by Calculated Risk on 7/20/2009 02:28:00 PM

From Bloomberg: Banks Fail to Make Adequate Loan-Loss Provisions, Moody’s Says (ht Brian, Bob_in_MA)

Banks have failed to make adequate provision for the losses on loans and securities they face before the end of next year ... U.S. banks may incur about $470 billion of losses and writedowns by the end of 2010, which may cause the banks to be unprofitable in the period ...

“Large loan losses have yet to be recognized in the banking system,” Moody’s said. “We expect to see rising provisioning needs well into 2010.”

This can't just be regional and community banks - this must include some of the stress test 19. Maybe it is time for another round of stress tests.

by Calculated Risk on 7/20/2009 01:32:00 PM

From Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart: On the Economic Outlook and the Commitment to Price Stability . Here is Lockhart's economic outlook:

Often a deep recession is followed by a sharp rebound in business and overall economic activity. Unfortunately, as I look ahead, I do not foresee this trajectory. I expect real growth to resume in the second half and progress at a modest pace. I do not see a strong recovery in the medium term.

There are risks to even this rather subdued forecast. The risk I'm watching most closely is commercial real estate. There is a heavy schedule of commercial real estate financings coming due in 2009, 2010, and 2011. The CMBS (commercial real estate mortgage-backed securities) market is very weak, and banks generally have no appetite to roll over loans on properties that have lost value in the recession. Refinancing problems will not directly affect GDP—it's commercial construction that factors into GDP—but I'm concerned problems in commercial real estate finance could adversely affect the otherwise improving banking and insurance sectors.

... the healing of the banking system will take time. Working off excess housing inventory will take time. The reallocation of labor to productive and growing sectors of the economy will take time. It will take time to complete the deleveraging of American households and the restoration of consumer balance sheets.

In short, I believe the economy must undergo significant structural adjustments. We're coming out of a severe recession, and it's not too much an exaggeration to say the economy is undergoing a makeover. We must build a more solid foundation for our economy than consumer spending fueled by excessive credit—excessive household leverage—built on a house price bubble.

The surviving financial system must find a new posture of risk taking. The balance of consumption and investment must adjust, with investment being financed by greater domestic saving. The distribution of employment must adjust to match worker skills, including newly acquired skills, with jobs in growth markets. Some industrial plant and equipment must be taken offline to remove excess and higher-cost capacity.

As I said, these adjustments will take time and will suppress growth prospects in the process. I believe the economy will underperform its long-term potential for a while because of the obstacles to growth that must be removed, adjustments it must undergo.
...
Let me summarize my argument here today. The economy is stabilizing and recovery will begin in the second half. The recovery will be weak compared with historic recoveries from recession. The recovery will be weak because the economy must make structural adjustments before the healthiest possible rate of growth can be achieved. While this adjustment process is going on in the medium term, I believe inflation and deflation are roughly equal risks and require careful monitoring. Slack in the economy will suppress inflation. And inflation is unlikely to result—by direct causation—from the recent growth of the Fed's balance sheet. In any event, the Fed has a number of tools being readied to unwind the policies used to fight the recession, and it will be some time before their use is appropriate.
emphasis added

by Calculated Risk on 7/20/2009 12:21:00 PM

From Dow Jones: Moody's: Commercial Real-Estate Prices Fall 7.6% In May

Commercial real-estate prices fell 7.6% in May ... The indexes are down 29% from a year ago and 35% from their October 2007 peak.

According to Moody's, CRE prices fell in 8.6% in April (about 16% in two months).

Talk about cliff diving!

by Calculated Risk on 7/20/2009 09:56:00 AM

From the Conference Board:

The Conference Board Leading Economic Index™ (LEI) for the U.S. increased 0.7 percent, The Conference Board Coincident Economic Index™ (CEI) decreased 0.2 percent ... The Conference Board LEI for the U.S. has risen for three consecutive months now ... With these large and widespread gains, its six month growth has picked up to the highest rate since the first quarter of 2006. Meanwhile, The Conference Board CEI for the U.S., measuring current economic activity, remains on a downtrend, but the pace of its decline has moderated somewhat in recent months. All in all, the behavior of the composite indexes suggest that the recession will continue to ease and that the economy may begin to recover in the near term.

This isn't something I follow very closely, but I'm curious to see when (or if) they try to call the end of the recession. The Conference Board was still saying "sluggish economic growth will likely continue in the near term" even after the recession started - so this might not be useful for turning points.

by Calculated Risk on 7/20/2009 08:13:00 AM

From Lingling Wei and Maurice Tamman at the WSJ: Commercial Loans Failing at Rapid Pace

U.S. banks have been charging off soured commercial mortgages at the fastest pace in nearly 20 years ... losses on loans used to finance offices, shopping malls, hotels, apartments and other commercial property could reach about $30 billion by the end of 2009.
...
Many of the most troubled [regional] banks have heavy exposure to commercial real estate. ...

In contrast to home loans, the majority of which were made by about 10 lenders, thousands of U.S. banks, especially regional and community banks, loaded up on commercial-property debt.
...
Some analysts, meanwhile, worry that banks aren't sufficiently recognizing losses on their commercial real-estate loans, thereby exposing themselves to bigger losses later. ..."Net charge-offs to date have been highly inadequate," said Richard Parkus, head of commercial mortgage-backed securities research at Deutsche Bank. "This is clearly a problem that is being pushed out into the future."

Many regional and community banks had excessive loan concentrations in Construction & Development (C&D) and CRE loans. The FDIC identified this as an emerging risk in 2006 - so it is no surprise. These smaller banks have been slow to recognize the related losses - possibly because many of the deals had interest reserves that mask the performance of the commercial building until the reserve runs dry. Then there is just more work for the FDIC ...