by Calculated Risk on 3/26/2009 04:14:00 PM

Rex Nutting writes at MarketWatch: Unemployment still rising

The raw numbers, not seasonally adjusted, [show] 6.4 million collecting state unemployment benefits, and an additional 1.4 million who were collecting the federal benefits that go to people who've been fruitlessly looking for a job for more than six months.

The claims numbers don't show the whole story.

About 4 million more people are officially unemployed but not eligible for jobless benefits. In addition, 8.6 million can find only part-time work and another 2 million have given up looking for work. Nearly 15% of the workforce is unemployed, underemployed, or just plain discouraged.

The employment situation is grim, and even if GDP turns slightly positive later this year, the unemployment rate will probably rise all this year and into 2010.

by Calculated Risk on 3/26/2009 02:51:00 PM

From Kris Hudson at the WSJ: Developers Scale Back Luxury Projects as Economy Shifts

Amid the worst retail climate in decades, a number of shopping developments are slated to open this year ...

Real-estate developers are expected this year to complete more than 78 million square feet of new retail space in the top 54 U.S. markets, according to real-estate-research company Property & Portfolio Research Inc. While that is down from the 144 million square feet completed last year -- the peak number this decade -- the amount expected this year probably is more than the market can absorb in its second year of a recession.
...
The situation is a reminder of the vulnerabilities of commercial real-estate development to changes in the economy. Because it can take years to get a project from conception to completion, projects that sounded like a great idea a few years ago are fast becoming problematic for developers.

For certain retail space, the absorption rate is negative because of all the store closings and retailer bankruptcies. Vacancy rates are already climbing sharply, and this additional 78 million square feet of retail space will push up the vacancy rate even more.

by Calculated Risk on 3/26/2009 12:13:00 PM

From HotelNewsNow.com: STR reports U.S. performance for week ending 21 March 2009

In year-over-year measurements, the industry’s occupancy fell 4.7 percent to end the week at 58.5 percent. Average daily rate dropped 8.0 percent to finish the week at US$99.92. Revenue per available room for the week decreased 12.3 percent to finish at US$58.45.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the YoY change in the occupancy rate (3 week trailing average).

The three week average is off 12.0% from the same period in 2008.

The average daily rate is down 8.0%, so RevPAR (Revenue per available room) is off 12.3% from the same week last year.

Data Source: Smith Travel Research, Courtesy of HotelNewsNow.com

by Calculated Risk on 3/26/2009 10:57:00 AM

From Bloomberg: Geithner Calls for ‘New Rules of the Game’ in Finance

... Geithner’s proposals would bring large hedge funds, private-equity firms and derivatives markets under federal supervision for the first time. A new systemic risk regulator would have powers to force companies to boost their capital or curtail borrowing, and officials would get the authority to seize them if they run into trouble.
...
The administration’s regulatory framework would make it mandatory for large hedge funds, private-equity firms and venture-capital funds to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC would be able to refer those firms to the systemic regulator, which could order them to raise capital or curtail borrowing.

The strategy also would require derivatives to be traded through central clearinghouses. And it would add new oversight for money-market mutual funds ....

While the Bush administration had proposed that the Federal Reserve take on the authority of a systemic-risk regulator, Geithner didn’t specify which agency should have the job. Bernanke has also called for such a regulator, and said the central bank should have some role.

Imagine if the Federal Reserve had been the "systemic-risk regulator" during the bubble.

According to Greenspan in 2005 "we don't perceive that there is a national bubble", just "a little froth", and even in March 2007 Bernanke said "the impact on the broader economy and financial markets of the problems in the subprime market seems likely to be contained".

How would a systemic-risk regulator help if they miss the problem?

I'm not opposing this idea - I don't see how it could hurt - and I think having the FDIC, OTS, Fed, state agencies, and others all providing risk oversight is unworkable.

by Calculated Risk on 3/26/2009 08:37:00 AM

The DOL reports on weekly unemployment insurance claims:

In the week ending March 21, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 652,000, an increase of 8,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 644,000. The 4-week moving average was 649,000, a decrease of 1,000 from the previous week's revised average of 650,000.
...
The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment during the week ending March 14 was 5,560,000, an increase of 122,000 from the preceding week's revised level of 5,438,000.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

The first graph shows weekly claims and continued claims since 1971.

The four week moving average is at 649,000.

Continued claims are now at 5.56 million - the all time record.

The second graph shows the 4-week average of initial weekly unemployment claims (blue, right scale), and total insured unemployed (red, left scale), both as a percent of covered employment.

This normalizes the data for changes in insured employment, and shows the initial unemployment and continued claims are both at the highest level since the early '80s.

This is another very weak report and shows continued weakness for employment.