by Calculated Risk on 1/28/2013 10:00:00 AM

From the NAR: Pending Home Sales Down in December but Remain on Uptrend

The Pending Home Sales Index,* a forward-looking indicator based on contract signings, fell 4.3 percent to 101.7 in December from 106.3 in November but is 6.9 percent higher than December 2011 when it was 95.1. The data reflect contracts but not closings.
...
Lawrence Yun , NAR chief economist, said there is an uneven uptrend. "The supply limitation appears to be the main factor holding back contract signings in the past month. Still, contract activity has risen for 20 straight months on a year-over-year basis," he said. "Buyer interest remains solid, as evidenced by a separate Realtor® survey which shows that buyer foot traffic is easily outpacing seller traffic."

Yun said shortages of available inventory are limiting sales in some areas. "Supplies of homes costing less than $100,000 are tight in much of the country, especially in the West, so first-time buyers have fewer options," he said ...

The PHSI in the Northeast fell 5.4 percent to 78.8 in December but is 8.4 percent higher than December 2011. In the Midwest the index rose 0.9 percent to 104.8 in December and is 14.4 percent above a year ago. Pending home sales in the South declined 4.5 percent to an index of 111.5 in December but are 10.1 percent higher December 2011. In the West the index fell 8.2 percent in December to 101.0 and is 5.3 percent below a year ago.

Contract signings usually lead sales by about 45 to 60 days, so this would usually be for closed sales in January and February.

As I've noted several times, with limited inventory at the low end and fewer foreclosures, we might see flat or even declining existing home sales. The key for sales is that the number of conventional sales is increasing while foreclosure and short sales decline.

by Calculated Risk on 1/28/2013 09:04:00 AM

People frequently ask how a sector that currently accounts for 2.5% of the US economy can be so important. First, residential investment has large swings during the business cycle, and will probably increase sharply over the next few years. Second, there are spillover effects from housing - meaning housing has a much larger impact on overall economic activity than just "residential investment".

We are starting to see some signs of spillover from Kate Linebaugh and James Hagerty at the WSJ: From Power Tools to Carpets, Housing Recovery Signs Mount

Companies that sell power tools, air conditioners, carpet fibers, furniture and cement mixers are reporting stronger sales for the fourth quarter, providing further evidence that a turnaround in the housing market is taking hold.

... executives at companies exposed to housing are growing more optimistic. Improvement in the sector could help broad tracts of the economy by creating jobs, improving consumer confidence and boosting property-tax receipts for municipalities. Construction typically is a big job creator during expansions, though the industry has been slow to staff up during the current recovery.

"The housing recovery will help lift businesses that have long been dormant," said Mark Vitner, senior economist at Wells Fargo. "People will be fixing up homes to put them up for sale—buying new air conditioners, painting, fixing roofs. As the new-home market picks up, that really feeds into [gross domestic product]."

Weekend:
• Summary for Week Ending Jan 25th
• Schedule for Week of Jan 27th
• Thresholds for QE
• Me, Me, Me

by Calculated Risk on 1/27/2013 09:16:00 PM

This is related to my earlier post on Thresholds for QE, from Binyamin Appelbaum at the NY Times: At Fed, Nascent Debate on When to Slow Asset Buying

The looming question is how much longer the asset purchases will continue.

... the discussion already has begun to swing toward informal thresholds.

Mr. Rosengren said last year that the Fed should certainly continue the purchases until the unemployment rate declines at least below 7.25 percent.

James Bullard, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis ... [told] CNBC that he expected the unemployment rate to drop to near 7 percent by the end of the year and that it would then be appropriate for the Fed to consider suspending its program of asset purchases.

This discussion is just starting, and I don't expect any significant announcements after the FOMC meeting this week.

The Asian markets are mostly green tonight; the Shanghai Composite index is up 1%.

From CNBC: Pre-Market Data and Bloomberg futures: the S&P futures and DOW are flat (fair value).

Oil prices have moved up a little recently with WTI futures at $95.97 per barrel and Brent at $113.27 per barrel. Gasoline prices are up about 5 cents over the last 10 days.

Monday:
• At 8:30 AM ET, Durable Goods Orders for December from the Census Bureau. The consensus is for a 1.6% increase in durable goods orders.

• At 10:00 AM, the NAR will release their Pending Home Sales Index for December. The consensus is for a 0.3% decrease in the index.

• At 10:30 AM, the Dallas Fed Manufacturing Survey for January will be released. This is the last of the regional surveys for January. The consensus is a decrease to 4.0 from 6.8 in December (above zero is expansion).

Weekend:
• Summary for Week Ending Jan 25th
• Schedule for Week of Jan 27th
• Thresholds for QE
• Me, Me, Me

by Calculated Risk on 1/27/2013 05:35:00 PM

Fun on a Sunday with a hat tip to reader Jeff for suggesting this post.

Last year I posted a photo of the early construction phase of the PIMCO Taj Mahal. Now they are working on the interior of the building (building on the left).

The question is: Does completion of the PIMCO building mark the top for bond prices?


Earlier:
• Summary for Week Ending Jan 25th
• Schedule for Week of Jan 27th
• Thresholds for QE
• Me, Me, Me

by Calculated Risk on 1/27/2013 02:42:00 PM

In the schedule for this coming week, I mentioned there is a two day Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting ending on Wednesday, January 30th with the FOMC announcement expected at 2:15 PM ET on Wednesday. No significant changes are expected at this meeting.

At the last meeting, the FOMC set "thresholds" for raising the Fed Funds rate. From the December FOMC statement:

"[The FOMC] anticipates that this exceptionally low range for the federal funds rate will be appropriate at least as long as the unemployment rate remains above 6-1/2 percent, inflation between one and two years ahead is projected to be no more than a half percentage point above the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run goal, and longer-term inflation expectations continue to be well anchored. The Committee views these thresholds as consistent with its earlier date-based guidance."
emphasis added

An interesting question is if the FOMC will set thresholds for reducing or ending the current $85 billion per month in asset purchases (aka Quantitative Easing or QE). Goldman Sachs chief economist Jan Hatzius discussed this possibility last week:

"The rationale for QE thresholds is similar to that for funds rate thresholds, namely that they would help the financial markets understand the Fed's reaction function with respect to changes in the economic outlook. If the committee adopted such an approach, the most likely thresholds would be 7.25% for the unemployment rate, 2.5% for the 1-2 year PCE inflation outlook, and "well anchored" inflation expectations. We would also expect an additional "out," namely that QE must not impair market functioning or create financial imbalances.

Any move to QE thresholds would probably not occur until the spring or summer of 2013. But the future of QE, the criteria for slowing or ending it, and perhaps even the question of whether QE thresholds are desirable in principle are likely to be on the FOMC's agenda as soon as next week."

Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren discussed this in a speech last year:

"My own personal assessment is that as long as inflation and inflation expectations are expected to remain well-behaved in the medium term, we should continue to forcefully pursue asset purchases at least until the national unemployment rate falls below 7.25 percent and then assess the situation.

I think of this number as a threshold, not as a trigger – and the distinction is important. I think of a trigger as a set of conditions that necessarily imply a change in policy. A threshold, unlike a trigger, does not necessarily precipitate a change in policy."

Based on the current FOMC projections of the unemployment rate, this threshold would not be reached until some time in 2014. I don't expect QE thresholds to be announced this week, but this might happen later this year.