by Calculated Risk on 1/24/2012 10:55:00 AM

From the BLS: Regional and State Employment and Unemployment Summary

Regional and state unemployment rates were slightly lower in December. Thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia recorded unemployment rate decreases, 3 states posted rate increases, and 10 states had no rate change, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Forty-six states registered unemployment rate decreases from a year earlier, while four states and the District of Columbia experienced increases.
...
Nevada continued to record the highest unemployment rate among the states, 12.6 percent in December. California posted the next highest rate, 11.1 percent. North Dakota again registered the lowest jobless rate, 3.3 percent ...

Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.

This graph shows the current unemployment rate for each state (red), and the max during the recession (blue). Every state has some blue - indicating no state is currently at the maximum during the recession.

The states are ranked by the highest current unemployment rate. Only four states and the District of Columbia still have double digit unemployment rates. This is the fewest since early 2009. At the end of 2009, 18 states and D.C. had double digit unemployment rates.


All current employment graphs

by Calculated Risk on 1/24/2012 10:00:00 AM

From the Richmond Fed: Manufacturing Activity Picks Up the Pace in January; Expectations Upbeat

In January, the seasonally adjusted composite index of manufacturing activity — our broadest measure of manufacturing — increased nine points to 12 from December's reading of 3.

Labor market conditions at District plants strengthened in January. The manufacturing employment index moved up eight points to end at 4, and the average workweek indicator added one point to 4. Wage growth remained modest, matching its three-month average of 10.

In our January survey, our contacts were more bullish about their business prospects for the next six months. The index of expected shipments increased nine points to 36, expected orders gained eleven points to finish at 32, and backlogs added eight points to 14. The capacity utilization and vendor delivery times indexes each rose nine points to finish at 11 and 20, respectively. Moreover, readings for planned capital expenditures moved up eight points to finish at 15.

District manufacturers' hiring plans in January were somewhat more optimistic as well. The expected manufacturing employment index edged up three points to 20, while the average workweek indicator held steady at 7. The index of expected wages was virtually unchanged at 19.

This was above the consensus of a reading of 6. This follows the reports of somewhat faster expansion from the Philly Fed and Empire State surveys.

by Calculated Risk on 1/24/2012 08:39:00 AM

From the Athens News: Eurogroup rejects PSI deal

Eurozone finance ministers on Monday gave the thumbs-down to a plan for private sector involvement (PSI) in the writedown on Greek debt.
...
"We told him [Venizelos] to continue the negotiations [with Dallara] until the interest rate comes down below 4 percent," Eurogroup chairman Jean-Claude Juncker told a news conference in Brussels late on Monday.

Juncker was referring to the average interest rate (annual coupon) of the new 30-year bonds that will be issued to bondholders after the haircut of 50 percent on the face value of their portfolio.

From the WSJ: EU Ministers Resume Crisis Talks

The International Monetary Fund and the euro zone's four triple-A-rated countries—Germany, the Netherlands, Finland and Luxembourg—are pushing for a low average interest rate on new bonds to be issued as part of the restructuring ...

"Obviously Greece and the banks have to do more in order to reach a sustainable debt level," Dutch Finance Minister Jan Kees de Jager said ... He said debt restructuring terms that ensure a sustainable debt level is "absolutely a precondition" for a second EU bailout package for Greece.

Of course Greece is a small part of the problem, also from the WSJ: Fears Mount That Portugal Will Need a Second Bailout

by Calculated Risk on 1/23/2012 08:46:00 PM

The FHFA released their analysis on the effectiveness of principal reductions for Fannie and Freddie loans. The FHFA analysis showed that principal reductions would be more costly for taxpayers than other alternatives.

Here is the letter: FHFA Releases Analysis on Principal Forgiveness As Loss Mitigation Tool

Here is the analysis: FHFA Analyses of Principal Forgiveness Loan Modifications.

In considering principal forgiveness, FHFA compared taxpayer losses from principal forgiveness versus principal forbearance, which is an alternate approach that the Enterprises currently undertake to fulfill their mission at a lower cost to the taxpayer. FHFA based its conclusion that principal forgiveness results in a lower net present value than principal forbearance on an analysis initially prepared in December 2010, which is attached, along with updated analyses produced in June and December 2011, which are also attached.

