by Calculated Risk on 9/12/2010 09:00:00 AM

It was a light week for economic news ...

Trade Deficit declines in July

The Census Bureau reports:

[T]otal July exports of $153.3 billion and imports of $196.1 billion resulted in a goods and services deficit of $42.8 billion, down from $49.8 billion in June, revised.

Click on graph for larger image.

The first graph shows the monthly U.S. exports and imports in dollars through June 2010.

Although imports declined in July, imports have been increasing much faster than exports.

The second graph shows the U.S. trade deficit, with and without petroleum, through July.

The blue line is the total deficit, and the black line is the petroleum deficit, and the red line is the trade deficit ex-petroleum products.

The decrease in the deficit in July was across the board, although the oil deficit only declined slightly. The trade gap with China declined slightly to $25.92 billion from $26.15 billion in June - essentially unchanged.

This is the 2nd largest monthly trade deficit since the 2008 collapse in trade.

Consumer Credit Declines in July

The Federal Reserve reports:

In July, total consumer credit decreased at an annual rate of 1-3/4 percent. Revolving credit decreased at an annual rate of 6-1/4
percent, and nonrevolving credit increased at an annual rate of 1/2 percent.

This graph shows the increase in consumer credit since 1978. The amounts are nominal (not inflation adjusted).

Revolving credit (credit card debt) is off 15.2% from the peak. Non-revolving debt (auto, furniture, and other loans) is off 1.1% from the peak. Note: Consumer credit does not include real estate debt.

Other Economic Stories ...

From the Federal Reserve: Beige book Continued growth, but "widespread signs of a deceleration"

Housing Completions will set new record low in 2010

The MBA reports: Mortgage Purchase Applications Up, Refinance Applications Fall Slightly in Latest MBA Weekly Survey

From the BLS: Job Openings increases in July, Low Labor Turnover

Unofficial Problem Bank List increases to 849 institutions

Best wishes to all.

by Calculated Risk on 9/11/2010 07:52:00 PM

Here is a new paper on EU Sovereign debt exposures. (ht Mark Whitehouse at the WSJ: Number of the Week: Hiding Europe’s Unpleasant Details)

From Blundell-Wignall, A. and P. Slovik (2010), “The EU Stress Test and Sovereign Debt Exposures”

The EU-wide stress test did not include haircuts for sovereign debt held in the banking books of banks on the grounds that over the 2 years considered default is virtually impossible in the presence of the EFSF [European Financial Stability Facility Special Purpose Vehicle], which is certainly large enough to meet funding needs of the main countries of concern over that period.

The haircuts applied to the trading book in the stress test are shown in the first block of Table 1. The trading book exposures (not reported in the stress test paper) are also shown. The EU wide loss from the haircut is around €26. bn. The contribution of the 5 countries where most of the market focus has been (Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Italy and Spain) is only €14.4bn.

Click on table for larger image in new window.

A different picture emerges when we consider the banking book. First it is important to note that the EU banking book sovereign exposures are very much larger than those of the trading book—around 83% of the total. If the same haircuts are applied to these exposures the loss amounts to €139bn, or 12% of the Tier 1 capital of the EU banks at the end of 2009 (and €165bn and over 14% of Tier 1 if trading book losses are added in). The haircuts of the 5 countries of market focus amount to €75.8bn in the banking book, and €90.2bn if the trading book amount is added in. This is around 8% of EU Tier 1 capital of stress tested banks.
...
This study has shown that most of the sovereign debt is held on the banking books of banks, whereas the EU stress test only considered their small trading book exposures. Sovereign debt held in the banking book cannot be ignored however. First, individual bank failures would see latent losses on the trading book realized, a fact that creditors and equity investors need to take into account. Second, and more importantly, the market is not prepared to give a zero probability to debt restructurings beyond the period of the stress test and/or the period after which the role of the EFSF SPV comes to an end. The main reasons for this are: the very large job ahead for fiscal consolidation in a period of weak economic growth; and the apparent difficulty of achieving structural/competitiveness reforms in some countries in a short period of time. The paper also showed that excessively exposed banks in principle can reduce their exposure by not re-financing maturing sovereign debt, with the government funding gap being met instead by the SPV. This would have the effect of transferring sovereign risk from the bank concerned to the public sector.

What happens in less than 2 years when the European Financial Stability Facility Special Purpose Vehicle is no longer providing funding?

by Calculated Risk on 9/11/2010 03:05:00 PM

From Steven Gjerstad and Vernon Smith in the WSJ: Why We're in for a Long, Hard Economic Slog (ht MrM)

In the Great Depression and in every recession since, recovery of residential construction has preceded recovery in every other sector, and its recovery has been far larger in percentage terms than the recovery in any other major sector.

Applied to the Great Recession, it appears that those who see signs of a recovery may be grasping at straws.

