by Calculated Risk on 11/11/2014 11:12:00 AM
Tuesday, November 11, 2014
More Employment Graphs: Duration of Unemployment, Unemployment by Education, Construction Employment and Diffusion Indexes
By request, a few more employment graphs that I haven't posted in a few months ...
Here are the previous posts on the employment report:
• October Employment Report: 214,000 Jobs, 5.8% Unemployment Rate
• Comments: Solid Employment Report, Seasonal Retail Hiring at Record Level
• Employment: Party Like It's 1999!
• Update: Prime Working-Age Population Growing Again
The general trend is down for all categories, and both the "less than 5 weeks" and 6 to 14 weeks" are close to normal levels.
The long term unemployed is just below 1.9% of the labor force - the lowest since January 2009 - however the number (and percent) of long term unemployed remains a serious problem.
Unfortunately this data only goes back to 1992 and only includes one previous recession (the stock / tech bust in 2001). Clearly education matters with regards to the unemployment rate - and it appears all four groups are generally trending down.
Although education matters for the unemployment rate, it doesn't appear to matter as far as finding new employment.
Note: This says nothing about the quality of jobs - as an example, a college graduate working at minimum wage would be considered "employed".
Since construction employment bottomed in January 2011, construction payrolls have increased by 663 thousand.
For manufacturing, the diffusion index increased to 58.6, up from 53.1 in September.
Think of this as a measure of how widespread job gains are across industries. The further from 50 (above or below), the more widespread the job losses or gains reported by the BLS. From the BLS:
Figures are the percent of industries with employment increasing plus one-half of the industries with unchanged employment, where 50 percent indicates an equal balance between industries with increasing and decreasing employment.Job growth was widespread in October.
Housing Update: It Appears Inventory build is Slowing in Previous Distressed Markets
by Calculated Risk on 11/11/2014 08:11:00 AM
Note: This is an update to an earlier post.
Watching existing home "for sale" inventory is very helpful. As an example, the increase in inventory in late 2005 helped me call the top for housing.
And the decrease in inventory eventually helped me correctly call the bottom for house prices in early 2012, see: The Housing Bottom is Here.
And at the beginning of this year I argued house price increases would slow in 2014 because of the increase in inventory.
I don't have a crystal ball, but watching inventory helps understand the housing market. If inventory kept increasing rapidly in certain markets, then we would eventually see price declines. However it now appears the inventory build is slowing in some former distressed markets.
The table below shows the year-over-year change for non-contingent inventory in Las Vegas, Phoenix and Sacramento. Inventory declined sharply through early 2013, and then inventory started increasing sharply year-over-year. It now appears the inventory build is slowing in these markets - and might even flatten or decline year-over-year soon in Las Vegas and Phoenix.
This makes sense. Prices increased rapidly in these markets in 2012 and 2013 (bouncing off the bottom with low inventory). Higher prices attracted more people to list their homes. But now that prices have flattened out - and there is plenty of inventory - potential sellers aren't as motivated to list their homes. Unlike following the housing bubble, most of these potential sellers probably don't need to sell, so listings will not grow to the moon!
I still expect overall nationwide inventory to continue to increase, but this is something to watch.
| Year-over-year Change in Active Inventory | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Month | Las Vegas | Phoenix | Sacramento |
| Jan-13 | -58.3% | -11.7% | -61.1% |
| Feb-13 | -53.4% | -8.5% | -51.1% |
| Mar-13 | -42.1% | -5.2% | -37.8% |
| Apr-13 | -24.1% | -4.9% | -10.3% |
| May-13 | -13.2% | -2.1% | 5.3% |
| Jun-13 | 3.7% | -1.6% | 18.3% |
| Jul-13 | 9.0% | -1.6% | 54.3% |
| Aug-13 | 41.1% | 2.4% | 46.8% |
| Sep-13 | 60.5% | 7.8% | 77.3% |
| Oct-13 | 73.4% | 15.7% | 93.2% |
| Nov-13 | 77.4% | 15.2% | 56.8% |
| Dec-13 | 78.6% | 20.9% | 44.2% |
| Jan-14 | 96.2% | 29.6% | 96.3% |
| Feb-14 | 107.3% | 37.7% | 87.8% |
| Mar-14 | 127.9% | 45.5% | 71.2% |
| Apr-14 | 103.1% | 48.8% | 46.3% |
| May-14 | 100.6% | 47.4% | 83.7% |
| Jun-14 | 86.2% | 43.1% | 91.0% |
| Jul-14 | 55.2% | 35.1% | 68.0% |
| Aug-14 | 38.8% | 21.9% | 60.6% |
| Sep-14 | 29.5% | 13.2% | 50.9% |
| Oct-14 | 8.3% | 5.7% | 29.1% |
Monday, November 10, 2014
Sacramento Housing in October: Total Sales down 1% Year-over-year, Equity Sales up 5%, Active Inventory increased 29%
by Calculated Risk on 11/10/2014 06:19:00 PM
About 5 years ago I started following the Sacramento market to look for changes in the mix of houses sold (equity, REOs, and short sales). For a few years, not much changed. But over the last 2+ years we've seen some significant changes with a dramatic shift from foreclosures (REO: lender Real Estate Owned) to short sales, and the percentage of total distressed sales declining sharply.
