreased this week by 4,500 to 452,500.

The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average.

The 4-week average of initial weekly claims has been at about the same level since December 2009 (eight months) and the 4-week average of 452,500 is high historically, and suggests a weak labor market.

by Calculated Risk on 7/28/2010 10:41:00 PM

For those interested, here is the paper by Alan Blinder and Mark Zandi that I mentioned last night: How the Great Recession Was Brought to an End

by Calculated Risk on 7/28/2010 06:04:00 PM

CR Note: This is from housing economist Tom Lawler.

Meritage Homes, the 11th largest US home builder in 2009, reported that net home orders in the quarter ended 6/30/10 totaled 900, down 21.5% from the comparable quarter of 2009. Home deliveries, in contrast, jumped by 35.6% from a year ago to 1,207, reflecting buyers’ (and the builders) rush to close prior to the expected 6/30 closing date deadline for the federal home buyer tax credit. Compared to the previous quarter, net orders fell 15.4% while home closings surged by 49.4%. As a result, the company order backlog as of 6/30/10 fell to 1,044, down 22.7% from 3/31/10 and down 34.4% from a year ago.

Company officials were reportedly “surprised” by the extent of the post-tax-credit slowdown, and some analysts were a little spooked by the company’s move to increase active communities this year in California, Arizona, and Florida, while reducing its footprint in “lower-margin” Texas markets, as well as its recent acquisitions of land/lots. Meritage noted that margins on its newer communities have been higher than on older communities, in part because it purchased “deeply discounted” lots – especially in CA/AZ/FL. The company also said that it had “reduced our incentives while maintaining prices,” though whether it can do so in the post-tax-credit world remained unclear. Meritage, btw, appears to be one of those builders cited in yesterday’s WSJ article that may increase building in troubled markets that have not fully recovered yet because of land/lot acquisitions. (“Housing Glut is Likely to Build,”, July 27th, p. A2. This article, by the way, vastly overstates the potential for an increase in housing production related to SOME builders buying land/lots, often mainly either from other troubled builders or from banks. It also ignored surveys of builders indicating that most have dramatically cut their building production plans following the post-tax-credit plunge in sales, and ignored the sharp drop in SF building permits in May and June!!!)

M/I Homes, the 16th largest US home builder in 2009, reported that net home orders in the quarter ended 6/30/10 totaled 602, down 20.7% from the comparable quarter of 2009. Home deliveries last quarter totaled 790, up 60.6% form a year ago, as buyers (and the builder) rushed to close prior to the expected 6/30 closing date deadline for the federal home buyer tax credit. Compared to the previous quarter, net orders in the latest quarter fell by 21.3% while home deliveries surged by 64.9%. As a result, the company’s order backlog fell to 748 on 6/30/10, down 20.1% from 3/31/10 and down 32.4% from a year ago.

M/I CEO Robert Schottenstein noted that “coincident with the expiration of the tax credit on April 30, 2010 (for contract signings), we experienced a noticeable decline in our sales activity for May and June, resulting in a 21% decline in sales for the quarter” (implying BIG declines in May and June!) – breaking the company's previous string of six consecutive YOY gains in net orders.

At the risk of repeating myself (yet again!!!), the incoming data on home builders highlight that new home sales based on settlements actually surged in Q2/10 vs. Q1/10, even though contracts signed on a seasonally adjusted basis declined. Similarly, existing home sales closed in Q2 increased from Q1, even though new pending home sales declined. So for you “home data folks” who I guess because of ignorance add closed existing home sales to new SF home sales based on contracts signed/deposits taken (as reported by Census) to measure total home sales – stop it, it’s just wrong, and doing so makes you look like a fool!

CR Note: This was from Tom Lawler.

by Calculated Risk on 7/28/2010 04:01:00 PM

From the Sacramento Bee: Schwarzenegger orders more furloughs

[Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's] new executive order requires employees take three unpaid days off per month. But unlike that policy, it has no termination date: Furloughs will end when lawmakers pass a 2010-11 budget.
...
The governor made the decision this week after Controller John Chiang said that unless lawmakers enacted a budget soon, the state's cash would go into the red by October. Chiang said he'll start issuing IOUs in August or September to conserve funds as long as possible.

And the beat goes on ...

by Calculated Risk on 7/28/2010 02:00:00 PM

Note: This is based on information collected on or before July 19, 2010.

