by Calculated Risk on 7/26/2011 10:00:00 AM
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
New Home Sales in June at 312,000 Annual Rate
The Census Bureau reports New Home Sales in June were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 312 thousand. This was down from a revised 315 thousand in May (revised from 319 thousand).
The first graph shows New Home Sales vs. recessions since 1963. The dashed line is the current sales rate.
Sales of new single-family houses in June 2011 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 312,000 ... This is 1.0 percent (±12.5%)* below the revised May rate of 315,000, but is 1.6 percent (±14.1%)* above the June 2010 estimate of 307,000.
Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.The second graph shows New Home Months of Supply.
Months of supply decreased to 6.3 in June from 6.4 months in May. The all time record was 12.1 months of supply in January 2009. This is still higher than normal (less than 6 months supply is normal).

The seasonally adjusted estimate of new houses for sale at the end of June was 164,000. This represents a supply of 6.3 months at the current sales rate.On inventory, according to the Census Bureau:
"A house is considered for sale when a permit to build has been issued in permit-issuing places or work has begun on the footings or foundation in nonpermit areas and a sales contract has not been signed nor a deposit accepted."
Starting in 1973 the Census Bureau broke this down into three categories: Not Started, Under Construction, and Completed.This graph shows the three categories of inventory starting in 1973.
The inventory of completed homes for sale fell to 60,000 units in June. The combined total of completed and under construction is at the lowest level since this series started.
The last graph shows sales NSA (monthly sales, not seasonally adjusted annual rate).In June 2011 (red column), 29 thousand new homes were sold (NSA). The record low for June was 28 thousand in 2010 (following the expiration of the homebuyer tax credit). The high for June was 115 thousand in 2005.
This was below the consensus forecast of 321 thousand, and was just above the record low for the month of June - and new home sales have averaged only 300 thousand SAAR over the 14 months since the expiration of the tax credit ... moving sideways at a very low level.
Case Shiller: Home Prices increase in May
by Calculated Risk on 7/26/2011 09:00:00 AM
S&P/Case-Shiller released the monthly Home Price Indices for May (actually a 3 month average of March, April and May).
This includes prices for 20 individual cities and and two composite indices (for 10 cities and 20 cities).
Note: Case-Shiller reports NSA, I use the SA data.
From S&P: Some More Seasonal Improvement in Home Prices
Data through May 2011 ... showed a second consecutive month of increase in prices for the 10- and 20-City Composites. The 10- and 20-City Composites were up 1.1% and 1.0%, respectively, in May over April. Sixteen of the 20 MSAs and both Composites posted positive monthly increases; Detroit, Las Vegas and Tampa were down over the month and Phoenix was unchanged.
...
In May 2011, the 10- and 20-City Composites recorded annual returns of -3.6% and -4.5%, respectively. Both Composites and 11 MSAs – Atlanta, Dallas, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, New York, Phoenix, San Diego, Seattle and Tampa – saw their annual rates worsen in May compared to April.
Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery. The first graph shows the nominal seasonally adjusted Composite 10 and Composite 20 indices (the Composite 20 was started in January 2000).
The Composite 10 index is off 31.8% from the peak, and up slightly in May (SA). The Composite 10 is 1.7% above the May 2009 post-bubble bottom (Seasonally adjusted).
The Composite 20 index is off 31.8% from the peak, and down slightly in May (SA). The Composite 20 is slightly above the March 2011 post-bubble bottom seasonally adjusted.
The second graph shows the Year over year change in both indices.The Composite 10 SA is down 3.6% compared to May 2010.
The Composite 20 SA is down 4.5% compared to May 2010.
The third graph shows the price declines from the peak for each city included in S&P/Case-Shiller indices.
Prices increased (SA) in 9 of the 20 Case-Shiller cities in May seasonally adjusted. Prices in Las Vegas are off 59% from the peak, and prices in Dallas only off 9.5% from the peak.From S&P (NSA):
As of May 2011, 16 of the 20 MSAs and both Composites posted positive monthly changes. Phoenix was flat. Detroit, Las Vegas and Tampa were the markets where levels fell in May versus April, with Detroit down by 2.8% and Las Vegas posting its eighth consecutive monthly decline. These three cities also posted new index level lows in May 2011. They are now 51.2%, 59.3% and 47.5% below their 2005-6 peak levels, respectively.There could be some confusion between the SA and NSA numbers, but this improvement is mostly seasonal. I'll have more ...
Monday, July 25, 2011
Busy Day Tomorrow: Case-Shiller and New Home Sales
by Calculated Risk on 7/25/2011 10:18:00 PM
The Asian markets are mostly green tonight, with the Hang Seng up 0.75%.
From CNBC: Pre-Market Data and Bloomberg futures: the S&P 500 is off about 4 points, and Dow futures are off about 25 points.
Tuesday ...
9:00 AM: S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index for May. Although this is the May report, it is really a 3 month average of March, April and May. The consensus is for flat prices in May, however I expect prices to increase NSA.
10:00 AM: New Home Sales for June. The consensus is for a slight increase in sales to 321 thousand Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR) in June from 319 thousand in May.
10:00 AM: Richmond Fed Survey of Manufacturing Activity for July. The consensus is for the index to be at 4, up from 3 in June (above zero is expansion).
