by Calculated Risk on 8/14/2009 08:34:00 AM

From the BLS: Consumer Price Index Summary

On a seasonally adjusted basis, the CPI-U was unchanged in July following a 0.7 percent increase in June ... The index for all items less food and energy [Core] rose 0.1 percent in July following a 0.2 percent increase in June.
...
The index for shelter fell 0.2 percent and the household energy index declined 0.3 percent. Within the shelter group, the indexes for rent and owners' equivalent rent were both unchanged in July after rising 0.1 percent in June. The index for lodging away from home turned down in July, falling 2.1 percent after increasing 0.3 percent in June, and has fallen 8.9 percent over the past 12 months.

Not only is the index for lodging off sharply, but the BLS measures for rent declined slightly (rounded to flat). Owners' equivalent rent (OER) is the largest component of CPI, and even though rents have been falling in most areas, OER was still increasing. The decline in July OER was very small, but it is a start.

Over the last 12 months, CPI has fallen 2.1 percent, the largest 12 month decline since 1950.

by Calculated Risk on 8/13/2009 10:36:00 PM

Form Bloomberg: Bank of America Wins Order on Colonial Bank Assets

U.S. District Judge Adalberto Jordan in Miami issued the order after Bank of America sued Colonial yesterday in Miami, claiming Colonial is holding the cash and loans as a custodian for Ocala Funding Inc. The order notes that the suit relates to more than 6,000 mortgages worth more than $1 billion.

“To the extent that the interests of the public are implicated in this case, they weigh in favor of requiring Colonial to honor its contractual obligations and avoiding what would amount to a $1 billion heist,” the judge said in an order posted online today.

In another action, from Ocala.com: Judge ties up over $4 million in Taylor Bean account

[Henley Holdings LLC] filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, accusing Taylor Bean of breach of contract. It also sought temporary injunctive relief, asking the court to force Taylor Bean to immediately deposit the $4.7 million into an account at a separate bank.

Henley was worried because Taylor Bean had essentially shut its doors, and because if Colonial failed, only $250,000 of Henley money would be covered by FDIC insurance.

That same day, a federal judge granted Henley's request and ordered at least $4.4 million of the company's funds put into an interest-bearing account within the court registry.

Court records show that Taylor Bean turned over that amount the next day.

What is interesting about the second action is that apparently Colonial Bank disclosed a new FDIC Cease & Desist order dated Aug. 11th. I'm told the FDIC order instructs Colonial to obtain FDIC approval for most activities, requires "prompt and unrestricted access" to all bank documents and employees, and requires proceduces to prevent the destruction of any bank documents.

by Calculated Risk on 8/13/2009 08:50:00 PM

In early April, a Homeowner Protection Act was signed into law in Illinois that delayed foreclosures for a short period. Foreclosure filings plummeted for a couple of months, but filings are now increasing again.

From the Chicago Tribune: Foreclosure actions delayed in spring move into system in summer

Initial notices of default, the first legal step in the foreclosure process, dropped substantially in the six-county Chicago area during the past three months, largely because of a 70 percent drop in filings over a 30-day period begun in early April, according to a midyear report from Chicago-based think tank Woodstock Institute. However, foreclosure efforts appear to again be on the rise.

In April, default notices were recorded on 5,539 homes in the Chicago area. After plummeting to 1,694 notices in May, default filings rose to 3,468 in June, Woodstock found.
...
Woodstock's data also shows that lower-income areas continue to have a higher raw number of foreclosures, but more-affluent areas are posting the bigger percentage gains in foreclosure activity. ...

Last month [according to RealtyTrac], 14,524 Illinois properties, 35 percent more than in June, received notices of initial default, sheriff sale and bank repossessions. During July, 6,770 Illinois homeowners were served with initial notices of default. That compares with 3,648 default notices in June, 3,139 notices in May and 6,407 notices in April. Bank repossessions, which increase the number of foreclosed homes for sale, also jumped. Lenders repossessed 3,700 Illinois homes last month.

The low end areas will always have the most foreclosures, but foreclosure activity is picking up in the mid-to-high end areas. But where will the buyers come from in the mid-to-high end areas?

First time buyers in affluent areas? I don't think so.

Investors looking for cash flow? The number don't work.

Move-up buyers selling their homes? A large number of sellers at the low-to-mid end are lenders ...

by Calculated Risk on 8/13/2009 06:05:00 PM

The First American CoreLogic Negative Equity Report for June 2009 is available on line. You have to sign up to read the report.

More than 15.2 million U.S. mortgages or 32.2 percent of all mortgaged properties were in negative equity position as of June 30, 2009 according to newly released data from First American CoreLogic. June’s negative equity share was slightly lower than the 32.5 percent as of the end of March 2009 and it reflects the recent flattening of monthly home price changes. As of June 2009, there were an additional 2.5 million mortgaged properties that were approaching negative equity and negative equity and near negative equity mortgages combined account for nearly 38 percent of all residential properties with a mortgage nationwide.

The aggregate property value for loans in a negative equity position was $3.4 trillion, which represents the total property value at risk of default. In California, the aggregate value of homes that are in negative equity was $969 billion, followed by Florida ($432 billion), New Jersey ($146 billion), Illinois ($146 billion) and Arizona ($140 billion). Los Angeles had over $310 billion in aggregate property value in a negative equity position, followed by New York ($183 billion), Miami ($152 billion), Washington DC ($149 billion) and Chicago ($134 billion).

... Nevada (66 percent) had the highest percentage with nearly two‐thirds of mortgage borrowers in a negative equity position. In Arizona (51 percent) and Florida (49 percent), half of all mortgage borrowers were in a negative equity position. Michigan (48 percent) and California (42 percent) round out the top five states.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the percent of households with mortgages underwater by state (and near negative equity defined as with less than 5% equity).

UPDATE: States with no data from CoreLogic: Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, South Dakota, Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming.

The high population states of California and Florida account for almost 35% of all borrowers underwater, but this graph shows the problem is widespread.

by Calculated Risk on 8/13/2009 04:28:00 PM

Update: Actual statement from Chiang: " ... to stop issuing IOUs on September 4, almost one month earlier than expected. ... the Controller will ask the board to approve a redemption date of September 4, which is almost one month earlier than the October 2 maturity date printed on the IOUs."

From Tom Petruno at the LA Times: California plans to pay off IOUs beginning Sept. 4

California expects to begin redeeming outstanding IOUs on Sept. 4, a month earlier than expected, thanks to cash savings from budget cuts, state Controller John Chiang announced today.

He said the state also will need $10.5 billion in short-term loans from investors to get through the fiscal year ending next June 30.
...
The borrowing plan and the savings from the slashed state budget "should provide sufficient cash to meet all of California’s payment obligations through the fiscal year," Chiang said in a statement.

And by popular request ...

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Instead of comparing the markets from the peak (See: the Four Bad Bears), Doug Short matched up the market bottoms for four crashes (with an interim bottom for the Great Depression).

Note that the Great Depression crash is based on the DOW; the three others are for the S&P 500.