by Calculated Risk on 7/25/2011 01:49:00 PM

From James Surowiecki at the New Yorker: Smash the Ceiling

The truth is that the United States doesn’t need, and shouldn’t have, a debt ceiling. Every other democratic country, with the exception of Denmark, does fine without one. There’s no debt limit in the Constitution. And, if Congress really wants to hold down government debt, it already has a way to do so that doesn’t risk economic chaos—namely, the annual budgeting process. The only reason we need to lift the debt ceiling, after all, is to pay for spending that Congress has already authorized.
...
One argument you hear for having a debt ceiling is that it’s useful as what the political theorist Jon Elster calls a “precommitment device”—a way of keeping ourselves from acting recklessly in the future, like Ulysses protecting himself from the Sirens by having himself bound to the mast. As precommitment devices go, however, the debt limit is both too weak and too strong. It’s too weak because Congress can simply vote to lift it, as it has done more than seventy times in the past fifty years. But it’s too strong because its negative consequences (default, higher interest rates, financial turmoil) are disastrously out of proportion to the behavior it’s trying to regulate. For the U.S. to default now, when investors are happily lending it money at exceedingly reasonable rates, would be akin to shooting yourself in the head for failing to follow your diet.

The smart option: Eliminate the debt ceiling!

Note: Still no worries. The debt ceiling will be raised.

by Calculated Risk on 7/25/2011 10:30:00 AM

From the Dallas Fed: Texas Manufacturing Activity Picks Up

Texas factory activity expanded in July, according to business executives responding to the Texas Manufacturing Outlook Survey. The production index, a key measure of state manufacturing conditions, rose from 5.6 to 10.8, suggesting output growth picked up this month.

The new orders index rose sharply from 6.4 in June to 16 in July. ... Labor market indicators reflected more hiring and longer workweeks. The employment index came in at 12.1, up from 5.3 in June. Twenty-two percent of manufacturers reported hiring new workers, the highest share this year. The hours worked index rose from 1.5 to 7.9.

There are two more regional manufacturing surveys that will be released this week (Richmond and Kansas City), and those surveys will probably show a slight improvement too.

by Calculated Risk on 7/25/2011 08:30:00 AM

No surprise (this is a composite index) ... from the Chicago Fed: Index shows economic growth again below average in June

The Chicago Fed National Activity Index increased to –0.46 in June from –0.55 in May; however, the index remained negative for the third consecutive month. Three of the four broad categories of indicators that make up the index improved in June, but only one made a positive contribution to the index.

The index’s three-month moving average, CFNAI-MA3, declined to –0.60 in June from –0.31 in May, remaining negative for a third consecutive month and reaching its lowest level since October 2009.

This graph shows the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (three month moving average) since 1967.

Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.

According to the Chicago Fed:

A zero value for the index indicates that the national economy is expanding at its historical trend rate of growth; negative values indicate below-average growth; and positive values indicate above-average growth.

This index suggests the economy was still growing in June, but below trend.

by Calculated Risk on 7/24/2011 09:45:00 PM

They seem crazy, but are they insane? I don't think so. And investors don't think so either ... at least not yet.

The Asian markets are barely red tonight, with the Nikkei off 0.6%.

From CNBC: Pre-Market Data and Bloomberg futures: the S&P 500 is off about 11 points, and Dow futures are off about 105 points.

A couple of articles, but nothing new ...

From the WaPo: Debt-limit talks at a standstill as parallel strategies take shape in House, Senate

From the WSJ: Gridlock for Debt Talks

Yesterday:
• Summary for Week Ending July 22nd
• Schedule for Week of July 24th

by Calculated Risk on 7/24/2011 06:34:00 PM

Tracking the participation rate for various age groups monthly is a little like watching paint dry, but the trends are important. Here is a look at some the long term trends (updated graphs through June 2011).

The following graph shows the changes in the participation rates for men and women since 1960 (in the 25 to 54 age group - the prime working years).

The participation rate for women increased significantly from the mid 30s to the mid 70s and has mostly flattened out - although the rate has been declining recently (down to 74.6% in June). The participation rate for men has decreased from the high 90s to 89.0% in June 2011. (down slightly from May)

Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.

There will probably be some "bounce back" for both men and women (some of the recent decline is probably cyclical), but the long term trend for men is down.

The next graph shows that participation rates for several key age groups.

There are a few key long term trends:
• The participation rate for the '16 to 19' age group has been falling for some time (red). This at 34% in June.

• The participation rate for the 'over 55' age group has been rising since the mid '90s (purple), although this has stalled out a little recently (perhaps cyclical).

• The participation rate for the '20 to 24' age group fell recently too (perhaps more people are focusing on eduction before joining the labor force). This appears to have stabilized - although it was down to 70.5% in June, and I expect the participation rate to increase for this cohort as the job market improves.

The third graph shows the participation rate for several over 55 age groups. The red line is the '55 and over' total seasonally adjusted. All of the other age groups are Not Seasonally Adjusted (NSA).

The participation rate is generally trending up for all older age groups.

The increase in participation of older cohorts might push up the overall participation rate over the next few years, however eventually the 'over 55' participation rate will start to decline as the oldest baby boomers move into even older age groups.

I've been expecting some small bounce back in the participation rate, but I don't think the bounce back will be huge - and we haven't seen it yet. This will be a key number to watch over the next few years.

Yesterday:
• Summary for Week Ending July 22nd
• Schedule for Week of July 24th