by Calculated Risk on 9/13/2005 08:07:00 PM

The Rocky Mountain News reports:

Economist Tucker Hart Adams said today it's not a question of if the U.S. economy slips into recession — it's just a matter of when.

Adams, giving her annual forecast at a breakfast for U.S. Bank customers, predicted 3.0 percent growth in the economy for 2006, down from an estimated 3.5 percent in 2005 and 4.2 percent in 2004.

But that's what she calls the "glass half full" scenario. The "glass half empty, and leaking" possibility is a recession in 2006 or 2007.

Adams continues to be concerned about consumer debt, unsustainable housing price increases, and high oil prices.

"Will (the recession) begin in 2006, or will we keep fooling ourselves, thinking we can spend more than we make and go further and further into debt? I don't know."

Here is the economic forecast. The conclusion:

This is the glass half full forecast. The economy stands at a fork in the road as we move through 2006, and we can make an equally compelling case for a year that ends in recession for the nation and most of the industrialized world. If the Chinese economy crashes, if Asian central governments stop buying U.S. government securities and interest rates move up 150-200 basis points, if there is an outbreak of trade protectionism in the U.S. that spreads around the globe, if the housing bubble bursts, if U.S. debt and deficits – consumer, government and/or current account – become unmanageable, if oil prices continue to rise – any combination of these and perhaps no more than a single one makes a recession inevitable. In terms of a mild recession, it is only a question of when it occurs, in 2006 or a year or so later. At some point U.S. consumers must bring their debt under control and housing prices must reflect demand for living space rather than Ponzischeme speculation. At worst, the eerie parallels with 1929 turn out to be predictive and we face a long period of difficult economic times.

by Calculated Risk on 9/13/2005 06:45:00 PM

General Glut and Dr. Setser have some excellent analysis on the trade deficit today. In the comments of General Glut's blog, Vorpal points out that the trade deficit is a record NSA (Not Seasonally Adjusted). Vorpal wrote:

"I wouldn't trust the [seasonal] adjustments because the nature of the deficit is changing so rapidly that historical precedent may be inaccurate."

Comment on Seasonal Adjustment: I believe the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Economic Analysis does the best possible job of seasonally adjusting these numbers. Vorpal makes a keen observation; the nature of portions of the deficit are changing rapidly and we need to look at several months worth of data and consider the NSA data too. For a brief description of adjustments, see this post (2nd graph and discussion). Although I didn't discover any apparent problems with the seasonal adjustment, Vorpal's comments did lead me to the following:


Click on graphs for larger images.

If we break down the NSA imports into three components (petroleum, China, and other) we see something possibly interesting. Petroleum imports are growing significantly and set another record in July.



Imports from China also set another record in July. Imports from China follow a clear seasonal pattern and we can expect imports to continue to rise for the next several months.

NOTE: The Long Beach and Los Angeles ports implemented the OffPeak initiative (adds late night hours to port operations) starting on July 23rd to handle the expected heavier late summer / fall imports. I expect August to be a strong month for imports from China.


While Petroleum imports and imports from China are setting records, other imports have shown relatively sluggish growth.

Perhaps the relatively weak dollar has slowed imports from other countries.

The final graph shows the trade deficit for goods excluding imports and exports of petroleum and China.

This graph shows that the "other" goods trade deficit (excluding services, and goods with China and Petroleum) peaked last summer. Perhaps that is why the dollar stopped falling earlier this year. Unfortunately it appears the "other" deficit is starting to climb again, and combined with more NSA records for China and petroleum products, I expect record SA trade deficit numbers over the next few months.

by Calculated Risk on 9/13/2005 11:35:00 AM

The OC Register reports:

The median housing selling price hit another record in August – the sixth peak in seven months – at $617,000, DataQuick reported this morning.

That's up from $601,000 in July and a 13 percent jump from the same month last year when fears were mounting that the local housing market was in trouble.

Sales were brisk in August as 4,708 units were sold. That's a 25 percent jump in pace from August 2004 amid that year's summertime doldrums.

Back in March I wrote that they were giving away "Free Money" in Orange County. The median price was $555K in March, so the price has increased $62K in 5 months (11%). OC Realtor Gary Watt's prediction of $70K in gains this year for a median priced home is looking good.

by Calculated Risk on 9/13/2005 08:30:00 AM

The U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis released the monthly trade balance report today for July:

"... total July exports of $106.2 billion and imports of $164.2 billion resulted in a goods and services deficit of $57.9 billion, $1.6 billion
less than the $59.5 billion in June, revised.

July exports were $0.4 billion more than June exports of $105.8 billion. July imports were $1.1 billion less than June imports of $165.3 billion."

Note: all numbers are seasonally adjusted.


Click on graph for larger image.

July 2005 was 13% worse than July 2004. For the first seven months of 2005, the trade deficits is up 18% over the same period in 2004.

Imports from China set another record of $21,283 Billion. Imports from Japan were off slightly to $11,363 Billion.


The average contract price for oil set a new record of $49.03 per barrel breaking the old record of $44.76 in April.

The SA petroleum trade deficit set another record of $18.5 Billion.

With record imports from China and a record petroleum deficit, I'm surprised that the overall trade deficit wasn't a record; but it was close. I expect the deficit to widen over the rest of the year.

by Calculated Risk on 9/12/2005 06:48:00 PM

A Reuters article, "Oil sinks back near $63", quotes Gary Ross, chief executive of U.S. energy consultancy PIRA Energy, saying:

"U.S. gasoline data over the next few weeks will show the effect of high oil prices on demand."

His statement is inaccurate. Gasoline data will show the effect of high gasoline prices on demand. Even with spot oil prices over $60, gasoline demand was still robust until Hurricane Katrina shut down several major refineries causing a supply shock for refined products.

The Financial Times makes a similar mistake:

"One factor driving up [crude oil] prices has been the inability of consuming countries to increase refinement capacity."

It is very possible that limitations on refining heavy and/or sour crude have increased the spread between different grades of crude (see Sweet and Sour Crude). However, a general constraint on refining capacity would lead to lower crude prices, not "drive" up the price of crude oil.

This confusion seems to be widespread in the financial media.