by Calculated Risk on 3/28/2009 09:54:00 AM
Saturday, March 28, 2009
Forecast: Two-thirds of California banks to face Regulatory Action
From the LA Times: FDIC orders changes at six California banks
[T]he Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. disclosed Friday that it had ordered six more California banks to clean up their acts in February after the agency examined their books and operations.So far 21 FDIC insured banks have failed this year, and 3 in California. There will probably be many more ...
...
The number of such regulatory actions has been increasing rapidly.
...
By the end of 2009, two-thirds of the state's banks will be operating under cease-and-desist orders or other regulatory actions, Anaheim-based banking consultant Gary S. Findley predicts.
...
Most banks targeted in such actions eventually tighten up operations and continue in business or merge with stronger institutions, but regulators are preparing for a major wave of failures.
...
In addition to public cease-and-desist orders, banks are subject to a variety of regulatory sanctions, including so-called memorandums of understanding, which are informal directives to correct problems. Regulators don't release those memos, but banks sometimes disclose them to shareholders.
Friday, March 27, 2009
Further Bailout of Automakers Expected on Monday
by Calculated Risk on 3/27/2009 10:18:00 PM
From the NY Times: U.S. Expected to Give More Financing to Automakers
The Obama administration will probably extend more short-term aid to General Motors and Chrysler on Monday ...Another week, another bailout.
The administration is expected to set a short deadline — weeks rather than months — to compel the automakers, their lenders and the U.A.W. to reach agreement.
Both G.M. and Chrysler are close to exhausting the loans they received since December. ...
G.M.’s request for up to $16.6 billion more in federal loans will be treated separately from Chrysler’s request for an additional $5 billion ...
The announcement on Monday will usher in a more intensive period of oversight by the government of G.M. and Chrysler ...
Words of Advice: December 13, 2000
by Calculated Risk on 3/27/2009 07:20:00 PM
Just some quick words of advice from Jon Stewart (Dec 13, 2000): (ht Martin)
FDIC on Omni National Bank, Atlanta Failure
by Calculated Risk on 3/27/2009 05:17:00 PM
Update: from Soylent Green Is People
Bank failures blight like crab grass...
Spray Round-Up on all....
From the FDIC: SunTrust Bank, Atlanta, Georgia, Receives the Insured Deposits of Omni National Bank, Atlanta, Georgia
Omni National Bank, Atlanta, Georgia, was closed today by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which then appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver.This is the follow-up to the earlier post.
...
As of March 9, 2009, Omni National Bank had total assets of $956.0 million and total deposits of $796.8 million. At the time of closing, there were approximately $2.0 million in uninsured deposits that potentially exceeded the insurance limits. ...
...
The cost to the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund is estimated to be $290 million. Omni National Bank is the twenty-first bank to fail this year. The last bank failure in Georgia was FirstCity Bank, Stockbridge, on March 20, 2009.
Q1 GDP will be Ugly
by Calculated Risk on 3/27/2009 04:43:00 PM
First, a quick market update ...
Click on graph for larger image in new window.
This graph is from Doug Short of dshort.com (financial planner): "Four Bad Bears".
Note that the Great Depression crash is based on the DOW; the three others are for the S&P 500.
On Q1 GDP:
Earlier today the BEA released the February Personal Income and Outlays report. This report suggests Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) will probably be slightly positive in Q1 (caveat: this is before the March releases and revisions).
Since PCE is almost 70% of GDP, does this mean GDP will be OK in Q1?
Nope.
I expect Q1 2009 GDP to be very negative, and possibly worse than in Q4 2008. Right now I'm looking at something like a 6% to 8% decline (annualized) in real GDP (there is significant uncertainty, especially with inventory and trade).
The problem is the 30% of non-PCE GDP, especially private fixed investment. There will probably be a significant inventory correction too, and some decline in local and state government spending. But it is private fixed investment that will cliff dive. This includes residential investment, non-residential investment in structures, and investment in equipment and software.
A little story ...
Imagine ACME widget company with a steadily growing sales volume (say 5% per year). In the first half of 2008 their sales were running at 100 widgets per year, but in the 2nd half sales fell to a 95 widget per year rate. Not too bad.
ACME's customers are telling the company that they expect to only buy 95 widgets this year, and 95 in 2010. Not good news, but still not too bad for ACME.
But this is a disaster for companies that manufacturer widget making equipment. ACME was steadily buying new widget making equipment over the years, but now they have all the equipment they need for the next two years or longer.
ACME sales fell 5%. But the widget equipment manufacturer's sales could fall to zero, except for replacements and repairs.
And this is what we will see in Q1 2009. Real investment in equipment and software has declined for four straight quarters, including a 28.1% decline (annualized) in Q4. And I expect another huge decline in Q1.
For non-residential investment in structures, the long awaited slump is here. I expect declining investment over a number of quarters (many of these projects are large and take a number of quarters to complete, so the decline in investment could be spread out over a couple of years). And once again, residential investment has declined sharply in Q1 too.
When you add it up, this looks like a significant investment slump in Q1.


