by Calculated Risk on 12/11/2007 11:19:00 PM

Reuters: SuperSIV fund now seen only $30 bln in size-CNBC

A banking industry fund to bail out structured investment vehicles reeling from the subprime mortgage crisis may only total $30 billion ... CNBC reported on Tuesday.

Bankers working on the fund said "if they're lucky," they may get $30 billion in SIV assets in the fund ...

On Nov 23rd, it was $75 billion to $100 billion.

Last week, it was $50 billion.

Now the SuperSIV will be "lucky" to be $30 billion. It's melting away.

I wouldn't be surprised if Citi's new CEO Vikram Pandit decides to pull out of the SuperSIV and move what remains of the Citi SIVs to their balance sheet.

A new broom sweeps clean.

by Calculated Risk on 12/11/2007 05:43:00 PM

From Bloomberg: Genworth Predicts Lower-Than-Expected 2008 Profit (hat tip Brian)

Genworth Financial ... said profit will miss analysts' estimates next year because of the U.S. housing slump. ...

Genworth's mortgage-insurance unit, which contributed about 15 percent of operating profit this year through Sept. 30, will lose as much as 25 cents a share in 2008, the Richmond, Virginia- based company said today in a presentation on its Web site.

``We did not expect the speed or degree of the unprecedented turn of the housing market,'' Chief Executive Officer Michael Fraizer said ... Fraizer has said Genworth covered too many mortgages in Florida...

Another CEO surprised by the "speed and degree" of the housing downturn. Also, I hate it when a CEO comments on his stock price:

``I am not satisfied with our stock price,'' Fraizer said.

Memo to Fraizer: Take care of business, the stock price will follow.

by Calculated Risk on 12/11/2007 05:29:00 PM

From Forbes: Weak Construction Blasts NCI (hat tip Michael)

NCI [Building Systems] which is headquartered in Houston, makes metal building materials used in non-residential construction. Its products include roofs and roll-up doors.

A slowdown in non-residential construction pressured NCI's fourth-quarter results. According to McGraw Hill, low-rise nonresidential construction fell by 4.4% during NCI's fiscal 2007.
...
NCI's fourth-quarter earnings miss shows trouble brewing in the non-residential construction market.

NCI Building Systems is the largest maker of metal building components in North America. They are focused on Commercial Real Estate (CRE) construction, and this is another sign of an impending slowdown in nonresidential structure investment.

by Calculated Risk on 12/11/2007 03:47:00 PM

Renting is a substitute for owning, and to understand the current excess housing inventory, we also need to consider rental units.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the number of occupied (blue) and vacant (red) rental units in the U.S. (all data from the Census Bureau).

In an earlier post, Home Builders and Homeownership Rates, I discussed the decade long decline in the total number of rental units - from 1995 to 2004 - and how that related to the rising homeownership rate.

The builders didn't stop building apartment units in 1995, instead the decline in the total units came from rental to owner conversions, and units being demolished (a fairly large number of housing units are demolished every year).

And even though the total number of rental units was declining, this didn't completely offset the number of renters moving to homeownership, so the rental vacancy rate started moving up - from about 8% in 1995 to over 10% in 2004.

The total number of rental units (red and blue) bottomed in Q2 2004, and started climbing again. Since Q2 2004, there have been 2.6 million units added to the rental inventory. This increase in units almost offset the recent strong migration from ownership to renting, so the rental vacancy rate has only declined slightly (from a peak of 10.4% in 2004 to 9.8% in the most recent quarter).

Where did these 2.6 rental units come from?

The Census Bureau's Housing Units Completed, by Intent and Design shows 773K units completed as 'built for rent' since Q2 2004. This means that another 1.8+ million rental units came from conversions from ownership to rental.

These could be older out-of-service units being brought back to the rental market, condo "reconversions", flippers becoming landlords, or homeowners renting their previous homes instead of selling. But this shows the substantial excess inventory in 2004 and 2005 that didn't show up in the new home or existing home inventory numbers at the time.

Back in 2006, I estimated the excess housing inventory at 1.1 million to 1.4 million units. The number is higher now since the home builders have continued to build too many homes. Note: of course price is a factor. With the rental vacancy still above the normal range, there are probably 700 thousand excess rental units in the U.S. (assuming the vacancy rate falls back to 8%).

Here is a rough estimate of the excess inventory:

Source	Units
Rental Units	700,000(1)
Vacant Homeowner Units	750,000(2)
Excess Builder Inventory	250,000(3)
Total	1,700,000

(1) calculated based a decline in the rental vacancy rate from 9.8% to 8%.

(2) based on the homeowner vacancy rate declining from 2.7% to 1.7% on 75 million units.

(3) Based on a return to 5 months of hard inventory (completed or in process). This includes an extra 100,000 units based on rising cancellation rates.

Note: this is another step towards my housing forecast for 2008.

by Calculated Risk on 12/11/2007 02:03:00 PM

Statement:

The Federal Open Market Committee decided today to lower its target for the federal funds rate 25 basis points to 4-1/4 percent.

Incoming information suggests that economic growth is slowing, reflecting the intensification of the housing correction and some softening in business and consumer spending. Moreover, strains in financial markets have increased in recent weeks. Today’s action, combined with the policy actions taken earlier, should help promote moderate growth over time.

Readings on core inflation have improved modestly this year, but elevated energy and commodity prices, among other factors, may put upward pressure on inflation. In this context, the Committee judges that some inflation risks remain, and it will continue to monitor inflation developments carefully.

Recent developments, including the deterioration in financial market conditions, have increased the uncertainty surrounding the outlook for economic growth and inflation. The Committee will continue to assess the effects of financial and other developments on economic prospects and will act as needed to foster price stability and sustainable economic growth.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; Timothy F. Geithner, Vice Chairman; Charles L. Evans; Thomas M. Hoenig; Donald L. Kohn; Randall S. Kroszner; Frederic S. Mishkin; William Poole; and Kevin M. Warsh. Voting against was Eric S. Rosengren, who preferred to lower the target for the federal funds rate by 50 basis points at this meeting.

In a related action, the Board of Governors unanimously approved a 25-basis-point decrease in the discount rate to 4-3/4 percent. In taking this action, the Board approved the requests submitted by the Boards of Directors of the Federal Reserve Banks of New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, and St. Louis.