by Calculated Risk on 7/17/2013 09:10:00 PM

First, here is a price index for commercial real estate that I follow. From CoStar: Commercial Real Estate Recovery Accelerates in May

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE PRICES ADVANCE ACROSS THE BOARD IN MAY: The two broadest measures of aggregate pricing for commercial properties within the CCRSI—the value-weighted U.S. Composite Index and the equal-weighted U.S. Composite Index—increased by 0.7% and 2.0%, respectively, in the month of May 2013, reflecting continued improvement in market fundamentals and increased investment activity. The value-weighted index, which is heavily influenced by larger transactions and typically tracks with high quality core real estate prices, has now increased by 41% from its most recent trough in 2010. For comparison, the equal-weighted index, which is influenced by smaller, more numerous opportunistic transactions, has improved by 10% from its bottom in 2011.
...
DISTRESS SALES DECLINE WITH IMPROVING FUNDAMENTALS: The percentage of commercial property selling at distressed prices declined to an average of 14.1% in April and May, the lowest two-month average on record since 2008. The decline in the number of distressed trades continues to support higher, more consistent pricing and has enhanced market liquidity by giving buyers and sellers greater confidence to do deals.
emphasis added

Note: These are repeat sales indexes - like Case-Shiller for residential - but this is based on far fewer pairs.

Thursday:
• At 8:30 AM, the initial weekly unemployment claims report will be released. The consensus is for an decrease to 344 thousand from 360 thousand last week.

• At 10:00 AM, Testimony by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress, Before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, U.S. Senate. The prepared testimony will be the same as delivered Wednesday, but the Q&A might be interesting.

• Also at 10:00 AM: the Philly Fed manufacturing survey for June. The consensus is for a reading of 9.0, down from 12.5 last month (above zero indicates expansion).

• Also at 10:00 AM, the Conference Board Leading Indicators for June. The consensus is for a 0.3% increase in this index.

by Calculated Risk on 7/17/2013 05:38:00 PM

From housing economist Tom Lawler:

Local realtor reports released since last Friday have been consistent with my early assessment that existing home sales as measured by the National Association of Realtors ran at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.99 million in June, down 3.7% from May’s pace. Limited data suggest that a mild slowdown in all-cash (and investor) buying may be a reason for the dip in June’s sales pace.

CR Note: The NAR is scheduled to report June existing home sales on Monday, July 22nd.  Based on Tom's earlier estimate, the NAR will report inventory at around 2.2 million for June, and months-of-supply around 5.3 (up from 5.1 months in May). This would still be a very low level of inventory - probably the lowest for June since 2002 or so - but a 6.3% year-over-year decline in inventory would be the smallest year-over-year decline since early 2011 (when inventory started to decline sharply).  Note: In May, inventory was down 10.1% compared to May 2012.   These smaller year-over-year declines suggest inventory bottomed earlier this year.

Tom Lawler also sent me the updated table below of short sales, foreclosures and cash buyers for several selected cities in June.

CR Note: Look at the two columns in the table for Total "Distressed" Share. In every area that has reported distressed sales so far, the share of distressed sales is down year-over-year - and down significantly in many areas. 

Also there has been a decline in foreclosure sales in all of these cities except Springfield, Ill.  Even short sales are now starting to decline year-over-year. 

Also, as Tom noted, the percent of cash buyers seems to be down a little in most areas.

	Short Sales Share		Foreclosure Sales Share		Total "Distressed" Share		All Cash Share
	Jun-13	Jun-12	Jun-13	Jun-12	Jun-13	Jun-12	Jun-13	Jun-12
Las Vegas	31.0%	34.2%	9.0%	27.8%	40.0%	62.0%	55.3%	54.0%
Reno	24.0%	37.0%	6.0%	21.0%	30.0%	58.0%
Phoenix	12.7%	32.8%	8.7%	14.1%	21.5%	46.8%	37.5%	46.9%
Sacramento	23.2%	31.0%	7.5%	19.7%	30.7%	50.7%	29.9%	33.4%
Minneapolis	6.0%	9.6%	15.7%	25.1%	21.7%	34.6%
Mid-Atlantic	7.6%	10.2%	6.3%	8.7%	13.9%	18.9%	15.9%	16.5%
Orlando	18.7%	28.5%	18.1%	25.2%	36.8%	53.7%	49.8%	51.7%
So. California*	16.2%	24.4%	9.1%	24.4%	25.3%	48.8%	30.2%	32.3%
Hampton Roads					22.8%	28.8%
Northeast Florida					35.6%	39.9%
Chicago					28.0%	33.0%
Toledo							28.1%	33.0%
Tucson							32.8%	32.9%
Omaha							14.9%	14.4%
Pensacola							29.8%	34.3%
Des Moines							17.5%	18.9%
Houston			8.4%	16.8%
Memphis*			18.2%	29.6%
Birmingham AL			19.4%	26.4%
Springfield IL			12.0%	9.2%
*share of existing home sales, based on property records

by Calculated Risk on 7/17/2013 02:05:00 PM

Fed's Beige Book "Prepared at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and based on information collected on or before July 8, 2013."

