by Calculated Risk on 2/09/2011 09:00:00 AM

This is the new UCLA Anderson Forecast and Ceridian Corporation index using real-time diesel fuel consumption data: Pulse of Commerce Index^TM

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the index since January 2000.

Press Release: PCI Posts 14th Consecutive Month of Year-Over-Year Growth

The Ceridian-UCLA Pulse of Commerce Index™ (PCI), issued today by the UCLA Anderson School of Management and Ceridian Corporation fell 0.3% on a seasonally and monthly workday adjusted basis in January, giving up some of December’s exceptional 1.8% sequential gain. Because of the very strong December showing, the three-month annualized moving average is up 5.1% and gaining strength.
...
The combined effect of very strong sequential gains in December and holding onto most of those gains in January suggest growth in industrial production for January equal to 0.3% when reported on February 16th.
...
The Ceridian-UCLA Pulse of Commerce Index™ is based on real-time diesel fuel consumption data for over the road trucking ...

Note: This index does appear to track Industrial Production over time (with plenty of noise). Industrial Production for December will be released February 16th.

by Calculated Risk on 2/09/2011 07:33:00 AM

The MBA reports: Mortgage Applications Decrease as Rates Jump in Latest MBA Weekly Survey

The Refinance Index decreased 7.7 percent from the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 1.4 percent from one week earlier.
...
"Mortgage rates increased last week as many incoming economic indicators continue to show stronger growth than had been anticipated. Refinance volume continues to be low, as fewer homeowners with equity have any incentive to refinance," said Michael Fratantoni, MBA’s Vice President of Research and Economics. "We are at the beginning of the spring buying season, but purchase volume remains weak on a seasonally adjusted basis."
...
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages increased to 5.13 percent from 4.81 percent, with points decreasing to 0.84 from 1.02 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value (LTV) ratio loans. This is the highest contract 30-year rate recorded in the survey since the week ending April 9, 2010.

Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.

This graph shows the MBA Purchase Index and four week moving average since 1990.

The four-week moving average of the purchase index suggests weak home sales through the first few months of 2011. That is quite an increase in mortgage rates!

by Calculated Risk on 2/08/2011 09:41:00 PM

From Binyamin Appelbaum at the NY Times: Plans Near for Freddie and Fannie

[The] report will be released as early as Friday, [and] will present a range of options without stating a preference.
...
One possibility ... would not create any federal replacement for Fannie and Freddie, leaving the private markets to provide mortgages for most Americans. The alternative approaches instead would continue some form of federal mortgage backstop.
...
One potential compromise described in current drafts of the administration’s proposal would reduce the government’s role to a last line of defense for the mortgage market. ... During normal times, the insurer would guarantee no more than 10 percent of mortgages, but in times of crisis, the government could raise that cap, offering guarantees to a broader range of investors so that money continues to flow into the mortgage market and credit remains available.

At the least, having Fannie and Freddie as the "last line of defense" seems to make sense. When the next crisis happens - and it will happen - if there is only a "private market", then the government would have to scramble to provide mortgages (a free fall would never be allowed), so you might as well plan for it in advance.

by Calculated Risk on 2/08/2011 06:45:00 PM

After my "D-List Data" post, I've received several requests to try to create a list of economic data by priority. I'm working on it, in the meantime, here is some more data for D-List.

I follow three measures of transportation: rail traffic, trucking and a diesel fuel index (Ceridian-UCLA Pulse of Commerce Index). I also occasionally review press releases for UPS and FedEx for comments on the economy and forecasts.

This is not primary data, but it is sometimes helpful in confirming other data. As an example, last year I was looking for a mid-year / 2nd half slowdown, and the transportation data was useful in confirming the slowdown was happening.

These indicators mostly improved towards the end of the year, confirming the brighter outlook.

The January rail traffic report released today by the Association of American Railroads suggests the economy expanded further in January. The January Pulse of Commerce Index (PCI) will be released tomorrow morning at 9 AM ET.

The PCI is also somewhat correlated to Industrial Production (IP) from the Federal Reserve (although the relationship is a bit noisy). So the release tomorrow will give us a hint on January IP to be released on Wednesday Feb 16th.

