by Calculated Risk on 1/09/2013 03:13:00 PM
Wednesday, January 09, 2013
Question #4 for 2013: What will the unemployment rate be in December 2013?
Earlier I posted some questions for this year: Ten Economic Questions for 2013. I'll try to add some thoughts, and maybe some predictions for each question.
Note: Here is a review of my 2012 Forecasts
4) Unemployment Rate: The unemployment rate is still elevated at 7.7% in November [7.8% in the December report]. For the last two years I've been too pessimistic on the unemployment rate because I was expecting some minor bounce back in the participation rate. Instead the participation rate continued to decline.
Maybe 2013 will be the year the participation rate increases a little, or at least stabilizes. Economists at the SF Fed wrote about this last [month]: Will the Jobless Rate Drop Take a Break?
The recent recession was unusual in its depth and its duration. Labor market conditions have remained difficult for a long time. As a result, large numbers of discouraged workers have stopped looking for jobs. A big unknown is whether these workers will stay out of the labor force permanently or enter as the economy recovers. If these workers join the labor force, increasing participation could have a major impact on the unemployment rate in the coming years.What will the unemployment rate be in December 2013?
Forecasting the unemployment rate includes forecasts for economic and payroll growth, and also for changes in the participation rate. Note: The participation rate is the percent of the working age population (16 and over) that is in the labor force.
We can be pretty certain that the participation rate will decline over the next couple of decades based on demographic trends, but it is unclear what will happen in 2013. The participation rate could bounce back (increase), as the Fed paper excerpted above suggests. Or the participation rate could decline further as has happened over the last few years
Here is a table showing the participation and unemployment rates for December since 2008.
| Unemployment and Participation Rate for December each Year | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| December of | Participation Rate | Unemployment Rate | Using December 2010 participation rate1 |
| 2008 | 65.8% | 7.3% | |
| 2009 | 64.6% | 9.9% | |
| 2010 | 64.3% | 9.3% | |
| 2011 | 64.0% | 8.5% | 8.9% |
| 2012 | 63.6% | 7.8% | 8.8% |
| 1This is the estimated unemployment rate assuming the participation rate had stayed at the December 2010 level of 64.3%, and all of the additional participants were unemployed (same employment growth). | |||
The last column shows what would have happened to the unemployment rate if the participation rate had held steady for the last two years. Clearly the declining participation rate played a key role in the decline in the unemployment rate.
I could make an argument for some bounce back in the participation rate (see Fed paper above), and then, with sluggish growth, we'd probably see an increase in the unemployment rate in 2013 to over 8%. However - as we've seen over the last couple of years - sluggish growth probably isn't sufficient to draw many people back into the labor force, and I could make an argument for another decrease in the participation rate.
My guess is the participation rate will remain around 63.6% in 2013, and with sluggish employment growth, the unemployment rate will be in the mid-to-high 7% range in December 2013 (little changed from the current rate).
Here are the ten questions for 2013 and a few predictions:
• Question #1 for 2013: US Fiscal Policy
• Question #2 for 2013: Will the U.S. economy grow in 2013?
• Question #3 for 2013: How many payroll jobs will be added in 2013?
• Question #4 for 2013: What will the unemployment rate be in December 2013?
• Question #5 for 2013: Will the inflation rate rise or fall in 2013?
• Question #6 for 2013: What will happen with Monetary Policy and QE3?
• Question #7 for 2013: What will happen with house prices in 2013?
• Question #8 for 2013: Will Housing inventory bottom in 2013?
• Question #9 for 2013: How much will Residential Investment increase?
• Question #10 for 2013: Europe and the Euro
Question #5 for 2013: Will the inflation rate rise or fall in 2013?
by Calculated Risk on 1/09/2013 12:42:00 PM
Earlier I posted some questions for this year: Ten Economic Questions for 2013. I'll try to add some thoughts, and maybe some predictions for each question.
Note: Here is a review of my 2012 Forecasts
5) Inflation: The Fed has made it clear they will tolerate a little more inflation, but currently the inflation rate is running below the Fed's 2% target. Will the inflation rate rise or fall in 2013?
Here is a look at four key measures of inflation: core CPI (consumer price index), core PCE prices (Personal Consumption Expenditures), median CPI and the trimmed-mean CPI through November 2012.
Click on graph for larger image.
On a year-over-year basis, the median CPI rose 2.2%, the trimmed-mean CPI rose 1.9%, the CPI rose 1.8%, and the CPI less food and energy rose 1.9%. Core PCE is for October and increased 1.7% year-over-year. These measures suggest inflation is mostly below the Fed's target of 2% on a year-over-year basis.