Reports from the twelve Federal Reserve Districts indicate that overall economic activity continued to increase at a modest to moderate pace since the previous survey. Manufacturing expanded in most Districts since the previous report, with many Districts reporting increases in new orders, shipments, or production. Most Districts noted that overall consumer spending and auto sales increased during the reporting period. Activity in a wide variety of nonfinancial services was stable or increased in most reporting Districts. Transportation was stable or increased in several Districts. Tourism remained strong in some reporting Districts, although several Districts noted softness from bad weather. Residential real estate and construction activity increased at a moderate to strong pace in all reporting Districts. Commercial real estate market conditions and construction continued to improve across the Districts. Banking conditions generally improved across the Districts. Credit quality improved, while credit standards remained largely unchanged. Agricultural conditions were mixed, as weather patterns varied, while extraction was generally stable or increased.

And on real estate:

Residential real estate activity increased at a moderate to strong pace in most Districts. Most Districts reported increases in home sales. Cleveland noted that June sales of single-family homes were down compared with earlier in the spring but up from last year. Boston, New York, Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas, and San Francisco noted strong residential real estate markets. Home prices increased throughout the majority of the reporting Districts. Boston, New York, Richmond, Atlanta, Minneapolis, Kansas City, and Dallas noted low or declining home inventories and upward pressures on home prices in some areas. Residential construction activity also improved moderately across the Districts, and contacts in New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, Minneapolis, Dallas, and San Francisco reported faster growth in multi-family construction, in particular.

Commercial real estate market conditions continued to improve across most Districts. New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, Minneapolis, and San Francisco reported modest to moderate improvements in nonresidential real estate activity. Dallas reported strong growth in leasing activity for office and industrial space. Boston and Richmond reported that commercial real estate conditions were holding steady or improving, depending on location. Nonresidential construction activity was stable or increased throughout the nation.
emphasis added

Residential real estate continues to be a strong sector for the economy.  Overall this was similar to the previous beige book with economic activity increasing at a "modest to moderate" pace.

by Calculated Risk on 7/17/2013 12:25:00 PM

A few comments:

• Overall the housing starts report was disappointing with total starts at a 836 thousand rate on a seasonally adjusted annual rate basis (SAAR) in June. This was well below the consensus forecast of 951 thousand SAAR.   Most of the decline was related to the volatile multi-family sector.

• Single family permits were at the highest level since May 2008, and it appears single family starts will increase over the next few months.

• Also housing starts are up significantly from the same period last year. Over the first half of 2013, multi-family starts are up close to 34% from the same period in 2012, and single family starts are up 20%. Those are significant increases in activity. 

• Even with this significant year-over-year increase, housing starts are still very low. Starts averaged 1.5 million per year from 1959 through 2000, and demographics and household formation suggests starts will return to close to that level over the next few years. This suggests significantly more growth in housing starts over the next few years.

Here is an update to the graph comparing multi-family starts and completions. Since it usually takes over a year on average to complete a multi-family project, there is a lag between multi-family starts and completions. Completions are important because that is new supply added to the market, and starts are important because that is future new supply (units under construction is also important for employment).

These graphs use a 12 month rolling total for NSA starts and completions.

Click on graph for larger image.

The blue line is for multifamily starts and the red line is for multifamily completions.

The rolling 12 month total for starts (blue line) has been increasing steadily, and completions (red line) are lagging behind. It is interesting that completions have lagged so far behind starts, and this suggests completions will increase significantly later this year and into 2014 (completions lag starts by about 12 months).

However the level of multi-family starts over the last 12 months - almost to the level in late '90s and early 00's - suggests that future growth in starts will mostly come from single family starts.

The second graph shows single family starts and completions. It usually only takes about 6 months between starting a single family home and completion - so the lines are much closer. The blue line is for single family starts and the red line is for single family completions.

Starts are moving up and completions are following.  Usually single family starts bounce back quickly after a recession, but not this time because of the large overhang of existing housing units. 

Note the low level of single family starts and completions.  The "wide bottom" was what I was forecasting several years ago, and now I expect several years of increasing single family starts and completions.

by Calculated Risk on 7/17/2013 09:29:00 AM

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testimony "Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress" Before the Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives (starts at 10 AM ET):

I emphasize that, because our asset purchases depend on economic and financial developments, they are by no means on a preset course. On the one hand, if economic conditions were to improve faster than expected, and inflation appeared to be rising decisively back toward our objective, the pace of asset purchases could be reduced somewhat more quickly. On the other hand, if the outlook for employment were to become relatively less favorable, if inflation did not appear to be moving back toward 2 percent, or if financial conditions--which have tightened recently--were judged to be insufficiently accommodative to allow us to attain our mandated objectives, the current pace of purchases could be maintained for longer. Indeed, if needed, the Committee would be prepared to employ all of its tools, including an increase the pace of purchases for a time, to promote a return to maximum employment in a context of price stability.
emphasis added

Here is the C-Span Link

Here is the Bloomberg TV link.