From the Federal Reserve: Beige book

Economic activity has continued to increase, on balance, since the previous survey, although the Cleveland and Kansas City Districts reported that the level of economic activity generally held steady.
...
Manufacturing activity continued to expand in most Districts, although several Districts reported that activity had slowed or leveled off during the reporting period. Districts also noted improved conditions in the services sector.
...
Reports on retail sales during the early summer months were generally positive, although in most Districts the increases were modest.

And on real estate:

Nearly all Districts reported sluggish housing markets in the months since the homebuyer tax credit expired on April 30. While some Districts, such as Boston and St. Louis, reported an increase in May and June home sales on a year-over-year basis, some contacts noted that these sales may reflect closings of homes under contract by the April tax credit deadline. The Boston, Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Kansas City Districts reported that home sales are expected to weaken going forward. Residential construction remained limited in several Districts. In the Atlanta District, residential construction activity softened from already weak levels. Homebuilders in the Cleveland District do not expect a turnaround in new home construction any time this year. Builders in the Chicago District are not introducing new inventory without a signed contract on a home. Housing starts were expected to decline for the second half of the year in the Dallas District and to increase slightly over the next three months in the Kansas City District.

Commercial and industrial real estate markets continued to struggle in all twelve Districts. Overall, vacancy rates were flat to slightly increased and continued to exert downward pressure on rents. Construction activity remained weak in most Districts. ... The outlook for commercial and industrial real estate across the Districts ranged from further declines in activity to slow growth.

by Calculated Risk on 7/28/2010 10:55:00 AM

Several analysts noted the reported re-default rate appeared too low ... it was.

Shahien Nasiripour at the HuffPo has the story: HAMP Report Revised After Analysts Question New Metric

The Obama administration has revised its latest monthly report on its signature foreclosure-prevention plan, deleting a heavily-criticized performance metric used to measure whether assisted homeowners are re-defaulting on their taxpayer-financed mortgages.
...
"Subsequent to releasing the report, Treasury received inquiries regarding the calculation methodology used in this table," spokesman Mark Paustenbach said Tuesday. "These inquiries were related to the treatment of modifications that are cancelled from HAMP and ultimately become ineligible for TARP incentives after 90 days delinquency.

"In an effort to review and better explain the methodology, we learned from our program administrator, Fannie Mae, that not all cancelled loans were included in the underlying information provided to Treasury," Paustenbach continued. "The error caused inconsistent reporting of permanent modifications during the snapshots reported. These omissions have impacted our previous analysis... with respect to the performance of HAMP permanent modifications."
...
In place of the now-deleted table, in a revised report posted Monday to their FinancialStability.gov Web site, Treasury said:

"Since the Making Home Affordable report was posted on July 20th, Fannie Mae, which administers the program, has reported to Treasury an issue in its implementation of the delinquency statistic methodology used to report performance of permanent modifications. Fannie Mae is now revising the data, and Treasury has retained a third-party consultant to provide additional review and validation. Upon completion of that independent review, a revised table will be provided.".

As Nasiripour notes, most analysts think a majority of HAMP modifications will eventually re-default. Nasiripour mentions a Fitch analyst's forecast that 75 percent will re-default; Barclays estimates 60 percent.

Last month, the reported median back end DTI¹ was 63.7% AFTER modification. That just screams "re-default".

From HAMP: ¹ Ratio of total monthly debt payments (including principal and interest on the first mortgage, taxes, insurance, homeowners association and/or condo fees, plus payments on installment debts, junior liens, alimony, car lease payments and investment property payments) to monthly gross income.

by Calculated Risk on 7/28/2010 08:33:00 AM

From the Census Bureau:

New orders for manufactured durable goods in June decreased $2.0 billion or 1.0 percent to $190.5 billion, the U.S. Census Bureau announced today. This was the second consecutive monthly decrease and followed a 0.8 percent May decrease.
...
Shipments of manufactured durable goods in June, down two consecutive months, decreased $0.7 billion or 0.3 percent to $195.0 billion. This followed a 0.7 percent May decrease.

From Reuters: Durable Goods Orders Fall Short as Demand Stays Weak

The Commerce Department said durable goods orders fell 1.0 percent after a revised 0.8 percent drop in May.

Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast orders increasing 1.0 percent in June from May's previously reported 0.6 percent fall.