Here is what I wrote last year on inflation:
There are some people who have been predicting an imminent rapid increase in inflation for almost 3 years - in their view, a sharp increase in inflation is always just around the corner. That view has consistently been wrong, although some people also claim the government measures are not correct and that inflation is much higher than reported.I could just repeat that post with a few of minor changes. The first change is QE3 has already been announced. A second change is that now some people who have been predicting an imminent rapid increase in inflation for almost 4 years! Always wrong, but never in doubt.
However private measures show similar results as BEA and BLS measures (see The Billion Prices Project). ...
The bottom line is the inflation rate will probably stay low in 2012 with high unemployment and low resource utilization. I expect QE3 to be announced before mid-year, and that will probably keep the inflation rate near the Fed's target (as opposed to falling further). But I don't see inflation as a significant threat in 2012.
A third possible change is related to the recent FOMC statement that indicated the Fed will tolerate an inflation outlook "between one and two years ahead" of 2 1/2 percent. Given the Fed's tolerance for a little more inflation, we might see a little more inflation in 2013 than in 2012 - but I still expect inflation to be near the Fed's target. With high unemployment and low resource utilization, I don't see inflation as a threat in 2013.
Here are the ten questions for 2013 and a few predictions:
• Question #1 for 2013: US Fiscal Policy
• Question #2 for 2013: Will the U.S. economy grow in 2013?
• Question #3 for 2013: How many payroll jobs will be added in 2013?
• Question #4 for 2013: What will the unemployment rate be in December 2013?
• Question #5 for 2013: Will the inflation rate rise or fall in 2013?
• Question #6 for 2013: What will happen with Monetary Policy and QE3?
• Question #7 for 2013: What will happen with house prices in 2013?
• Question #8 for 2013: Will Housing inventory bottom in 2013?
• Question #9 for 2013: How much will Residential Investment increase?
• Question #10 for 2013: Europe and the Euro
Reis: Mall Vacancy Rate declines in Q4
by Calculated Risk on 1/09/2013 09:19:00 AM
Reis reported that the vacancy rate for regional malls declined to 8.6% in Q4 from 8.7% in Q3. This is down from a cycle peak of 9.4% in Q3 2011.
For Neighborhood and Community malls (strip malls), the vacancy rate declined to 10.7% in Q4, down from 10.8% in Q3. For strip malls, the vacancy rate peaked at 11.1% in Q3 2011.
Comments from Reis Senior Economist Ryan Severino:
[Strip mall] Vacancy declined by only 10 bps during the fourth quarter. This was an improvement versus the third quarter when the vacancy rate was unchanged. On a year‐over‐year basis, the vacancy rate declined by only 30 bps. During the quarter absorption exceeded construction by a sufficient enough margin to lower the vacancy rate, but only marginally. With only 915,000 square feet delivered, more robust demand would cause vacancy to compress expeditiously. But even with so few completions occurring, the economy is not generating enough demand for space.
...
Asking and effective rents grew by 0.2% and 0.1%, respectively, during the quarter. This was only a negligible increase versus the third quarter when both metrics increased by just 0.1%. It was the fifth consecutive quarter that asking and effective rents have increased.
...
[New construction] With tepid retail sales and scant demand for space, new construction remained near record‐low levels during the quarter. 915,000 square feet were delivered during the fourth quarter, versus 723,000 square feet during the third quarter. However, this is a slowdown compared to the 2.951 million square feet of retail space that were delivered during the fourth quarter of 2011. In fact, 915,000 square feet is the fifth‐lowest figure on record since Reis began tracking quarterly data in 1999.
...
[Regional] Malls continue to outperform their neighborhood and community shopping center comrades. The vacancy rate declined by another 10 basis points during the quarter. This is the fifth consecutive quarter with a vacancy decline. Asking rent growth declined slightly versus last quarter, growing by another 0.2%. This was the seventh consecutive quarter of asking rent increases. The improvement in mall subsector remains consistent if not exhilarating.
Click on graph for larger image.This graph shows the strip mall vacancy rate starting in 1980 (prior to 2000 the data is annual). The regional mall data starts in 2000. Back in the '80s, there was overbuilding in the mall sector even as the vacancy rate was rising. This was due to the very loose commercial lending that led to the S&L crisis.
