by Calculated Risk on 12/31/2009 12:06:00 AM

From the NY Times: New York State Has First Deficit in General Fund

... For the first time in history, [New York]’s main bank account is poised to end the year in the red.

... New York had a negative balance of $174 million in its general fund on Wednesday, with nearly $1 billion in bills owed by day’s end. ... To fill the gap, New York will be forced to rely on ... raiding its short-term investment pool ... But that account itself is dangerously low, with only about $800 million on hand, compared with a balance in more flush years of as much as $16 billion.

And the lower the short-term balance falls, the harder it is for the state to cover its day-to-day bills and the closer New York moves toward a previously unimaginable eventuality: A government check that bounces.

No problem - just write IOUs.

by Calculated Risk on 12/30/2009 08:03:00 PM

This is a pretty bold squatter. According to Jim, the squatter moved in right after the tenant left ... and when the landlord (in foreclosure) showed up, the squatter called the cops and accused him of trying to break in - and apparently was able to obtain a restraining order against the owner ... it is now Jim's problem!

by Calculated Risk on 12/30/2009 04:55:00 PM

From the Treasury: Treasury Annouces [SIC] Resturcturing of Commitment To GMAC

Treasury will commit $3.8 billion of new capital to GMAC ... Prior to today's actions, Treasury had invested $12.5 billion in preferred stock of GMAC. Treasury owns $13.1 billion in preferred stock in GMAC, through purchases and the exercise of warrants, and 35 percent of the common equity in GMAC.

From the WaPo: U.S. taking majority ownership of GMAC

The Treasury Department said it will increase its stake in GMAC to 56 percent from 35 percent. It also will hold about $14 billion in what amount to loans that GMAC may eventually be required to repay.

by Calculated Risk on 12/30/2009 03:12:00 PM

I've added two polls on the right sidebar.

Predict the 2010 GDP growth and the Dec 2010 unemployment rate.

I'll post the poll results here tomorrow and post my own thoughts over the weekend.

Please feel free to post your predictions in the comments too - and I'll link to this post next year.

Best to all

by Calculated Risk on 12/30/2009 12:35:00 PM

Here is a comparison of real house prices and the unemployment rate using the LoanPerformance national house price data (starts in 1976) and Case-Shiller Composite 10 index (starts in 1987). Both indexes are adjusted by CPI less shelter. This is an update to a post earlier this year.

Click on image for larger graph in new window.

The two previous national declines in real house prices are evident on the graph (early '80s and early '90s). The dashed green lines are drawn at the peak of the unemployment rate following the peak in house prices.

In the early '80s, real house prices declined until the unemployment rate peaked, and then increased sluggishly for a few years. Following the late 1980s housing bubble, real house prices declined for several years after the unemployment rate peaked.

Although there are periods when there is no relationship between the unemployment rate and house prices, this graph suggests that house prices will not bottom (in real terms) until the unemployment rate peaks (or later, especially since the current bubble dwarfs those previous housing bubbles). This also suggests that real house prices are probably 10% or more too high on a national basis.