This was well below expectations, and is further evidence of a slowdown in the manufacturing sector.

by Calculated Risk on 7/28/2010 07:53:00 AM

The MBA reports: Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey

The Refinance Index decreased 5.9 percent from the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index increased 2.0 percent from one week earlier and is the highest Purchase Index observed in the survey since the end of June.
...
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages increased to 4.69 percent from 4.59 percent, with points decreasing to 0.88 from 1.04 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value (LTV) ratio loans.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the MBA Purchase Index and four week moving average since 1990.

Although the weekly applications index increased slightly, the 4-week average is still near the levels of 1996.

This collapse in the mortgage application index has already shown up as a decline in new home sales, and will show up in the July and August existing home sales reports (counted at close of escrow).

by Calculated Risk on 7/27/2010 10:58:00 PM

Alan Blinder and Mark Zandi will release a new paper tomorrow analyzing the impact of the policy response to the crisis ... Sewell Chan at the NY Times has a preview: In Study, 2 Economists Say Intervention Helped Avert a 2nd Depression

In a new paper, [Alan S. Blinder, a Princeton professor and former vice chairman of the Fed, and Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics] argue that without the Wall Street bailout, the bank stress tests, the emergency lending and asset purchases by the Federal Reserve, and the Obama administration’s fiscal stimulus program, the nation’s gross domestic product would be about 6.5 percent lower this year.

In addition, there would be about 8.5 million fewer jobs, on top of the more than 8 million already lost; and the economy would be experiencing deflation, instead of low inflation.

I'll post a link tomorrow (if it is available). David Leonhardt adds:

As Mr. Blinder and Mr. Zandi note, their estimates of the fiscal stimulus are similar to the estimates of others — including the Congressional Budget Office.

Although Zandi completely missed the housing bubble, I've been using his estimates of the impact of policy (and estimates from Goldman Sachs), and I think they have been very useful in forecasting.

by Calculated Risk on 7/27/2010 07:32:00 PM

Earlier today the Census Bureau released the homeownership and vacancy rates for Q2 2010.

I posted a few graphs this morning, and I noted that the homeownership rate had fallen to the 1999 level of 66.9%.

A few years ago - when the homeownership rate was at 69%, I forecast that the rate would probably fall to the 66% to 67% range. Here is a repeat of the graph from this morning showing the trend of the homeownership rate since 1965.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Note: graph starts at 60% to better show the change.

As I noted this morning, the homeownership rate increased in the '90s and first half of the '00s because of changes in demographics and "innovations" in mortgage lending. My guess is the increase due to demographics (older population) will probably stick, but the mortgage "innovation" increase will disappear.

Using the data from the Census Bureau on number of households per age cohort, we can calculate what would have happened to the overall homeownership rate if the rate per age cohort had stayed the same as in 1989 or in 1999.

Using the 1989 percentages, the homeownership rate would have increased from 63.9% in 1989 to 66.2% in 2009 just because of the aging population. Using the 1999 homeownership percentages, the homeownership rate would be 66.8% given the changes in demographics. That was the basis for my original forecast of the homeownership rate falling to the 66% to 67% range.

It is certainly possible that the homeownership rate might fall further than I originally expected since certain cohorts now own at a lower than historically normal rate - and many of these people might be turned off on home ownership for some time (if not forever).

The second graph shows the homeownership rate by age cohort for 1989, 1999, 2005 (peak of housing bubble), and Q2 2010.

For those currently under 30, the homeownership rate is above the 1989 and 1999 levels - probably because most of these people were too young to participate in the insanity and some have taken advantage of the first time home buyer tax credit.

For the 30 to 60 groups, the homeownership rate is currently below the 1989 and 1999 levels. These groups were in their early 20s to early 50s during the bubble years - the prime buying years.

For the groups above 60 years old, the homeownership rate has stayed above the 1989 level. Most of these people already owned and probably didn't participate in the insanity.

But notice the highest cohort (over 75 years old). The homeownership rate is above the bubble years! This could mean that some people are staying in their homes, perhaps waiting for a better market to sell.

This does shows that the most impacted cohorts are currently in the 30 to 60 age groups, with the 30 to 35 year old cohort the hardest hit group (in their mid to late 20s during the bubble). The next hardest hit groups are the 45 to 59 cohorts - probably because some people were moving up to more home than they could afford.

For now I'll stick with my prediction of the homeownership rate falling to 66% or so, but it could certainly fall lower.