by Calculated Risk on 9/13/2005 06:45:00 PM
Tuesday, September 13, 2005
Trade Deficit: Another Look
General Glut and Dr. Setser have some excellent analysis on the trade deficit today. In the comments of General Glut's blog, Vorpal points out that the trade deficit is a record NSA (Not Seasonally Adjusted). Vorpal wrote:
"I wouldn't trust the [seasonal] adjustments because the nature of the deficit is changing so rapidly that historical precedent may be inaccurate."Comment on Seasonal Adjustment: I believe the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Economic Analysis does the best possible job of seasonally adjusting these numbers. Vorpal makes a keen observation; the nature of portions of the deficit are changing rapidly and we need to look at several months worth of data and consider the NSA data too. For a brief description of adjustments, see this post (2nd graph and discussion). Although I didn't discover any apparent problems with the seasonal adjustment, Vorpal's comments did lead me to the following:

Click on graphs for larger images.
If we break down the NSA imports into three components (petroleum, China, and other) we see something possibly interesting. Petroleum imports are growing significantly and set another record in July.

Imports from China also set another record in July. Imports from China follow a clear seasonal pattern and we can expect imports to continue to rise for the next several months.
NOTE: The Long Beach and Los Angeles ports implemented the OffPeak initiative (adds late night hours to port operations) starting on July 23rd to handle the expected heavier late summer / fall imports. I expect August to be a strong month for imports from China.

While Petroleum imports and imports from China are setting records, other imports have shown relatively sluggish growth.
Perhaps the relatively weak dollar has slowed imports from other countries.
The final graph shows the trade deficit for goods excluding imports and exports of petroleum and China.

This graph shows that the "other" goods trade deficit (excluding services, and goods with China and Petroleum) peaked last summer. Perhaps that is why the dollar stopped falling earlier this year. Unfortunately it appears the "other" deficit is starting to climb again, and combined with more NSA records for China and petroleum products, I expect record SA trade deficit numbers over the next few months.
O.C. housing price hits $617,000
by Calculated Risk on 9/13/2005 11:35:00 AM
The OC Register reports:
The median housing selling price hit another record in August – the sixth peak in seven months – at $617,000, DataQuick reported this morning.Back in March I wrote that they were giving away "Free Money" in Orange County. The median price was $555K in March, so the price has increased $62K in 5 months (11%). OC Realtor Gary Watt's prediction of $70K in gains this year for a median priced home is looking good.
That's up from $601,000 in July and a 13 percent jump from the same month last year when fears were mounting that the local housing market was in trouble.
Sales were brisk in August as 4,708 units were sold. That's a 25 percent jump in pace from August 2004 amid that year's summertime doldrums.
US Trade Deficit: $57.9 Billion for July
by Calculated Risk on 9/13/2005 08:30:00 AM
The U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis released the monthly trade balance report today for July:
"... total July exports of $106.2 billion and imports of $164.2 billion resulted in a goods and services deficit of $57.9 billion, $1.6 billionNote: all numbers are seasonally adjusted.
less than the $59.5 billion in June, revised.
July exports were $0.4 billion more than June exports of $105.8 billion. July imports were $1.1 billion less than June imports of $165.3 billion."

Click on graph for larger image.
July 2005 was 13% worse than July 2004. For the first seven months of 2005, the trade deficits is up 18% over the same period in 2004.
Imports from China set another record of $21,283 Billion. Imports from Japan were off slightly to $11,363 Billion.

The average contract price for oil set a new record of $49.03 per barrel breaking the old record of $44.76 in April.
The SA petroleum trade deficit set another record of $18.5 Billion.
With record imports from China and a record petroleum deficit, I'm surprised that the overall trade deficit wasn't a record; but it was close. I expect the deficit to widen over the rest of the year.
Monday, September 12, 2005
Oil and Gasoline Confusion
by Calculated Risk on 9/12/2005 06:48:00 PM
A Reuters article, "Oil sinks back near $63", quotes Gary Ross, chief executive of U.S. energy consultancy PIRA Energy, saying:
"U.S. gasoline data over the next few weeks will show the effect of high oil prices on demand."His statement is inaccurate. Gasoline data will show the effect of high gasoline prices on demand. Even with spot oil prices over $60, gasoline demand was still robust until Hurricane Katrina shut down several major refineries causing a supply shock for refined products.
The Financial Times makes a similar mistake:
"One factor driving up [crude oil] prices has been the inability of consuming countries to increase refinement capacity."It is very possible that limitations on refining heavy and/or sour crude have increased the spread between different grades of crude (see Sweet and Sour Crude). However, a general constraint on refining capacity would lead to lower crude prices, not "drive" up the price of crude oil.
This confusion seems to be widespread in the financial media.
Gasoline Update
by Calculated Risk on 9/12/2005 01:11:00 AM
My latest post on Angry Bear is up: Gasoline: A Time for Caution.
And here is an interesting follow on article: Could Katrina kill the SUV?
Even before Hurricane Katrina tore through the southern United States, hampering a big chunk of the US oil industry, consumers were having second thoughts about gas-guzzling sport utility vehicles.The headline is an exaggeration, but the automobile industry was in trouble before the hurricane and it is very possible that consumer preferences will change in response to higher gas prices (just like in the early '80s). The consequences for the automobile manufacturers and the US economy might be significant.
Katrina could now hasten the demise of the SUV, at least in its current guise, after years in which it has ruled the roost over the world's biggest auto market, analysts believe.
...
"Potentially, Katrina could signal the death knell of the SUV in as much as consumers are going to find themselves once burned, twice shy to buy such vehicles," Wachovia economist Jason Schenker said.
"High gas prices and the perceived fragility of the US energy sector are all likely to weigh on consumers' choices for years," he said.
Sales of big SUVs dropped dramatically in August, hurting both American and Japanese manufacturers, which have been trying to edge into the segment over the past five years
Best to all.