Update on Europe
by Calculated Risk on 7/25/2011 07:10:00 PM
UPDATE: President Obama Press Conference at 9PM ET.
From the WSJ: Europe Rates Resume Climb
By Monday afternoon, Spain's [Ten year] debt was being traded at a yield of 6%, or 3.24 percentage points above the rate on German bonds, seen as a risk-free investment. The rate represented an upswing from 5.7% last Thursday, just as news of the new bailout deal for Greece began to emerge. On July 18, the rate hit 6.3%.Yields moved higher today, but are still below the previous peaks. The Greek 2 year yield is up to 28.1% (was above 39%).
Italy was paying 5.5%, up from 5.2% on Thursday, but down from 5.8% on July 18.
The Portuguese 2 year yield is down to 15.3% (was above 20%)
The Irish 2 year yield is up to 15.4% (was above 23%).
The Italian 2 year yield is up to 4.0%. And the Spanish 2 year yield is up to 4.2%.
Here are the links for bond yields for several countries (source: Bloomberg):
| Greece | 2 Year | 5 Year | 10 Year |
| Portugal | 2 Year | 5 Year | 10 Year |
| Ireland | 2 Year | 5 Year | 10 Year |
| Spain | 2 Year | 5 Year | 10 Year |
| Italy | 2 Year | 5 Year | 10 Year |
| Belgium | 2 Year | 5 Year | 10 Year |
| France | 2 Year | 5 Year | 10 Year |
| Germany | 2 Year | 5 Year | 10 Year |
Be careful with the Housing Vacancies and Homeownership report
by Calculated Risk on 7/25/2011 03:58:00 PM
This is more technical for analyst and reporters: On Friday the Census Bureau will release the Q2 Housing Vacancies and Homeownership. This report is frequently mentioned by analysts and the media to track the homeownership rate, and the homeowner and rental vacancy rates. Unfortunately the report is based on a fairly small sample, and does not track the decennial Census data.
Economist Tom Lawler has pointed out the discrepancies in the homeownership rate before, and he points out that the vacancy rates are "silly" too.
From economist Tom Lawler: HVS Rental Vacancy Rate Silliness: The Case of Richmond, Virginia
In early 2009 the Richmond, Virginia press wrote numerous articles after quarterly HVS data on metro area rental vacancy rates “showed” that the rental vacancy rate in the Richmond, Virginia metro area in the fourth quarter of 2008 was 23.7%, the highest in the country. This shocked local real estate folks, including folks who tracked rental vacancy rates in apartment buildings in the area. The Central Virginia Apartment Association, e.g., found that the rental vacancy rate based on a survey of 52 multi-family properties in the Richmond, VA metro area was around 8% -- above a more “normal” 5%, but no where close to 23.7%. And while the HVS attempts to measure the overall rental vacancy rate (and not just MF apartments for rent), the data seemed “whacky.”
When I talked to Census folks back then, they said that there quarterly metro area vacancy rates were extremely volatile and had extremely high standard errors, and that folks should focus on annual data.
However, “annual average” data from the HVS showed MASSIVELY different rental vacancy rates in Richmond, Virginia than did the American Community Survey, which also produces estimates of the vacancy rate in the overall rental market.
Here are some annual data comparisons of the HVS rental vacancy rate and the American Community Survey (ACS) rental vacancy rate (which is also for the overall rental market) from 2006 through 2009, as well as the Census 2010 rental vacancy rate for April 1, 2010.
| HVS Rental Vacancy Rates: The Case of Richmond, VA Metro Area | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| HVS (annual average) | ACS (annual average) | Census 2010 (April 1) | |
| 2006 | 13.8% | 8.1% | |
| 2007 | 16.3% | 8.1% | |
| 2008 | 20.8% | 9.1% | |
| 2009 | 18.5% | 7.8% | |
| 2010 | 13.5% | 8.8% | |
I am showing Richmond not because it is the most “outlandish,” but rather because the HVS data “mistakes” create huge confusion in the local press. Census analysts had no clue why the HVS data produced such outlandish estimates relative to the ACS – it could be massive sampling errors, significant non-sampling errors, or both.
There are several other MSAs where the HVS rental vacancy rates just look plain “silly.” Some Census analysts agree that the HVS MSA data aren’t reliable, and even that several state data aren’t reliable, but, well, er, the national data are probably “ok” – which they are not.
From CR: Media and Analysts: There are serious questions about this report. Here are some previous post by Lawler on the HVS:
• Census Bureau on Homeownership Rate: We've got “Some 'Splainin' to Do”
• Lawler: Census 2010 and the US Homeownership Rate
• Lawler: Census 2010 Demographic Profile: Highlights, Excess Housing Supply Estimate, and Comparison to HVS
• Lawler: The “Excess Supply of Housing” War
• Lawler: Census Releases Demographic Profile of 12 States and DC: Confirms Bias of HVS
• Lawler: Census 2010 and Excess Vacant Housing Units
• Lawler: On Census Housing Stock/Household Data
• Lawler: Housing Vacancy Survey appears to massively overstate number of vacant housing units
• Lawler: US Households: Why Researchers / Analysts are “Confused”


