In Depth Analysis: CalculatedRisk Newsletter on Real Estate (Ad Free) Read it here.

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Misc: Kansas City Fed Manufacturing, Foreclosures Spread, Japan Downgrade and more

by Calculated Risk on 1/27/2011 11:24:00 AM

• From the Kansas City Fed: Survey of Tenth District Manufacturing

Growth in Tenth District manufacturing activity moderated somewhat in January, but activity was stronger than a year ago and optimism
remained fairly high. Price indexes in the survey were still elevated, particularly for raw materials.

The month-over-month composite index was 7 in January, down from 14 in December and 11 in November ... The employment index edged down from 11 to 8.
Note: I've been using the production index from the Kansas City Fed, and they have now introduced a composite index. The last of the regional Fed surveys for January will be released on Monday (Dallas Fed).

The ISM manufacturing index will released on Tueday, Feb 1st, and the regional Fed surveys suggest the index will be in the mid to high 50s (same range as December).

• From RealtyTrac: 2010 Foreclosure Activity Down in Hardest Hit Markets But Increases in 72 Percent of Major Metros
“Foreclosure floodwaters receded somewhat in 2010 in the nation’s hardest-hit housing markets,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “Even so, foreclosure levels remained five to 10 times higher than historic norms in most of those hard-hit markets, where deep faultlines of risk remain and could potentially trigger more waves of foreclosure activity in 2011 and beyond. Meanwhile foreclosures became more widespread in 2010 as high unemployment drove activity up in 72 percent of the nation’s metro areas — many of which were relatively insulated from the initial foreclosure tsunami.”
• From the NY Times: S.&P. Downgrades Japan as Debt Concerns Spread

• From Bloomberg: Mortgage Rates on 30-Year U.S. Loans Increase for the Second Straight Week
The average rate for 30-year fixed loans climbed to 4.80 percent for the week ended today from 4.74 percent, according to Freddie Mac.

Pending Home Sales index increases 2% in December

by Calculated Risk on 1/27/2011 10:00:00 AM

UPDATE:
• On February 23rd, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) will release revisions for the past three years (2008 through 2010) along with the January existing home sales report. This is the ordinary annual revision, and the revisions will probably be minor.

• The NAR is working on benchmarking existing home sales for previous years with other industry data. There is no planned release date for these possible revisions - if any are announced. The process is expected to be completed sometime after mid-year, and I expect this effort will lead to significant downward revisions to previously reported sales.

Original post:

Special Note: I've been discussing the National Association of Realtors (NAR) existing home sales data with several analysts. As an example, Keith Jurow has been sending me data from local areas, and also calculations based on data from Inside Mortgage Finance suggesting that the NAR existing home sales data is overstating sales. I've also looked at other sources, and I think the NAR started over estimating sales in 2006 or 2007 (perhaps by 5% or so in 2007), and the errors have increased since then (perhaps 10% or 15% or more in 2009 and 2010). I expect the NAR will revise down sales for these years in the not too distant future (I'm hearing whispers of coming revisions - but I haven't been able to confirm this with the NAR).

From the NAR: Pending Home Sales Continue Uptrend

The Pending Home Sales Index,* a forward-looking indicator, increased 2.0 percent to 93.7 based on contracts signed in December from a downwardly revised 91.9 in November [revised down from 92.2]. The index is 4.2 percent below the 97.8 mark in December 2009. The data reflects contracts and not closings, which normally occur with a lag time of one or two months.
This suggests existing home sales in January and February will be somewhat higher than in December, although - based on mortgage applications - I think we might see a slight decline in sales.

Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims increase sharply to 454,000

by Calculated Risk on 1/27/2011 08:42:00 AM

The DOL reports on weekly unemployment insurance claims:

In the week ending Jan. 22, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 454,000, an increase of 51,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 403,000. The 4-week moving average was 428,750, an increase of 15,750 from the previous week's revised average of 413,000.
Weekly Unemployment Claims Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims for the last 10 years. The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims increased this week by 15,750 to 428,750.

This was much higher than consensus expectations. The recent decline in the four week average has been good news - and this large increase (just one week) is concerning. Blame it on the snow ...

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Merle Hazard on Italy

by Calculated Risk on 1/26/2011 08:57:00 PM

A ditty from Merle on Italy (short to fit the time slot on Paul Solman's Making $ense (Solman is discussing Europe this week).

New Home Inventory by Stage of Construction

by Calculated Risk on 1/26/2011 05:16:00 PM

The Census Bureau reported that new home inventory declined to 190,000 new houses for sale at the end of December. A common questions is: What inventory is included?

According to the Census Bureau:

"A house is considered for sale when a permit to build has been issued in permit-issuing places or work has begun on the footings or foundation in nonpermit areas and a sales contract has not been signed nor a deposit accepted."
Starting in 1973 the Census Bureau broke this down into three categories: Not Started, Under Construction, and Completed.

Distressing Gap Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.

This graph shows the three categories of inventory starting in 1973.

The inventory of completed homes for sale fell to 80,000 units in December. And the combined total of completed and under construction is at the lowest level since this series started.

In most areas the 'completed' and 'under construction' inventory of new homes is fairly lean. (Tom Lawler sent me a note just as I was finishing this post, he wrote: Currently new SF home inventories are “pretty lean,” which is good since new home sales are still “pretty soft.” )

Here are the New and Existing December home sales posts:
New Home Sales increase in December
December Existing Home Sales: 5.28 million SAAR, 8.1 months of supply
Existing Home Inventory increases 8.4% Year-over-Year in December
Home Sales: Distressing Gap
• Graph galleries for New Home and Existing Home sales

FOMC Statement: No change

by Calculated Risk on 1/26/2011 02:15:00 PM

• The target range for the federal funds rate remains at 0 to 1/4 percent
• The policy of reinvestment of principal payments remains
• no change to the plan to purchase an additional $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities by the end of June 2011.
• the key sentence "likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate for an extended period" remains

From the Federal Reserve:

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in December confirms that the economic recovery is continuing, though at a rate that has been insufficient to bring about a significant improvement in labor market conditions. Growth in household spending picked up late last year, but remains constrained by high unemployment, modest income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight credit. Business spending on equipment and software is rising, while investment in nonresidential structures is still weak. Employers remain reluctant to add to payrolls. The housing sector continues to be depressed. Although commodity prices have risen, longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable, and measures of underlying inflation have been trending downward.

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. Currently, the unemployment rate is elevated, and measures of underlying inflation are somewhat low, relative to levels that the Committee judges to be consistent, over the longer run, with its dual mandate. Although the Committee anticipates a gradual return to higher levels of resource utilization in a context of price stability, progress toward its objectives has been disappointingly slow.

To promote a stronger pace of economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with its mandate, the Committee decided today to continue expanding its holdings of securities as announced in November. In particular, the Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its securities holdings and intends to purchase $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities by the end of the second quarter of 2011. The Committee will regularly review the pace of its securities purchases and the overall size of the asset-purchase program in light of incoming information and will adjust the program as needed to best foster maximum employment and price stability.

The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate for an extended period.

The Committee will continue to monitor the economic outlook and financial developments and will employ its policy tools as necessary to support the economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with its mandate.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Elizabeth A. Duke; Charles L. Evans; Richard W. Fisher; Narayana Kocherlakota; Charles I. Plosser; Sarah Bloom Raskin; Daniel K. Tarullo; Kevin M. Warsh; and Janet L. Yellen.
No dissent. A mention of rising commodity prices, but not much change in the language.