by Calculated Risk on 7/05/2009 01:27:00 PM

Rising vacancies. Falling rents. Negative absorption. The trend continues ...

From the Baltimore Business Journal: D.C. area office vacancies reach 12.3%

The Washington, D.C., area’s commercial real estate market saw a net absorption of negative 726,100 square feet in the second quarter, the third straight quarter of negative absorption ... the Washington region’s office vacancy rate has now reached 12.3 percent.

... "we are entering into a period of steady rent declines" [said Kevin Thorpe, director of market research for Cassidy & Pinkard Colliers]
emphasis added

From Reuters: Manhattan office vacancy hits 15-year high-report

The vacancy rate for top quality Midtown Manhattan office buildings reached its highest level in 15 years and asking rents fell nearly 11 percent in the second quarter, a Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL.N) report said.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

For Q1, REIS reported the office vacancy rate nationwide rose to 15.2% from 14.5% in Q4 2008.

This graph shows the office vacancy rate starting 1991.

The Q2 data should be released this week.

by Calculated Risk on 7/05/2009 09:43:00 AM

From Lauren Beale at the Los Angeles Times: Vacancies give renters room to negotiate

The first quarter saw the largest rent decline in a decade for Los Angeles County, Reis' [Victor Calanog, director of research] said. Effective rents, those that take concessions into account, fell 1.7% in the first quarter of this year from the fourth quarter of 2008, while asking rents dropped 1%.

And vacancy rates are rising:

The rate climbed to 5.3% in the first quarter from 3.8% in the first quarter of 2008, said [Reis' Calanog] ... In contrast, vacancies had been hovering between 2% and 3% for the last decade.
...
The last time vacancy rates were this high in Los Angeles County was in the early 1990s, when they hit 5%.

Declining rents puts more pressure on house prices ... and rents could continue to fall through 2010.

Here are some comments from BRE (a REIT) in February:

We believe we are looking at a negative rent curve for the next two years.

We believe on a composite basis, market rents in 2009 could fall between 3 and 6% from peak levels in 2008. And the rent cuts in 2010 could be deeper ...

by Calculated Risk on 7/04/2009 10:52:00 PM

From Gretchen Morgenson at the NY Times: So Many Foreclosures, So Little Logic

Alan M. White, an assistant professor at the Valparaiso University law school in Indiana analyzed data on 3.5 million subprime and alt-A mortgages in securitization pools overseen by Wells Fargo.
...
In June, the data show almost 32,000 liquidation sales; the average loss on those was 64.7 percent of the original loan balance.

Here are the numbers: the average loan balance began at almost $223,000. But in the liquidation sale, the property sold for $144,000 less, on average. ...

Loss severities, like foreclosures, are rising. In November, losses averaged 56.1 percent of the original loan balance; in February, 63.3 percent.

Well, it is an article by poor Gretchen, so we need to highlight a funny...

Loan modifications occur when a lender agrees to change terms of a troubled borrower’s mortgage; the most common approach is to reduce the loan’s interest rate. ... Lenders and their representatives, however, don’t like to modify loans through interest rate cuts ...

I guess they don't like doing the most common approach!

Note: the database analyzed by Professor White is for subprime and Alt-A only, whereas the OCC data includes prime loans - so it is hard to compare. Here is the OCC report for Q1: OCC and OTS: Prime Delinquencies Surge in Q1
And a couple of earlier posts on the OCC report:

OCC and OTS: Prime Delinquencies Surge in Q1

Modifications and Re-Default

by Calculated Risk on 7/04/2009 08:32:00 PM

This piece "Mortgages Made Simpler" by Richard Thaler, is a discussion of the proposed Obama Administration regulatory requirement that lenders offer consumers "plain vanilla" mortgages. From the Treasury regulatory reform proposals (page 66):

We propose that the regulator be authorized to define standards for “plain vanilla” products that are simpler and have straightforward pricing. The CFPA should be authorized to require all providers and intermediaries to offer these products prominently, alongside whatever other lawful products they choose to offer.

I found the following description amusing:

Traditional economics is based on imaginary creatures sometimes referred to as “Homo economicus.” I call them Econs for short. Econs are amazingly smart and are free of emotion, distraction or self-control problems. Think Mr. Spock from “Star Trek.”

Real people are not Econs. Real people have trouble balancing their checkbooks, much less calculating how much they need to save for retirement; they sometimes binge on food, drink or high-definition televisions. They are more like Homer Simpson than Mr. Spock. Call them Homer economicus if you like, or just Humans. Behavioral economics is the study of Humans in markets.

Designing policies for Econs is pretty straightforward. Because they are smart consumers and make good choices, the best policies give them as many choices as possible and simply assure that they have access to all the relevant information.

Humans, however, can use a bit more help, especially when the options are hard to understand.

I like the idea that all consumers be offered a "plain vanilla" mortgage option, and also that many of the non-traditional mortgage products come with warning labels.

Of course most CR readers are probably "Homo economicus" and are free to opt out.

by Calculated Risk on 7/04/2009 04:34:00 PM

Matt Padilla at the O.C. Registers interviews the CEO of a bank that recently acquired a failed bank: Profiting from an Irvine bank failure

Note: This regards the failure of MetroPacific Bank in Irvine, California on June 26th (just over a week ago).

Q. How did you learn a bank was going to fail and its assets be sold?

A. [Glenn Gray CEO of SunWest]: It first starts with us, or any bank, that wants to be a bidder letting the FDIC know that. ... We did that several months ago, when we anticipated that, unfortunately, bank failures were going to be an ongoing occurrence.

Then we turn the clock back to about four weeks ago. The FDIC notified us of a potential failed bank situation. They spoke in very general terms, describing a business bank with about $80 million in assets in Orange County with a single branch. They asked, ‘Are you interested?. Well, yes, that fits our profile: community banks in Orange County or North San Diego.

Next they say here’s your password, go to a secure Web site and find more information. Once we visit the site we understand which bank it is ... The data are macro level. But there is enough information for you to start to form an opinion, and you don’t have to put in bid yet.

Next they told us we would have two days of due diligence. We came on site, visiting the bank in an area segregated from the rest of the employees. Most employees didn’t know we were on site. There was an FDIC representative there. Now we start to get into more micro level detail. ... We met some people, but couldn’t get into their background or interview them.

Once the on-site review was done, we got a couple of days to form a bid. We finished up on a Thursday and had to provide a bid the following Tuesday. The next day (Wednesday June 24) they asked for some clarification and a little negotiation. Thursday (June 25) they notified us that our bid was accepted. Friday morning (June 26) we met with a larger group of FDIC employees and they did a walk through of what was going to happen. Then it happened that Friday at 4 p.m. They went in and took over the bank and we followed them.

There is much more in the interview including some comments on commercial real estate lending.