In the mid-'00s, mall investment picked up as mall builders followed the "roof tops" of the residential boom (more loose lending). This led to the vacancy rate moving higher even before the recession started. Then there was a sharp increase in the vacancy rate during the recession and financial crisis.
The yellow line shows mall investment as a percent of GDP through Q3. This has increased from the bottom because this includes renovations and improvements. New mall investment has essentially stopped.
The good news is, as Severino noted, new square footage is near a record low, and with very little new supply, the vacancy rate will probably continue to decline slowly.
Mall vacancy data courtesy of Reis.
Tuesday, January 08, 2013
Wednesday: Mall Vacancy Rate
by Calculated Risk on 1/08/2013 09:10:00 PM
Over there ... from the NY Times: Unemployment Rises to New High in Euro Zone
The euro zone jobless rate rose to 11.8 percent in November from 11.7 percent in October, according to Eurostat, the statistical agency of the European Union. Eurostat estimated that 18.8 million people in the euro zone were unemployed in November, two million more than a year earlier.Austerity at work. The beatings will continue until morale improves.
... on Tuesday, the Federal Statistics Office in Berlin said that German exports declined 3.4 percent while imports slid 3.7 percent in November from a month earlier. The weakness narrowed Germany’s trade surplus to €14.6 billion ...
Wednesday economic releases:
• Early: Reis Q4 2012 Mall survey of rents and vacancy rates. In Q3 Reis reported the regional mall vacancy rate declined to 8.7%, from 8.9% in Q2. The vacancy rate peaked at 9.4% in Q3 2011. For Neighborhood and Community malls (strip malls), the vacancy rate was unchanged at 10.8% in Q3. For strip malls, the vacancy rate peaked at 11.0% in Q2 2011.
• At 7:00 AM ET, the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will release the results for the mortgage purchase applications index.
Las Vegas Real Estate: Sales and Inventory decreased year-over-year in December
by Calculated Risk on 1/08/2013 04:27:00 PM
This is a key distressed market to follow since Las Vegas has seen the largest price decline of any of the Case-Shiller composite 20 cities.
From the GLVAR: GLVAR reports home prices increased 24 percent in 2012,ranking as third best sales year ever
GLVAR said the total number of local homes, condominiums and townhomes sold in December was 3,624. That’s up from 3,293 in November, but down from 4,250 total sales in December 2011. Compared to November, single-family home sales during December increased by 10.4 percent, while sales of condos and townhomes increased by 8.5 percent. Compared to one year ago, home sales were down 14.3 percent, while condo and townhome sales were down 16.5 percent.A few key points:
...
The total number of homes listed for sale on GLVAR’s Multiple Listing Service declined in December, with a total of 14,601 single-family homes listed for sale at the end of the month. That’s down 6.6 percent from 15,637 homes listed for sale at the end of November and down 24.1 percent from one year ago. ...
[T]he number of available homes listed for sale without any sort of pending or contingent offer by the end of December, GLVAR reported 3,688 single-family homes listed without any sort of offer. That’s down 4.2 percent from 3,849 such homes listed in November and down 58.2 percent from one year ago.
...
GLVAR’s statistics through December 2012 show a dramatic transition from foreclosures to short sales – which occur when a lender agrees to sell a home for less than what the borrower owes on the mortgage. The percentage of existing homes sold as part of a short sale set a new record in December, accounting for 45.8 percent of all sales. Foreclosures, which made up more than half of all sales a few years ago, accounted for only 9.5 percent of all sales in December 2012.
• Inventory decreased in December, and inventory is down 24.1% from Decmeber 2011. For single family homes without contingent offers, inventory is down sharply from a year ago (down 58.2% year-over-year).
• Short sales are more than four times foreclosures now. The GLVAR reported a record 45.8% of sales were short sales in December, and only 9.5% foreclosures. We've seen a shift from foreclosures to short sales in most areas (not just in areas with new foreclosure laws). Note: Some of the surge in short sales might have been to beat the expiration of the Mortgage Debt Relief Act of 2007. The Act was extended as part of the fiscal deal, so the number of short sales should remain high in 2013.
• The decline in overall sales is because of fewer foreclosure sales (Las Vegas had a record number of real estate sales in 2011, even higher than at the peak of the bubble in 2005, because of all the distressed sales!). As the market slowly recovers, the number of distressed sales should fall and the number of conventional sales should rise. This has been happening in Las Vegas, although distressed sales were up some in December compared to November due to seasonal factors.
Overall this is a slowly improving distressed market. Note: I ignore the median price because that is impacted by the mix.