Finally, rail traffic is an example of excess capacity in the economy. The railroad companies are always investing in maintenance and repairs, but investment in new equipment will probably not pick up significantly until traffic starts to approach the levels seen in 2006 – the peak year (still a long ways to go).

Here is the graph gallery for transportation.

by Calculated Risk on 2/08/2011 03:59:00 PM

From the Association of American Railroads: January Freight Rail Traffic Continues Steady Growth. The AAR reports carload traffic in January 2011 was up 8.0% compared to January 2010. Intermodal traffic (using intermodal or shipping containers) is up 7.4% over January 2010.

U.S. freight railroads originated an average of 285,573 carloads per week in January 2011, for a total of 1,142,293 carloads for the month. That’s up 8.0% over January 2010 and up 7.3% over January 2009. That sounds like a nice gain — and it is — but to keep it in perspective, other than 2009 and 2010 it’s still the lowest January average since 1994.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows U.S. average weekly rail carloads (NSA).

From AAR:

• On an unadjusted basis, 15 of the 20 commodity categories saw carload gains on U.S. railroads in January 2011 compared with January 2010. The five commodity categories seeing declines — grain mill products, primary forest products, coke, nonmetallic minerals, and waste and non-ferrous scrap — together accounted for less than 8% of total carloads for the month. The highest-volume commodity categories were all up in January.

As the first graph shows, rail carload traffic collapsed in November 2008, and now, over 18 months into the recovery, carload traffic has only recovered part way.

The second graph is for intermodal traffic (using intermodal or shipping containers):

• In January 2011, U.S. railroads originated 863,099 intermodal trailers and containers, an average of 215,775 per week — up 7.4% over January 2010, up 10.1% over January 2009, and the third highest January average in history(behind January 2006 and January 2007).

• Growth in intermodal traffic is a function both of a growing economy
and growing international trade as well as conversion of freight from over-the-highway moves to rail intermodal moves.
excerpts with permission

Traffic is increasing slowly, but combined traffic is still well below the 2008 levels.

by Calculated Risk on 2/08/2011 02:16:00 PM

From Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart: Rising Prices, the Cost of Living, and Inflation. A few excerpts:

So what about inflation? I'll start with what the data tell us. The retail price measures jumped at year end as the price of gasoline rose. But looking beyond the rise in gasoline prices, consumer price increases remained exceptionally modest.
...
Yet inflation anxiety is rising. There seems to be a disconnect between what the Fed is saying and what people are experiencing when they fill up their gas tanks or read about rising food prices around the world.
...
I do think in the swirl of official statements and public discourse we may be talking about different things. To my way of thinking, the term "inflation" is misused in describing rising prices in narrow expenditure categories (for example, food inflation). Nonetheless, recent price news has encroached on the public consciousness with the effect that any price rise of an important consumption item is often taken as signaling inflation.
...
Let's review what inflation is and is not. Inflation affects all prices. Inflation is not the rise of individual prices or the rise of categories of prices.
...
The Fed, like every other central bank, is powerless to prevent fluctuations in the cost of living and increases of individual prices. We do not produce oil. Nor do we grow food or provide health care. We cannot prevent the next oil shock, or drought, or a strike somewhere —events that cause prices of certain goods to rise and change your cost of living.

So monetary policy is not about preventing relative price adjustments dictated by market forces. It is about controlling the broad direction and pace of change of all prices across the economy.
...
Notwithstanding the energy-driven jump in prices in December, underlying inflation is currently below the level that I would define as price stability. My current projection shows underlying inflation gradually rising over the next few years, putting us back into a range consistent with the 2 percent target by 2013.

There is much more in the speech, but these excerpts touch on a few key points. There does appear to be a disconnect between what the Fed is looking at for monetary policy, and what the general public (and some politicians) are looking at. Monetary policy cannot control the price of oil or other commodities that are being driven up by supply and demand factors (as an example, monetary policy can't help with a drought in China and other food production problems).

The bottom line is the core measures of inflation are still very low, and it is very unlikely that the Fed will raise the Fed funds rates this year.