Putting this determination in context, as of June 30, 2011, the Enterprises had nearly three million first lien mortgages with outstanding balances estimated to be greater than the value of the home, as measured using FHFA’s House Price Index. FHFA estimates that principal forgiveness for all of these mortgages would require funding of almost $100 billion to pay down mortgages to the value of the homes securing them. This would be in addition to the credit losses both Enterprises are currently experiencing.

Another factor to consider is that nearly 80 percent of Enterprise underwater borrowers were current on their mortgages as of June 30, 2011. (Even for more deeply underwater borrowers – those with mark-to-market loan-to-value ratios above 115 percent, 74 percent are current.) This trend contrasts with non-Enterprise loans, where many underwater borrowers are delinquent.

Given that any money spent on this endeavor would ultimately come from taxpayers and given that our analysis does not indicate a preservation of assets for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac substantial enough to offset costs, an expenditure of this nature at this time would, in my judgment, require congressional action.
...
While it is not in the best interests of taxpayers for FHFA to require the Enterprises to offer principal forgiveness to high LTV borrowers, a principal forgiveness strategy might reduce losses for other loan holders. Indeed, in several of the examples cited, such as Ocwen and Wells Fargo, principal forgiveness is being offered to borrowers whose loans the investor or servicer purchased at a discount, which would likely change the analytics significantly. ... Additionally, less than ten percent of borrowers with Enterprise loans have negative equity in their homes (9.9 percent in June 2011), whereas loans backing private label securities were more than three times more likely to have negative equity (35.5 percent in June 2011).

This is reminder that Fannie and Freddie loans were much better than the private label loans.

As an aside: Here is a table from the report (as of June 30, 2010). This shows the total loans, the UPB (Unpaid Principal Balance) and the number of loans current. Of course house prices have fallen over the last 18 months, and there have been other changes (refinances, foreclosures, home sales), but this gives an idea of the number of HARP eligible loans for refinancing once the program becomes automated in March. HARP will apply to all current loans with LTV greater than 80% (about 7 million loans).

Note: There are just over 50 million first mortgage liens, so as of June 2010, Fannie and Freddie held about 60% of the mortgages - but a much smaller percentage of the delinquent loans.

Fannie and Freddie: MTM LTV Distribution June 30, 2010
	UPB ($ Billions)	Total Loans (000s)	Percent of UPB	Current (000s)	Percent Current
LTV Missing	$27.5	346	1.1%	315	91.0%
LTV <= 80%	$2,994.4	21,547	71.2%	20,821	96.6%
80 < LTV < 105	$1,206.5	6,461	21.4%	5,801	89.8%
105 < LTV < 115	$140.2	704	2.3%	512	72.8%
115 < LTV <= 150	$235.9	1,069	3.5%	804	75.2%
LTV > 150%	$29.6	135	0.4%	43	31.8%
Total	$4,634.1	30,262	100.0%	28,296
Source: Historical Loan Performance dataset. Excludes modifications and foreclosure alternatives. LTVs updated using FHFA's Monthly Purchase Only House Price Index.

by Calculated Risk on 1/23/2012 06:58:00 PM

The Department of Transportation (DOT) reported:

• Travel on all roads and streets changed by -0.9% (-2.1 billion vehicle miles) for November 2011 as compared with November 2010.

• Travel for the month is estimated to be 240.9 billion vehicle miles.

• Cumulative Travel for 2011 changed by -1.4% (-38.3 billion vehicle miles).

The following graph shows the rolling 12 month total vehicle miles driven.

Click on graph for larger image.

In the early '80s, miles driven (rolling 12 months) stayed below the previous peak for 39 months.

Currently miles driven has been below the previous peak for 48 months - and still counting! And not just moving sideways ... the rolling 12 month total is still declining.

The second graph shows the year-over-year change from the same month in the previous year.

This is the ninth straight month with a year-over-year decline in miles driven, although this is the smallest decline for 2011.

The decline in miles driven is probably due to a combination of high gasoline prices, a sluggish economy and some changes in driving habits.