This is something I've been writing about since I started the blog in 2005, but it is worth repeating ... even though Residential Investment usually only accounts for around 5% GDP, it isn't the size of the sector, but the contribution during the recovery that matters - and housing is usually the largest contributor to economic and employment growth early in a recovery.

But not this time because of the large number of excess housing units.

Here is the paper from Steven Gjerstad and Vernon Smith: Household expenditure cycles and economic cycles, 1920 – 2010

This has key implications for policy. As an example, a policy (like the housing tax credit) that encourages adding to the housing stock (new home construction) is a clear mistake, whereas policies that are aimed at household creation (jobs) or at least household preservation (like extended unemployment benefits) make more sense. Also policies aimed at supporting house prices - keeping the price above the market clearing price - are counterproductive and also a mistake.

by Calculated Risk on 9/11/2010 11:49:00 AM

I saw this article at CNBC yesterday: Outlook Gloomy at Secret Billionaire Meeting

For 25 years, legendary Wall Street strategist Byron Wien, now with The Blackstone Group, has held summer meetings with high net worth individuals to get their outlook on the global economy and investing. This year’s group, totaling fifty individuals and including more than 10 billionaires, was decidedly pessimistic on the U.S. economy ...

That reminded me to check on Byron Wien's The Surprises of 2010 list.

Note: For anyone not familiar with the list, Wien tries to make predictions that are generally out of the consensus view - he has been doing this for 24 years, and usually gets more than half right.

It looks like this will be an off year for the "Surprises" list ...

A quick review of Wien's possible surprises:
1. The United States economy grows at a stronger than expected 5% real rate during the year and the unemployment level drops below 9%. ...
CR: Not Likely.

2. The Federal Reserve decides the economy is strong enough for them to move away from zero interest rate policy. In a series of successive hikes beginning in the second quarter the Federal funds rate reaches 2% by year-end.
CR: Not Gonna Happen.

3. Heavy borrowing by the U.S. Treasury and some reluctance by foreign central banks to keep buying notes and bonds drives the yield on the 10-year Treasury above 5.5%. ...
CR: Not Gonna Happen

4. In a roller coaster year the Standard and Poor’s 500 rallies to 1300 in the first half and then runs out of steam and declines to 1000, ending where it started at 1115.10. ...
CR: Missed on the high, but the general idea of a trading range has been correct so far.

5. Because it is significantly undervalued on a purchasing power parity basis, the dollar rallies against the yen and the euro. It exceeds 100 on the yen and the euro drops below $1.30 as the long slide of the greenback is interrupted.
CR: Right on the euro, wrong on the yen.

6. Japan stands out as the best performing major industrialized market in the world as its currency weakens and its exports improve. Investors focus on the attractive valuations of dozens of medium sized companies in a market selling at one quarter of its 1989 high. The Nikkei 225 rises above 12,000
CR: The Nikkei did rally to 11,200 before falling sharply, but I think this counts as a miss.

7. Believing he must be a leader in climate control initiatives, President Obama endorses legislation favorable for nuclear power development. ...
CR: Didn't happen.

8. The improvement in the U.S. economy energizes the Obama administration. The White House undergoes some reorganization and regains its momentum. ...
CR: Not likely this year.

9. When it finally passes, financial service legislation, like the health care bill, proves to be softer on the industry than originally feared. ...
CR: I think this was right.

10. Civil unrest in Iran reaches a crescendo. Ayatollah Khomeini pushes out Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in favor of a more public relations adept leader. Economic improvement becomes the key issue and anti-Israel rhetoric subsides.
CR: Sounds good, but very unlikely.

2009 was Wien's best year (he reviews 2009 here), but it looks like 2010 will be his worst.

by Calculated Risk on 9/11/2010 08:43:00 AM

Note: this is an unofficial list of Problem Banks compiled only from public sources.

Here is the unofficial problem bank list for September 10, 2010.

Changes and comments from surferdude808:

After six additions and one removal, the Unofficial Problem Bank List includes 849 institutions with aggregate assets of $415.3 billion, up from 844 institutions with assets of $412 billion last week.

The additions include First National Community Bank, Dunmore, PA ($1.3 billion Ticker: FNCB); Pacific Mercantile Bank, Costa Mesa, CA ($1.1 billion Ticker: PMBC); Community Shores Bank, Muskegon, MI ($262 million Ticker: CSHB); First American State Bank, Greenwood, CO ($244 million); Service1st Bank of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV ($232 million Ticker: WLBC); and Bank of the Eastern Shore, Cambridge, MD ($223 million).

The removal is the failed Horizon Bank ($188 million). Next week, we anticipate for the OCC to release its actions for August.

The FDIC has only closed one bank over the last three weeks - but the additions keep coming!