by Calculated Risk on 3/18/2010 03:28:00 PM

Note: since the mix is changing, the median price is not useful. The repeat sales indexes - like FirstAmerican CoreLogic and Case-Shiller - have problems too, but they probably are better for actual price changes.

From DataQuick: Bay Area home sales down slightly from last year, median sale price rises

Bay Area home sales were subpar again in February, dipping below the year-ago level for the second straight month as some potential buyers worried about job security, some couldn’t get financing and others found a thin inventory of homes for sale. ...

Last month’s sales fell 22.2 percent short of the February average of 6,413 sales since 1988, when DataQuick’s statistics begin.

February’s sales were the second-lowest for that month since 1995, behind the record-low 3,989 homes sold in February 2008. January and February this year are the only two months since August 2008 in which sales have fallen year-over-year.

“The sales and price data remain choppy, with more ups and downs and inconsistencies than we’d typically see. It’s partly the season – January and February are often atypical and don’t serve as good barometers. But it’s more than that. The market remains fundamentally off kilter. There’s still relatively little lending going on in the upper price ranges, and little adjustable-rate financing, which had been vital to the Bay Area. Investor and cash-only deals remain well above normal, as does the level of sales involving distressed property,” said John Walsh, MDA DataQuick president.

“Despite the widening stability seen in the housing market in recent months, the outlook remains murky,” he said. “Whether prices will firm, or remain firm, will depend largely on three factors: The market’s response as the government reduces its housing stimulus, the economy’s ability to gain traction, and the decisions that lenders and borrowers will make in countless distress cases. The key question is how much more distressed inventory is coming, and when.”

Foreclosure resales – homes that had been foreclosed on in the prior 12 months – rose to 36.6 percent of all homes resold last month, marking the fourth consecutive month in which foreclosure resales edged higher. Foreclosure resales peaked at 52 percent of resales in February 2009, then gradually fell and, in the fall, leveled off near 32 percent before starting to rise modestly.

... Federally-insured, low-down-payment FHA loans, a popular choice among first-time buyers, made up 26.9 percent of Bay Area purchase loans last month. That was up from 23.3 percent a year ago and 1.4 percent two years ago.

Last month absentee buyers – mostly investors – purchased 19.4 percent of all Bay Area homes sold, the same as in January and up from 18.4 percent a year ago. The monthly absentee buyer average over the past decade is 13.0 percent. Buyers who appeared to have paid all cash – meaning there was no corresponding purchase loan found in the public record – accounted for a record 27.1 percent of sales in February, up from 25.7 percent in January and 24.4 percent a year ago.

This is definitely a market "off kilter". Almost 27% of the buyers used FHA insured loans, and another 27% paid cash (mostly investors). This is a long way from normal ...

by Calculated Risk on 3/18/2010 12:51:00 PM

From HotelNewsNow.com: STR: New Orleans tops weekly numbers

Overall the industry’s occupancy ended the week with a 4.6-percent increase to 57.7 percent, ADR dropped 1.9 percent to US$97.80, and RevPAR was up 2.6 percent to US$56.44.

The following graph shows the occupancy rate by week since 2000, and the rolling 52 week average occupancy rate.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Note: the scale doesn't start at zero to better show the change.

The graph shows the distinct seasonal pattern for the occupancy rate; higher in the summer because of leisure/vacation travel, and lower on certain holidays.

It appears that occupancy rates have bottomed and even started to increase, but the level is still well below normal - the average occupancy rate for this week is close to 62%, well above the current 57.7%. This low occupancy rate is still pushing down room rates (on a YoY basis) although revenue per available room (RevPAR) increased.

As mentioned last week, the other good news for the industry (although bad news for construction employment) is that the pipeline of new hotel projects has slowed sharply, see: STR: US pipeline for February 2010

Data Source: Smith Travel Research, Courtesy of HotelNewsNow.com

by Calculated Risk on 3/18/2010 10:46:00 AM

The Fed's favorite house price indicator from First American CoreLogic’s LoanPerformance ...

From LoanPerformance: January Home Price Index Shows Narrowing Annual Decline

National home prices, including distressed sales, declined by 0.7 percent in January 2010 compared to January 2009, according to First American CoreLogic and its LoanPerformance Home Price Index (HPI). This was a significant improvement over December’s year-over-year price decline of 3.4 percent. Excluding distressed sales, year-over-year prices declined in January by 0.4 percent; while in December the non-distressed HPI fell by 3.3 percent year-over-year. Compared to a year ago, the month-to-month rate of decline is lessening – in January 2009, the HPI showed the largest one month decline in its more than 30-year history. On a month-over-month basis, the national average home price index decline accelerated, falling by 1.9 percent in January 2010 compared to 0.8 percent in December 2009, indicating the housing market still remains weak.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the national LoanPerformance data since 1976. January 2000 = 100.

The index is off 0.7% over the last year, and off 29% from the peak.

The index has declined for five consecutive months.

by Calculated Risk on 3/18/2010 09:24:00 AM

From Binyamin Appelbaum and David Cho at the WaPo: Small banks lag in repaying Treasury for bailout funds

[H]undreds of community banks have yet to return their bailouts. More than 10 percent of the 700 banks that got federal bailouts and are still holding the money even failed to pay the government a quarterly dividend in February. The list of 82 delinquent banks is significantly longer than the 55 banks that failed to make payments in November, according to an analysis by Linus Wilson, a finance professor at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.

Wilson calculated that the missed payments totaled $78.1 million in February and that banks now have missed a total of $205 million in dividend payments to the government.

Many of the community banks still holding aid from the Troubled Assets Relief Program are struggling with losses on real estate development loans.

Here is the report from the Treasury.

And in excel format under Dividend and Interest Reports.

There are three permanent deadbeats on the list: CIT Group (filed bankruptcy and wiped out its $2.3 billion in TARP debt), UCBH Holdings Inc. was seized by the FDIC (TARP lost $298.7 million), and Pacific Coast National Bank was also seized by the FDIC (TARP lost $4.1 million).

by Calculated Risk on 3/18/2010 08:26:00 AM

The DOL reports on weekly unemployment insurance claims:

In the week ending March 13, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 457,000, a decrease of 5,000 from the previous week's unrevised figure of 462,000. The 4-week moving average was 471,250, a decrease of 4,250 from the previous week's unrevised average of 475,500.
...
The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment during the week ending March 6 was 4,579,000, an increase of 12,000 from the preceding week's revised level of 4,567,000.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since 1971.

The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims decreased this week by 4,250 to 471,250.

The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The current level of 457,000 (and 4-week average of 471,250) is still very high, and suggests continuing job losses through the middle of March. Note: There is no way to compare directly between weekly claims, and net payrolls jobs.