This data suggests healing in the Sacramento market and other distressed markets are showing similar improvement. Note: The Sacramento Association of REALTORS® started breaking out REOs in May 2008, and short sales in June 2009.
In October 2014, 12.1% of all resales were distressed sales. This was up from 11.1% last month, and down from 16.7% in October 2013. The slight increase was probably seasonal.
The percentage of REOs was at 6.1%, and the percentage of short sales was 6.0%.
Here are the statistics for October.
Click on graph for larger image.
This graph shows the percent of REO sales, short sales and conventional sales.
There has been a sharp increase in conventional sales that started in 2012 (blue) as the percentage of distressed sales declined sharply.
Active Listing Inventory for single family homes increased 29.1% year-over-year (YoY) in October. This was the smallest YoY increase in June 2013, and the YoY increases have been trending down after peaking at close to 100%.
Cash buyers accounted for 20.6% of all sales, down from 23.9% in October 2013 (frequently investors). This has been trending down, and it appears investors are becoming much less of a factor in Sacramento.
Total sales were down 0.8% from October 2013, and conventional equity sales were up 4.6% compared to the same month last year.
Summary: Distressed sales down sharply, cash buyers are down significantly, and inventory up significantly (but increases slowing). This is what we'd expect to see in a healing market. As I've noted before, we are seeing a similar pattern in other distressed areas.
Lawler on Toll Brothers: Net Orders Up, Orders Per Community Down Last Quarter
by Calculated Risk on 11/10/2014 03:58:00 PM
From housing economist Tom Lawler: Toll Brothers: Net Orders Up, Orders Per Community Down Last Quarter; Deliveries Up, Partly on “Spike” in Lumpy “City Living”
From Toll:
"In anticipation of its webcast presentation and related investor meetings on November 13, 2014 at the UBS Building and Building Products 11th Annual CEO Conference in New York City, Toll Brothers, Inc. (NYSE:TOL) (www.tollbrothers.com), the nation's leading builder of luxury homes, today announced preliminary results for contracts, backlog and home building revenues for its fourth quarter and fiscal year ended October 31, 2014. These results are preliminary and unaudited. The Company will announce final totals when it releases fourth quarter and fiscal year earnings results on December 10, 2014 ...”Here are some summary statistics for the quarter ended October 31, 2014 compared to the comparable quarter of 2013.
| Units | Average Sales Price | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quarter Ended: | 10/2014 | 10/2013 | % Chg | 10/2014 | 10/2013 | % Chg |
| Net Orders: Total | 1,282 | 1,183 | 8.4% | $756,786 | $709,214 | 6.7% |
| Traditional | 1,234 | 1,136 | 8.6% | $720,989 | $691,989 | 4.2% |
| City Living | 48 | 37 | 29.7% | $1,677,083 | $1,429,730 | 17.3% |
| Deliveries: Total | 1,807 | 1,485 | 21.7% | $747,205 | $703,367 | 6.2% |
| Traditional | 1,684 | 1,460 | 15.3% | $702,732 | $679,452 | 3.4% |
| City Living | 123 | 25 | 392.0% | $1,356,098 | $2,100,000 | -35.4% |
| Net Orders/Community | 5.01 | 5.17 | -3.1% | |||
| Backlog As of: | 10/2014 | 10/2013 | % Chg | 10/2014 | 10/2013 | % Chg |
| Total | 3,679 | 3,679 | 0.0% | $739,250 | $714,732 | 3.4% |
| Traditional | 3,535 | 3,481 | 1.6% | $708,487 | $690,089 | 2.7% |
| City Living | 144 | 198 | -27.3% | $1,494,444 | $1,147,980 | 30.2% |
Update: The California Budget Surplus
by Calculated Risk on 11/10/2014 01:08:00 PM
In November 2012, I was interviewed by Joe Weisenthal at Business Insider. One of my comments during our discussion on state and local governments was:
I wouldn’t be surprised if we see all of a sudden a report come out, “Hey, we’ve got a balanced budget in California.”At the time that was way out of the consensus view. And a couple of months later California announced a balanced budget, see The California Budget Surplus
The situation has improved significantly since then. Here is the most recent update from California State Controller John Chiang: Controller Releases October Cash Update
State Controller John Chiang today released his monthly report covering California's cash balance, receipts and disbursements in October 2014. Total revenues for the fourth month of Fiscal Year 2014-15 were $6.0 billion, coming in above Budget Act estimates by $662.2 million, or 12.3 percent.This is just one state, but I've been expecting local and state governments (in the aggregate) to add to both GDP and employment in 2014 - and that has happened. I expect this trend to continue in 2015.
For the fiscal year to date (July 1-October 31), total revenues reached $27.9 billion, beating estimates by $1.2 billion, or 4.5 percent.
“Four months into the fiscal year, California's coffers overflow by $1.2 billion. The news comes on the heels of two other positive developments: the vote to strengthen California's rainy-day fund through Proposition 2, and the credit upgrade that followed one day later," Chiang said.
emphasis added


